NAZI USED FLUORIDE TO DISABLE, KILL IN THEIR DEATH CAMPS / PSYCHIATRY KILLS DOCUMENTED PROOF…/ FLUORIDE – THE LUNATIC DRUG / FORCED STERALIZATION OF ETHNIC GROUPS, DISABLED, INNOCENT… A MUST READ ESPECIALLY NOW !!!

Tags

... / PSYCHIATRY KILLS / FLUORIDE - THE LUNATIC DRUG / NAZI USED FLUORIDE TO DISABLE & KILL IN THEIR DEATH CAMPS, African AIRLINE, Alex Jones, ALTERNATE CARE, alzheimer, AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL BLOODLINES, anthrax, APARTMENT, Arthritis, ASTHMA, AUTISM, Baby, BACTERIAL INFECTION, BANK RUN, BAPTIST, BAPTIST CHURCH, baseball, bauerstein, BLACK POPE, BLOGS, BOATING, BOB CHAPMAN, BOOK STORE, BOSTON, BOSTON HERALD, BOSTON WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, boy scouts, breast cancer, BUDDHISM, BUILDER, BUS, BUS COMPANY, C SPAN, CADALLIAC, california, CALTECH, cancer, cancer of the breast, CARPENTRY, catholic church, cats, CELL PHONE, CHEVY, CHILD CARE, childcare, CHINESE FOOD, Cholera, CHRISTMAS, church, CITY, CLINICS, CNN, COLD, COLDS, COLON, COMPUTER GAMES, CONDO, cooking, CROOP, CULINARY, DAIRY, DANCING WITH THE STARS, dating, death, DIABETES, DIGITAL TV, DOCTOR, doctors, dogs, Dollar Collapse, DR. BOB BECK, DR. HULDA CLARK, DUTCHSINSE, ECZEMA, EHARMONY, ELECTRICIAN, Elenin, emphysema, Euro, FAIR, FARM, FARMER'S MARKET, Federal Reserve, fema, florida, FLU, football, FORCED STERILIZATIONS OF ETHNIC / INNOCENT, FORD, Fox news, freemasons, Fukushima, FUNGUS, GAMING, GARAGE, GEORGE TOWN UNIVERSITY, Gerald Celente, girl scouts, GM, gold, GOLDEN JACKASS, golf, google, GRADE SCHOOL, GRANGES, GREEK FOOD, GREEK ORTHODOX, HARVARD, HEALTH CARE, HEALTH PROBLEMS, HEART, heart disease, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, HIGH SCHOOL, HIV/AIDS, HOCKEY, HOME DEPOT, homeland security, HONDA, HOSPITAL, HOSPITALS, HUNTING, HYUNDAI, illuminati, IMF, indian restaurant, Infowars, italian restaurnat, Japan, Japanese Encephalitis, JEHOVAH WITNESS, Jesuits, JEWISH, L.A. TIMES, LAWN, Leishmaniasis, LEPARD, Lindsey Williams, liver cancer, LOWES, Lung cancer, LUPUS, Malaria, MALL, marshal law, MASON, MASS, MASTER PLAN OF THE ILLUMINATI, MATCH.COM, max keiser, MAYO CLINIC, Measles, MEN'S CLUB, Meningitis, MEXICAN FOOD, MIDDLE EAST, MIT, Movies, MS, MSNBC, MUSLIM, MUSLIM TEMPLE, myeloid leukemia, NEW WORLD ORDER, NEW YORK POST, NEW YORK TIMES, news, NEWSPAPER, Nibiru, nwo, OBAMBA, occupy america, occupy movement, occupy movement exposed, Onchocerciasis, ORTHODOX, pets, PIZZA, PLATNIUM, PLUMBER, PNEUMONIA, Police, POLICE BRUTALITY, Pope, porn, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETOWN, prisonplanet, prostate cancer, prostitution, PROTESTANT CHURCH, PUERTO RICO, racing, Radiation, RADIO, RANCH, Rapture, receipe, RECEIPES. XXX, RESTAURANT, RESTAURANTS, ROMANCE, Rotavirus, rothschild, rothschild means red shield, rothschild own the federal reserve, rothschild real name is bauer, Rothschilds, rothschilds are jesuits, ROTHSCHILDS CONTROL THE WORLD, rothschilds exposed, ROTHSCHILDS OWN 165 CENTRAL BANKS, rothschilds own you, Satanists, Schistosomiasis, SCROOGLE, SEARS, sex, Shigellosis, SHOOTING, SHOP, SHOPRITE, silver, SINUS CONGESTION, SINUSITIS, sports, steve quayle, STOCK MARKET, STOP AND SHOP, Strep Throat, stroke, TACOMA, TARGET, TB, TELEPHONE, TELEVISION, tennis, terrorism, The Illuminati Card Game - Plan For World Control, theatre, TOLEC, TOYOTA, Trades, TRAIN, Travel, truck, truck stops, truckers, trucking, TRUTH ABOUT CHRISTMAS, Tuberculosis, Typhoid, Unemployment, UNITED NATIONS CODEX ALIMENTARIUS (DEPOPULATION BELOW 500 MILLION WORLD WIDE) SUMMARIZED IN 7 POINTS, United States Presidents and The Illuminati / Masonic Power Structure / Lucifer (Satan), UNIVERSITY, US DEBT, US DOLLAR COLLAPSE, US PRESIDENTS EXPOSED, USA PRESIDENTS, veterans, VETERINARIANS, VETS, Virus, WALL STREET JOURNAL, war, WEB SITES, WEBSTER TARPLEY, weight loss, WOMEN'S CLUB, YALE, Yellow Fever, YMCA, YOU ARE ALL SLAVES, YWCA

Population Control, Nazis, and the United Nations! (U.N.)

by Anton Chaitkin

ROCKEFELLER AND MASS MURDER

The Rockefeller Foundation is the prime sponsor of public relations for the United Nations’ drastic depopulation program, which the world is invited to accept at the UN’s scheduled September conference in Cairo, Egypt.

Evidence in the possession of a growing number of researchers in America, England, and Germany demonstrates that the Foundation and its corporate, medical, and political associates organized the racial mass murder program of Nazi Germany.

These globalists, who function as a conduit for British Empire geopolitics, were not stopped after World War II. The United Nations alliance of the old Nazi rightwing with the New Age leftwing poses an even graver danger to the world today than the same grouping did in 1941.

Oil monopolist John D. Rockefeller created the family-run Rockefeller Foundation in 1909. By 1929 he had placed $300 million worth of the family’s controlling interest in the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey (later called “Exxon”) to the account of the Foundation.

The Foundation’s money created the medical specialty known as Psychiatric Genetics. For the new experimental field, the Foundation reorganized medical teaching in Germany, creating and thenceforth continuously directing the “Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry” and the “Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity.” The Rockefellers’ chief executive of these institutions was the fascist Swiss psychiatrist Ernst Rudin, assisted by his proteges Otmar Verschuer and Franz J. Kallmann.

In 1932, the British-led “Eugenics” movement designated the Rockefellers’ Dr. Rudin as the president of the worldwide Eugenics Federation. The movement called for the killing or sterilization of people whose heredity made them a public burden.

The Racial Laws

A few months later, Hitler took over Germany and the Rockefeller-Rudin apparatus became a section of the Nazi state. The regime appointed Rudin head of the Racial Hygiene Society. Rudin and his staff, as part of the Task Force of Heredity Experts chaired by SS chief Heinrich Himmler, drew up the sterilization law. Described as an American Model law, it was adopted in July 1933 and proudly printed in the September 1933 Eugenical News (USA) with Hitler’s signature. The Rockefeller group drew up other race laws, also based on existing Virginia statutes. Otmar Verschuer and his assistant Josef Mengele together wrote reports for special courts which enforced Rudin’s racial purity law against cohabitation of Aryans and non-Aryans.

The “T4″ unit of the Hitler Chancery, based on psychiatrists led by Rudin and his staff, cooperated in creating propaganda films to sell mercy killing (euthanasia) to German citizens. The public reacted antagonistically: Hitler had to withdraw a tear-jerker right-to-die film from the movie theaters. The proper groundwork had not yet been laid.

Under the Nazis, the German chemical company I.G. Farben and Rockefeller’s Standard Oil of New Jersey were effectively a single firm, merged in hundreds of cartel arrangements. I.G. Farben was led up until 1937 by the Warburg family, Rockefeller’s partner in banking and in the design of Nazi German eugenics.

Following the German invasion of Poland in 1939, Standard Oil pledged to keep the merger with I.G. Farben going even if the U.S. entered the war. This was exposed in 1942 by Sen. Harry Truman’s investigating committee, and President Roosevelt took hundreds of legal measures during the war to stop the Standard-I.G. Farben cartel from supplying the enemy war machine.

In 1940-41, I.G. Farben built a gigantic factory at Auschwitz in Poland, to utilize the Standard Oil/I.G. Farben patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal. The SS was assigned to guard the Jewish and other inmates and select for killing those who were unfit for I.G. Farben slave labor. Standard-Germany president Emil Helfferich testified after the war that Standard Oil funds helped pay for SS guards at Auschwitz.

In 1940, six months after the notorious Standard-I.G. meeting, European Rockefeller Foundation official Daniel O’Brian wrote to the Foundation’s chief medical officer Alan Gregg that “it would be unfortunate if it was chosen to stop research which has no relation to war issues” so the Foundation continued financing Nazi “psychiatric research” during the war.

In 1936, Rockefeller’s Dr. Franz Kallmann interrupted his study of hereditary degeneracy and emigrated to America because he was half-Jewish. Kallmann went to New York and established the Medical Genetics Department of the New York State Psychiatric Institute. The Scottish Rite of Freemasonry published Kallman’s study of over 1,000 cases of schizophrenia, which tried to prove its hereditary basis. In the book, Kallmann thanked his long-time boss and mentor Rudin.

Kallmann’s book, published in 1938 in the USA and Nazi Germany, was used by the T4 unit as a rationalization to begin in 1939 the murder of mental patients and various “defective” people, perhaps most of them children. Gas and lethal injections were used to kill 250,000 under this program, in which the staffs for a broader murder program were desensitized and trained.

Dr. Mengele…

In 1943, Otmar Verschuer’s assistant Josef Mengele was made medical commandant of Auschwitz. As wartime director of Rockefeller’s Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity in Berlin, Verschuer secured funds for Mengele’s experiments at Auschwitz from the German Research Council. Verschuer wrote a progress report to the Council: “My co-researcher in this research is my assistant the anthropologist and physician Mengele. He is serving as Hauptstuermfuehrer and camp doctor in the concentration camp Auschwitz…. With the permission of the Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler, anthropological research is being undertaken on the various racial groups in the concentration camps and blood samples will be sent to my laboratory for investigation.”

Mengele prowled the railroad lines leading into Auschwitz, looking for twins — a favorite subject of psychiatric geneticists. On arrival at Mengele’s experimental station, twins filled out “a detailed questionnaire from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.” There were daily drawings of blood for Verschuer’s “specific protein” research. Needles were injected into eyes for work on eye color. There were experimental blood transfusions and infections. Organs and limbs were removed, sometimes without anesthetics. Sex changes were attempted. Females were sterilized, males were castrated. Thousands were murdered and their organs, eyeballs, heads, and limbs were sent to Verschuer and the Rockefeller group at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.

In 1946, Verschuer wrote to the Bureau of Human Heredity in London, asking for help in continuing his “scientific research.”

Facelift

In 1947, the Bureau of Human Heredity moved from London to Copenhagen. The new Danish building for this was built with Rockefeller money. The first International Congress in Human Genetics following World War II was held at this Danish institute in 1956. By that time, Verschuer was a member of the American Eugenics Society, then indistingishable from Rockefeller’s Population Council.

Dr. Kallmann helped save Verschuer by testifying in his denazification proceedings. Dr. Kallmann created the American Society of Human Genetics, which organized the “Human Genome Project” — a current $3 billion physical multiculturalism effort. Kallmann was a director of the American Eugenics Society in 1952 and from 1954 to 1965.

In the 1950s, the Rockefellers reorganized the U.S. eugenics movement in their own family offices, with spinoff population-control and abortion groups. The Eugenics Society changed its name to the Society for the Study of Social Biology, its current name.

The Rockefeller Foundation had long financed the eugenics movement in England, apparently repaying Britain for the fact that British capital and an Englishman-partner had started old John D. Rockefeller out in his Oil Trust. In the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England adopted what they called Crypto-eugenics, stating in their official reports that they would do eugenics through means and instruments not labeled as eugenics.

With support from the Rockefellers, the Eugenics Society (England) set up a sub-committee called the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which for 12 years had no other address than the Eugenics Society.

This, then, is the private, international apparatus which has set the world up for a global holocaust, under the UN flag. [For more information about the Planned Parenthood and Rockefeller connection to AIDS and disinformation campaigns, read the book "Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola--Nature, Accident or Intentional?" by Dr. Leonard Horowitz (Tetrahedron Press, 1996).]
End of article.

Here is another article for further insight into the eugenics conspiracy by Matt Burg. Also taken from the internet.

Bayer, Hoechst AG, IG Farben and Nazi Germany
By Matt Burg

In 1945 the German army surrendered to the allied powers ending World War 2 in Europe. WWII left Germany humiliated and economically devastated.

The Nuremberg trials were conducted to punish those who had committed acts against humanity. I.G. Farben, the corporation that provided the German army with the gas Zyklon B used to exterminate over 6,000,000 Jews was found guilty of war crimes. The International Military Tribunal ordered the corporation to disband. The result of the disbanding of I.G. Farben was the creation of several smaller corporations. One of these corporations called Hoechst AG grew to become a prosperous company with many subsidiaries. Hoechst AG did not die like the court had intended.

In 1980 a group of French scientists accidentally synthesized a molecule that chemically resembles the hormone progesterone. This molecule has a unique ability to bond the progesterone receptor cells and block their normal activity. The result of the molecule’s activity is to block the hormone progesterone, vital to maintaining a pregnancy. The Drug was not invented with the goal of terminating pregnancy, however by the time it was synthesized there was the demand for a new and simplified abortion technique.

The drug first entered the spotlight in 1982 and the controversy erupted shortly after. In 1988 the after extensive testing the French government accepted Mifepristone for public use. The drug is now commonly known as RU 486, the name assigned by the inventor Rousell-Uclaf, a division of the chemical company Hoechst AG. The drug was removed from circulation in France only a month after it was released for public use. The drug was removed by Rousell’s CEO Wolfgang Hilger; a devout Catholic after Rousell Uclaf was flooded with letters from outraged Roman Catholic doctors, and after Church-sponsored protests marched through the streets of Paris. The drug was returned to circulation after a group of Pro-Choice Doctors met in Rio de Janeiro and petitioned the French Government. Less than 48 hours later the French Government forced Roussel Uclaf to return the drug to circulation.

RU 486 will allow Rousell Uclaff, a division of Hoechst AG to increase the corporation’s production in America. The company has deeper intentions than what is obvious. Hoechst AG a company with deep roots in the Nazi party intends to control the population of the world and eliminate the lesser races as Hitler intended through the use of RU 486 and the World Health Organization.

Rousell Uclaff

Rousell Uclaff is a division of Hoechst AG, a large worldwide chemical corporation that was founded in 1863 in Germany. This small company with, only 5 employees, manufactured chemical dyes. In 1925, several German chemical companies merged into a single corporation with the name IG Farbenindustrie, Inc. (IG Farben) World War I created a demand for chemical products. After WWI, the devastated German government gave IG full government support by eliminating taxes and loaning the company funds. In 1925, the company changed it’s to IG Farbenindustrie A. G. IG became one of the military industrial powers of the Ruhr, owning its own coalmines.

In 1932 IG gave Adolf Hitler its full support during the election and so Hitler was presented with the Chancellorship of Germany. Without the support of the IG and the rest of the German monopolies and cartels, Hitler could not have won his political fight. And the German industrialists could see that without Hitler their empires would crumble. During WWII IG produced all of Germany’s synthetic rubber, lubricating oil, synthetic gasoline, the greatest bulk of German explosives, 90% of plastics, and light metals. More than any other corporation IG sat at the center of a web of international cartel agreements. IG participated in the plunder of conquered countries including Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Norway, Holland, Belgium, France and the rest of Central Europe. IG took over control of every chemical plant of importance in countries conquered by the Nazi Empire. IG played an important role in adapting the industries of those countries to the purposes of the Nazi war machine.

IG Farben ran the Buna Rubber Works at Auschwitz by opening a corporate concentration camp known as Monowitz on May 21, 1945. I.G Farben used slave labor extensively in many of their factories throughout the Nazi Empire.

IG was a big part in developing chemical/gas warfare. Toxic gases were produced at Hoechst, Afga and Leverkusen plants.

IG produced fully 95% of the poison gases for Germany. It was called Zyklon B, a commercial form of hydrocyanic acid, which became active on contact with air. It was manufactured by a firm called Degesch which was largely owned by IG Farben, and it had been brought to Auschwitz in the summer of 1941 as a vermin-killer and disinfectant.

In 1945, when the International Military Tribunal was announced and began trying Nazi officials for crimes committed during WWII, the list of crimes which one could be indicted were as follows:

(1) Conspiracy to commit charges 2, 3, and 4, which are listed here;

(2)crimes against peace-defined as participation in the planning and waging of a war of aggression in violation of numerous international treaties;

(3) war crimes-defined as violations of the internationally agreed upon rules for waging war; and

(4) crimes against humanity-”namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecution on political, racial, or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of domestic law of the country where perpetrated.”

On July 29, 1948, sentences for mass murder and slavery were handed down at the Nuremberg trials to twelve Farben executives. The longest sentence dealt out was to Dr. Fritz ter Meer, a top executive and scientist on the Farben managing board was seven years. After WWII, IG Farben was liquidated and the companies like Bayer, Hoechst, BASF, and AFGA took its place.

In 1949, less than a year after the Nuremberg Trials had ended; Hoechst AG opened a branch in Brazil. The company offered the whole representation of products in Brazil by establishing Pontosan Productos Quimicos, Farmcuticose e Aniilianas and appointed Wilhelm Kurtz as President. The company rapidly expanded and manufactures products ranging from pharmaceuticals to welding and cutting equipment. In 1995 Pontosan Productos Quimicos, Farmcuticose e Aniilianas acquired the company Anilsud, formerly owned by Hoechst Argentina forming an Argentine branch. Today, Pontosan Productos Quimicos, Farmcuticose e Aniilianas renamed Hoechst Commercial is one of the leading companies for the distribution of chemicals in Brazil.

Hoechst International headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany with branches in Asia, Oceania and America. Hoechst employs more than 145 thousand people. Hoechst is one of the largest groups in the chemical industry, with sales of approximately US$ 13158 in DM billions for the first quarter of 1997.

Methods of Action Mifepristone resembles the hormone progesterone yet it has a far different effect on the progesterone receptor cells. Progesterone is a hormone secreted by the uterus when a female gets pregnant. The hormone is vital to maintaining the pregnancy because it stimulates the endometrial lining to supply the embryo with nutrients. Mifepristone is given in 600mg doses When mifepristone enters a progesterone receptor cell, the molecule blocks any further action of the hormone progesterone making the body act as if it were not even pregnant. The lack of progesterone causes erosion of the endometrial lining and so the embryo dies. Two days later Prostaglandin is taken which causes the uterus to contract and will expel the embryo in 97% of the cases. Mifepristone is effective for up to seven weeks after coitus.

Mifepristone has several side effects of varying degrees. Use of Mifepristone can cause heavy bleeding, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and painful uterine contractions. About 2% hemorrhage and more than one in one hundred require hospitalization. Mifepristone effectively terminates pregnancy about 95% of the time.

Researchers have found that mifepristone is 99% effective in preventing pregnancy when used as a method of postcoital contraception if used within 72 hours after unprotected intercourse.

Political Involvement

In 1983, clinical trials on the use of RU 486 as a method of early abortion began in the U.S. at the University of Southern California, Five years later, Mifepristone was “approved” by the French government forcing the entire country to choose a side on the moral debate. The outrage from members of the Roman Catholic Church brought Roussel Uclaf to their knees and prevented the drug from further circulation. Three days later, the combined efforts of various physicians convinced the French government to force Rousell Uclaf to return the drug to circulation. Anti-abortion forces threatened Roussel Uclaf’s parent company, Hoechst AG, with economic reprisal if RU 486 was ever marketed in the United States. In March of 1989, Hoechst informed the anti-abortion forces that the company had no intention of marketing or distributing RU 486 outside of France. President Bush responding to his pro-life platform along with fellow anti-abortion congressional representatives enacted a ban on the importation of RU 486 for personal use.

In July of 1990 the Feminist Majority Foundation delegation met with Rousell Uclaff CEO Edouard Sakiz. Eleanor Smeal, acknowledged as one of America’s rights advocates, and Peg Yorkin, a prominent feminist producer and philanthropist founded the FMF in 1987. The organizations with 150,000 male and female members stand up for women’s rights (including reproductive rights), equality, and empowerment. Hoechst AG Officials argued that the U.S. political climate is not conductive to U.S. distribution because the current administration had banned the importation of the drug and as the current views of the administration on abortion, distribution was not possible.

In February of 1991, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) endorsed the testing and use of RU 486. With the support of the AAAS, the FMF aggressively and successfully pursued endorsements of RU 486 from almost every scientific and medical organization in the country.

In July of 1992, the first direct challenge of the FDA import alert on RU 486. Last year a pro-choice group called Abortion Rights Mobilization decided to force a court challenge of the import ban imposed on RU 486 (Mifepristone) by the Bush Administration in 1989. The organization helped Leona Benton, a pregnant 29-year-old California social worker, fly to England, obtain a dose of RU 486, then try to bring it back into the U.S. through New York City’s Kennedy Airport. Customs officials seized the pills. The ensuing legal battle went up to the Supreme Court, which refused to order the government to return the pills. (The Pill that changes Everything, Pg. 52)

On November 4, 1992, Bill Clinton was elected President of the United States. The FMF immediately sent a letter to a Rousell Uclaf CEO Edouard Sakiz and Hoechst AG CEO Wolfgang Hilger informing them that with Clinton’s election and the election of more women and pro-choice members of Congress the political obstacles to RU 486 in this country had “effectively been removed.”

FMF is not alone in the legalization debate, other organization who support mifepristone in America are Planned Parenthood Federation of America, a government funded organization specializing in sex and reproductive education. Planned Parenthood Clinics provide pregnancy tests, birth control and abortion services. The organization is also an avid supporter of reproductive rights.

The National Organization for Women is another supporter of mifepristone in America. NOW is a strong supporter of Abortion and Reproductive rights. Now has strongly urged the United States Government to approve mifepristone in America.

There are many organizations that strongly oppose mifepristone in America. The National Right to Life Committee is a strong force in the Abortion debate. The NRLC supports the right to life in all cases including Euthanasia and Abortion.

The National Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee for Pro-Life Activities is a group of eight active U.S. Cardinals who influence the government according to the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. They oppose abortion in all forms stating that life is sacred from conception to birth.

Hoechst and the United Nations

In October of 1996, the United Nations/World Health Organization Codex Alimentarius Commission met in Bonn, Germany to make changes in the rules governing dietary supplements for member nations. Codex is empowered by governments to set standards of operation for the health industry. Over 90% of the international organization are allowed to send delegates to the meetings to represent large multinational pharmaceutical corporations. A proposal made by the German delegation and sponsored by Hoechst, Bayer and BASF the three corporations that were formerly IG Farben before they were ordered to disband after the Nuremberg Trials. The drug company backed proposals call for the following:

1) No vitamin, mineral, herb, etc., can be sold for prophylactic (preventive) or therapeutic reasons.

2) Natural remedies can be sold as food but they must not exceed the potency levels set by the commission. This means that consumer access to dietary supplements will be limited to the RDA dosage as a maximum limit for vitamins. Supplements without a RDA would be illegal to sell because they would become drugs.

3) Codex regulations for dietary supplements would become binding, eliminating the escape clause within the General Agreement of Tariff and Trade (GATT) that allows a nation to set its own standards will be heavily fined by the World Trade Organization (WTO) creating the potential of crippling the entire sectors of that nation’s economy.

4) All new supplements would be banned unless they go through the Codex approval process.

This policy is has been enacted in Norway and Germany. This policy if approved would cause pharmacy regulation of many supplements and vitamins causing a significant price increase. Any country not following the policy would be subject to fines from the World Trade Organization.

The Codex process is now at “Step Five”- formalization and debate concerning the specific features of the policy. In two years, Codex could jump from step 5 to step8 to finalize the restrictions.

Theory

Hoechst AG a company with deep roots in the Nazi party intends to control the population of the world and eliminate the lesser races as Hitler intended through the use of RU 486 and the World Health Organization. Hoechst AG intends to get RU 486 approved for manufacturing and distribution in America and other countries worldwide so that they can use it to achieve goals further down the road. In 1949 with the disbanding of the formerly IG Farben Corporation into smaller corporations was not set back to Hoechst or any of the other corporations. The corporations could continue to business and the International Military Tribunal had almost helped the corporations out by making them split up.

This helped them in several ways, first the corporations were no longer known by the less than desirable name of IG Farben Corporation the former supporter of Hitler and the German army. Second of all, using the “divide and conquer ” tactic, the smaller corporations quickly spread to other countries where they purchased small corporations and used the identity of the smaller corporations to increase sales and profits. The main example of this was the spread of Hoechst AG to Brazil. Less than a year after the Nuremberg Decision had been reached; Hoechst AG had already begun to rebuild in Brazil. This was the first evidence that the liquidation of IG Farben had not worked. The new corporation quickly began to purchase smaller corporations and added them to the increasing list of corporations owned by Hoechst AG International.

Hoechst is an extremely rich and powerful International corporation. The reason why they are building and expanding their branches in new countries is so they can market mifepristone in many countries worldwide. Hoechst will not only achieve financial gain through their expansion but they will also have more control over the countries that they supply with mifepristone.

Hoechst’s real motive eludes the groups supporting RU 486 in America. Hoechst’s attempts to market mifepristone in America through it’s subsidiary Rousell Uclaff could not have come at a better time. The company knew that the Clinton administration supported abortion and reproductive rights so they simply waited until the atmosphere in the country was a bit more to their liking. Using the support from groups like the Feminist Majority Foundation and the National Organization for Women Hoechst would not need Hoechst’s ultimate goal is to increase production worldwide of RU 486 to gain representation in the Codex. Because Codex representation is based on nationality, the more countries that Hoechst manufactures in, the more representation in Codex they get. Hoechst can gain representation in the Codex and essentially can control the Global Health Market. Control over the global health market would allow Hoechst to gain control of Global Health Care.

The approval mifepristone in several UN countries would make it much easier for Hoechst to distribute the drug worldwide. If the drug is already legal in the majority of the UN countries then Hoechst will have to do little convincing to get the drug approved in the other countries. This is why Hoechst is attempting to market mifepristone in America and is already manufacturing and distributing the drug in the United Kingdom and in China.

The money and power held by Hoechst could easily influence the World Health Organization which would allow Hoechst to dictate World Health Policy. The backup support of the World Trade Organization would make it almost impossible for any country to oppose the policies influenced mainly by Hoechst.

The corporation would become so powerful that they could regulate the use of mifepristone. They would be able to control who was allowed to use mifepristone and who was not allowed to use mifepristone. Hoechst, with their power and influence could bring the Nazi party back into power in order to continue Hitler’s goal of establishing the “perfect race”. No longer would they need to use Zyklon B to exterminate the “undesirables.”

When a female got pregnant they could simply have her take a dose of Mifepristone and they would not have to waste the time or money to eliminate the “undesirables” by means of lethal force. Hoechst could simply make all of the races other than the Aryan race slowly deplete in number and then simply go extinct. The unfinished goals of World War 2 would be taken care of. There would finally be an end to the Jewish problem. The “perfect race” would rule the World for the rest of Mankind’s existence.

Mifepristone could become a problem very quickly. Population control is the final explanation for mifepristone. Humans need to learn to be responsible for their own actions. In order to prevent history from repeating itself, we need to make sure that humans never become so irresponsible that an outside force such as Hoechst can come in and take control. Hitler did it once, let’s not let it happen again.

Here is an article taken from the web dealing with eugenics. Author is unknown.

Eugenics is false science. It is about the selective prevention or encouragement of births for social, racial, or political ends. When promoting anti-natalist measures, such measures are often hidden beneath rhetoric about freedom of choice or reproductive health.

When eugenic goals demand increased fertility, those goals may be advanced in the name of national power, race survival, or even family support programs (including maternity leave, day care, child care allowances, etc. as in much of Europe today) which would be considered progressive if not for the intent behind them.

Eugenics is not about reproductive freedom. It is, in fact, the antithesis of reproductive freedom because it is essentially concerned with competitive fertility. As such, it is similar to — but not identical to — population control. The distinction here is that eugenics supplies a biological or genetic interpretation to its means and aims. If it is a particular race that is to targeted, for instance, the eugenicist will first offer a “scientific” basis for such a plan — usually consisting of statistical “evidence” that the disfavored group is less capable of achievement, more prone to anti-social behavior, or otherwise disproportionately responsible for a prevalent social problem. Most importantly, the eugenicist will insist that this “inferiority” is hereditary — that “excessively” high birthrates among these people will lead to a general decline in the quality of the society as a whole.

Thus the eugenicist will believe it a legitimate and necessary public policy that minimizes procreation among certain groups (sometimes coinciding with the promotion of greater fertility among other segments of the population).

It should be added that an activity designed to influence levels of fertility is not the only tactic available for use under a eugenic program. High rates of incarceration (especially where a large number of young adults are concerned) may be tolerated precisely because imprisonment results in a loss of reproductive opportunity.

Eugenic goals also extend to immigration when an incoming population is defined in some “scientific” way as socially inferior or if an exclusion policy selects by ethnicity or class. As was made abundantly clear under the Nazi program of mass genocide, a well-functioning eugenics operation is never satisfied for long with modest results. It is almost inevitable that the escalation of what is deemed a “useful” activity will be seen advocates as “more useful.”

The word eugenics comes from the Greek for “good genes.” Therefore, any policy that is thought by advocates to stimulate the prevalence of “good genes” is considered eugenic in its effect. Another term — dysgenic is applied to a situation in which the undesirable elements grow at a greater rate than the rest.

Finally, it should be pointed out that eugenics can be broken down into several distinct philosophies. Social Darwinism is a term commonly applied to class-based eugenics. The operative theory here is that wealth is spontaneously distributed throughout the society according to the merits of the individuals within the society.

In other words, adherents believe the wealthy are rich because of inherent traits that make them productive members of the community. The poor, on the other hand, are said to be destined to want precisely because they are of “inferior stock.” Thus, in the mind of the eugenicist, any effort to promote economic justice will have a dysgenic effect because it only encourages breeding among these “lesser” types.

This kind of thinking can be found not far beneath the surface of contemporary proposals like the “family cap” for welfare parents, certain campaigns to halt teen pregnancy and the flap about an “illegitimacy.” Racial eugenics defines people from different regions of the world as having unique evolutionary characteristics which make one group more suited to certain pursuits than another. This is the ideology behind The Bell Curve and similar publications that have aroused controversy in the past few years.

Some proponents of eugenics cite physical or mental disabilities as cause for limits to reproduction. In terms of policy, they are more interested in stigmatizing the alcoholic, the drug abuser, or the mental patient than in seeking authentic forms of treatment and measures that would influence the economic or social environment in which such problems flourish. This form of eugenics has made inroads into many of the more legitimate sciences such as human genetics and bio-ethics. Indeed, eugenics is especially dangerous in this area because of the opportunity to apply obvious truths — the fact that children inherit physical features from their parents, to name one — to political issues, such as “criminal tendencies” or an “underclass” culture, in a way that results in discriminatory policies.

by Don Weitz
Toronto, Ontario

For almost 150 years, psychiatry has been masquerading as a medical science and as a branch of medicine.  It is not and never was a science or a type of health care.  Modern psychiatry is driven by unproved empirical assumptions, medical biases, and pseudo-scientific opinions.  There are no scientifically established, independently proven facts in psychiatry.  Psychiatry, in fact, has no laws or testable hypotheses and no coherent and comprehensive theory.  Psychiatry conspicuously lacks scientific proof or evidence to support its news-media-parroted claims of “mental illness” or “disorders”.

After about seventy years of psychiatric practices and research, there is still no diagnostic test for schizophrenia or any of the other three hundred so-called mental disorders listed in the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), which is essentially a list of class-driven moral judgements of allegedly abnormal behaviour, published and propagandized by the American Psychiatric Association.  The DSM is the official bible of organized psychiatry.  The DSM is the equivalent of the Malleus Maleficarum in the middle ages, which Spanish inquisitors used to identify, target, stigmatize and burn witches and heretics.  Today’s witches, heretics, and scapegoats are labeled mentally ill or schizophrenic.

Hospital psychiatry with its emphasis on the control of inmate behaviour through high risk behaviour modification programs, biological “treatments”, physical and mechanical restraints, locked doors and wards, and seclusion/isolation rooms, have always exhibited several fascist elements.  I want to focus on three: fear, force and fraud.  These are the guiding principles and policies used to control citizens and groups in the population whom government leaders and other authorities, including the police and so-called mental health experts, have judged to be dissident, problematic or difficult to control.  Hospital psychiatry is very similar to the prison system.  In the prison or correctional system psychiatrists have been used as consultants to design dangerous, unethical behaviour modification programs and to conduct high risk drug experiments on prisoners.  Both the psychiatric system and the prison system systematically use fear, force and fraud for the purpose of social control and punishment – not for purposes of treatment or rehabilitation, both of which are euphemisms.  It is or should be obvious that forced treatment is in fact punishment.  It is frequently cruel and usual and should therefore be banned in the United States under that nation’s Eighth constitutional amendment.  Virtually all treatments in psychiatric facilities are forced or administered without informed consent.  They are administered against the “patient’s” (the prisoner’s) will or with consent obtained by threatening the “patient” with worse consequences, or with consent obtained by keeping the “patient” unaware of important information about serious risks and alternatives.  Informed consent in psychiatry is a cruel sham.  It doesn’t exist.

Fear/Terror – “Terror acts powerfully upon the body through the medium of the mind and should be employed in the cure of madness.  Fear accompanied with pain and the sense of shame has sometimes cured the disease”.  That was written almost two centuries ago in 1818 by Dr. Benjamin Rush, father of American psychiatry, and the first president of the APA, whose face still appears on the official seal of the American Psychiatric Association.  Dr. Rush advocated and practiced terror by designing and using the straitjacket, the tranquilizer chair and “fear of death” on numerous inmates in 19th century lunatic asylums.  Rush once had his son locked up in an insane asylum – some father!

Fear is a powerful motivator in enforcing conformity, obedience and making people submit to authority.  Historically, inducing and manipulating fear or masked terror has always been a key policy and practice in all fascist regimes, such as Italy under Mussolini, Nazi Germany under Hitler, and the Soviet Union under Stalin – in fact, under any dictatorship.  The threat of punishment, torture and the threat of being killed is enough to cause fear, panic, and terror if most of us.  We do as we’re told or else.

As used in psychiatry, fear or terror is more selective but is widespread and powerful.  In the institution, psychiatry frequently resorts to blackmail to control the more “uncontrollable” and difficult or non-compliant patient.  Psychiatrists and other therapists threaten their patients with longer incarceration, higher doses of forced neuroleptics or “antidepressants”, and/or threatened transfers to more severe maximum security institutions if they misbehave, fail to follow doctors’ orders, refuse to take their “medication”, refuse to follow institutional rules, or annoy their captors in other ways.  Generally aimed at captive populations of involuntary patients, these threats typically strike fear in many of them, and psychiatrists know it.  For example, some years ago, several patients and former patients of Queen Street Mental Health Centre, Toronto’s notorious mental hospital or psycho-prison, told me and other activist-critics that psychiatrists have threatened, if they didn’t calm down or control themselves, to transfer them to Penetang, the Oakridge division of Penetanguishene Mental Health Centre, a maximum security behaviour modification facility in Ontario, known for its harsh and brutal environment.  Penetang was and still is recognized as punishment, one of the most barbaric psycho-prisons in Canada.  It should have been shut down years ago, especially after a scathing report about many of its abuses by psychiatrist Steven Harper.

Threatening patients with physical restraints or solitary confinement is also extremely effective in arousing fear or panic in patients.  On virtually every psychiatric ward or unit, there is a place, euphemistically called “The Quiet Room”, a barren and forbidden cell-like room, with a mattress or sink, usually no toilet or blankets.  While languishing the quiet room, patients are sometimes further restrained by leather cuffs, two-point and four-point restraints, tightly wrapped around their wrists and/or ankles so they can barely move, for hours at a time.  The mere threat of loss of freedom, involuntary committal, or being locked up in a psychiatric ward or institution against your will, and without any trial or public hearing, is enough to frighten most of us.  In virtually every province and territory in Canada, these are the main criteria or reasons for being locked up or committed to a psychiatric institution: judgement of mental illness or disorder; judgement of threatening to physically hurt yourself or another person; judgement of being unable to look after yourself.  Note that these criteria are subjective moral judgements of dissident behaviour based on observation and opinion, not medical or scientific facts.  Despite the fact that mental illness or mental disorder, which in my opinion is a metaphor for dissidence, has never been officially classified as a medical disease or illness, only physicians are legally authorized to make these non-medical and fateful judgements.

In Ontario, any doctor can sign a committal form which forces an individual to be locked up in any psychiatric facility for the first 72 hours for observation and assessment.  Two other doctors can sign a form authorizing an individual’s imprisonment for another 2-4 weeks.  During the last few years, approximately 50% of thousands of people treated in Ontario’s nine psychiatric hospitals were involuntarily committed.

The threat or fact of losing your freedom being locked up in a psychiatric facility for days or months at a time is terrifying.  The minimal or non-existent advocacy currently provided in Ontario makes the right to appeal or protest a sham, and this serves to heighten people’s fear and despair.  The mere threat of forced psychiatric treatment as well as the treatment itself can be terrorizing – e.g., electroshock, also called electro-convulsive therapy (ECT), but more accurately called electro-convulsive brainwashing by shock survivor critics such as Leonard Frank.  My close friend Mel told me of being dragged by several aids along the hallway to a hospital shockroom.  I can imagine his terror and the terror of others who suffered the same fate.  I suffered a similar terror when I was forcibly subjected to over 50 subcoma insulin shocks in the 1950s.  To the surprise of many people, this barbaric brain-damaging and memory destroying treatment not only exists, but is expanding in Canada and the United States.  Its main targets are women and the elderly, particularly elderly women.

There is also the threat of psychiatric drugs, euphemistically called “medication”.  These chemicals such as minor tranquilizers, antidepressants and the anti-psychotics such as Haldol, Modicate, Thorazine, and the so-called mood modifier Lithium, are not natural substances but are manufactured poisons, aptly called neurotoxins by psychiatrist and psychiatry critic Peter Breggin in several of his books and Joseph Glenmullen, a clinical instructor in psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, in his book Prozac Backlash.  These chemicals have no scientifically proven medical value or benefit.  What they do is control or subdue any problematic or disturbing behaviour, mood and emotion.  These toxins, particularly neuroleptics like Haldol, Modicate, Chlorpromazine, are so disabling, powerful and fearsome that many psychiatric survivors and other critics call them chemical lobotomies or chemical straitjackets.  These drugs have many serious and disabling effects, called “side effects” to minimize how they are perceived, such as trembling, uncontrollable shaking or movement of the hands or other parts of the body (which occur in the neurological disorder such as Parkinsonism or tardive dyskenisia), powerful muscular cramps, blurred vision, restless pacing, nightmares, sudden outbursts of anger, agitation, memory loss, fainting, blood disorders, seizures, and sudden death.  These so-called side effects are the drugs’ intended effects.  This fear of psychiatric drugs is compounded by ignorance and uncertainty, because psychiatrists and other doctors fail to inform patients of the drugs’ horrific effects.

Without the use or threat of force, fascism could not exist.  Machiavelli, Mussolini, Hitler knew this.  All dictators, would-be dictators, and bullies know this basic fact.  And this is the case with psychiatry.  Without the use and threat of force, institutional psychiatry would die.  Lots of psychiatrists would be out of a job.  I wish that would happen! Psychiatry gets its authority and power to force, imprison, involuntarily commit, and treat individuals against their will from the state.

Mental health legislation gives psychiatrists and other physicians the power to involuntarily commit any person they “believe”, after only minutes of examination, to be dangerous to themselves or others.  This is problematic.  The Mental Health Act wrongly assumes that doctors can predict dangerous and violent behaviour, which they cannot do.  It is worth emphasizing that Ontario’s Mental Health Act, as with other mental health acts across Canada and the United States, legally sanction the state to use force to detain or imprison people for days, weeks or months at a time.  Unfortunately, there has never been a public outcry or protest over the fact that people judged or assumed to be crazy or dangerous, but not charged with any crime, can nevertheless be locked up without a trial or the legal rights accorded to people charged with crimes such as murder or rape.  This is prevention detention, which is illegal in Canada and other so-called democratic countries, but it is legal and a common practice in all police states and totalitarian countries.  I know of no lawsuit challenge to involuntary committal as preventive detention and therefore as unconstitutional.

In institutional psychiatry in fascist states, forced treatment is the rule, not the exception.  Forced treatment and tortuous terminal medical experiments inflicted on thousands of Jews, gypsies, political prisoners, women and children, were carried out in death camps during World War II throughout Nazi Germany.  There is now irrefutable, documentary evidence that it was the German psychiatrists, particularly prominent professors of psychiatry, and psychiatry department heads, who were chiefly responsible for initiating and administering the infamous T4 program, which involved the mass murder of over 200,000 mental patients and thousands of sick and disabled children and adults during the holocaust.  The term euthanasia and mercy death to describe this murderous program is a cruel euphemism.

Much of biological psychiatry, which is largely based on unproved assumptions about the biological and genetic causes of schizophrenia and other mental disorders, can be traced back to the racist, eugenics-driven psychiatrist in Nazi Germany, Ernst Rudin, who propagated the myth that schizophrenia is a genetic disease.  He, along with hundreds of other psychiatrists in the T4 program of mass murder of psychiatric patients, is still cited in some psychiatric journal articles, as documented by researcher-activist Lenny Lapon in his brilliant book, Mass Murderers in White Coats: Psychiatric Genocide in Nazi Germany.  He states that several German psychiatrists from the Nazi era emigrated to the United States and Canada and succeeded in indoctrinating many of his colleagues in his biological, genetic and racist theories of mental illness.  Heinz Layman who emigrated to Canada in 1937, is chiefly responsible for introducing Thorazine or Chlorpromazine, and propagated the use of psychiatric drugs in Canada.

We now have an epidemic of brain damage caused by psychiatric drugs, partly due to Layman and all the other doctors he taught.  In one 1954 journal article, Layman admitted that Thorazine was a “pharmacological substitute for lobotomy”.  Despite publicly acknowledging this alarming fact, it never stopped Layman from using it on many “schizophrenic” patients in Montreal’s Douglas Hospital.  Layman also persuaded Ewen Cameron to administer chlorpromazine and many other drugs and massive amounts of electroshock.  Chlorpromazine, considered an experimental drug at the time, was widely used on many patients during Cameron’s infamous brainwashing experiments at the Allan Memorial Institute in the 1950s and 1960s.

There was no informed consent then, and there is none now.  During the Nazi years, the doctors didn’t seek permission.  According to Nazi ideology, these were “useless eaters”, “subhumans”.  This is a mindset that still rules in biological psychiatry throughout North America.  Another legacy of psychiatry in Nazi Germany is the widespread acceptance and justification of abuse to break the will of non-compliant or rebellious patients.  Physical or mechanical restraints such as straps, ropes, belts, handcuffs and solitary confinement are used in psychiatric institutions not to treat or protect but to punish people for dissident or rebellious behaviour.  It is this naked display of force and threats against patients by hospital staff which resembles the awesome brutality of German psychiatric staff during the holocaust.

Fraud: A very apt quote by Leonard Roy Frank, author of Influencing Minds is “Mystification is psychiatry’s defense against the danger of being found out”.  Many of the labels or diagnoses used by psychiatrists do not refer to real psychiatric problems or to actual illnesses.  Psychiatry professor Thomas Szasz has exposed the fraud and the myth of the concept of mental illness in many books, starting with his classic The Myth of Mental Illness.  This misrepresentation one of the greatest scientific scandals in our scientific age.  The code words that are now used in biological psychiatry such as anti-depressants do not assist people with overcoming depression or get at the causes of depression.  The term “Quiet Room” is a fraudulent code for solitary confinement.  The word “medication” is also a misleading euphemism and misrepresentation for toxic substances to which many of us have been subjected.

I’ve tried to show that institutional, coercive psychiatry has a fascist history and that biological psychiatry as practiced today in psychiatric facilities in Canada and the United States is still based on fear, force and fraud.  Psychiatry does not deserve public or government support.  We must work to abolish psychiatry.  We must also continue working to create self-help advocacy groups, more drop-in centers, and more affordable, supportive housing in our communities.  We need to create our own alternatives to the monstrous and evil mental health system.  By doing this, we empower ourselves.  This is our work, our challenge, and our hope.

Here is a roport exposing eugenics serilizations that were carried out in the United States of America upon the Native American Indian population by the USA government as a policy. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/sterilize.html I recommend you read it especially if you have any native american blood in you at all.

Brain Shrinkage in “Schizophrenics” Caused by Drugs not Disease!

By Shemuwel Antoine Moser

Recently within the USA and possibly elsewhere there has been much publicity within the media about so-called evidence of a biological cause for “schizophrenia.” Recent autopsies performed on several “schizophrenics” revealed severe atrophy of the brain; also called brain shrinkage.

An extremist psychiatrist named E. Fuller Torrey who is an aggressive lobbyist for state sanctioned forced psychiatric drugging has taken this information and is arguing for a biological cause for “schizophrenia.” Nothing could be further from the truth. The fact is, nearly every one of these autopsies were performed on people who have taken antipsychotic drugs – also called neuroleptics or neuroleptic drugs – for ten years or more. These autopsies rather than providing evidence of a biological cause for schizophrenia, are actually providing evidence that the neuroleptic drugs have caused the brain shrinkage.

The truth is that before the advent of psychiatric medications, thousands upon thousands of autopsies have been performed on so-called “schizophrenics”; which did not reveal any brain shrinkage whatsoever. For many years long before the advent of antipsychotic medications, inmates of psychiatric institutions had no say so what so ever as to what would be done with their bodies when they died. Most of these inmates of the psychiatric institutions received autopsies where their brains were removed and used for scientific study, and their brains were determined to be indistinguishable from that of a “normal” brain.

The fallacious explanation of how this brain shrinkage is supposedly supposed to occur is that as a person matures they start pruning off dendrites but “schizophrenics” prune off an excessive number of dendrites until their brains shrink severely. There is no real proof whatsoever of these fallacious claims. What is actually happening however is that when the chemical that makes up the drug blocks the dopamine receptors on the ends of dendrites, therefore acting as a chemical straight jacket by preventing neuronal communication between dendrites, the receiving dendrites cut-off from communication from its neuronal mate can only make the assumption that its neuronal mate has died. So the only option the neuron can make is to prune off that dendrite because it has lost contact with the other neuron due to the chemical strait jacket of the antipsychotic drugs. If a neuron looses contact with enough dendrites the cell will commit “suicide” and die.

Rather than admit the truth about the severe brain damage that these antipsychotic drugs are causing due to fear of an avalanche of lawsuits, the government-backed psychiatric and pharmaceutical establishments are seeking a cover-up by making the reprehensible claim that the drug induced brain damage that they themselves are causing is actually biological evidence for a cause of “schizophrenia”.

E. Fuller Torrey’s last outrageous fallacious claim for a biological cause for “schizophrenia” was that our brains were infected with the herpes virus. E. Fuller Torrey is a manic fanatic that is foaming at the mouth with the insatiable desire to force antipsychotic drugs on anybody who violates the underwritten rules of society.

Now the rest of the government-backed psychiatric and pharmaceutical establishments have jumped on E. Fuller Torrey’s bandwagon for fear of going bankrupt due to an avalanche of lawsuits which would be the result if they acknowledge the brain atrophy that they have caused to thousands upon thousands of victims. Perhaps even millions.

Remember that it has not been that long ago since the psychiatric establishment were performing brain butchering by jamming an ice pick like instrument between the eyes of their “schizophrenic” victims and then twirling the instrument around and around in circular like motions thereby destroying the frontal lobes of the brain which they called the lobotomy. Just as in the days of the lobotomy it is still the psychiatric establishment’s desire to cause those labeled “insane” serious brain damage.

Long before the days of the lobotomy the Hospital of St. Mary of Bethlehem, an institution in London England for the “mentally ill” from which the word bedlam was coined, psychiatric inmates were chained to the wall and whipped with whips; thus the phrase “the whips and chains of bedlam.” In Nazi Germany 260,000 to 280,000 psychiatric inmates were executed by the Nazis as they were the very first victims of the holocaust.

After World War II under a top-secret program called Project Paper Clip countless numbers of Nazi scientists were imported into the United States; a good portion of them being psychiatrists. In fact so many psychiatrists being former Nazis immigrated to the United States of America that sometime after World War II one-third of all psychiatrist in the United States were former Nazis. Many of these went to work for the CIA and helped with their mind control programs such as MKULTRA and MKDELTA. Many went into private practice while others procured employment within universities to teach the USA’s next-generation of psychiatrists.

It is not surprising that the government-controlled media in the USA have jumped on the bandwagon of the government backed psychiatric and pharmaceutical establishments to promote this horrendous cover-up.

The psychiatric establishment started out as state-sponsored hate crimes against those who are different. Given the extremely long sordid history of the psychiatric establishment in abusing those labeled “insane” it is no wonder that they are willing to lie in order to cover up the incalculable damage that they have caused to countless numbers of their victims. It is incomprehensibly reprehensible that the drug induced brain damage that the psychiatric and psychological establishment are inflicting on their victims is actually being used as “proof” of a biological cause for “schizophrenia”. E. Fuller Torrey should be hung from the highest tree as quickly as possible. And the government sponsored propaganda of the media should be ashamed of the continued disinformation campaign concerning the issue of psychiatric drugs and “mental illness”. The “whips and chains of bedlam” live on. They are now chemical in nature.

Recently the DoD (Department of Defense) has given E. Fuller Torrey his own brain lab. Why would the DoD be interested in researching the brain unless it is to continue the sinister mind control efforts started by the CIA. These evil people will stop at nothing until they obtain complete ownership and control of everyone’s mind. Dan Rather of CBS news parroted on national TV the words of E. Fuller Torrey . Yes psychiatrists really are shrinks and they can shrink your brain if you don’t get protection from the Almighty Father Yehovah. See http://www.watchtower.org/ .

Read the book by the psychiatrist Dr.Peter R. Breggin, M.D. called “Toxic Psychiatry” for more information on the brain shrinkage caused by psychiatric drugs and the fraud and nemesis of all labeled with a psychiatric label; Dr. E. Fuller Torrey.

List of neuroleptic drug names: Chlorpromazine, ( Brand names are as follows; Chlor-PZ, Klorazine, Promachlor, Promapar, Sonazine, Thorazine, Chlorprom, Chlor-Promanyl and Largactil ) Fluphenazine, ( Brand names are as follows; Permitil, Prolixin, Modecate, Moditen ) Mesoridazine Besylate, ( Brand name is Serentil ) Perphenazine, ( Brand names are as follows; Trilafon, Etrafon, Triavil, Phenazine and Etrafon ) Prochlorperazine, ( Brand names are as follows; Compazine and Stemetil ) Promazine Hydrocloride, ( Brand name Sparine ) Thioridazine, ( Brand names are Mellaril, Novoridazine and Thioril ) Trifuoperazine, ( Brand names are as follows; Stelazine, Clinazine, Novaflurazine, Pentazine, Terfluzine and Triflurin ) Clozapine, ( Brand named Clozaril, in Germany called Leponex ) Haloperadol, ( Brand name Haldol ) Loxapine, ( Brand name Loxitane ) Pimozide ( Brand name is Orap ) Thiothixene, ( Brand name Navane ) Risperidone, Zyprexa ( Brand name is Olanzapine ), Sertindole, Ziprasidone, Amperozide, Remoxipride, Melperone, Zotepine, Isofloxythepin, Setoperone, Perospirone, Quetiapine. Also the antidepressant drug Sertraline ( Brand name Zoloft ) is molecularly indistinguishable from that of the neuroleptics and has even been tried as a neuroleptic. This list contains generic names and many brand names used in the USA and Canada. This list is by no means comprehensive.

Reprise/Forced Sterilizations

Sterilization of Native American Women
Reviewed by Omaha Master’s Student

Bruce E. Johansen

For: José Barreiro (editor-in-chief of NATIVE AMERICAS)
September, 1998

On the phone, during long marches, occupying federal surplus property, in court fighting for treaty rights — wherever Indian activists gathered during the “Red Power” years of the 1970s, conversation inevitably turned to the number of women who had had their tubes tied or their ovaries removed by the Indian Health Service. This was, I heard one woman joke bitterly at the time, a “fringe benefit of living in a domestic, dependent nation.”
          Communication spurred by activism provoked a growing number of Native American women to piece together what amounted to a national eugenic policy, translated into social reality by copious federal funding. (See sidebar) They organized WARN (Women of All Red Nations) at Rapid City, South Dakota, as Native women from more than thirty nations met and decided, among other things, that “truth and communication are among our most valuable tools in the liberation of our lands, people, and four-legged and winged creations.”
          WARN and other women’s organizations publicized the sterilizations, which were performed after pro-forma “consent” of the women being sterilized. The “consent” sometimes was not offered in the women’s language, following threats that they would die or lose their welfare benefits if they had more children. At least two fifteen-year-old girls were told they were having their tonsils out before their ovaries were removed.
          The enormity of government-funded sterilization has been compiled by a masters’ student in history, Sally Torpy, at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. Her thesis, “Endangered Species: Native American Women’s Struggle for Their Reproductive Rights and Racial Identity, 1970s-1990s,” which was defended during the summer of 1998, places the sterilization campaign in the context of the “eugenics” movement.
          No one even today knows exactly how many Native American women were sterilized during the 1970s. One base for calculation is provided by the General Accounting Office, whose study covered only four of twelve IHS regions over four years (1973 through 1976). Within those limits, 3,406 Indian women were sterilized, according to the GAO.
          Another estimate was provided by Lehman Brightman, who is Lakota, and who devoted much of his life to the issue, suffering a libel suit by doctors in the process. His educated guess (without exact calculations to back it up) is that 40 per cent of Native women and 10 per cent of Native men were sterilized during the decade. Brightman estimates that the total number of Indian women sterilized during the decade was between 60,000 and 70,000.
          By 1970, anecdotal evidence of the surge in sterilization began to accumulate, according to Torpy’s detailed account. For example, welfare case workers in Apollo, Pennsylvania had removed Norma Jean Serena’s daughter Lisa, three years of age, and son, Gary, age four, from her home before she underwent a tubal ligation after the birth of her son Shawn, in 1970. One day after Shawn was removed to a foster home, Serena signed consent forms for the surgery, emotionally battered by accusations of case workers that she was an unfit mother.
          Three years later, with legal assistance from the Council of Three Rivers Indian Center in Pittsburgh, Serena sued Armstrong County for return of her children from foster care. She also sued a number of area hospitals for damages related to her sterilization. A jury found that the children had been taken under false pretenses from Serena, who is of mixed Creek and Shawnee ancestry.
          During trial, attorneys for Serena questioned the “evidence” on which welfare case workers had decided to take her children and recommend her sterilization. The main “problem” seemed to have been the fact that black friends of Serena visited her home, as reported by anonymous tipsters in the neighborhood who asserted fear for their own children. While one caseworker described Serena’s apartment as “dirty and unkempt,” and her children as “undernourished and dazed,” unable to walk, speak, or hold eating utensils, a doctor who examined the children shortly afterwards found them “alert and in good health.” According to Torpy’s account, Serena was awarded $17,000 by a jury, and her children were ordered released to her. The Armstrong County child welfare bureaucracy stalled several months before returning the children, according to Torpy’s account, and did so only after officials were confronted with a contempt-of-court citation.
          Parts of Serena’s case were not settled until 1979, when several doctors and a male social worker were acquitted of having violated her civil rights by taking part in her sterilization. The key issue was whether she had given consent for the operation. Serena said she could not recall having signed a consent form; the attending physician said he had explained the operation to Serena and that he was convinced she understood him. A jury agreed.
          At about the same time that Serena had her run-in with case workers, a twenty-six year old Native American woman entered the office of a Los Angeles physician in 1970 seeking a “womb transplant” because she had been having trouble getting pregnant. The doctor, who never asked her name, told the woman she had been the subject of an hysterectomy, removal of her ovaries, which cannot be reversed. The operation had been performed under false pretenses. The woman, who was engaged to be married and who had hoped to raise a family was “devastated,” according to Torpy.
          The last vestiges of legally sanctioned eugenics played out during the 1960s, when concern about overpopulation expressed by industrial leaders in the United States (most notably by members of the Rockefeller family) became official federal policy — with massive spending to back it up — under the Nixon administration. Sterilization for the poor and minorities was officially sanctioned in 1970, just about the time students were killed at Kent and Jackson State universities as they protested expansion of the Vietnam War. Reservation populations became targets of a policy that also was being advocated nationally, especially for poor and minority women. In 1969, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also had relaxed its own restrictions on sterilizations.
          In 1970, when the IHS initiated its sterilization campaign (paid 100 per cent by federal funds), the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare vastly accelerated programs that paid 90 per cent of the costs to sterilize non-Indian poor women, following enactment of the Family Planning Act of 1970. The rate of sterilization for women as a whole in the United States then jumped by 350 per cent in five years, according to Torpy’s research.
          Before 1969 (following Nixon’s election as president) funding of sterilizations (as well as abortion) had been banned by the federal government. Between 1969 and 1974, HEW increased its family planning budget from $51 million to more than $250 million, Torpy found. HEW records reveal that between 192,000 and 548,000 women were sterilized each year between 1970 and 1977, compared to an average of 63,000 a year between 1907 and 1964, a period which included the zenith of the eugenics movement.
          Torpy reports that during 1977 Dr. R.T. Ravenholt, director of the United States Agency for International Development (office for population control), said that the United States hoped to sterilize 25 per cent of the world’s roughly 570 million fertile women. Ravenholt linked such control measures to the “…normal operation of U.S. commercial interests around the world.” These statements were published in a news story in the St. Louis Dispatch.
          During this wave of sterilizations, no other medical structure had the captive clientele of the IHS, however. “Native American women represented a unique class of victims among the larger population that faced sterilization and abuses of reproductive rights,” Tropy wrote in her thesis. “They had, and continue to have, a dependent relationship with the federal government which has put them at greater risk…”
          Within half a decade, Indian Health Service doctors were sterilizing so many reservation women that, according to Torpy, one Native American woman was being sterilized for every seven babies born.

IHS Sterilizations Were
the Last Gasp of Official Eugenics

          By the time sterilization reached its zenith of popularity in the Indian Health Service, it was the last official gasp of a century-old “scientific” effort to breed “desirable” human traits. The pseudo-science of eugenics was born at a time when forced assimilation was the order of the day for most Native Americans, a time when reputable scientists invoked a Social Darwinism that separated all human societies into three classes: civilized (reserved for white European or European-derived cultures), “barbarian,” and “savage.”
          According to Sally Torpy’s master’s thesis, the word “eugenics” was first used in 1883 by an Englishman, Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. Galton defined the word as “the use of genetics to improve the human race.” He was a recognized genius by the age of eight, having translated Latin into English. All through his life, Galton sought to genetically perpetuate intelligence and reduce procreation by the “mentally deficient.” His writings helped to create a “science of race improvement.” Galton’s first priority was to stop reproduction by “imbeciles, feeble-minded persons, moral imbeciles, and such inebriates, epileptics, deaf, and dumb, and blind persons.”
          At the same time another pseudo-science, called Craniology, asserted that the intelligence of a race could be measured by the average size of a sample of skulls. Predictably, Nordic Europeans were found to have the largest skulls. In this context, Torpy quotes Edward Spriggs, Jr., writing in The Review of Law and Social Change. Spriggs, writing in the early 1970s, called involuntary sterilization “an unconstitutional menace to the poor.” He also wrote that early eugenicists “espoused the theory that a wide variety of individual maladies and even social ills, such as poverty, were eugenic (incurable) in nature and that the best solution was prevention by sterilization.”
          Eugenics was alternately prescribed for just about anyone deemed to be retarded, antisocial or otherwise unfit to pass on genes to future generations. These theories often were propounded with a definite racial cant in the “era of the vanishing race,” a time when Oswald Spengler also wrote that he foresaw the “decline of the West” in a maw of multiethnic madness. Schoolchildren memorized Rudyard Kipling’s Gunga Din, with its poetic imagery of the “white man’s burden.” The theories of Thomas Malthus, a century old by the time eugenics was born, were called into the service of population-control advocates who recalled Malthus’ dictum that population grows geometrically while food supply increases only arithmetically.
          By 1907, when Indiana enacted the first compulsory eugenic sterilization law, eugenicists generally fell into two ideological camps: “positive eugenicists,” who believed that those people with genes deemed behaviorally or racially superior should be encouraged to reproduce. “Negative eugenicists,” the category into which the IHS campaign would fall, favored aggressive sterilization of people whose traits should not, in their view, be allowed to remain in the human gene pool.
          Eugenics was championed by the American Breeders’ Association in the early years of the century. In 1913, the ABA changed its name to the American Genetic Association. This “scientific” association published an academic journal, Journal of Heredity, whose editor, Paul Popenoe, popularized the idea of sterilizing children who (in Torpy’s words) “did not show adequate improvement in their schooling by the time of puberty.” Eugenic views also were advanced by the Human Betterment Association.
          Eugenic views received support during the 1920s from Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, who is quoted by Torpy in a case involving sterilization:

It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime [which he seemed to assume to be predictable and incurable] or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.

          If society could require mandatory inoculation for disease, said Justice Holmes, it could require that certain person’s fallopian tubes be severed or their ovaries removed. Eugenics was most often practiced on criminals, the mentally disturbed, and the poor, many of whom were non-white. When the practice was aimed at certain ethnic groups, including Native Americans, Spriggs called it “incipient genocide.”
          The International Indian Treaty Council, which helped to mobilize opposition to the sterilization campaign as it unfolded, agreed with Spriggs:

The United Nations Convention on Genocide states that imposing measures intended to prevent births within a group of people…are acts of genocide…[such as] sterilization of women are direct attacks on nationhood. Sterilization must continue as a birth-control choice for women, but for Native people it should be seen in the context of national identity. If an Indian woman is a member of a 3,000-member nation, sterilization has serious consequences for the survival of [her] people as a whole.

          Holmes’ opinions popularized the practice throughout the rest of the 1920s and 1930s in the United States. The American Eugenics Society initially condoned sterilization of Jews and other “social undesirables” by Hitler’s regime in Germany, then reluctantly distanced itself from Nazi practices after their manifest cruelty became known.
          The effort to enact eugenics legally reached a zenith by 1930, by which time 30 states and Puerto Rico had passed laws requiring mandatory sterilization for a great number and variety of committed or anticipated crimes or moral offenses. Nearly all of the states with such laws allowed legal sterilization of the mentally ill or “defective.” In nineteen states, sterilization was legal for parents whose children were thought likely to experience “physical, mental, or nervous disorders.” Six states allowed operations to prevent childbirth to parents whose children might be “socially inadequate.”
          In Michigan, sterilization was legal for anyone deemed “criminally insane.” Eleven states allowed sterilization of epileptics. Seven states allowed sterilization of habitual criminals, and two (Washington and Wisconsin) could sterilize “nonhabitual criminals.” In Iowa, a person who was deemed to be a “menace to society” might be placed under orders to lose his or her reproductive rights. Also in Iowa, as well as South Carolina, a case of syphilis could earn a court order for sterilization, and in California, Iowa, and Michigan “moral degeneracy” was enough. Five states prescribed sterilization for “sexual deviants or perverts.” A sixth state, South Dakota, allowed sterilization for “perverted or abnormal mentality.” Other laws prescribed compulsory sterilization for drug addicts and prostitutes.
          The state sterilization laws were held to be unconstitutional for the general population under the Bill of Rights (prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment) before the same practices came into vogue within the federal Indian-management bureaucracy.
          Outside of very occasional, anecdotal reports in a few major newspapers, the mainstream media generally ignored the wave of sterilizations as it was happening. The first large-audience, detailed description of the sterilizations was published not in the United States, but in Germany. Torpy tapped sources of information in small, specialized (often leftist or health-related) journals of opinion that, taken together, sketch a history of the sterilization campaign. She credits Brightman and the International Indian Treaty Council and others, including Constance Redbird Pinkerton-Uri, for keeping the issue alive enough to spark the interest of Senator James Abourezk of South Dakota, which led to a General Accounting Office report and congressional oversight hearings that eventually curbed the practice.
          By 1974, some IHS doctors who were critical of the sterilizations began investigating on their own. Pinkerton-Uri, a physician and law student who is Choctaw and Cherokee, started her own inquiry after complaints were lodged by Native patients against the Claremore, Oklahoma, IHS hospital. Taking publicity about the Serena cases and what she had found at Claremore, along with other pieces of evidence, Pinkerton-Uri began calling Senator Abourezk’s office. The office also had received inquiries from Charlie McCarthy, an IHS employee in Albuquerque, regarding sterilizations of Native American women.
          Torpy followed the trail of Abourezk’s investigation, beginning with an intern in his office, Joan Adams, who took the initiative to investigate whether Native women were being sterilized “without their consent and under duress.” This preliminary investigation convinced Adams (and, later, Senator Abourezk) that further study was needed. Abourezk, using Adams’ research, then called for a GAO investigation.
          Torpy describes the findings of the GAO report, which surveyed IHS records in four of twelve Bureau of Indian Affairs regions: Albuquerque, Phoenix, Oklahoma City, and Aberdeen, South Dakota. The study covered only 46 months, between 1973 and 1976. (As of 1977, the IHS operated 51 hospitals and 86 health centers or clinics.) Within this sample, the GAO found evidence that the IHS or its contractors had sterilized 3,406 women, 3,001 of them of child-bearing age (15 to 44 years).
          Since the GAO study did not even begin to arrive at a total number of sterilizations, opponents of the practice looked at the data in another way, as a percentage of the women of child-bearing age in each examined area who were sterilized. In Oklahoma, using the GAO study’s numbers, 1,761 of roughly 17,000 women of child-bearing age were sterilized. In Phoenix, the number was lower, 78 of 8,000; in Aberdeen, the figure was 740 of 9,000. They began to make a case that, with only 100,000 fertile Native women of child-bearing age in the United States, the sterilizations were putting a significant dent in the gene pools of many individual Native American nations.
          Regarding the threat to the Native American gene pool, Torpy quotes Ms. Pinkerton-Uri:

A 200 million population could support voluntary sterilization and survive, but for Native Americans it cannot be a preferred method of birth control. While other minorities might have a gene pool in Africa or Asia, Native Americans do not; when we are gone, that’s it.

          At times, the battle over sterilization became localized and quite heated. In response to Pinkerton-Uri’s charges at the Claremore Hospital, physicians threatened to close the facility. “In response,” writes Torpy, “an unidentified group of Native Americans pitched a tipi on the hospital lawn alongside the American Indian Movement flag.”
          By the mid-to-late 1970s, the sterilization program was well known on the Native movement circuit. By 1974, Akwesasne Notes was carrying reports describing sterilizations, and Native American women’s attempts to mobilize against them. As a Ph.D. student in Seattle who had become involved in Native American issues (beginning with fishing rights), I requested an airing of the sterilization program in The Nation, the magazine that, in 1977, had allowed me a forum to present the first nationally published account of Leonard Peltier’s case. An editor at The Nation told me the magazine would publish the story only if I could supply a written statement from the IHS that genocide was its policy. No statement, the editor said, no story. I was unable to find such a tidy admission, although I could see a wave of sterilizations as I combined the GAO report’s findings with case-study materials from my files.
          By 1977, a class action suit had been initiated by three Montana Native American women. The names of the three Northern Cheyenne women who filed the class action suit were not released publicly out of fear that they would be condemned by other Cheyennes. The class-action suit never went to court, and never directly affected anyone other than the three claimants. Attorneys for the defendants approached the women’s attorneys and offered a cash settlement on condition that the case remain sealed. The women accepted the settlement.
          At about the same time, Marie Sanchez, the Northern Cheyennes’ chief tribal judge, conducted her own informal poll, and found that at least 30 women she contacted had been sterilized between 1973 and 1976. It was Sanchez who found two fifteen year old girls who said that they had been told they were having their tonsils out, only to emerge from a local IHS hospital without their ovaries.
          Torpy’s account brings what became a general pattern down to a personal level:

Another woman who had complained to a physician about migraine headaches was told that her condition was a female problem, and was advised that a hysterectomy would alleviate the problem. Her headaches continued, however, until she was diagnosed with a brain tumor.

          Also during 1977, the American Indian Policy review Commission found the IHS lacking adequate policies, appropriations, delivery services, and oversight for provision of health services to Native Americans. Even in 1977, the rate of infant mortality on Indian reservations was three times that of the general population in the United States; the tuberculosis rate was still eight times as high. the average life span of a Native American living on a reservation was 47 years, compared with almost 71 years in the general population. The IHS seemed to be short of personnel and equipment to treat many things, but the agency always seemed to have enough doctors, nurses, equipment, and money to tie fallopian tubes and remove ovaries.
          By the late 1970s, sterilizations continued at some IHS hospitals despite protests and suits. Brightman visited Claremore’s IHS facility for six months during late 1978 and early 1979, collecting records for six months, and found evidence of 81 sterilizations. Brightman later related his findings as part of a speech on the U.S. Capitol steps which was recorded and played for some of Claremore’s nurses, who, according to Torpy, “validated that sterilizations were occurring and with greater frequency.”
          Many Native women looked at the battle against sterilization as part of a broader, older, struggle to retain their families in a culturally appropriate context. The battle against sterilizations brought back memories of having children taken from their homes, beginning with the establishment of Carlisle School in 1879, to face a gauntlet of forced assimilation in a factory model of education. In 1977, roughly a third of reservation children were still attending the same system of boarding schools that had become a principal part of the assimilative model a century earlier. In 1973, 33,672 Native American children lived in federal boarding schools rather than at home, according to statistics compiled by Torpy.
          Many women also were reminded of the many Native children taken for foster care by non-Indians. In the middle 1970s, the proportion of Indian children placed in foster care in Western states (compared to the general population) ranged from 640 per cent, in Idaho, to 2,000 per cent, in North Dakota. This disparity was diminished (but not eliminated) by legislative measures beginning about 1980 which demanded that social workers appreciate Native ways of raising children instead of assuming that they were evidence of lack of parenting skills by Anglo-American, middle-class standards.
          On many reservations today, Indian midwives or nurses advise women on whether sterilization is appropriate. The number of births to Indian women had risen to 45,871 in 1988, compared with 27,542 in 1975, according to census records cited in Torpy’s thesis.
          Even though the cruder abuses of the sterilization wave in the 1970s seem to have abated, “Even today,” writes Torpy, “there remains a need for constant and close surveillance over physicians and health facilities and health facilities so that all poor women and women of color are allowed to make their own reproductive choices.”

International sterilization anecdotes

          While developing information about the impact of sterilization on Native American women in the United States, anecdotes popped up from time to time which indicate that sterilization is far from dead as a eugenic prescription for the elimination of Native populations in Latin America.
          Christina Lamb reported in the London Sunday Telegraph September 13 that a politician in northeastern Brazil is using sterilization of a diminishing Native tribe to garner votes among non-Indian Brazilians who have taken much of (and want more of) their land.
          At least eighty indigenous women of the Pataxuh-he band in the Brazilian state of Bahia have been sterilized by Ronald Lavigne, who is a medical doctor as well as a politician. Lavigne offers sterilization to women (who cannot get other types of birth control) every time he runs for office. Some women have complained after the fact that the finality of tube-tying was not explained to them.
          Lamb reports that many of the operations were undertaken on women desperate to reduce the size of their families because many children in the area die of malnutrition.
          ”This is genocide,” Lamb reported Roberto Liebgott, an activist with native peoples in Bahia, to have said. In some villages, every woman of child-bearing age has been sterilized, leading to the probable demise of entire peoples in a generation or two.
          For Lavigne, sterilizations are paid back at the ballot box, where a study by the Brazilian Congress estimates that the candidate snags between seven and 25 extra votes for each operation from land owners, many of them recent immigrants, who fully understand their stake in reducing Native populations in the area. Within a few years, Pataxuh-he land holdings have been reduced from 50,000 to 20,000 hectares, according to Lamb. Lavigne is a leading figure in Brazil’s right-wing Liberal Front, the party favored by new rich landowners in the Amazon Basin.
          Blood also has been spilled over the immigrants insistence that the land’s original inhabitants will not challenge their title. Last year, a local leader took his peoples’ complaints to Brasilia, the federal capital. Galdino Jesus dos Santos was jumped by a gang of youths at a bus stop in the capital. They beat him, then dumped gasoline over his bruised, battered body and lit a match.
          Far from Brasilia, in Omaha, Nebraska, medical personnel at local clinics caring for an influx of Mexican and other Latin American immigrants say that many women come to them complaining of having trouble getting pregnant. The Omaha care-givers are left to tell the women, many of whom are of Mexican Indian ancestry, that they have been sterilized or implanted with IUDs by Mexican doctors. Most of the women express surprise at this, to put it mildly, indicating that any form of consent they may have been given was not comprehended.
          The flood of immigration to Omaha has been caused by a vibrant labor market (state unemployment is under 2 per cent) and economic hardship from the Rio Grande southward. The influx is so large that local Immigration and Naturalization Service officials estimate that a quarter of the workers in Nebraska’s meat-packing plants are undocumented. The INS has set up a special program, “Operation Prime Beef,” to catch them.

Compulsory-sterilization

Compulsory sterilization (surgical procedure) programs sprouted up in many countries at the beginning of the 20th century, usually as part of a program of negative eugenics to prevent undesirable members of the population from reproducing. They generally specified that an institution or legal body could order that an individual be operated upon, for the purpose of preventing further procreation, against their will (and sometimes without their knowledge). Usually such programs advocated sterilization by means of vasectomy in males and salpingectomy or tubal ligation in females, as they were not operations which significantly affected sexual drive or the personality of the individuals operated upon (unlike, for example, castration). This increased the seemingly innocuous nature of the operations, adding a veneer of scientific objectivity. Plans for forced sterilization for the purposes of avoiding overpopulation are sometimes, but not usually, directly related to any eugenic intent. Please see population control for more information on this type of sterilization.

United States of America

The first significant country to undertake compulsory sterilization programs for the purpose of eugenics was the United States of America. The principal targets of the American program were the mental retardation and the mental illness, but also targetted under many state laws were the deaf, the blind, the epilepsy, the physically deformed, and even orphans and the homeless. Some sterilizations also took place in prisons and other penal institutions, targeting criminality, but they were in the relative minority. The first state to introduce compulsory sterilization legislation was Pennsylvania, in 1905, but it was vetoed by the governor. Indiana became the first state to enact sterilization legislation in 1907 followed closely by Washington and California in 1909. Sterilization rates across the country were relatively low until the 1927 Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell which legitimized the forced sterilization of patients at a Virginia home for the mental retardation. The number of sterilizations performed per year increased until another Supreme Court case, Skinner v. Oklahoma, complicated the legal situation by ruling against punitive sterilization in 1942. After World War II, public opinion towards eugenics and sterilization programs became more negative in the light of the connection with the genocide policies of Nazi Germany, though sterilizations continued in a few states until the early 1960s. Some states continued to have sterilization laws on the books for much longer after that, though they were rarely if ever used. In the end, over 64,000 individuals were sterilized under state compulsory sterilization programs in the United States, with California leading the pack, itself responsible for over a third of all sterilization operations. Information about the California sterilization program was produced into book form and widely disseminated by eugenicists E.S. Gosney and Paul B. Popenoe, which was said by the government of Adolf Hitler to be of key importance in proving that large-scale compulsory sterilization programs were feasible. In recent years, the governors of many states have made public apologies for their past programs. None have offered to compensate those sterilized, however, citing that few are likely still living (and by definition would have no affected offspring) and that inadequate records remain by which to verify them.

Germany

The most infamous sterilization program of the 20th century took place under the most infamous regime of the 20th century: the Third Reich. One of the first acts by Adolf Hitler after achieving total control over the Germany state was to pass the Gesetz zur Verh?erbkranken Nachwuchses (The Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring) in July 1933. The law was signed in by Hitler himself, and over 200 eugenic courts were created specifically as a result of the law. Under the German law, any doctor in the Reich was required to report patients of theirs who were mentally retarded, mentally ill (including schizophrenia and manic depression), epilepsy, blindness, deafness, or physically deformed, and a steep monetary penalty was imposed for any patients who were not properly reported. Individuals suffering from alcoholism or Huntingtons disease could also be sterilized. The individuals case was then presented in front of a court of Nazi officials and public health officers who would review their medical records, take testimony from friends and colleagues, and eventually decide whether or not to order a sterilization operation performed on the individual, using force if necessary. By the end of World War II, over 400,000 individuals were sterilized under the German law and its revisions, most within its first four years of being enacted. When the issue of compulsory sterilization was brought up at the Nuremberg trials after the war, many Nazis defended their actions on the matter by indicating that it was the United States itself from whom they had taken inspiration.

Other countries

Dozens of countries around the world, especially in Europe, also had similar sterilization programs, though very few had rates as high as the United States, much less Germany. In recent years it has come out that Sweden in particular had a strong sterilization program, sterilizing around 62,000 individuals over a period of 40 years. Other countries with notably active sterilization programs include Canada, Australia, Norway, Finland, Estonia, Switzerland, Iceland, and some countries in Latin America (including Panama and Puerto Rico).

T-4-Euthanasia-Program

In Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitlers T-4 Euthanasia Program was established in order to maintain the supposed purity (eugenics) of the so-called Aryan race by systematically killing children and adults born with physical deformities or suffering from mental illness. The name T-4 comes from the address of the office, Tiergartenstrasse 4 in Berlin. The operation was put by Hitler under the control of the Chief of the State Chancellery Philip Bouhler and Doctor of Medicine Karl Brandt. Defective children were removed from their families and taken to hospitals, where the exterminations were carried out at the Hartheim and Hadamar killing centres. The program was expanded to include adults to prevent any deficient member of the German Master race from breeding so they could not pass on their inferiority. One of the most important and well-known books about the Nazi Euthanasia action was written by Ernst Klee: Euthanasie im NS-Staat ? Die Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens. Klee describes the extermination hospitals like Grafeneck or Hartheim, where the first gas chambers were built, before the Holocaust, and where mostly adult victims were suffocated with carbon monoxide. Klee describes further the killing of crippled children by doctors with lethal injections and the starvation of patients marked for extermination. Klee describes as well the resistance from the churches and the relatives of the victims, which led to a slowdown and greater secrecy of the operation, but did not stop it. The operation was conducted still more covertly after August 1941, when 70,000 people had already died in the gas chambers of Grafeneck, Hartheim, Hadamar, Bernburg, Brandenburg and Sonnenstein. By that time every third inmate of a psychiatric institution in Germany had already died, either by being actively killed or by starvation, leading to about 93,000 free beds at the end of 1941, to use the Nazi terminology. On August 18, 1941, Hitler ordered a temporary halt to T-4. Graduates of the Aktion T4 program were then transferred to the concentration camps, where they continued in their trade. Euthanasia did not end in 1941, however, it still took place in hospitals around Germany and Austria, and crept East into a few of the occupied territories. An estimated 200,000 people died under the auspices of the T-4 program. As Klee notes, most of the persons responsible for carrying out the T-4 Euthanasia Program became active in the Holocaust as well, developing gas chamber technology and even helping to build death camps at Belzec, Treblinka or Sobib⠩n Operation Reinhard. Aside from the well-known Auschwitz concentration camp these were the main centers of extermination by gas for millions of people. Along with the euthanasia program, the Nazi regime also targeted the disabled through its compulsory sterilization program.

Bibliography

Henry Friedlander, The Origins of Nazi Genocide. From Euthanasia to the Final Solution, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill & London, 1995, ISBN 0807822086.
Ernst Klee. Euthanasie im NS-Staat. Die Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens, Frankfurt am Main 1983, ISBN 3596243262, in German.
Ernst Klee. Dokumente zur Euthanasie. ISBN 3596243270, in German.
Ernst Klee. Was sie taten. Was sie wurden. ISBN 3596243645, in German.
Michael Burleigh, Nazi Euthanasia Programs in Dieter Kuntz, ed. Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum/University of North Carolina Press, 2004. ISBN 0-8078-2916-1

Forced sterilization of mental patients

Edmonton, Alberta
March 21, 1928

“…the patient may safely be discharged if the danger of procreation with its attendant risk of multiplication of the evil by transmission of the disability to the progeny were eliminated, the board may direct …sexual sterilization of the inmate…”

Alberta passes the Sexual Sterilization Act. It provides for the forced sterilization of inmates in mental hospitals.

Similar laws are enacted in other provinces, such as British Columbia.

Want To Know More?

See:
Sexual Sterilization Act, S.A. 1928, c.37.

Did you know?

Sterilization of the “feeble-minded” is supported by leading women’s rights figures such as Emily Murphy and Nellie McClung.

The Sanger Paradox- the Myth of Choice

The founder of Planned Parenthood in her own words

“The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective  offspring… represents the most humane act of mankind.”   

Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Chapter 10

“We prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of  making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded.” 

 The Pivot of Civilization  Margaret Sanger, Brentano’s Press, NY, 1922, p. 263

“Authorities tell us that 75% of the school-children are defective.  This means that no less than fifteen million schoolchildren, out of 22,000,000 in the United States, are physically or mentally below par.

Planned Parenthood was known as the American Birth Control League until 1942.  (Backlash against the eugenics movement which the ABCL espoused, and its ties to Nazis here and abroad compelled the name change.)  That said, now for some little known facts regarding  Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, and her stated aims from its conception…

The eugenics movement was a pseudo-science which advocated the forced sterilization of “feeble-minded” U.S. citizens in hopes of insuring racial purity; it was a doomed and tragic attempt to create what Sanger believed would be “a race of thoroughbreds.”  Eugenics as a “science” fell apart with the discovery of DNA and new insights on chromosomes and genetic mutation. But thought the sterilization program which Sanger and supporters advocated most adversely affected poor whites and minorities, it was also aimed at all Americans of every color and creed who didn’t fit into an insanely narrow and scientifically invalid notion of who was fit to conceive. This was only 1 in 4 Americans, in Sanger’s most generous estimates.

Confronted with these shocking truths about the menace of feeble-mindedness to the race, a menace acute because of the unceasing and unrestrained fertility of such defectives, we are apt to become the victims of a ‘wild panic for instant action.’ There is no occasion for hysterical, ill-considered action, specialists tell us.  They direct our attention to another phase of the problem, that of the so-called ‘good feeble-minded.’ We are informed that imbecility, in itself, is not synonymous with badness.  If it is fostered in a ‘suitable environment,’ it may express itself in terms of good citizenship and useful occupation.  It may thus be transmuted into a docile, tractable, and peaceable element of the community. The moron and the feeble-minded, thus protected, so we are assured, may even marry some brighter member of the community, and thus lessen the chances of procreating another generation of imbeciles.  We read further that some of our doctors believe that in our social scale, there is a place for the good feeble-minded.

“In such a reckless and thoughtless differentiation between the ‘bad’ and the ‘good’ feeble-minded, we find new evidence of the conventional middle-class bias that also finds ___expression among some of the eugenists.  We do not object to feeble-mindedness simply because it leads to immorality and criminality; nor can we approve of it when it expresses itself in docility, submissiveness and obedience.  We object because both are burdens and dangers to the intelligence of the community”

To see more then go to this link: http://impiousdigest.com/sanger_paradox.htm

The Philippians version of Planned Parenthood is the Family Family Act.

In the Buck vs. Bell decision of May 2, 1927, the United States Supreme Court upheld a Virginia statute that provided for the eugenic sterilization for people considered genetically unfit. The Court’s decision, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., included the infamous phrase “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Upholding Virginia’s sterilization statute provided the green light for similar laws in 30 states, under which an estimated 65,000 Americans were sterilized without their own consent or that of a family member.

Although Indiana passed the first eugenic sterilization statute in 1907, this and other early laws were legally flawed and did not meet the challenge of state court tests. To remedy this situation, Harry Laughlin of the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor designed a model eugenic law that was reviewed by legal experts. The Virginia statute of 1924 was closely based on this model.

The plaintiff of the case, Carrie Buck, and her mother Emma, had been committed to the Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded in Lynchburg, Virginia. Carrie and Emma were both judged to be “feebleminded” and promiscuous, primarily because they had both had borne children out of wedlock. Carrie’s child, Vivian, was judged to be “feebleminded” at seven months of age. Hence, three generations of “imbeciles” became the “perfect” family for Virginia officials to use as a test case in favor of the eugenic sterilization law enacted in 1924.

On the eve of the Virginia legal contest, the ERO dispatched its field worker, Dr. Arthur Estabrook, to provide expert testimony. After some cursory examination, Estabrook testified that the seven month old Vivian “showed backwardness.” The Superintendent of the Virginia Colony, Dr. Albert Priddy, testified that members of the Buck family “belong to the shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of anti-social whites of the South.” Upon reviewing the case, the Supreme Court concurred “that Carrie Buck is the probable potential parent of socially inadequate offspring, likewise afflicted, that she may be sexually sterilized without detriment to her general health and that her welfare and that of society will be promoted by her sterilization”

Buck vs. Bell was flawed in many ways. “Feeblemindeness” is no longer used in medical terminology; it was clearly a catch-all term that had virtually no clinical meaning. It is impossible to judge whether or not Carrie was “feebleminded” by the standards of her time, but she was not patently promiscuous. According to Carrie, Vivian’s conception was the result of Carrie’s rape by the nephew of her foster parents. She, probably like many unwed mothers of that time, was institutionalized to prevent further shame to the family. Just as clearly, Vivian was no imbecile. Vivian’s first grade report card from the Venable School in Charlottesville showed that this daughter of a supposed social degenerate got straight “As” in deportment (conduct) and even made the honor role in April, 1931. She died a year later of complications following a bout of the measles.

Although in 1942 the Supreme Court struck down a law allowing the involuntary sterilization of criminals, it never reversed the general concept of eugenic sterilization. In 2001, the Virginia General Assembly acknowledged that the sterilization law was based on faulty science and expressed its “profound regret over the Commonwealth’s role in the eugenics movement in this country and over the damage done in the name of eugenics.” On May 2, 2002 a marker was erected to honor Carrie Buck in her hometown of Charlottesville.

END

&&&

Fluoride – The Lunatic Drug

Never forget that;
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil
is that good men do nothing.
—  Edmund Burke
http://www.policyexperts.org/experts/

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 06:27:31 -0500
From: “Beaver Cole” <bcole@longview.net>

DO YOURSELF a favor and read this message to the very end.  Then we will talk some
more as this is how we get things done in this country by talking about it.

Please send this to your entire mailing list.

Beaver Cole
The Oil Patch Newspaper -
http://www.the-oil-patch.com
Longview, Texas

====================================
—– Original Message —–
From: Cliff Hume – humec@island.net
To: <Recipient list suppressed>
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 12:57 AM
Subject: [NH] Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride

Thanks Kraig and Shirley Carroll:

I have read much about this over the years, but this has to be the shortest
and the best.

Yours truly,

Cliff Hume.

=====================================

From: Shirley Carroll – thehavens@highland.net
Subject: [NH] Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride
From: Brian Jerome – brian@eternalmatrix.com
Subject: Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride

SICKNESS CONTROL 101: FLUORIDE, THE LUNATIC DRUG

“TELL A LIE LOUD ENOUGH AND LONG ENOUGH AND PEOPLE WILL BELIEVE IT.”
(Adolph Hitler)

“EARTH IS AN INSANE ASYLUM, TO WHICH THE OTHER PLANETS DEPORT THEIR
LUNATICS.” –Voltaire (Memnon the Philosopher).

Controversial fluoride is one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC
(FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl
FLUoride).

Sodium fluoride, a hazardous-waste by-product from the manufacture of
aluminum, is a common ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anesthetics,
hypnotics, psychiatric drugs, and military nerve gas. It`s historically
been quite expensive to properly dispose of, until some aluminum industries
with an overabundance of the stuff sold the public on the terrifically
insane but highly profitable idea of buying it at a 20,000% markup,
injecting it into our water supplies, and then DRINKING it.

Yes, a 20,000% markup: Fluoride– intended only for human consumption by
people under 14 years of age–is injected into our drinking water supply at
approx. 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink 1/2 of one
percent of the total water supply, the rest literally goes down the drain
as a free hazardous-waste disposal for the chemical industry, where we PAY
them so that we can flush their expensive hazardous waste down our toilets.
How many salesmen dream of such a deal? (Follow the money.)

Independent scientific evidence repeatedly showing up over the past 50
years reveals that fluoride allegedly shortens our life span, promotes
cancer and various mental disturbances, accelerates osteoporosis and broken
hips in old folks, and makes us stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one
package. There are reports of aluminum in the brain possibly being a
causative factor in Alzheimer`s Disease, and evidence points towards
fluoride`s strong affinity for aluminum and also its ability to “trick” the
blood-brain barrier by looking like the hydrogen ion, and thus allowing
chemical access to brain tissue.

Scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on this mega-bucks PR
ploy have consistently been given a very unscientific Black-PR treatment,
and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never
arrive in the press. Follow the money to find the control. In 1952 the
slick PR campaign which ramrodded the concept of fluoridation through via
our Public Health departments and various dental organizations was likened
to a highly-emotional “beer-salesman`s convention” instead of the objective
scientific experiment which it should properly have been. It`s continued in
that vein right up to present time. To illustrate the emotional vs. the
scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given by people
(perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of fluoridation comes up. Ask
yourself, “Is this response EMOTIONAL BLUSTER, or is it UNBIASED AND
OPENLY- INTERESTED OBJECTIVITY?” There is a tremendous amount of emotional,
highly unscientific know-it-all !
attached to fluoridation. Many truly independent (unattached to any
vested-interest) scientists who`ve spent a large portion of their lives
studying and working with this subject have been subjected to a surprising
amount of uncalled-for and unfair character assassination from strong
vested- interest groups who profit from the public`s ignorance as well as
from their illnesses. (Follow the money.)

Do you have diabetes or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11
million Americans with diabetes. Since many diabetics drink more liquids
than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 11
million Americans probably shouldn`t drink fluoridated water, because in
doing so, they`ll receive an excessive dose of fluoride.

Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which
is your main route of fluoride elimination. –So those people with kidney
disease also shouldn`t drink fluoridated water. Cases are on record
(Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where kidney patients on dialysis machines
died, due to a fluoride overdose in the city water supply. Let`s begin at
the beginning:

The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in
Germany`s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about
fluoride`s supposed effect on children`s teeth; their alleged reason for
mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and
force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission. (Ref.
book: “The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben” by Joseph Borkin.)

The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional
Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins,
a chemist:

“I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation
regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth About Water Fluoridation,
to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England
from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. “In the 1930`s, Hitler and
the German Nazi`s envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a
Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very
ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and
adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the
population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water
supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas,
reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in
women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied
a prominent place. …

“Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce
an individual`s power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and
narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the
will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient light lobotomy]

“The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children`s
teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could
be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real
purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses
to domination and control and loss of liberty.

“When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German
General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and
military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control
through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because
it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world. …

“I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official
of the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the
Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and
sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years` research into the
chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine–any person
who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more
will never again be the same person mentally or physically.” CHARLES E.
PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954.
__________________________

Quoting Einstein`s nephew, Dr. E.H. Bronner (a chemist who had also been a
prisoner of war during WWII) in a letter printed in The Catholic Mirror,
Springfield, MA, January 1952:

“It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts are among the `next` on the
agenda of the water poisoners.

“There is a sinister network of subversive agents, Godless `intellectual`
parasites, working in our country today whose ramifications grow more
extensive, more successful and more alarming each new year and whose true
objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic–from
within if they can, according to their plan–for their own possession. “The
tragic success they have already attained in their long siege to destroy
the moral fiber of American life is now one of their most potent footholds
towards their own ultimate victory over us.

“Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most
subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration. …

“As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22
years, 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on
my years of practical experience in the health-food and chemical field, let
me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national
suicide. Don`t do it.

“Even in small quantities, sodium fluoride is a deadly poison to which no
effective antidote has been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the
most efficient rat-killer. … Sodium fluoride is entirely different from
organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and provided by
nature, in God`s great providence and love, to build and strengthen our
bones and our teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from
proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assimilable
by the human body, whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in
fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully water soluble.
The body refuses to assimilate it. “Careful, bonafide laboratory
experimentation by conscientious, patriotic research chemists, and actual
medical experience, have both revealed that instead of preserving or
promoting `dental health,` fluoridated drinking water destroys teeth,
before adulthood and after, by the destructive mottling and other
pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also
creates many other very grave pathological conditions in the internal
organisms of bodies consuming it. How can it be called a “health” plan?
What`s behind it?

“That any so-called “doctors” would persuade a civilized nation to add
voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable.
It is the height of criminal

insanity. “No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed and agreed from 1939
to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin`s Last Will and Hitler`s Mein Kampf:

“America we shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within.” …

“Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of
water poisoning by fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other
countries. Sodium fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most
effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless, tasteless; no
antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete extermination of rats.
……………..

“Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide, or quick
national liquidation. It is criminal insanity–treason!” Dr. E.H. Bronner,
Mfg. Research Chemist, Los Angeles.

……………….

Re: Re: Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride. Willeam A Choby DMD MAGD MPA FICCMO ACD
Sunday, 13-Aug-2000 22:27:35

The addition of any chemical agent to public water for any purpose other than to improve its purity is a violation of our constitutional right to privacy. This civil right is drawn from the Bill of rights which prohibits the government from forcing homeowners to quarter soldiers at their expense for the purpose of protecting us from our enemies. The introduction of therapeutic fluoride into the water with the intention of protecting us from dental disease is a similar invasion of our private homes.

It is truly tragic that organized dentistry has taken this issue to promote itself as a caretaker of the public’s oral health. Nothing could be further from the truth. Organized dentistry’s primary purpose is to further the interests of its dues paying members. They should leave the affairs of the public’s health to the experts of constitutional law and not public opinion.

Willeam A Choby DMD MAGD MPA FICCMO ACD

———————————-
Earliest available Russian fluoride evidence:
(APFN NOTE: THIS INFO WAS FAXED VIA APFN IN 1993)
http://enteract.com/~mgfree/Medical/Fluorine/FluorineApathy.html

“I, Oliver Kenneth Goff, was a member of the Communist Party and the Young
Communist League, from May 2, 1936, to October 9, 1939. During this period
of time, I operated under the alias of John Keats with number 18-B-2. My
testimony before the Government is in Volume 9 of the Un-American
Activities Report for 1939.

“While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist training
schools in New York and Wisconsin … and we were trained in the
revolutionary overthrow of the U.S. Government. “… We discussed quite
thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in
Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school
felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would
bring about a spirit of lethargy in the nation, where it could keep the
general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism. We also
discussed the fact that keeping a store of deadly fluoride near the water
reservoir would be advantageous during the time of the revolution, as it
would give us opportunity to dump this poison into the water supply and
either kill off the populace or threaten them with liquidation, so that
they would surrender to obtain fresh water.

============================================
Nerve Agents
Lethal organo-phosphorus compounds inhibiting cholinesterase
http://www.opcw.nl/chemhaz/nerve.htm

“The plain fact that fluorine is an insidious poison, harmful, toxic and cumulative
in its effects, even when ingested in minimal amounts, will remain unchanged no
matter how many times it will be repeated in print that fluoridation of the water
supply is ‘safe’.” Ludwig Gross, M.D., former Chief of Veterans Administration
Cancer Research, Bronx, NY.
http://www.connect4free.net/home/geofjoan/chem_sen/halogen.html

Los Angeles fluoridation lawsuit
http://www.sonic.net/~kryptox/law/law.htm

Fluoride or Sodium Hydroxide?
An Environmental Detective Story, by Dan Montgomery
http://www.sonic.net/kryptox/water/hydrox.htm

AMERICA: OVERDOSED ON FLUORIDE
http://www.zerowasteamerica.org/Fluoride.htm

An International Coalition to End Water Fluoridation and Alert
People to Fluoride’s Health and Environmental Risks
http://www.fluoridealert.org/index.htm

“Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of
all time.” -
Robert Carton, PhD, scientist, formerly of the US Environmental Protection Agency.
http://www.npwa.org.uk/

PRESS RELEASE – July 2000
ARSENIC LEVELS COULD SOUND DEATH-KNELL FOR WATER FLUORIDATION PLANS
http://tinyurl.com/93tsm5

Fluoridation / Fluoride Toxic Chemicals In Your Water
http://www.holisticmed.com/fluoride/

Are the claimed benefits of ingesting fluoride over-rated
and the risks to our health and eco-system under-reported?
http://www.fluoridation.com/

Impact of Artificial Fluoridation on Salmon Species in
the Northwest USA and British Columbia, Canada
http://www.fluoridation.com/fish.htm

Skeletal fluorosis is a crippling bone disease caused by fluoride
http://www.fluoridation.com/skeletal.htm

STOP  Fluoridation  USA
http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/

DID GOVERNMENT APPROVE CITIZENS AS TOXIC WASTE SITES?
http://www.thewinds.org/archive/medical/fluoride01-98.html

Leading Edge Scientific Abstracts on Fluoride Bio-Toxicity
http://www.trufax.org/abstract/abstract.html

Related Research:
The Crime and Punishment of I. G. Farben
by Joseph Borkin (out of print book search)

Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride
by Bernard Meyer Wagner

Fluoridation : the Great Dilemma
by George L. Waldbott

Fluoride the Aging Factor :
How to Recognize and Avoid the Devastating Effects of Fluoride
by John, Dr. Yiamouyiannis

Scientific Knowledge in Controversy :
The Social Dynamics of the Fluoridation Debate
by Brian Martin

Medical Mafia by Guylaine Lanctot

Racketeering in Medicine by James P. Carter

The Cure for All Diseases by Dr. Hulda Regehr Clark

Censured for Curing Cancer :
The American Experience of Dr. Max Gerson
by S.J. Haught

******
Kraig and Shirley Carroll …… in the hills of SE Kentucky
http://www.thehavens.com/
thehavens@highland.net
606-376-3363

=============================================

The Real Story on Arsenic in Your Water

Neal Boortz
Mon Apr 9 15:41:13 2001

The Real Story on Arsenic in Your Water

Neal Boortz
April 3, 2001

At first it sounded pretty damming: George W. Bush had 86′ed an
EPA regulation further limiting the amount of arsenic that could
legally be found in America’s drinking water.

For people who don’t bother to look beyond the sensational
headlines, this sounds mighty bad indeed! Everybody knows that
arsenic is poisonous! Everybody knows that you can die from
arsenic poisoning! Why, it’s absolutely outrageous that President
Bush would do such a thing! He’s a madman!

I purposely avoided conversation on this particular subject this week
until I could get a little more information.

OK, here goes. So everybody knows that arsenic is poison, right?
Fine. Do you also know that arsenic is found naturally in broccoli and
other vegetables? Do you know that most groundwater already
contains arsenic? Did you know that at low levels arsenic is virtually
harmless to the human body?

Here’s what happened. The National Academy of Sciences issues a
report saying that there is too much arsenic in America’s water
supply. The EPA follows suit with a new regulation lowering the
permissible arsenic in our water supply form 50ppb (parts per
billion) to 10ppb.

Fine. Now, what would this cost, and how many lives would it save?

Cost? The water industry says it would cost about $6 billion in
immediate capital outlays and about $600 million a year from then
on.

That cost should be no factor, though, if huge numbers of lives could
be saved. So, what’s the toll in saved souls? The EPA says that by
reducing the arsenic level in water we’re going to statistically save
about 28 lives per year.

Whenever you talk about saving lives through regulation, you ought
to pay a little attention to just how much each one of those saved
lives would cost. We could, for instance, save the lives of a lot of
airline passengers if each passenger could be encased in an
escape pod with automatic fire suppression systems and a decent
parachute in case of a disaster. The cost, though, would be
absolutely prohibitive. The EPA realizes this and has suggested a
figure of “cost per statistical life saved” for its regulations. That
figure is around $4 million.

So, what would the cost-per-life-saved be of these new EPA arsenic
regulations? OK, get your official Clark Howard calculator out. The
new arsenic regs would save about 28 lives per year – at a cost of
$65 million per life. That’s over 16 times the EPA’s own suggest
threshold limit!

So, now that you’ve learned a bit more, does Bush’s rejection of the
new EPA standards sound so horrible?

So why does this work so well? How can Democrats, union goons
and mental midgets like Barbra Streisand succeed so wildly in
demonizing George W. for a decision that actually makes sense?
Easy, because the decision doesn’t make sense UNTIL the facts
are known. Facts – poison to the left and the liberal mental process.

Rioting College Students

So Arizona lost. Big deal. But once again we were treated to video
of rioting students overturning cars and setting fires.

Just once I would like to read about strong disciplinary action being
taken by a college or university after an event like this. Get the video,
then identify every single person you can in that video. If you had
your hands on that car when it was turned over – you’re out. Pack
your stuff. Your education at this university is over. Period. No
questions. If your face is shown around that fire – so long! Time to
apply to another institute of higher education.

Yeah – like we’re going to get that type of a response from today’s
college and university administrators.

Wouldn’t It Be Nice if This Spread!

Tax Revolt: Dozens of small-business owners have stopped
withholding taxes from their employees and have challenged the IRS
to prove them wrong. “60 Minutes II” reports on a tax revolt that’s a
direct challenge to the way our tax system runs.

Well, Texas congressman Ron Paul has introduced a bill that, sadly,
doesn’t have a snowball’s chance. He wants to end tax withholding.

Class Warfare Rages On

Let’s take a quick look at the way the AFL-CIO participates in and
encourages the politics of envy and class warfare in America.

Here’s a link to a page on the AFL-CIO Web site:

http://cw2k.capweb.net/aflcio/letterstate.cfm?letter_id=1512

It’s a letter you can automatically send to your favorite politician or
journalist. Throughout this letter you can see one of the elements of
this class warfare agenda. The left and the AFL-CIO are working to
differentiate between “the rich” and “working people.” The goal here
is to promote the idea that wealthy people don’t actually work for
their money. And since they don’t work for their money, it’s no real
big deal if their money is taken away from them and given to people
who actually DO work!

If you want a good rundown on the entire leftist-socialist movement
in the United States, there is no better place to start than
http://www.aflcio.org/home.htm .

Before we move on, here’s a quote from AFL-CIO president John J.
Sweeney about Bush’s tax cut idea:

“My fear is that he is so determined to reward his corporate and
ideological backers that he will ignore the needs of the vast majority
of American people who make daily decisions between pork chops
and peanut butter – as he pays attention only to those who must
decide between a $190 and a $125 bottle of Bordeaux.”

Nice, huh? We have two classes of people in this country. Those
who work and have to decide between pork chops and peanut
butter; and those who are rich and who’s only problem is which wine
to drink with their gourmet dinner.

Hey, Sweeney. The next time one of your precious union members
needs a job, tell him to go apply for work to someone trying to
decide between pork chops and peanut butter.

They’re Not Interested in Educating Your Kid

If you needed further proof that government schools don’t give a rat’s
derriere when it comes to educating your child, here it is.

Thomas Edison Elementary School in San Francisco used to be the
kind of school that “parents fought to get out of,” according to the
San Francisco Chronicle. I say “used to be” because in 1998, a
company called Edison Schools came in, privatized it and renamed
it the Edison Charter Academy. The New York Times says that
since Edison took over the school, the proportion of students
scoring in the upper half on national math and reading tests has
doubled. And the number of students scoring in the lowest ranks has
been cut by one-third.

That’s great, right? Kids at Edison Charter Academy are learning,
and their test scores show it. The kids get their future handed back
to them and San Francisco looks good for allowing Edison Schools
to take charge. It’s a win-win situation, right?

Not if you’re a member of the San Francisco Board of Education. A
recent investigation alleges Edison discriminates against black
students, sends special education students to other campuses, and
hasn’t provided the school district with records that track the public
money the school uses. At a school board meeting last Tuesday, the
board voted 6-1 to give Edison Schools 90 days to fix these
“problems.” If the board still finds problems, the school will lose its
charter and revert to government control.

Parents of children at the Edison Charter Academy attended last
week’s meeting and begged the board not to revoke Edison’s
contract. More than 80 percent of the academy’s parents have
signed a petition asking the city to keep Edison Schools.

And opponents of Edison Schools have failed to provide any
concrete evidence that Edison has forced students out to increase
test scores.

Oh, and let’s not forget that this is the same school district whose
loose finances led them to spend $30 million in voter-approved
construction funding for other things, like salaries. Audits show that
over the past eight years, the district has routinely spent money it
didn’t have. And this week, the district passed up a $50 million
federal technology grant because it couldn’t even pony up the 17
cents per federal dollar.

The bottom line is that a private company beat government
educators at their own game, and the school board doesn’t like it
one bit. So they’re going to do their best to sack Edison Schools
and protect their monopoly on San Francisco’s children.

Speaking of Privatizing Schools …

It wasn’t a very good week for Edison Schools.

The company also wanted to privatize the five worst-performing
schools in Brooklyn, the Bronx and Manhattan – but was stopped
cold. But it’s not the school administrators who sent Edison down to
defeat, it’s the apathetic, government-addicted parents that nixed
this proposal.

Only 2,267 of nearly 5,000 eligible parents cast votes last week.
And Edison Schools required “yes” votes from a majority of all
eligible parents at each school. Mayor Rudy Giuliani wants the
school board to allow Edison to take over the 20 worst schools –
with or without parental approval.

Kenneth Wilson is the father of a kindergartner and a first-grader at
one of these dreadful government schools: Community School 66 in
the Bronx. On Thursday he said, “We hate Edison because they’re
going to come in here as a business. Each child is a dollar sign.”
Wow! A true candidate for Parent of the Year.

Sorry … how is that different from a government-run school? And is it
somehow diabolical for a for-profit company to want to operate as a
business? Is there something about a company that makes it less
qualified than the do-nothing government educators who currently
run the show?

If Kenneth Wilson and the other parents put that much stock in the
ability of the government regime to teach their kids how to read and
write, they’re deluding themselves.

Every parent who sends their kid to a government school should sit
down and try to think of a single thing the government does well –
besides tyrannize freedom-loving individuals.

Our benevolent imperial federal government can’t do anything right.
So why should you think they’re qualified to educate your child?

Be Careful How You Ridicule Dubya

ABC News needs better copy editors.

On last Thursday’s “World News Tonight,” White House reporter
(and Clinton flack) Terry Moran ridiculed George W. Bush for using
the term “energy crisis.” That’s because, as Moran said, “there are
no gas lines and the price of crude oil is actually declining.”

The very next night, anchor Charles Gibson plugged an upcoming
story by saying, “When we come back, America’s energy crisis. Gas
prices are soaring and they’ll get even worse this summer.”

So one night there’s no energy crisis and Dubya’s a dunce … and
the next night there is an energy crisis!

Which is it, ABC? You can’t have it both ways. And you’ve just shown
the world that you’re more interested in slamming the Bush
administration than reporting the facts.

Neal Boortz is the hugely popular nationally syndicated radio host.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/4/3/143117.shtml

=========================================================
Why American’s are SHEEPLES: FLUORIDE
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/sheeples.htm

Shocking News About Fluoride
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flouride.htm

TOP FLUORIDE EXPERT APOLOGIZES FOR PUSHING POISON
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fluoride-expert.htm

FLUORIDE Links:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fluoride.htm

Fluoride is a Corrosive Poison
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/poison.htm

POPULATION CONTROL
Warning: The life you save may be your own!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/control3.htm

Finding the Truth about the Social Security Debate – JULY 2000
http://www.policyexperts.org/insider/2000/jul00/welcome.html

It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything
else, that prevents us from living freely and nobly.
-Bertrand Russell
http://www.apfn.org

Water vs. Coke

Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 10:02 AM

Subject: Water vs. Coke

Water vs. Coke

  We all know that water is important but I’ve never seen it written
down like this before.

75% of Americans are chronically dehydrated. (Likely applies to half
world pop.)

In 37% of Americans, the thirst mechanism is so weak that it is often
mistaken for hunger.

Even MILD dehydration will slow down one’s metabolism as much as 3%.

One glass of water shut down midnight hunger pangs for almost 100% of
the dieters studied in a U-Washington study.

Lack of water, the #1 trigger of daytime fatigue.

Preliminary research indicates that 8-10 glasses of water a day could
significantly ease back and joint pain for up to 80% of sufferers.

A mere 2% drop in body water can trigger fuzzy short-term memory,
trouble with basic math, and difficulty focusing on the computer
screen or on a printed page.

Drinking 5 glasses of water daily decreases the risk of colon cancer
by 45%, plus it can slash the risk of breast cancer by 79%, and one is
50% less likely to develop bladder cancer.

Are you drinking the amount of water you should every day?

=========================================================

   COKE

   No wonder coke tastes soooo good:

1. In many states (in the USA) the highway patrol carries two gallons
of Coke in the truck to remove blood from the highway after a car
accident.

2. You can put a T-bone steak in a bowl of coke and it will be gone in
two days.

3. To clean a toilet: Pour a can of Coca-Cola into the toilet bowl and
…….Let the “real thing” sit for one hour, then flush clean. The
citric acid in Coke removes stains from vitreous china.

4. To remove rust spots from chrome car bumpers: Rub the bumper with a
crumpled-up piece of Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil dipped in Coca-Cola.

5. To clean corrosion from car battery terminals: Pour a can of
Coca-Cola over the terminals to bubble away the corrosion.

6. To loosen a rusted bolt: Applying a cloth soaked in Coca-Cola to
the rusted bolt for several minutes.

7. To bake a moist ham: Empty a can of Coca-Cola into the baking pan,
wrap the ham in aluminum foil, and bake. Thirty minutes before the ham
is finished, Remove the foil, allowing the drippings to mix with the
Coke for a sumptuous brown gravy.

8. To remove grease from clothes: Empty a can of coke into a load of
greasy clothes, add detergent, And run through a regular cycle. The
Coca-Cola will help loosen grease stains. It will also clean road haze
from your windshield.

FYI: 1. The active ingredient in Coke is phosphoric acid. Its Ph is
2.8. It will dissolve a nail in about 4 days.

2. To carry Coca-Cola syrup (the concentrate) the commercial truck
must use the Hazardous material place cards reserved for Highly
corrosive materials.

3. The distributors of coke have been using it to clean the engines of
their trucks for about 20 years!

Still Want To Drink Up?

(Got MILK?) Or better yet, pure, clean WATER

=======================================

Subject: Proof is in the water…city stops adding fluride…
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:06:42 EDT
From: PLANETNEWS@aol.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
PLANETNEWS broadcast…
Proof is in the water
Bishopville to stop adding fluoride to water
By MATT SCHAFER
Item Staff Writer
June 25, 2001

BISHOPVILLE – Water – it runs from every spigot, every faucet, every shower
head. And in Bishopville, it soon will become more natural.
At the end of June, Bishopville will discontinue adding fluoride to its
water, a practice that started more than 30 years ago.

The American Dental Association began promoting adding fluoride to town
water supplies to fight tooth loss. But because there has been data showing
fluoride both harms and helps teeth, controversy has swirled about the
mineral.

Mike Deas, the Bishopville utility director, got curious one day and started
studying its effects.

“I started to do some research, and I started to read all these things where
fluoride could be dangerous,” Deas said.”I started thinking, what if 20
years from now, it turns out that fluoride is harmful, and we didn’t stop
using it? What would they think of us?”

Needed by the body in trace amounts, fluoride helps the body retain calcium
required for bone and tooth development. But research, Deas found, pointed
to long-term problems and diseases resulting from drinking water containing
fluoride.

Some studies show a link between fluoridation and hip fractures. One study
shows a 5 percent increase in cancers in communities that add fluoride to
the water.

Deas said he was braced for backlash when the decision was announced, but he
hasn’t received one phone call or visit. The state Department of Health and
Environmental Control has no official opinion and allows towns and water
companies to make their own decision on fluoride.

“There is no requirement that anyone use it,” said Ronny Rentz, the director
for DHEC’s Wateree District. “I don’t know what the general feeling is, to
be honest.”

The South Carolina Board of Dentistry has never issued an opinion on
fluoride use, either.

The Item contacted both dentists in Bishopville, and both declined to
comment.

Also, several European countries including France, Germany, Austria and
Luxembourg either never used fluoride or have stopped using it.

Locally, Sumter uses fluoride while Manning never has added it.

“The only thing we add to our water is chlorine for disinfectant,’ said
Rubin Hardy, public works director for Manning.

Al Harris, director of public services for Sumter, doesn’t plan on getting
rid of fluoride any time soon.

“There’s some controversy on it as it is with any chemical; but right now,
we plan to probably leave it in for a while,” Harris said.

The American Dental Association has maintained that fluoride is a key
component of dental care.

The ADA cites study after study that shows that adding fluoride to the water
supply is an effective means of helping tooth growth in poorer communities.

Still, Deas said he believes the people of Bishopville could be better
served by fluoride through other sources.

While the most common source of fluoride is water, it is also in meats such
as liver and kidneys; fish and seafood, including canned sardines; and
apples, grape juice, eggs and tea.

Additionally, much of the fluoride Bishopville adds to the water gets
returned to the environment. Once in the environment, it is considered a
contaminant and has to be regulated.

Deas estimates that less than one-tenth of a percent of Bishopville’s water
is actually consumed. Lee County has several industries and farms that use
water for irrigation and industrial purposes.

After reviewing the situation, Deas has come to one conclusion.

“If they could prove we knew it was harmful and didn’t do anything about it,
the lawsuits could wipe out a town like this,” he said.

END

Use of Sodium Fluoride

for mass behavioral control in Nazi Germany which is now being carried out in the USA.

It is a matter of record that sodium fluoride has been used for behavior control of populations. 

In an “Address in Reply to the Governor’s Speech to Parliament”,  Mr. Harley Rivers Dickinson, Liberal Party Member of the Victorian Parliament for South Barwon, Australia [In Australia, parliamentarian Mr. Harley Dickenson raised the issue in the Victorian Legislative council, which is recorded in the official Hansard report on August 12th, 1987] made a statement on the historical use of fluorides for behavior control. 

Mr. Dickinson reveals that,

“At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent Charles Elliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany. While there, he was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff. 

“This scheme was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water. In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.

“Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual’s power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him.

“Both the Germans and the Russians added fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile.”

It is interesting that Dr. George Estabrooks, an advisor to the United States Government on hypnotism and psychological behavior control, later became chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate was and remains today the most ardent producer and advocate for fluoridated toothpaste. The use of chemicals by the government to modify behavior of select population groups is not new. During the first two World Wars, bromides were administered to service men to dim the libido in an attempt to inhibit forays into local bordellos.

Today, in Australia, the military fluoridates the drinking water of the soldiers, ostensibly to protect the teeth. However, since the mythical ability of fluorides “to prevent tooth decay” only exists for those under the age of 12, it is certain that the real purpose is less altruistic. In volume one of Matrix III, we discussed the role of Alcoa Aluminum in the production of fluoride, the role of Alcoa lawyer Oscar Ewing, who eventually gained control of what was to become the United States Public Health Service, his promotion of fluoridation and the use of advertising and false propaganda in an attempt to sell water fluoridation to an unsuspecting public. Interestingly, it turns out that Alcoa transferred its sodium fluoride production technology to Germany in 1939 under the Alted Agreement, and Dow Chemical Company transmitted its experience and technology to Germany during the same period.

So, we have the U.S. transmitting technology to Germany before the war that allows Germany to experiment on select elements of the European population, and then after the war Nazi scientists and the results of experiments are brought back to the United States under Operation Paperclip. Curious, isn’t it? 

A little research turned up the fact that I.G. Farben developed organophosphate nerve agents, Zyklon B cyanide-based extermination gas used on the Jews during the war, and many other interesting substances. I.G. Farben, financially supported by the United States, was the first to develop and process heroin and cocaine. They also developed fluorinated nerve gases Sarin and Soman. Farben had many interconnections with companies in the United States and Britain. Consult the illustrative chart in this book. 

In a letter abstracted from Fluoridation and Lawlessness, published by the Committee for Mental Health and National Security (with obvious implications) from the aforementioned Charles Perkins, U.S. appointed post-war head of I.G. Farben, to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, October 2, 1954, we read the following:

 ”We are told by the fanatical ideologists who are advocating the fluoridation of the water supplies in this country that their purpose is to reduce the incidence of tooth decay in children, and it is the plausibility of this excuse, plus the gullibility of the public and the cupidity of public officials that is responsible for the present spread of artificial water fluoridation in this country. 

“However – and I want to make this very definite and positive – the real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children’s teeth. If this were the real reason, there are many ways in which it could be done which are much easier, cheaper and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination, control and loss of liberty.” 

Furthermore, 

“When the Nazis decided to go into Poland, the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans and personnel. The scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plans to Communize the world. I say this in all earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorides. Any person who drinks artificially fluoridated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically.”

When Major General Racey Jordan was in charge of the massive lend-lease airlift operations from Great Falls, Montana to Russia, via Alaska, he queried the trans-shipment of considerable amounts of sodium fluoride. He was told frankly that it was to put into the drinking water of the prisoner of war camps to take away their will to resist. It is also interesting that former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who has a background in academic chemistry, initiated a program involving astronomical expenditures of UK revenue on a fluoridation campaign in Northern Ireland. 

____________________________________________________________________

The Truth About ‘Fluoride’

http://www.greaterthings.com/Lexicon/F/Fluoride.htm

(or what every Mother should know)

by A. True Ott
tott@mountainwest.net
© August 2000

See also | Feedback

Fluoride used by Nazis to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas — poisons of choice for tyrant rats.

First of all, it needs to be stated that the ‘substance’ referred to as ‘Fluoride’ is a misnomer – there is no such substance listed in the periodic chart of the elements, nor in the prestigious CRC handbook, nor in the sacred ‘bible’ of the pharmaceutical industry – the illustrious ‘Merck Index’. Instead, we find a GAS called Fluorine – and from the use of this gas in various industries such as aluminum manufacturing and the nuclear industry -certain toxic by-products are created which have ‘captured’ fluorine molecules. One such toxic, poisonous ‘by-product’ is called sodium Fluoride – which according to the Merck Index is primarily used as rat and cockroach poison and is also the active ingredient in most toothpastes and as an “additive to drinking water”. But sadly, there is much more to this sordid tale.

Did you know that sodium Fluoride is also one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin Nerve Gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUORIDE) – (Yes, folks the same Sarin Nerve Gas that terrorists released on a crowded Japanese subway train!). 

Let me repeat: the truth the American public needs to understand is the fact that Sodium Fluoride is nothing more (or less) than a hazardous waste by-product of the nuclear and aluminum industries. In addition to being the primary ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, it is also a main ingredient in anesthetic, hypnotic, and psychiatric drugs as well as military NERVE GAS! Why, oh why then is it allowed to be added to the toothpastes and drinking water of the American people?

Historically, this substance was quite expensive for the worlds’ premier chemical companies to dispose of – but in the 50′s and 60′s – Alcoa and the entire aluminum industry – with a vast overabundance of the toxic waste – SOMEHOW sold the FDA and our government on the insane (but highly profitable) idea of buying this poison at a 20,000% markup and then injecting it into our water supply as well as into the nation’s toothpastes and dental rinse. Yes that’s right folks, a 20,000% markup. Consider also that when sodium Fluoride is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink ½ of one percent of the total water supply, the hazardous chemical literally ‘goes down the drain’ and voila – the chemical industry has not only a free hazardous waste disposal system – but we have also PAID them handsomely in the process!!

Independent scientific evidence over the past 50 plus years has shown that sodium fluoride shortens our life span, promotes various cancers and mental disturbances, and most importantly, makes humans stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one neat little package. There is increasing evidence that aluminum in the brain is a causative factor in Alzheimer’s Disease, and evidence points towards sodium fluoride’s strong affinity to ‘bond’ with this dangerous aluminum (remember it is a by-product of aluminum manufacturing) and also it has the ability to ‘trick’ the blood-brain barrier by imitating the hydrogen ion thus allowing this chemical access to brain tissue.

Honest scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on sodium fluoride’s mega-bucks propaganda campaign have consistently been given a large dose of professional ‘black-listing’ and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never have received the ink they deserve in the national press. Just follow the money to find the ‘control’ and you will find prominent American families to be prominent ‘players’ in the scandal. In 1952 a slick PR campaign rammed the concept of ‘fluoridation’ through our Public Health departments and various dental organizations. This slick campaign was more akin to a highly emotional “beer salesman convention” instead of the objective, scientifically researched program that it should have been. It has continued in the same vein right up to the present day – and now sodium fluoride use has now become ‘usual and customary’.

To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of fluoridation comes up. You need to ask yourself, “Is this particular response based on EMOTIONS born of TRADITION, or is it truly unbiased and based instead on thoroughly researched objectivity?” There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific “know-it-all” emotions attached to the topic of ‘sodium fluoride’ usage – but I personally have yet to find even ONE objective, double blind study that even remotely links sodium fluoride to healthy teeth at ANY AGE. Instead, I hear and read such blather as “9 out of 10 DENTISTS recommend ‘fluoride’ toothpaste” etc. etc. etc. Let me reiterate: truly independent (unattached to moneyed vested interest groups) scientists who’ve spent a large portion of their lives studying and working with this subject have been hit with a surprising amount of unfair character assassinations from strong vested-interest groups who reap grand profits from the public’s ignorance as well as from their illnesses. (Just follow the money!)

Do you have diabetes and/or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans with diabetes. If it is true that diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 11 million people are at much higher risk drinking fluoridated water because they will receive a much deadlier dose because of their need for higher than normal water consumption. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which of course is the primary means in which fluoride (or any other toxic chemical) is eliminated from the body. Does it not make sense that these people shouldn’t drink fluoridated water at all? Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where ill kidney patients on dialysis machines died because they ingested relatively small amounts of SODIUM FLUORIDE from unwittingly drinking the ‘fluoridated’ city water supply? Will adequate warnings be given to people with weak kidneys, or will the real cause of such deaths be ‘covered up’ in the name of ‘domestic tranquility’?

Concerning the ‘practice’ of putting sodium fluoride into drinking water, where did this insanity begin and WHO tried it first? From personal research, the very first occurrence of purposefully putting sodium fluoride into drinking water was in the German ghettos and in Nazi Germany’s infamous prison camps. The Gestapo you see had little concern about sodium fluoride’s ‘supposed’ effect on children’s teeth; instead, their reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to STERILIZE HUMANS and force the people in their concentration camps into calm, bovine, submission. (See for reference: “The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben” written by Joseph Borkin.) Kind of shocking isn’t it folks!! Ah, but it gets even better.

The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from a research chemist by the name of Charles Perkins. He writes:

“I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, “The Truth about Water Fluoridation”, to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. In the 1930′s Hitler and the German Nazis envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.

“Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual’s power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient and cost-effective light lobotomy? --- Ott].

“The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children’s teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.”

“When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go to Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plans to communize the world.”

“I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years’ research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine — any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically.”

Signed: CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October, 1954.
______________________________________________________________

Another letter needs to be quoted at length as well to help corroborate Mr. Perkin’s testimony. This letter was written by a brilliant (and objectively honest) scientist named Dr. E.H. Bronner. Dr. Bronner was a nephew of the great Albert Einstein, served time in a WWII prison camp and wrote the following letter printed in the Catholic Mirror, Springfield, MA, January 1952:

“It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts are among the ‘next’ on the agenda of the water poisoners.

“There is a sinister network of subversive agents, Godless intellectual parasites, working in our country today whose ramifications grow more extensive, more successful and more alarming each new year and whose true objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic —- from within if they can, according to their plan — for their own possession.”

“The tragic success they have already attained in their long siege to destroy the moral fiber of American life is now one of their most potent footholds towards their own ultimate victory over us.”

“Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration. As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22 years 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on my years of practical experience in the health food and chemical field, let me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national suicide. DON’T DO IT!!”

“Even in very small quantities, sodium fluoride is a deadly poison to which no effective antidote has been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the most effective rat-killer. Sodium Fluoride is entirely different from organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and provided by nature, in God’s great providence and love, to build and strengthen our bones and our teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assailable by the human body; whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully water soluble. The body refuses to assimilate it.”

“Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation by conscientious, patriotic research chemists, and actual medical experience, have both revealed that instead of preserving or promoting ‘dental health’, fluoridated drinking water destroys teeth before adulthood and after, by the destructive mottling and other pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also creates many other very grave pathological conditions in the internal organisms of bodies consuming it. How then can it be called a ‘health plan’? What’s behind it?”

“That any so-called ‘Doctors’ would persuade a civilized nation to add voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable. It is the height of criminal insanity!”

“No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin’s ‘Last Will’ and Hitler’s Mein Kampf: “America we shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within.”

“Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of water poisoning by fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other countries. Sodium Fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless, tasteless; no antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete extermination of rats.”

“Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide, or quick national liquidation. It is criminal insanity ——- treason!!”

Signed: Dr. E.H. Bronner, Research Chemist, Los Angeles

Apparently, the public outcry by Dr. Bronner and others precluded the fluoridation of public water systems for a season – but soon thereafter, the Food and Drug Administration allowed this deadly poison to be put in ‘toothpaste’, and our dentists were systematically brainwashed into providing ‘fluoride treatments’ to their many patients. Of course, today many major metropolitan areas have a minimum of 1 parts per million sodium fluoride systematically added to their water supply and more areas are seeking to add this poison every year. Add to this the fact that bottling companies (soft drinks, juices, etc.) use fluoridated water to make their products – is it any wonder that people can no longer think clearly and ask pertinent questions of their elected and ecclesiastical leaders? Is it also a mystery why so many top Nazi mind control scientists were brought to America by the CIA and their infamous ‘Operation Paper Clip’?

If you believe all of this is ‘just a coincidence’ – go ahead and keep brushing your teeth with your ‘fluoride’ toothpaste and sucking on your sodium fluoride enhanced Coke or Pepsi product – for ignorance truly is bliss and you truly deserve what you get.

Mothers, if your little ones are having trouble concentrating at home or in school, or have been diagnosed as ‘attention deficit’ – perhaps you would be well advised to look for the culprit (and the solution to the problem) no further than your home medicine cabinet (your tube of toothpaste) and your friendly neighborhood school’s water fountain!!

Jehovah’s Witnesses oppose mind control because it is Witchcraft and we do not knowingly consume poison. We try to only use bottled water and brush our teeth with salt that has no aluminum added. Go to WWW.WATCHTOWER.ORG and fill out the online form so you can be contacted by those who will help educate you to protect you from wolves in sheep’s clothing. Read Amos chapter 4 in the Holy scriptures and you will see that Yehovah (Jehovah) the Almighty Father gave His people cleaness of teeth. They were exorted to return to Him. So if you are relying on Witchcraft (fluoride chemicals) for cleaness of teeth then you should return to the Almighty Father because he can give you cleaness of teeth without the need to use alchemy which is witchcraft. The Hebrews were certainly not using fluoridated toothpaste or drinking fluoridated water for their teeth health. Yehovah was the source of their clean teeth not witchcraft. If you are relying on witchcraft you need to come back to the Almighty Father Yehovah.

END

&&&

Psychiatry Kills Documented Proof Psychiatric Drugs Shorten Life Span Version 2.012m By Shemuwel Antoine Moser Also see: This and Thisfor information proving the USA is medicating people through their water supply. No longer is involuntary drugging only a concern to those locked away in an institution. “Laws quietly passed in 36 US states now allow the government to court order you to take psychiatric drugs, even though you’re law abiding and living at home, in your own neighborhood. These court orders are known as “Involuntary Outpatient Commitment” (IOC). Typically, you’d be required to report to your community mental health center every few weeks for a “depot injection” of a “neuroleptic drug” such as Prolixin or Haldol in your butt. These drugs are time released [in a base of oil and injected intramuscularly], so that the super-powerful impact lasts weeks until your next injection. The court orders can be routinely re-approved, so these injections can go on for years.”  Disclaimer: Many of the statements that follow in this report (Namely the effect that neuroleptic drugs have on the duration of life span and sense of well being.) have not been investigated or evaluated by the FDA (so they claim) nor do they care to. The FDA does not even require animal studies to determine how these drugs affect the duration of life span which is shocking considering that the FDA is supposed to be charged with protecting the American people. The conclusions in this report are based on available facts, for which a positive assertion can be made by putting the information together so that the true nature of these drugs can be established. This information is what the FDA, psychiatrists, and the pharmaceutical companies do NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW. This information is both shocking and scandalous and reveals a probable eugenics conspiracy so be warned. The common people that are affected by this are not supposed to be smart enough to understand and figure it out, but I have. The purpose of this report is to prove conclusively that neuroleptic drugs (Also know as antipsychotics or antipsychotic drugs, tranquilizers, psychotropics or psychotrophics, or psychotropic drugs or psychotrophic drugs) shorten life span, destroy sexual function and fertility, take away sense of well being which can precipitate suicide and or violent behavior etc. This will be established in this discussion through a rudimentary explanation of some facets of biochemistry and by quoting reputable sources. Also to empower the people who may be affected by this with knowledge that they can use to defend their rights and help overturn these laws as unconstitutional and as basic human rights violations. Also to help educate people who have friends and or family members who are affected by this and to provide understandable information to the general public who are being denied the facts. These drugs are not just given to those labeled as “schizophrenic” or said to be “psychotic” or have “psychosis” or have “schizophrenia”. These drugs are often given to people with depression, manic depression or bipolar disorder, mania, Alzheimer’s patients or those suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease, people with brain damage or head injuries, retarded children and adults, many children with Attention Deficit Disorder or ADD or ADHD and children and teenagers who simply have a hot temper (which ironically the drugs will make worse) as well as many other things. If you are unsure whether a certain drug is a neuroleptic or not then here is a list of many names for neuroleptic drugs. List of neuroleptic drug names: Chlorpromazine, (Brand names are as follows; Chlor-PZ, Klorazine, Promachlor, Promapar, Sonazine, Thorazine, Chlorprom, Chlor-Promanyl and Largactil) Fluphenazine, (Brand names are as follows; Permitil, Prolixin, Modecate, Moditen) Mesoridazine Besylate, (Brand name is Serentil) Perphenazine, (Brand names are as follows; Trilafon, Etrafon, Triavil, Phenazine and Etrafon) Prochlorperazine, (Brand names are as follows; Compazine and Stemetil) Promazine Hydrocloride, (Brand name Sparine) Thioridazine, (Brand names are Mellaril, Novoridazine and Thioril) Trifuoperazine, (Brand names are as follows; Stelazine, Clinazine, Novaflurazine, Pentazine, Terfluzine and Triflurin) Clozapine, (Brand named Clozaril, in Germany called Leponex) Haloperadol, (Brand name Haldol) Loxapine, (Brand name Loxitane) Pimozide (Brand name is Orap) Thiothixene, (Brand name Navane) Risperidone (Brand name Risperdal), Zyprexa (Brand name is Olanzapine), Sertindole, Ziprasidone (Brand name Geodon or Geodone was planned to be named Zeldox), Amperozide, Remoxipride, Melperone, Zotepine, Isofloxythepin, Setoperone, Perospirone, Quetiapine (Brand name Seroquel)Methotrimeprazine (Brand name Nozinan or Nosinan, called Levomepromazin in Germany), Zuclopenthixol (Brand name Clopixol), Zuclopenthixol Acetate (Brand name Clopixol Acuphase), Amisulpride (Brand name Solian). Also the antidepressant drug Sertraline (Brand name Zoloft) is molecularly indistinguishable from that of the neuroleptics and has even been tried as a neuroleptic. This list contains generic names and many brand names used in the USA and Canada. This list is by no means comprehensive. The compulsory administration of neuroleptic drugs by order of the state is not only a violation of one’s right to liberty but also the right to life and the pursuit of happiness. The right to life because neuroleptics shorten life span and the precipitous onset of degenerative disease that these drugs induce. The right to the pursuit of happiness because neuroleptics take away sense of well being. The right to liberty because of not being able to make ones own decision regarding the administration of these drugs and the right to freedom of religious worship when the administration of these drugs precludes their use when it violates one’s religious values and convictions. For legitimate religious grounds to refuse these drugs see Footnote C below. The compulsory administration of neuroleptics because of state order is a violation to one’s right to life because the drugs not only shorten life span but also make the quality of one’s life inferior due to the precipitous onset of degenerative disease that these drugs induce. This is not a statement unsupported by fact. Let me now explain. Dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine all belong to the class of neurotransmitters called catecholamines. Catecholamines are synthesized from the amino acids L-Phenylalanine and L-Tyrosine. This is the complete step by step synthesis of these substances: L-Phenylalanine –> L-Tyrosine — > L-DOPA –> Dopamine –> Norepinephrine –> Epinephrine. L-Tyrosine is also converted to the thyroid hormone thyroxine by the thyroid and dopamine is also converted to the skin pigment melanin. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that is synthesized from the amino acid L-Tryptophan. Melatonin the sleep-inducing hormone produced by the pineal gland is synthesized from Serotonin. Here is the complete step by step synthesis of these substances. L-Tryptophan –> 5-Hydroxy – L-Tryptophan (5-HTP) –> 5-Hydroxy – L-Tryptomine (Serotonin) –> Melatonin (O-methyl – N – Acetylserotonin). The main function of neuroleptics is blockage of catecholamines in the brain. They have greatest affinity for dopamine receptors and to a lesser extent norepinephrine and epinephrine. (A future report of mine will prove that these drugs destroy dopaminergic receptors. See Footnote B for a simplified explanation of this.) Neuroleptics block dopamine receptors in the brain with generally greatest affinity for D1 and D2 receptors. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter and a receptor is the “keyhole” which dopamine like a key, plugs into for neuronal communication. There are many other neurotransmitters, all with their respective “key holes” or receptors. But the analogy of a “keyhole” is insufficient because there are different receptors that fit their corresponding neurotransmitter. Different sides of the neurotransmitters will fit into the different types of receptors. It is like the fact that a puzzle piece has different sides with different shapes. It’s the different sides of the neurotransmitter that fit into their corresponding receptors. Since these neurotransmitter molecules are three dimensional in shape, the different sides of its shape fit the different receptors. When a dopaminergic neuron fires, it releases dopamine into the synapse from vesicles within the presynaptic dendrite. The synapse is a gap or space between dendrites, which are branches off the neuron and a presynaptic dendrite is the dendrite that releases the neurotransmitter. Think of this gap as if it were the gap of a spark plug in an automobile except it is not electricity that fires within this gap it is a chemical messenger; a neurotransmitter. This dopamine then binds with dopamine receptors on postsynaptic dendrites, which are the dendrites on the other end of the gap that are the recipient of the neurotransmitter that branch off another neuron. The neurotransmitter then floats within the synapse and through quantum mechanics is drawn to the postsynaptic receptors on the end of the other dendrite where they bind activating ion pumps. Ion pumps are tubular molecular machines made up of amino acid building blocks, which is a protein. Ion pumps are also called channels. These receptors surrounding the circumference of the ion pump cause this ion pump to dilate when activated by the stimulating neurotransmitter dopamine which allows electrolytes to pass through the cell membrane causing an electrical shift in polarity which causes the neuron to fire an electrical charge down its axon. When the electrical charge reaches the other end it causes dopamine to be released from that neuron’s presynaptic dendrites and the process continues in a cascade. The neurotransmitter Serotonin is an inhibiting neurotransmitter that mediates the expression of the stimulating neurotransmitter Dopamine. There are third dendrites from neurons of the serotoninergic system utilizing this inhibiting neurotransmitter serotonin that act as variable switches at different points within the dopaminergic system. If serotonin is being released into a synapse from a third dendrite where dopamine had just been released, this inhibiting neurotransmitter then acts as a chemical straight jacket by binding to serotoninergic receptors on these same ion pumps which mediates the degree to which dopamine will cause this neuron to fire its electrical charge. This is the simplified relationship dopamine has with serotonin. There are many other neurotransmitters both stimulatory and inhibitory that act in many complex ways that have yet to be understood by science up until this point in time. (For instance the neurotransmitter GABA (4-AminoButyric Acid) is another inhibiting neurotransmitter that has a mediating effect on the stimulating neurotransmitter Glutamate and also has a mediating affect on the stimulating neurotransmitter dopamine in some dopaminergic pathways. The seizure drug Valproic acid or Valproate (brand name Depakote or Depakane) is often prescribed for “mania” or “manic psychosis” and Bi Polar disorder also known as manic depression. Depakote causes an increase in GABA in the brain by inhibiting the two enzymes that are involved in breaking down this neurotransmitter.) Many newer neuroleptic drugs bind with both dopamine and serotoninergic receptors. These serotoninergic receptors are activated continuously by these drugs while at the same time blocking normal serotoninergic function, greatly inhibiting dopaminergic expression. Neuroleptic drugs block dopamine receptors in all areas of the brain for the types of receptors they have affinity for. Antagonism of a type of receptor is not neurological pathway specific and antagonizes all receptors of the type it has affinity for without regard for the actual function of the neurological pathways they affect. Most dopaminergic function takes place within the limbic system of the brain. (See the article in the magazine called “American Scientist” March-April 1996 Volume 84 called “Reward Deficiency Syndrome” on pages 134 and 135 for an explanation of the limbic system and how it relates to the “reward cascade” which I will discuss later in this report. Click Here for the Article Online The limbic system of the brain contains a structure called the hypothalamus. This area of the brain called the hypothalamus is responsible for the regulation of pituitary hormones by the release of controlling hormones. The pituitary is a small gland located at the base of the brain just under the hypothalamus. The pituitary in turn regulates all other bodily hormones. See the book “Facts and Comparisons” III W. Port Plaza, Suite 300 St. Louis MO. USA 63146-3098 (telephone 314-216-2100 or 1-800-223-0554). (Note this book is currently used by Rite Aid Pharmacies in the USA as a reference aid and it is a loose bound updatable book. The updatable section called “Antipsychotic Agents” is (c) 1990) This book states under “antipsychotic agents” that “Antipsychotics block postsynaptic dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia, hypothalamus, limbic system, brain stem and medulla… The phenothiazines appear to act at both D1 and D2 receptors, whereas haloperidol appears to act primarily at D2 receptors.” (“D” here stands for dopamine and each different receptor is numbered.) Also see the book “Drug Info for the Health Care Professional 17th edition volume I 1997″ by Authority of the United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc. (c) 1997 by The United States Pharmacopeial Convention Inc. printed by Rand McNally, Taunton, Massachusetts. Distributed by USPC 12601 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, Maryland USA. This book states on page 2321 in the section on phenothiazines under the subheading “Mechanism of action/Effect” that neuroleptics “block postsynaptic mesolimbic dopaminergic receptors in the brain… and depress the release of hypothalamic and hypophyseal hormones.” Hypophyseal hormones are pituitary hormones. One hormone the hypothalamus produces is TRH (thyrotropin releasing hormone or thyrotrophin releasing hormone). This hormone when released by the hypothalamus stimulates the release of the pituitary hormone TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone also called thyroidea stimulating hormone, thyreotropic hormone, threotrophin hormone, TTH, thyrotropin, thyrotrophin). TSH in turn when released by the pituitary stimulates the production or release of the thyroid hormone thyroxine which is abbreviated T4 (four because this is the number of iodine atoms the hormone contains). Thyroxine is the hormone that regulates bodily metabolism. Lowering metabolism by lowering the body’s capacity to produce thyroxine shortens life span. See the book “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones 2nd Edition” by Roman J. Kutsky, Ph.D. published by Van Nostrand Reinhold Company New York (c)1973. On page 369 in this book under “Essentially for Life” it states “Deficiency” of thyroxine “in adult shortens life span”. Also on page 367 of this book in paragraph three it states that the capacity to produce this hormone is associated with aging. And on page 371 under “Deficiency Symptoms” where it states among other things that deficiency of thyroxine causes “Decreased BMR” (BMR is the abbreviation of Basal Metabolic Rate), “Increase in blood lipid and cholesterol” (lipid is fat). Also see the book “Fats that Heal Fats that Kill” (c) 1986,1993 by Udo Erasmus Ph.D. and published by Alive Books, Fraser Park Drive, Burnaby BC Canada V5J 5B9. On page 37 of this book at the top of the page it states that “Decreased metabolic rate is also involved in aging, arthritic diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular disorders, and is another general symptom of degenerative diseases.” Published by Alive Books, 7436 Fraser Park Drive, Burnaby BC Canada V5J 5B9. (c) 1986,1993. Exposure to cold temperatures will stimulate the production of TRH by means of dopaminergic neurons within the hypothalamus which stimulates the production of TSH by the pituitary which in turn stimulates the production of T4 by the thyroid which raises metabolism and body temperature to keep the body warm and to regulate the burning of fat and carbohydrates as fuel. The increased body temperature from a good metabolism stimulates the production of the anabolic hormone testosterone and anabolism keeps the body rejuvenated and fights aging. As I have shown interfering with this process lowers metabolism and shortens life span. Lowered metabolism causes weight gain and according to the American Medical Association’s own statistics the more overweight a person is the more likely that person will suffer a premature death. See the chapter called “Drugs Used in Obesity” starting on page 2439 of the book “Drug Evaluations Annual 1995″ by the American Medical Association. Neuroleptic drugs suppress the production of T4 thereby lowering metabolism by suppressing the release of the hypothalamic hormone TRH. Metabolism is the main mechanism that promotes thermogenesis. Thermogenesis is the production of body heat from the burning of fatty acids and glucose when body heat is lost due to exposure to cold temperatures and simply the continuous normal loss of body heat. It is T4 in the end that is responsible for helping to generate body heat that is lost and to keep the bodies metabolism going which includes both catabolism the burning of fat and glucose as fuel and anabolism the building up of the body through the maintenance and manufacture of replacement biochemical substances and structure which fights aging. Metabolism is both catabolic and anabolic. Although T4 technically is a catabolic hormone catabolism and anabolism are interconnected in a continues cycle so catabolism through T4 promotes anabolism. A healthy well nourished body will not burn protein as fuel. Because of the neuroleptics or antipsychotics actions on the hypothalamus suppressing the release of TRH the pituitary doesn’t produce as much TSH and in turn the Thyroid doesn’t produce as much T4. See the book again “Facts and Comparisons”. This book states under “Antipsychotic Agents” that neuroleptics “depress various components of the reticular activating system which is involved in the control of basal metabolic rate and body temperature, wakefulness, vasomotor tone, emesis, and hormonal balance.” Also see the book “Cecil Textbook of Medicine 19th edition” edited by James B. Wyngaarden, MD, Lloyd H. Smith, Jr., MD and J. Claude Bennett, MD published by W.B. Saunders Company, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. Philadelphia London, Toronto, Montreal, Sydney, Tokyo. This book states on page 1569 under “The Pathogenesis of Fever” under the subheading “Initiation of Fever” that “…thermoregulation originate[s] in the hypothalamus” and “… neuroleptic drugs are capable of disrupting the hypothalamic response and may interfere with the development of fever. Among these, [the neuroleptic] phenothiazines are the best known for their poikilothermic effect. These agents are not specifically active in febrile states; rather, they act to disable thermoregulatory mechanisms at all times following their administration.” Also see the book called “AHFS 96 Drug Information” published by American Hospital Formulary Service and “published by the authority of the board of directors of the American Hospital Formulary Service. This book states on page 1617 at the bottom right of the page; “Phenothiazines have a poikilothermic effect, interfering with temperature regulation in the hypothalamus: depending on environmental conditions, hypothermia or hyperthermia can occur.” Hypothermia is under heating of the body and hyperthermia is overheating of the body. Many people forced to take neuroleptics have died of heatstroke. See footnote A at the end of this thesis. Again see the book “Drug Info for the Health Care Professional 17th edition volume I 1997″ on page 2321 in the section on phenothiazines under the subheading “Mechanism of action/Effect” that neuroleptics “block postsynaptic mesolimbic dopaminergic receptors in the brain… and depress the release of hypothalamic and hypophyseal hormones.” These effects are the result of blockage or destruction of dopamine receptors within the hypothalamus. Suppression of this hormonal system is one of the main mechanisms in which neuroleptics shorten life span. Many of the quotes are obtained from statements concerning the class of neuroleptics called phenothiazines but since all neuroleptics block or destroy dopamine receptors they all produce the same undesirable symptoms. For instance this quote from the book “Drug Info for the Health Care Professional” page 1564 under the heading of “haloperidol” a neuroleptic in a class by its self; “[The] Pharmacological effects of haloperidol are similar to the effects of… phenothiazines”. All neuroleptics block or destroy dopamine receptors so therefore all suppress hypothalamic hormone secretion. Now again see the book “Fats that Heal Fats that Kill” on page 37 at the top of the page where it states that “Decreased metabolic rate is also involved in aging, arthritic diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular disorders, and is another general symptom of degenerative disease.” On page 191 of the same book at the top of the page it states; “The brightness of the fire is the rate at which our body produces energy our metabolic rate. For continued good health, it is vital that the fire of life burns brightly.” Decreased metabolic rate not only leads to obesity but also to degenerative disease. Not only do neuroleptic drugs shorten life span but also make life inferior due to inducing the onset of degenerative disease. See the book “Facts and Comparisons” again under “antipsychotic agents” and note that one of the neuroleptic drugs is sarcastically named “thioridazine” (Brand names are Mellaril, Novoridazine and Thioril) denoting the fact that these drugs suppress the production of the thyroid hormone thyroxine or T4. “Thio” being a grammatical construct from the beginning of the word thyroxine and also the beginning of the word iodine, which is the mineral that this hormone contains, followed by the word rid in the middle of this construct denoting the fact that these drugs get rid of or suppress the release of this hormone. In my opinion this reveals the utter contempt the designers of these drugs have for those labeled “mentally ill”. Also the question must be asked, why would a drug be named after a life span shortening “side effect” unless that was its sole intended purpose? This also reveals that the designers of these drugs knew the biological effects of these drugs even before they were pushed on the public. Also notice that one of the neuroleptics is called “mesoridazine besylate” (Brand name is Serentil). Meso means middle which is where the limbic system is located in the brain. Since neuroleptic drugs shorten life span, the compulsory administration of these drugs by court order of the state is a violation of one’s right to life. Again see the book “Drug Info for the Health Care Professional 17th edition volume I 1997″ on page 2321 which states that neuroleptics “block postsynaptic mesolimbic dopaminergic receptors in the brain … [and] … depress the release of hypothalamic and hypophyseal hormones.” Again hypophyseal hormones are hormones produced by the pituitary gland. Because hypothalamic hormones control the release of pituitary hormones this is the reason pituitary hormones are suppressed. Most hypothalamic hormones are releasing hormones. One hypothalamic hormone which is an inhibiting hormone is prolactin release-inhibiting hormone (abbreviated PRIH also called PIF, RIH, prolactin inhibiting factor or prolactin inhibiting hormone, PIH, prolactostatin). Since neuroleptic drugs suppress the release of this inhibiting hormone then the pituitary is free to secrete abnormal amounts of this female hormone that regulates lactation into the blood stream of both males and females. Most other bodily hormones are suppressed by neuroleptics except for prolactin for this reason. Since phenothiazines were the first neuroleptics used starting with Thorazine and the fact that phenothiazines have been used on more people then all other neuroleptics combined, the affect on hormone production caused by these drugs has been well established. All the other neuroleptics have been designed after what has been learned from the phenothiazines. The level of hypothalamic hormone production is in direct correlation with dopaminergic activity or the ability of the dopaminergic system to function normally without interference. For this reason all neuroleptics that block or destroy dopamine receptors or utilize the serotoninergic system or both will suppress the production of all hypothalamic hormones which in turn suppresses pituitary hormone production and in turn all other bodily hormones. Serotonin is an inhibiting neurotransmitter that mediates the function of the dopaminergic system. Excess serotonin stimulation has the effect of suppressing the dopaminergic system. One neuroleptic called Molindone (brand names Lidone and Moban) utilizes this function by mimicking serotonin. Also this is why antidepressant drugs that raise levels of serotonin cause sexual dysfunction. One “antidepressant” drug Sertraline (Brand name Zoloft) is molecularly indistinguishable from that of the neuroleptics. In fact Zoloft has even been tried as a neuroleptic. Perhaps it’s labeled as an antidepressant just for people who insist that their “problems are just depression”. A man I talked to on the telephone at the FDA told me that Zoloft was so powerful at destroying sexual function that if just one pill is taken by someone with premature ejaculation it will slow him down. But don’t take this man’s word for it. Even the PDR says Zoloft causes sexual dysfunction. Percentage rates of impotence listed in the PDR for various drugs is misleading as only people who were sexually active and not embarrassed to speak about it would even report impotence or sexual dysfunction as a side effect. Every male I have questioned who has been on these drugs has confided in me that these drugs have caused them some type of major sexual problem. See the book “Biochemistry A Case-Oriented Approach fifth edition” by the Department of Biochemistry, The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. Montgomery Rex Ph.D., Thomas Conway Ph.D. and Arthur A. Spector MD (c) 1990 The C.V. Mosby Company. This book states on page 761 that prolactin secretion is increased by “serotonin”. See the book “Facts and Comparisons” again under “antipsychotic agents” under “Carcinogenicity / prolactin secretion:” which states “Neuroleptic drugs elevate prolactin levels which persist during chronic administration.” This is a reference to all neuroleptics, not just phenothiazines. Also see the book again called “Biochemistry A Case-Oriented Approach fifth edition” on page 761 in the seventh paragraph where it states that “Some medications, acting as dopamine antagonist, increase prolactin secretion. Although many drugs of this type exist, the most common are the antipsychotic phenothiazines, such as thorazine.” On page 778 of this same book it states in the first paragraph; “Dopamine is an active compound believed to inhibit prolactin secretion”. Since neuroleptics block or destroy dopamine receptors there is no dopaminergic activity to inhibit prolactin secretion. Going back to page 761 of this same book it sates in the fifth paragraph under “Disorders associated with prolactin” that “Prolactin secretion has a dramatic effect in blocking the pituitary gonadotrophs, and elevated prolactin levels are associated with sexual dysfunction. Hyperprolactinemia before puberty blocks sexual maturation and the pubertal growth spurt. After puberty, hyperprolactinemia is associated with loss of libido and impotence in males and amenorrhea in females.” The gonads are testicles in men and ovaries in women and amenorrea is the abnormal suspension or suppression of menstruation. Hyperprolactinemia is the abnormal excessive production of the female hormone prolactin. One pituitary gonadotroph is luteinizing hormone (abbreviated LH and also called luteotrophin or luteotropin, interstitial cell-stimulating hormone, ICSH, Prolan B, gonadotrophin II or gonadotropin II, metakentrin, corpus luteum-ripening hormone). See the book again “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones” on page 323 under “Deficiency Diseases, Disorders” where it states that deficiency of this hormone causes “Hypogonadism”. (Hypogonadism is the inability of the gonads to perform their function of remaining fertile and producing sex hormones.) Also on this page it states that this hormone is necessary for “reproduction”. Now reference page 327 of this book under “Mode of Action” where it states that this hormone “increases synthesis of steroid hormones (sex hormones) … estradiol (estrogen) … [and] testosterone”. Also here it also states that this hormone “stimulates rupture of follicles in ovary”. (This is so the ova or egg can be released from the ovary.) The other pituitary gonadotroph is follicle stimulating hormone (abbreviated FSH, and also called Follotropin or Follotrophin, Thylakentrin, Prolan A, gonadotrophin I or gonadotrophin I, gametogenic hormone, follicle ripening hormone, gametokinetic hormone). See the book again “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones” on page 330 where it states that this hormone is required for “reproduction”. Also see page 332 under “Deficiency Symptoms” where it states that deficiency of this hormone causes “Decreased gametogenic function and development (nonfunctional)”. (This is just a fancy way of saying that deficiency of this hormone will cause any sperm or ova produced to be genetically incapable of producing offspring or rendering any sperm or ova (eggs) produced “nonfunctional”) Also on this page it states that deficiency of this hormone also causes “Atrophy of the gonads” (atrophy means to waste away), “No maturation of ova, sperm”, “Obesity”, “Decreased libido, potency, hair growth” and “decreased blood levels of estrogen”. (Estrogen is the female sex hormone.) Pituitary gonadotrophs stimulate the production of sex hormones by the gonads. The hypothalamic hormone, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone regulates these pituitary gonadotrophs. (Abbreviated LRH also called LRF, LH-releasing factor or LH-releasing hormone, (LH-RH/FSH-RH), Gonadotropin releasing hormone (abbreviated Gon-RH or GnRH)) This hormone is suppressed by neuroleptics so here is another mechanism by which sex hormone production is inhibited besides the inhibition due to excessive prolactin secretion. Going further on to the sex hormones which neuroleptic drugs inhibit we will learn more about what these drugs do to the body. Estradiol also called estrogen (some other names are female hormone, dihydrotheelin, dihydrofollicular hormone, dihydrofolliculin) “is essential for reproduction and female characteristics. Its chief functions are to maintain and regulate female sex characteristics and behavior. Its chief importance is as the major female sex hormone with its command of female sex development and maintenance of female body characteristics and behavior. …Deficiency conditions include menopause and delayed maturation.” As stated in the book “Hand Book of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones” on page 415. (See footnote D) On page 419 of the book “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones” it states that deficiency of estrogen will cause “Delayed maturation”, “Female accessory and reproductive organs recess” (recess means not to function), “Decreased female behavior pattern”, “Senescence” (means Growing old, aging), and “Menopause”. Here is further proof that neuroleptic drugs program the body to self-destruct, grow old and die and proof that these drugs prevent reproduction. Another female hormone that is stimulated by the hypothalamic hormone, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone through the pituitary hormone luteinizing hormone is progesterone. So therefore neuroleptics also inhibit the production of this hormone as well. On page 423 of the book “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones” it states that progesterone “is indirectly essential for life, since it is a precursor to aldosterone and cortisol, which is essential. Its chief functions are to synergize the actions of estradiol (estrogen) in the female organs, especially during pregnancy. Its importance stems from the fact that it is a precursor to all the steroid hormones and that estradiol (estrogen) requires its presence for many of its actions. …Deficiency conditions [include]… dysfunctional uterine bleeding.” On page 427 under “Deficiency Symptoms” this book states that deficiency of progesterone causes “Termination of pregnancy”, “Decreased production of steroids”, Decreased ovulation”, “Loss of normal cyclic changes” and “Decreased development for implantation and gestation”. This is shocking because neuroleptics are routinely given to pregnant women who commonly have miscarriages and then the prescribing psychiatrists will deny that the drugs were the cause! Now onto the male sex hormone testosterone; Testosterone’s “chief functions are: development and maintenance of the male organs, male sex characteristics, and behavior, as well as stimulation of growth (anabolic), and metabolism of muscles, liver; and kidney. The chief importance of testosterone lies in its major command of male sex development, body characteristics, and behavior. Deficiencies include eunuchoidism, and male hypogonadism. …Testosterone is formed mainly in the testes (interstitial cells) but also in small amounts in the adrenal cortex and the ovary[s].” (From page 431 of the book “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones”) On page 433 of this book it states that testosterone is “essential for reproduction in all (male) vertebrates”. On page 435 of this book it states that deficiency of testosterone will cause, “Involution of accessory organs (prostate, seminal vesicles)”, (involution is the progressive decline or degeneration of normal physiological functioning occurring as a result of the aging process and or decrease in size of an organ.) “Decreased male behavior patterns and libido”, “Decreased secondary sex traits”, “Poor muscle development and function”. Neuroleptic drugs will destroy sexual function in men and produce sterility and will cause musculature to waste away since this is another hormone that neuroleptic drugs suppress the production of. See the web address below that states that risperidone (which is a neuroleptic in a class by itself) will cause “testicular atrophy” because of its “antidopaminergic activity”. All neuroleptics though will cause testicular atrophy due to hormonal suppression. See “Atypical Antipsychotics: A Practical Review” at: Risperidone and do a search on the page for “testicular atrophy”. You must first have a user name and password before accessing this article. It is open to anyone who wants a password. I have received this argument from someone who presented himself as a medical student. He said that dopamine and Prolactin Release-Inhibiting Hormone is one and the same. He also said “of course a drug acting as a dopamine antagonist is going to affect this hormone”. I had to set this man straight. I told him this: “That is not true. Prolactin Release Inhibiting-Hormone (also known as PRIH, Prolactostatin, RIH, Prolactin Inhibiting Factor or hormone, PIF, PIH, PRIF), which is produced by the hypothalamus is a chain of amino acids similar in structure to Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone. This can be found in the book “The Handbook of Vitamins Minerals and Hormones” by Roman J. Kutsky, Ph.D. on page 303, which is a very good biochemistry fact book written in outline form. At the time of publication of this book the exact structure of Prolactin Release-Inhibiting Hormone had not been determined but they knew enough about it that they knew it was similar in structure to Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone which is a chain of amino acids called a peptide which is a small protein. Dopamine is a monoamine derived from the amino acids L-Tyrosine and or L-Phenylalanine. It has been called “Prolactin Inhibiting Factor” but should never be called “hormone” since it is a neurotransmitter. Apparently there is much confusion in the medical field regarding this. I also told this man this; “I can understand your confusion because it has been known for years that Dopamine affected Prolactin, but by the mechanisms pointed out in this report. Dopamine affects the release of all hypothalamic hormones not just Prolactin Release Inhibiting Hormone or Prolactostatin. Here is the exact amino acid sequence of PRIH; Asp – Ala – Glu – Asn – Leu – Ile – Asp – Ser – Phe – Gln – Glu – Ile -Val – Lys – Glu – Val – Gly – Gln – Leu – Ala – Glu – Thr – Gln – Arg – Phe – Glu – Cys – Thr – Thr – His – Gln – Pro – Arg – Ser – Pro – Leu – Arg – Asp – Leu – Lys – Gly – Ala – Leu – Glu – Ser – Leu – Ile – Glu – Glu – Glu – Thr – Gly – Gln – Lys – Lys – Ile”. I also told him this: “Dopamine is not a hormone but a neurotransmitter. No doubt there are many independent neurological pathways that utilize this stimulating neurotransmitter in the control of the release of these hypothalamic hormones. That is why the release of these hormones operate independently of each other and that dopamine antagonism inhibits all hypothalamic hormone production because antagonism is not neurological pathway specific and never will be. Which is why the drug chemical approach to treating “mental illness” is fundamentally flawed and will never be the answer. Go to this web-site where the hypothalamic peptide prolactostatin or prolactin release-inhibiting hormone is available for sale for research purposes. http://www.penlabs.com/biopro/biopeptides3_32.html It is called Prolactin Release Inhibiting Factor or (PIF) on this Web-site. Go here to this German language web-site where it is identified as a hypothalamic hormone. http://www-stud.uni-essen.de/~st0184/Infos/eseldiv.htm. The name Prolactostatin is used on this web-site. There are three hypothalamic “statins” and they are all inhibiting peptides. The idea that PRIH is dopamine is outmoded and erroneous. Dopamine is the controlling neurotransmitter involved in the release of PRIH. There have been studies in the past that seemed to suggest that dopamine acts directly on the pituitary to inhibit prolactin, but such studies are flawed in that infusing dopamine into the area of the pituitary to observe the affect on Prolactin release could very well be effecting real PRIH release from the hypothalamus simply because of the close proximity of the pituitary to the hypothalamus. The pituitary is after all at the base of the hypothalamus and this dopamine infusion could easily be crossing over into the hypothalamus and stimulating the dopaminergic system and therefore releasing real PRIH which in turn would inhibit prolactin thus giving the appearance that dopamine was the sole causative factor acting directly on the pituitary. As has already been established neuroleptic drugs inhibit the production of the hormone progesterone and it is a precursor to the hormone aldosterone, (Precursor means the body uses one substance to synthesis or to produce another substance. In simpler words the body makes the hormone aldosterone from the hormone progesterone) so therefore aldosterone is also inhibited by neuroleptic drugs. See the book “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones” again on page 406 where many deficiency symptoms are cited which include “Muscular weakness” and “Stress intolerance”. See the book again on page 401 where it states at the bottom of the page that aldosterone is “One of the most essential of all hormones; absence can be fatal in [a] short time period”. Now look at the book “Facts and Comparisons” again under “antipsychotic agents” under “adverse reactions” where it states that after the administration of neuroleptics that “Sudden Death has occasionally been reported.” Could this perhaps at least be partly due to the inhibition of aldosterone secretion by these neuroleptic drugs? Aldosterone secretion is partly governed by the pituitary hormone ACTH (the abbreviation for adrenocorticotropic hormone or adrenocorticotrophic hormone and also called adrenocorticotropin or adrenocorticotrophin, corticotropic hormone or corticotrophin hormone) which is in turn governed by release of the hypothalamic hormone corticotropin-releasing hormone or corticotrophin-releasing hormone. (Abbreviated CRH and also called CRF, cortical-releasing factor or cortical-releasing hormone, adrenocorticotropin-releasing factor or adrenocorticotrophin-releasing factor, corticotropin-releasing factor or corticotrophin-releasing factor.) See the book “Handbook of Vitamins Minerals and Hormones” again on page 342 at the bottom of the page where it states that ACTH is “one of the most essential hormones-Absence causes notable shortening of normal life span.” Now see page 344 of this same book where it states that deficiency of ACTH causes “Decreased weight of adrenal (atrophy)”, “Decreased mobilization of free fatty acids” (so fat can be burned as fuel). It also states here that deficiency of ACTH causes “Decreased steroids in blood, urine (17-hydroxy and 17-keto)” (ketones are produced as a byproduct of the burning of fat as fuel. Since deficiency of ACTH decreases ketones it means that fat is not being utilized as fuel which will lead to weight gain), “Fasting hypoglycemia” and “Increased insulin sensitivity” Which explains why it is common for people on these neuroleptic drugs to be glucose intolerant. Since neuroleptic drugs inhibit the production of all these hormones described above, they also cause all the problems associated with deficiency of these hormones. Here is unquestionable proof that neuroleptic drugs not only shorten life span but also destroy sexual function and fertility or the ability to procreate offspring or have children. Aldosterone is not the only hormone that is controlled by the ACTH, CRH hormonal cascade. ACTH and CRH also control the release of the adrenal hormone cortisol (Also called hydrocortisone, Compound F, 17-hydroxycorticosterone. Substance M, glucocorticoid) (also cortisol is converted into cortisone in the body). On page 407 of the book “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones” it states that the “chief functions” of cortisol “are to maintain stress reactions, capillary permeability, release of other hormones, liver anabolism, and extrahepatic catabolism. Its chief importance is maintenance of stress reactions”. (“liver anabolism” is the rejuvenation of the liver and liver synthesis of substances that keep the body rejuvenated and “extrahepatic catabolism” is the burning of fat as fuel in all parts of the body except for the liver.) Also on this page it states that “Factors inhibiting the release” of cortisol “are: high glucocorticoids, low ACTH, and pituitary hormones.” On page 408 of this book it states at the bottom of the page that “Absence” of cortisol “causes shortening of life span due to inability to respond to stress situations.” On page 411 of this book it states that deficiency of cortisol causes decreases in “Kidney function, leading to death”, “Liver glycogen, gluconeogenesis”, “Intestinal absorption, blood sugar” and “Stress response-Ultimately death”. Also on page 411 it states that deficiency of cortisol will cause increases in “Fat anabolism, hemoconcentration” (Fat anabolism is the depositing of new fat tissue), “Muscular weakness” and others. Here is further proof that neuroleptic drugs shorten life span. Now on to another hormone which neuroleptic drugs suppress the release of which is the pituitary hormone growth hormone. (Abbreviated GH and also called somatotropin or somatotrophin, phyone, anterior pituitary growth hormone, adenohypophyseal growth hormone, somatotrophic hormone, STH) You may think that this is not a problem because most of the people these drugs are given to are already adults or in their teens. (I have been recently discovering that a growing number of children with ADD or similar “conduct disorder” are being given these drugs.) But growth hormone has other functions in adults. See the book again called “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones” on page 307 where it states that “Because growth hormone controls the nitrogen balance of an organism, it is thought to be involved in the aging process.” On page 309 of this same book it states that absence of growth hormone will result in a “decrease in normal life span.” On page 311 it states that deficiency will result in “Increased fat deposition.” The hypothalamic hormone growth hormone-releasing hormone (abbreviated GRH and also called GHRH, GRF, somatotropin-releasing factor or somatotrophin-releasing factor or somatotropin-releasing hormone or somatotrophin-releasing hormone, growth hormone releasing-releasing factor or growth hormone releasing-releasing hormone, SRF, GHRF) stimulates the secretion of growth hormone by the pituitary. As we have already learned neuroleptics suppress the release of both hypothalamic and pituitary hormones. Here is further evidence that neuroleptic drugs shorten life span. Therefore the compulsory administration of neuroleptic drugs by court order of the state is a violation of one’s right to life. Neuroleptic drugs also possess “adrenergic blocking effects”. Again reference the book “Facts and Comparisons” under the section “Antipsychotic agents”. The book states on the first page of this section “In addition, the drugs exert anticholinergic and alpha-adrenergic blocking effects.” Also see the book “Drug Info for the Health Care Professional” again on page 2321 under the section on phenothiazines where it states under the subheading “Mechanism of action/effect” that “Phenothiazines also produce an alpha-adrenergic blocking effect.” (Phenothiazines being just one of the classes of neuroleptic drugs all of which block dopamine receptors and cause the same effects due to blockage of these receptors.) This is so because of the chemical similarity of dopamine to the adrenergic neurotransmitters, all of which belong to a family of neurotransmitters called catecholamines. The adrenergic neurotransmitters are adrenaline and noradrenaline. (Also called epinephrine and norepinephrine) These two neurotransmitters are synthesized or created from dopamine; thus the similarity in their molecular structure. Both these neurotransmitters double as hormones. Since neuroleptics block or destroy alpha-adrenergic postsynaptic receptors this would simulate a deficiency. See the book again “Handbook of Vitamins, Minerals and Hormones” this time under “Epinephrine”. This book states on page 445 concerning epinephrine that “It is not essential for life, but it is indirectly essential, since it is involved in stress responses via cortisol, which is essential”. (We have already learned the importance of cortisol.) On this same page it states that one of the functions of epinephrine or adrenaline is increasing metabolic rate in time of need to respond to stress or emergency. Also see page 447 under the subheading “Essentiality for Life” where it states that deficiency of this hormone and neurotransmitter will cause “possible shortening of life span due to decreased response to emergencies.” So if threatened by a life threatening situation neuroleptic drugs make one physically ill equipped to face the threat. Also on page 448 under “Deficiency Symptoms”, “Not fatal, but organism cannot respond to emergency, hard work, temperature extreme, emotional disturbance”. Not fatal of course unless one fails to respond adequately to an emergency or dies of heatstroke. Again see the book “Facts and Comparisons” under “Antipsychotic Agents” under “Adverse Reactions” where it states that “Heatstroke/Hyperpyrexia induced by neuroleptics has occurred. They may act in several ways including disrupting the hypothalamic thermoregulator center, alpha-adrenergic blockage and autonomic mechanisms.” (Hyperpyrexia is overheating of the body.) And of course not being able to respond to emotional disturbance or stress blocking the stress response making one incapable of dealing with stress thus precipitating agitation. This is destructive to the body in it’s own right so here is another way these neuroleptic drugs shorten life span. Also appetite is controlled in part by noradrenaline within the hypothalamus. Lowered metabolism and the compulsion to consume more food due to increased appetite from the blockage of noradrenaline receptors within the hypothalamus equals weight gain. It can not be avoided. See the book again called “Facts and Comparisons” under “antipsychotic agents” under “Adverse Reactions” under “Miscellaneous” which states that neuroleptics will cause “increases in appetite and weight”. Neuroleptics also have “anticholinergic blocking effects”. Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter. The brain produces an enzyme called acetylcholinesterase to break down excess acetylcholine to prevent it from accumulating to abnormal levels. This break down of acetylcholine by this enzyme comprises the anticholinergic system. Neuroleptic drugs have “anticholinergic blocking effects” meaning they cause the accumulation of acetylcholine to abnormal levels. Nerve gas’s method of causing death is by its anticholinergic blocking activity. Also insecticide kills insects by this same method causing an abnormal build up of acetylcholine in the brain and nervous system of the insect. See the book again called “Facts and Comparisons” under “antipsychotic agents” at the bottom of the first page in this section where it states that “In addition, the drugs exert anticholinergic and alpha-adrenergic blocking effects.” Now see the book called “Brainscapes” by Richard M. Restak, MD published by NY Herperion (c) 1995. On page 57 of this book it states; “As we have discussed earlier, after a neurotransmitter and it’s receptor have reacted, the process must be brought to a halt, which is accomplished either by the destruction of the neurotransmitter and recycling of it’s constituents, or by a so-called reuptake system, whereby the neurotransmitter is recaptured and stored once again within the vesicle. In the case of acetylcholine, the process involves a breakdown brought about by the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, which cleaves the neurotransmitter back to its original chemical building blocks. This process can be interfered with by compounds responsible for some of the worst horrors of twentieth-century warfare. Nerve gases, such as the deadly Sarin released into the subway system in Tokyo in March 1995, form irreversible bonds with anticholinesterase [acetylcholinesterase], thus inhibiting the enzymes’ ability to break down acetylcholine in the synapse.” Then on page 121 of this same book it states; “In the section on neurotransmitters we mentioned another class of neurotoxins, inhibitors of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, which breaks down the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Many pesticides are designed to attack the nervous system of insects by altering the breakdown of acetylcholine. Not surprisingly, these agents also act on our brains and nervous systems to produce symptoms like weakness, difficulty in breathing, visual disturbances, and in some cases explosive violence. With low rates of exposure the problems are more subtle, a prevailing sense of tension, disturbed sleep, restlessness, chronic anxiety, and nervousness when standing in lines.” All of these symptoms can be observed in people on neuroleptics. For instance “visual disturbances”, see the book again “Facts and Comparisons” under “Ocular” in Adverse Reactions which states that neuroleptics will cause “Glaucoma; photophobia; blurred vision; miosis; mydriasis; ptosis; star-shaped lenticular opacities; epithelial keratopathies; pigmentary retinopathy. Eye lesions may regress after drug withdrawal.” Also as Richard Restak MD reports insecticide exposure will cause “restlessness” and or “nervousness when standing in lines.” This has been given a name “Akathisia”, see the book again “Facts and Comparisons” under “Extrapyramidal” under “akathisia” which states that neuroleptics cause “a condition of constant motor restlessness [called akathisia] and may include feelings of muscle quivering, an inability to sit still and an urge to constantly move about.” Akathisia comes from the Greek word meaning “can’t sit still,” and refers to significant physical and mental agitation. Akathisia is to violence what a match is to gasoline. Also he reports that insecticide exposure will cause “difficulty breathing”, again see the book “Facts and Comparisons” in the same section under “Respiratory” which states that neuroleptics cause “Laryngospasm; bronchospasm; increased depth of respiration; dyspnea.” (Dyspnea is difficulty breathing or shortness of breath.) Also he states that insecticide exposure will cause “weakness”, again see the book “Facts and Comparisons” in the same section under “Other CNS effects:” that neuroleptic drugs will cause “Cerebral edema, headache, weakness, tremor, staggering gait; twitching; tension; jitteriness; akinesia; ataxia; fatigue; slurring [of speech]; abnormal cerebrospinal fluid proteins;” etc. Also Richard Restak MD reports that insecticide exposure will cause “disturbed sleep”. Again see the book “Facts and Comparisons” in the same section under “Other CNS effects” where it states that these drugs cause “insomnia” and under “Adverse behavioral effects:” where it states that neuroleptic drugs cause “nocturnal confusion” and “bizarre dreams”. Richard Restak MD also reports that insecticide exposure will cause “a prevailing sense of tension”, again see the book “Facts and Comparisons” under “Other CNS effects” where it states that neuroleptics cause “tension”. Also he reports that insecticide exposure will cause “anxiety”. Now see the book called “The Essential Guide to Prescription Drugs Revised Edition” (c) 1980 by James W. Long MD and published by Harper & Row on page 344 under haloperadol (a neuroleptic drug) that this drug can cause “anxiety”. Also Richard Restak MD reports in his book that insecticide exposure causes “in some cases, explosive violence.” Now see the book “Facts and Comparisons” in the same section under “Adverse behavioral effects:” where it states that neuroleptics can cause “hyperactivity” and “agitation”. (See the commentary coming up concerning a Star Trek Voyager episode entitled “The Chute” where the story centered on this very effect.) Of course nerve gas and insecticide are poisons and neuroleptics have blatantly poisonous properties in that part of their function is the same as that of nerve gas and insecticide in causing an abnormal build up of acetylcholine. In fact the very molecular base of one class of neuroleptics called phenothiazines is used as an insecticide! See the book again entitled “AHFS 96 Drug Information American Hospital Formulary Service” in the second paragraph in the right column, which states that “Phenothiazine [a class of neuroleptics] is still used as an anthelmintic in veterinary medicine and as an insecticide.” The very insecticides that Richard Restak MD is referring to in his book “Brainscapes” are being given to those labeled mentally ill as a claimed “beneficial medical treatment”! Here is further evidence that neuroleptics shorten life span. Again remember that all neuroleptics interfere with the breakdown of acetylcholine so don’t assume that because the drug isn’t a phenothiazine that it will not have these effects. Other neuroleptics may even be worse at interfering with the break down of acetylcholine then phenothiazine. Personally every time I have been on neuroleptics I have been extremely agitated sometimes breaking things. One time I even assaulted my father because of these drugs. These drugs can cause extreme feelings of rage. This is precipitated by the horrible torturous feelings that these drugs induce. This well-known effect of excess acetylcholine was even the theme for a Star Trek Voyager episode called “The Chute” (this is an American science fiction television show) in which two of the members of the crew were abducted and placed aboard a space station prison. In order to keep the prison population down the prisoners where unknowingly exposed to a chemical that caused the build up of acetylcholine by interfering with its breakdown. This caused the prisoners to be violent and enraged often killing each other. After the crew members were rescued the “holographic” doctor on Voyager revealed that it was interference with the breakdown of acetylcholine that was causing the violence and that the prison’s operators must be using the chemical to keep the prison’s population down. (Could this be why many prisoners in the USA are forced or coerced into taking neuroleptic drugs?) Based on this fact of neuroleptics, not only is compulsory administration of neuroleptic drugs by court order of the state a violation of the right to life but also the pursuit of happiness because these drugs take away one’s sense of well being causing “agitation”. Ironically these drugs are often prescribed under the pretense that they will prevent violence when in reality they can actually promote it. This leads to another problem with neuroleptic drugs and how they take away sense of well being. Within the limbic system of the brain is an electrochemical cascade called the “reward system”. This system is responsible for giving a person their sense of well being. Disruption of this electrochemical neuronal cascade results in ones sense of well being, being supplanted with negative emotions such as anxiety, depression, anger and generally a very negative outlook on things. The end result of the reward system’s neuronal cascade is stimulation of dopamine D2 receptors within the nucleus accumbens and the hippocampus, which are located within the limbic system of the brain. See a problem yet? Remember neuroleptic drugs as you have already learned block or destroy dopamine D2 receptors preventing their stimulation by the neurotransmitter dopamine. Again see the book “Facts and Comparisons” under “Antipsychotic Agents” where it states on the first page of this section; “Antipsychotics block postsynaptic dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia, hypothalamus, limbic system, brain stem and medulla. …The phenothiazines appear to act at both D1 and D2 receptors, whereas haloperadol appears to act primarily at D2 receptors.” Neuroleptics do indeed take away one’s sense of well being by utilizing more then one mechanism. This is very self destructive to the body and will result in a premature death if one doesn’t commit suicide first. Ironically these drugs are prescribed to people to prevent suicide when in reality they actually promote it. Perhaps the designers of these drugs want to give the person that extra amount to push them over the edge and actually do it. Personally two times I was on these drugs for extended periods I attempted suicide because of them. So here is further proof that the compulsory administration of neuroleptic drugs because of court order of the state is not only a violation of one’s right to life but also one’s right to the pursuit of happiness. This is so since the administration of these drugs take away sense of well being making it very difficult to feel happiness. Read the article entitled “Reward Deficiency Syndrome” as published in “American Scientist” magazine March-April 1996 for a detailed and in depth discussion of this brain function called the “reward cascade”. Click Here for the Article Online. Neuroleptic drugs block dopamine receptors in all areas of the brain for the types of receptors they have affinity for. Antagonism of a type of receptor is not neurological pathway specific and antagonizes all receptors of the type it has affinity for without regard for the actual function of the neurological pathways they affect. Most dopaminergic function takes place within the limbic system of the brain. (See the article in the magazine called “American Scientist” March-April 1996 Volume 84 called “Reward Deficiency Syndrome” on pages 134 and 135 for an explanation of the limbic system and how it relates to the “reward cascade” which I will discuss later in this report. ) This magazine article states on page 135 under figure 4, “If the activity of the dopamine D2 receptor is deficient, the activity of neurons in the nucleus accumbens and the hippocampus is decreased, and the individual experiences unpleasant emotions or cravings for substances that can provide temporary relief by releasing dopamine.” On page 132 of this article it states that disruption of the stimulation of D2 receptors as part of the “reward cascade” will “supplant an individual’s feeling of well being with anxiety, anger or a craving for a substance that can alleviate the negative emotions.” In this magazine article it explains that “reward deficiency syndrome” is the cause of behavioral disorders such as attention deficit disorder (with and without hyperactivity), personality disorder, conduct disorder, antisocial personality, aggressive behavior, autism (autism is the abnormal introversion and egocentricity, acceptance of fantasy rather then reality). After reading this article I came to understand the source of many of my own problems and why neuroleptics were exasperating them. And also why I had an insatiable craving for alcohol whenever I was on neuroleptics that even persisted for a long time after they were discontinued since the damage caused by neuroleptics to the dopaminergic system is long term. Or I would consume caffeinated cola flavored soda – craving the caffeine – until my stomach would become bloated and I would throw up. Again see the book “Facts and Comparisons” under “antipsychotic agents” under “Adverse Reactions” under “Adverse behavioral effects:” where it states that neuroleptics will cause “…restlessness; hyperactivity; agitation; … depression; … paranoid reactions.” And again see the book “The Essential Guide to Prescription Drugs Revised Edition” (c) 1980 where it states that haloperadol (a neuroleptic) causes “anxiety”. Also as reported in this report, since these neuroleptic drugs cause adrenergic blocking and inhibition of the adrenal hormone cortisol, these drugs reduce capacity to deal with stress both emotionally and physically. So here is irrefutable proof that these drugs not only take away sense of well being but also shorten life span. The state does NOT have the right under any circumstances to order the compulsory administration of a substance, which shortens life span and takes away one’s sense of well being, a substance with poisonous properties like that of nerve gas and insecticide! The constitution of the United States of America guarantees certain inalienable rights, namely the right to liberty (making one’s own decision regarding personal matters), the right to life, and the right to the pursuit of happiness. When the state orders the compulsory administration of neuroleptics EVERY ONE of these inalienable rights is being violated. Mental health officials will first do their very best to intimidate and coerce a “patient” or “client” into “voluntarily” taking neuroleptics before they will attempt to get a court order that will allow them to involuntarily drug someone. They will use mind games or psychology on a person coming back to them repeatedly telling them such things as “Don’t you want to get better?”. Many times when doing this they will invade your personal space. Perhaps in an attempt to provoke you into an act of violence that they will then use as “evidence” that you “need” these drugs. Many times they will tell the person that they will not qualify for social security assistance if they do not take the drugs or that they will remain locked up in an institution if they do not take the drugs. Any call to the Social Security Administration will reveal that it is not required that someone takes neuroleptics in order to receive or continue to receive social security. Perhaps what the psychiatrists are really saying is that they will not support a disability claim if the person doesn’t take the drugs. In such case this is blackmail. Don’t be tricked by a psychiatrist’s attempts to get you to try a new drug that is supposed to be “safer” then the older ones. All neuroleptics block or destroy dopamine receptors even the newer ones. Therefore the newer so called, “safer” neuroleptics will also cause what has been described in this report by the very fact that they also block or destroy dopamine receptors. Risperidone (Brand name Risperdal) and Zyprexa (Brand name is Olanzapine) affect higher reasoning centers and make it almost impossible to form complex thoughts. This is due to its effects on the neurotransmitter Serotonin. If I were on either of these two drugs it would have been impossible for me to do the research and write this report. I speak form experience because I have temporarily taken both Zyprexa and Risperidone. On just two pills of Zyprexa I could not even access my memories of research on these drugs. On Risperidone I had slurred speech, word substitutions, difficulty forming complex thoughts pages of text appeared as blank piece of paper when previously I could rapidly digest the material. Resist psychiatric drugging. Use the evidence in this report to argue in probate court that the involuntary administration of these drugs is a violation of all your fundamental constitutional rights, most importantly the right to life and the pursuit of happiness. They will not be able to get around these two rights. They take away liberty from the “mentally ill” under the guise that they are supposedly not competent to make their own decisions regarding their own medical care, but they will not be able to get around these other two rights. If possible get your own attorney rather then allowing the court to appoint one for you because it is my experience that these court appointed attorneys are not really motivated to defend you and may even be secretly serving the interest of the mental health officials and the state. If you do not get a favorable decision in the probate court then insist on an appeal and remember to attempt to maintain your determination to follow through with the appeal realizing that these drugs take away your will power and ability to resist domination. Use this knowledge to fight this effect of the drugs. If necessary appeal these constitutional issues all the way to the Supreme Court. Only when we as a people fight and defend our rights will changes be made, not only for our personal protection but also for that of our loved ones and our children and our children’s children. It is not just the “mentally ill” that are affected by this. Routinely these drugs are administered to the retarded (including children) and the elderly in nursing homes as well as Alzheimer’s patients, people with head injuries or brain damage etc. It is very clear that the motivation behind the administration of antipsychotics, antipsychotic drugs, neuroleptics, or neuroleptic drugs to the “mentally ill” and others is eugenic in nature. For those who do not know what eugenics is, it is idea that the human race can be improved by preventing “inferior stock” from reproducing and by inducing an early death. The eugenic idea got its start with psychiatrists in the USA. Later Hitler shocked the world with the holocaust of millions of people, basing his program on eugenics practices that were already being carried out in the USA. But the first to be killed in Nazi Germany was the “mentally ill”. Before Hitler did the things he did, the forced sterilization of the “mentally ill” in the USA was common practice. But as you are already probably starting to see after reading the evidence centered on neuroleptic drugs, the same eugenics program is being covertly carried out under the guise of a “beneficial medical treatment”. In the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England adopted what they called “Crypto-eugenics”, stating in their official reports that they would do eugenics through means and instruments not labeled as eugenics. Abortion and the push of birth control is one of these and as it should be clear from reading this report on the true nature of neuroleptic drugs that it is a eugenics conspiracy also. After World War II so many psychiatrists immigrated to the USA that some time after the war, one third of all psychiatrists in the USA were former Nazi’s. The founder or “father” of psychiatry in the United States was a Freemason named Benjamin Rush. He was one of the signers of the United States constitution. Psychiatry was founded as a means to take care of critics of Freemasonry or the Masonic Lodge. Also to take care of people who are revealing  ”National Security Secrets” and also to take care of people who “step on the big guys toes” by challenging their interests or causing them to loose money. Also to take care of “whistle blowers” and to take care of people who are attempting to change Satan’s demon inspired “status quo”. “Status Quo” means the generally accepted viewpoint which is often wrong. To take care of true Christians who are discovering truths from the Holy Scriptures and revealing them to the people. The Mason or Freemason named Benjamin Rush invented a restraint chair with straps on it that he named “the tranquilizer” which is where this word originated. He also invented the straight jacket. The electric chair today is a modification of Benjamin Rush’s invention. The Masonic Lodge is evil to the core. The Catholic Church is no better because they also run psychiatric wards and cooperate with the government to silence people by “taking care of them”. The Catholic Church has a lot of stock in the pharmaceutical industry which includes psychiatric drugs. Psychiatry has become for the Catholic Church their new means of inquisition and their psychiatric wards in their hospitals are their inquisition halls were people are tortured chemically. I was personally drugged with a double dose of Haldol in the hospital named “Mercy Medical Center” in their emergency room in Springfield Ohio and when I cried out that I was a Jehovah’s Witness being drugged by a Catholic hospital they shipped me to the State Mental Health facilities at Twin Valley Behavioral Modification in Dayton Ohio instead of putting me in their own facilities there. A Freemason probate judge by the name of Richard P. Carey sent me by his order to a state mental health facility where I was repeatedly drugged by court order. I told him in court that he was a Freemason and he read an internet site I once had online exposing Freemasonry. It is clear his motives were to attempt to silence me for exposing Freemasonry or the Masonic Lodge. The Masons are very strong in Clark County Ohio. For instance Sheriff Gene A. Kelly of Clark County Ohio is a 32 degree Freemason. I know because he admitted it once to me on the telephone. Judge Richard P. Carey is a Freemason Nazi. He attempted to silence me but the Almighty Father Yehovah protected me. USA courts have forced drugs on me many times in the past by court order. But the Almighty Father has protected me and I still have my mind intact and have two new sons by his blessings. Willful unrepentant poisoners can not enter into the Kingdom of Yehovah Elohim (Jehovah God). See http://www.watchtower.org/ for people who can help you rely on the Almighty Father in spirit and truth so you to can receive the protections of the Almighty Father from wolves like Richard P. Carey Freemason. Once congressman David Hobson (congressman Hobson or congressman Dave Hobson) in Springfield Ohio tried to get me institutionalized because I gave him a copy of this report. That did not work so Sheriff Gene A. Kelly attempted to get my father to institutionalize me. I even got multiple death threats in my E-mail for writing this report and speaking out against Freemasonry on the internet. I want these people to know that I forgive them and pray for them and that they can be forgiven of anything as long as they turn to Yehovah in genuine repentance. See http://www.watchtower.org/ Judge Richard P. Carey, Clark County Probate Court 50 East Columbia St., 5th Floor, Springfield, Ohio 45502-1194 Phone (937) 328-2437 Fax (937) 328-2589 – Call, Visit, Write or Fax him and let him know your outrage and how you know he acted with injustice. The following excerpt is taken from the public service publication entitled “Psychiatry Destroying Religion in the Name of Salvation” by the Citizens Commission on Human Rights under the chapter entitled “The Devil’s Doctors – From the Nazi Holocaust to ‘Assisted Suicide’” “While psychiatry has tried to expunge any connection between itself and the racial genocide of the Nazi Holocaust, the hard facts is that psychiatry spawned “eugenics” almost three decades before the Nazi’s took power in 1933. It was psychiatry that turned the Nazis into the mass murders, not vice versa. And it was their ideology which fired Hitler’s mania to eradicate religion.” “As early as 1895, German psychiatrist Alfred Ploetz wrote: “Should it turn out that in spite of it the new-born is a weakly and ill-bread child, then a gentle death will be provided for him by the medical board, which decides over the citizenship papers of the society, let’s say through a small dose of morphine…. [The parents] will not give themselves over to rebellious feelings for long but will try it fresh and happily a second time, if they are permitted to do so and have a certificate granting them the right to the procedure.”" [Dr. Thomas Roder and Volker Kubillus, Manner hinter Hitler (Malters: p Pi-Verlag fur Politik und Gesellschaft, 1994) pp. 65-66] “Within ten years, Ploetz founded the German Society for Racial Hygiene, joining with another psychiatrist, Ernst Rudin who would later turn sterilization operations into one of the Nazi’s most prolific death machines. Declaring racial hygiene a “spiritual movement,” Rudin and his associates worked to disseminate their ideas and principles to the public. Despite “quietly and gradually winning over the hearts and minds of our best Germans,” they could not gain support at upper government levels. Eventually they found a willing collaborator in Adolf Hitler. “Only through [the Fuhrer] did our dream of over thirty years, that of applying racial hygiene to society, become a reality,”" Rudin said. [Dr. Thomas Ruder, Volker Kubillus and Anthony Burwell, Psychiatrist the Men Behind Hitler (Los Angeles: Freedom Publishing, 1995) p. 94.] “Hitler was also influenced by two psychiatric books: The Release of the Destruction of Life Devoid of Value (1920) by Hoche and Binding and The Principles of Human Heredity and Racial Hygiene (1921) by Bauer, Fischer and Lentz. Lentz wrote, “I have heard that Hitler had read the second edition of Bauer-Fischer-Lentz during his incarceration in Landsberg. Some parts of it are mirrored in Hitler’s phrases. In any case, with great mental energy, he had made the basic ideas of racial hygiene and their importance his own, while most of the academic authorities still look upon these issues rather unappreciatively.” [Roder, Kubillus, and Burwell, op. Cit., p. 37.] “According to Hoche and Binding: 1. The suffering of a sick or wounded person who is about to die can be shortened through the use of a medical drug. 2. The acceleration of the death process is not an act of murder but “in truth a pure act of healing.” 3. A doctor should be allowed to employ euthanasia on any unconscious person without legal consequences. 4. There are people who are worthless to society. Primary among these are the inmates of the “idiot institutions,” who are “not only worthless, but of absolutely negative value.” 5. The incurably dumb who can neither agree to survive or to be killed should be killed. “Their death will not be missed in the least except maybe in the hearts of their mother or guardian…. When we become more advanced, we will probably be saving those poor humans from themselves.”" [Ibid., p.41.] “With Hitler providing the public face and vehicle for implementation, the next few years saw an avalanche of legislation which legitimized psychiatry’s demonic plans. On July 4, 1933, the Sterilization Act was enacted, clearing the path for wholesale euthanasia. July 4, 1933 saw the Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Children passed.” “By 1936, the first systematic transfers of the mentally ill from various institutions to the concentration camps began. In 1937, criminals and repeat offenders were relocated to the camps, followed by “vagrants, alcoholics, work dodgers, welfare recipients and even already-sterilized, feeble minded women.” That same year, the Third Reich embarked upon a cleansing of the churches and charitable establishments. People were relocated first into state institutions, then ultimately to the death camps.” “The number of sterilizations performed in Germany between 1934 and 1945 is estimated to be as high as 350,000. And while German psychiatric hospitals held 300,000 to 320,000 patients in 1939, only 40,000 were alive in 1946. The rest had met their deaths at the hands of psychiatry. [Ibid., p. 48; Fredric Wertham, M.D., A Sign For Cain: An Exploration of Human Violence (London: Robert Hale Limited, 1966), p. 158.] In 1941, the Hadamar psychiatric institution “celebrated the cremation of the ten thousandth mental patient in a special ceremony. Psychiatrists, nurses, attendants, and secretaries all participated. Everybody received a bottle of beer for the occasion,” author Fredric Wertham, M.D. reported.” [Wertham, A Sign For Cain..., op. Cit., p. 157.] End of excerpt from the public service publication entitled “Psychiatry Destroying Religion in the Name of Salvation” by the Citizens Commission on Human Rights under the chapter entitled “The Devil’s Doctors – From the Nazi Holocaust to ‘Assisted Suicide.’” The Citizens Commission on Human Rights is a non-profit anti-psychiatry organization that works hard to expose psychiatry for what it is. They offer many public service publications free of charge. But I recommend a small donation so they can keep up their very important work. Their address is: Citizens Commission on Human Rights International, 6362 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite B, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Their telephone numbers are 1-800-869-2247 or 213-467-4242. Their web-address is: http://www.cchr.org Although this organization is run by the Church of Scientology their anti-psychiatry public service literature doesn’t teach Scientology. My quote from them above should not be misconstrued as my endorsement of Scientology as I am not a Scientologist nor am I familiar with what they teach. Also another organization to get in contact with is Support Coalition International a group calling themselves “psychiatric survivors” at the web address http://www.mindfreedom.org  See this web-site on psychiatric drugs: http://www.antipsychiatry.org/drugs.htm . Also go here. http://www.wildestcolts.com  Also see http://home.earthlink.net/~bazillion/psych_news.html . Discusses electroconvulsive “therapy”. This Internet resource called Psychiatric Tattler contains information worth reading. http://www.ect.org/tattler  and a links page to other fine sites here: http://www.ect.org/tattler/links.html. Also see these anti-psychiatry links on this web-site: http://www.psychnet-uk.com/psychiatry/antipsychiatry.htm. Also see the links at: http://www.mentalhealthfacts.com/mhresources.html and http://www.schizoaffective.org and http://www.mentalhealthfacts.com also see http://www.richardboyden.com/ It is very clear that psychiatry kills. The term psychiatric abuse is an understatement because the whole purpose of psychiatry is to abuse. The only legitimate form of psychiatry is that of the talking psychiatrist who doesn’t use mind altering chemicals. This is the type of psychiatrist Dr. Peter R. Breggin, M.D. author of Toxic Psychiatry is. God bless Dr. Peter Breggin MD for his work. If you haven’t already, read his book entitled Toxic Psychiatry for a lot of good info. This is Dr. Peter Breggin’s web-site address. http://www.breggin.com  Psychiatry kills. The thesis above concerning the biological ramifications of the administration of these drugs is new and is not contained in Dr. Peter Breggin’s book but his book does contain a great deal of useful information not contained in this report. Resist psychiatry’s forced drugging. Use the evidence in this report to argue in probate court that the involuntary administration of these drugs is a violation of all your fundamental constitutional rights, most importantly the right to life and the pursuit of happiness. They will not be able to get around these two rights. They take away liberty from the “mentally ill” under the guise that they are supposedly not competent to make their own decisions regarding their own medical care, but they will not be able to get around these other two rights. If possible get your own attorney rather then allowing the court to appoint one for you because it is my experience that these court appointed attorneys are not really motivated to defend you and may even be secretly serving the interest of the other side. If you do not get a favorable decision in the probate court then insist on an appeal and remember to attempt to maintain your determination to follow through with the appeal realizing that these drugs take away your will power and ability to resist domination. Use this knowledge to fight this effect of the drugs. If necessary appeal these constitutional issues all the way to the Supreme Court. Only when we as a people fight and defend our rights will changes be made, not only for our personal protection but also for that of our loved ones and our children and our children’s children. You can beat psychiatric drugging. If you resist they will more then likely back down. It costs a lot of money to house someone in an institution and the county you live in must pay for it. In Ohio medicaid pays $480 a day and the state picks up the rest for a total cost of $800 to $1000 a day. Nine times out of ten they will be unwilling to do this, so stick by your guns and resist psychiatric drugging. Don’t show up to get the injections and make them send a police officer after you to bring you into the inpatient unit. All this resistance will pay off because they will more then likely give up. They will lock you up in isolation for a few days hoping they will be able to brake your will power. If you continue to resist and maintain your resolve they will give up. Believe me, I speak from experience. If they do send you to an institution then 9 times out of 10 this will be a scare tactic and will only be temporary so maintain your resolve to resist. Be sure to never sign anything they want you to sign no matter what. If they apply a lot of pressure to get you to sign something just say that you want your lawyer to read it first. They keep people up to 90 days by court order in an institution so stick by your guns on the rare chance that this happens to you. Use the evidence in this report to fight for your rights in court and appeal if necessary all the way to the USA Supreme Court. Also remember to not fight back in any physical way even under extreme provocation because they will take this as proof that they are justified in any action they take against you and will be detrimental in any defense you may offer to the court. Use passive resistance. Make them hold you down to give you injections but do not try to harm the provocateurs. You can also protect yourself by getting a living will, which states your wishes should you ever become “incompetent”. If you are currently involved in the mental health system it will become necessary to have your lawyer accompany you to see your psychiatrist, psychologist, counselor, therapist etc. to get them to sign an affidavit concerning your current competency to enter into a living will. Don’t tell the mental health official that you want this affidavit for the purpose of avoiding involuntary drugging or you will most likely not get their cooperation. Tell them that you need a living will so you will not be kept on life support should you become brain dead etc. so they will be likely to cooperate. You will need this affidavit as a technicality so it can not be claimed at a later date that because you were involved in the mental health system that at the time you entered into the living will you were not competent to do so. It is not just the “mentally ill” that are affected by this. Routinely these drugs are administered to the retarded (including children) and the elderly in nursing homes as well as Alzheimer’s patients, people with head injuries or brain damage etc… These drugs are even prescribed to teenagers and young children who simply have a hot temper, which ironically the drugs make worse. To biochemist, biologist, nutritionist, physicians, etc. If you have additional information and or references to add to the material presented below then please contact me at one of the E-mail addresses provided or contact the mailing address provided. It would be greatly appreciated. Also if any psychiatrists, psychologists, FDA or pharmaceutical officials or employees etc. that want to turn whistle blower by adding more information to what is provided in this report or by providing proof that a conspiracy is involved concerning these drugs then please E-mail one of the E-mail addresses or the mailing address provided below. Words can not express how much it would be appreciated. Your identity will be held in the strictest of confidence if you so desire. IMPORTANT! Save this document while you have it because it is actively being censored. Please aggressively disseminate this information. E-mail, fax or mail this report to senators, congressmen and others involved in the government and politics. Also give a copy to your family doctor because many doctors are ignorant of the facts or have never considered the ramifications. E-mail, fax or mail this report to probate judges, appeal judges, and others involved in the government and politics. E-mail, fax or mail it to lawyers, civil and human rights organizations. E-mail, fax or mail this report to the media. Give a copy to local law enforcement officials. Give copies to neighbors, family, friends, people at work, and mental health patients and their family. Post this report on wwwboards and the news groups all over the Internet, not only in the USA but also in other countries. Please post it to the web and get others to link to it. Pass it along by direct E-mail to others on the Internet. It is very important that this information be disseminated to everyone. You can only protect yourself, friends, family and other loved ones through knowledge and knowledge is power. PLEASE disseminate this information aggressively so changes can be made in current law in many states. And please keep this entire report complete and intact when doing so. List of neuroleptic drug names: chlorpromazine, (Brand names are as follows; chlor-PZ, klorazine, promachlor, promapar, sonazine, thorazine, chlorprom, chlor-promanyl and largactil) fluphenazine, (Brand names are as follows; permitil, prolixin, modecate, moditen) mesoridazine besylate, (Brand name is serentil) perphenazine, (Brand names are as follows; trilafon, etrafon, triavil, phenazine and etrafon) prochlorperazine, (Brand names are as follows; compazine and stemetil) promazine hydrocloride, (Brand name sparine) thioridazine, (Brand names are mellaril, novoridazine and thioril) trifuoperazine, (Brand names are as follows; stelazine, clinazine, novaflurazine, pentazine, terfluzine and triflurin) clozapine, (Brand named clozaril in Germany called leponex) haloperadol, (Brand name haldol) loxapine, (Brand name loxitane) pimozide (Brand name is orap) thiothixene, (Brand name navane) risperidone (Brand name risperdal), zyprexa (Brand name is olanzapine), sertindole, ziprasidone, (Brand name geodon or geodone. Was planned to be named zeldox) amperozide, remoxipride, melperone, zotepine, isofloxythepin, setoperone, perospirone, quetiapine (Brand name seroquel) methotrimeprazine (Brand name nozinan or nosinan, called levomepromazin in Germany), zuclopenthixol (Brand name clopixol ), zuclopenthixol acetate (Brand name clopixol acuphase), amisulpride (Brand name solian). Also the antidepressant drug sertraline (Brand name zoloft) is molecularly indistinguishable from that of the neuroleptics and has even been tried as a neuroleptic. This list contains generic names and many brand names used in the USA and Canada. This list is by no means comprehensive. Please help provide the names used in other countries by E-mailing me. All the drugs above affect metabolism and the production of hormones in the body by their dopamine antagonism. All these drugs will shorten life span by their very nature and the FDA does not even require animal test on these drugs to determine how they affect the duration of life span. Such test should be done with guinea pigs because of their inability to manufacture their own vitamin C within their livers like that of us humans. Psychiatry is abusive and the whips and chains of Bedlam live on but they are now chemical in nature. If you have additional information to add then please E-mail me. Or write to me at Shemuwel Antoine Moser, 5700 Mallard Dr. Huber Heights OH 45424 USA Footnote A: Support Coalition International reported: Consider the well-publicized heat wave deaths in the summer of ’95. Member Jerry Egan sent Dendron the Chicago Tribune (7/22 & 7/26/95) in which Medical Examiner Jeffrey Jentzen revealed that “in Milwaukee, 15 of the 24 deaths due to heat stroke also involved psychiatric drugs.” In other words, the coroner attributed more than 60% of these deaths to psychiatric drugs. According to the US Dept. of Health & Human Services, neuroleptics are indeed a major culprit in heat wave deaths (DHHS MMWR; 6/30/95, p. 467) Dr. Frederick Zugibe, medical examiner of Rockland County in New York State, is a hero in our movement for breaking the silence over these past 20 years about neuroleptic-related deaths. In a phone interview, he recalled how his autopsy findings about frequent neuroleptic-related deaths made the front page of The New York Times [7/17/78]. Whistleblowing led to harassment. “Colleagues even called me late at night saying I should resign,” said Zugibe, “but I stayed at my job, and later I won awards.” Little has changed he said, and he partly blames coroners for remaining so silent. Footnote B: An inspection of the molecular structure of most neuroleptics will reveal reactive compounds molecularly bounded to the benzene ring of these drugs such as fluorine and chlorine. It is these reactive compounds that give the molecule its catalytic ability to destroy the receptor by cleaving the protein apart that makes up the receptor. Both the neuroleptics that act on dopamine receptors (as well as other psychoactive drugs) and the neurotransmitter dopamine and other catecholamines contain a benzene ring. This is the mechanism that most neuroleptics employ in destroying the receptors, which are on the ends of dendrites. So as you can see the function of these drugs is to create damage to the dopaminergic system. In effect the drugs cause brain damage. Dr. Peter Breggin reveals in his book “Toxic Psychiatry” studies that have been done that reveal people who have been on these drugs for ten years or more have a severely atrophied brain (brain shrinkage). People in their thirties who have been on these drugs for ten years or more have the brain size of a person in their seventies. Since these drugs destroy or disable the dopaminergic receptors they prevent dopamine from interacting with the receptor ever again forcing neurons to randomly grow new dendrites creating neurofibrillary tangles in a defensive measure to counteract the brain damage. After a person goes off the drugs in time new receptors will form but the brain changes caused by the drugs are permanent. Personally I suffered problems with hyperpyrexia two years after I received two 100mg Haldol dec injections and still have a very low tolerance to high temperatures. I have a theory that the brain shrinkage caused by these drugs is at least partly due to fact that the brain is constantly attempting to replace lost receptors and amino acids are constantly being used to construct new receptors taking away from the amino acid needs of other brain systems leading to the atrophy. Studies have also shown that phenothiazine promote the production of free radicals in the brain and body. (Chignell, C.F., Motten, A.G. and Buettner, G.R. (1985) “Photoinduced free radicals from chlorpromazine and related phenothiazines. Relationship to phenothiazine induced photosensitization.” Environ. Health Perspect., 64, 103 110.) Free radicals are believed to be one of the causes of the neurofibrillary tangles found in Alzheimer’s patients and also the brain damage of Parkinson’s Disease. Ironically these drugs are commonly given to patients with Alzheimer’s Disease which these drugs make worse. Also free radicals are believed to be a major cause in the aging process. Here is more proof psychiatric drugs shorten life span. Footnote C: A legitimate religious ground for not taking these drugs would be the Christian Biblical teaching that the use of mind altering chemicals and poisons on someone is witchcraft. Witches used to exercise their control over others through a “magick spell” using secret mind altering chemicals. Or a witch would use something like deadly nightshade to poison someone. See http://www.dogma.org/femmegothique/intro.htm  and look for the words “Deadly Nightshade” on this neo-witch site. Unfortunately the site has been taken down but there still is a link on the host site that still has the words “deadly nightshade” but the link will be dead. I don’t know how much longer it will remain. See Richard Restak MD’s book called “Receptors” for a detailed discussion of how witches used to use anticholinergic drugs and how the myth that a witch could fly on a broomstick came about. Also these neuroleptics drugs can be very sedating making one sleep a lot. Witches used such drugs as a means of control over people in the past. This fact is revealed in the Disney fairy tell “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs”. The evil queen who was also a witch soaked an apple in a cauldron of mind altering chemicals and tricked Snow White into eating it and she fell asleep. Also in the Disney fairy tell “Sleeping Beauty” the witch poisoned the prick of a spindle and used hypnosis to get the princes to prick her finger on it and she fell asleep. In the movie “The Wizard of Oz”, the “wicked witch of the west” caused Dorothy and company to fall into a deep sleep by means of spreading a poison dust over a field of flowers which Dorothy and the Lion breathed in because the scent of the flowers inspired deep inhalation. There is symbolism here as well because the flowers are the opium poppy the source of codeine, morphine and heroin. These drugs except the last one have been a favorite of doctors for years. Granted these are just “stories” but stories have basis in fact. See sub-footnote A for a tangential discussion of the wizard in the movie “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz” and Freemasonry. The psychiatrist witches want to turn you into Sleeping Beauty with a figurative poison apple, a neuroleptic drug. Psychiatrist have been known to put the neuroleptics into the juice of “patients” who were refusing to take the drugs “voluntarily” and the nurses would offer it to the “patient” who unknowingly would consume the poison. Believe me, I speak from experience. The hospital this happened to me at was Grand View Hospital in Dayton Ohio. I also read in a medical book under one neuroleptic how the author described how easily Depakene could be added into the food of a “noncompliant patient”. The Bible book of Revelation states at chapter 21 verse 8 this: “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and the murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all the liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” Revelation 22:15 says: “For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murders, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.” These two scriptures are quoted out of the King James Version of the Holy Bible. The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures reads as follows: Revelation 21:8 “But as for the cowards and those without faith and those who are disgusting in their filth and murderers and fornicators and those practicing spiritism and idolaters and all the liars, their portion will be in the lake of fire that burns with fire and sulphur. This means the second death.” Revelation 22:15 “Outside are the dogs and those who practice spiritism and the fornicators and the murderers and the idolaters and everyone liking and carrying on a lie.” Notice that the King James Version uses the word sorcerers and the New World Translation uses the phrase “those practicing spiritism”. To understand the root meaning of this word it will be necessary to look up the word sorcerers in The New Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance Of The Bible (King James Version) by James Strong, LL.D., S.T.D. Copyright 1890. After finding the word sorcerers in the index you will see these two scriptures of Revelation listed. There will be two numbers which are 5332 and 5333 on the far right where sorcerers is indexed. You will need these numbers to locate the original Greek words in the Greek Dictionary in the back of this book. You will notice in this dictionary will be listed different grammatical forms of this Greek word from number 5331 to 5333. They are pharmakeia, pharmaeus, pharmakon, and pharmakos. These are the same Greek words that the English words pharmacy, pharmacist, pharmacology, pharmaceutical, pharmacist, phramacopoeia or pharmacopeia, etc. are derived from. In the dictionary at the back of this book it will say the Greek words above mean, druggist or poisoner, magic (magick), sorcerer, magician, witchcaft. If you are not a Christian and you are faced with involuntary drugging now would be a good time to convert. If you are already a Christian and face involuntary drugging but didn’t know this Bible teaching from God then don’t blame yourself, you know now. The older version of the MD hypocratic oath was addressed to false pagan gods. Also the symbol that medical doctors (MD not DO) use of two snakes wrapped around a pole is pagan in origin. To see this symbol used by the Medical Society that MDs belong to go to this web-site: http://www.drkoop.com  Here is a Satanic Witchcraft illustration taken from the web. Notice that this same medical drug symbol is in the goat of mendes lap. To understand the symbolism of some of this such as the candle on this goats head it will be necessary to go to these web-site resources. http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1165.cfm  and http://www.cuttingedge.org/n1040.html  and http://www.cuttingedge.org/goathead.gif  and http://www.cuttingedge.org/n1081.html  and http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1164.cfm  and http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1165.cfm . Tell the judge that as a Christian it violates your religious faith to allow witchdoctors to practice witchcraft on you. Explain what you have learned. According to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in the USA the judge must follow certain guidelines when you raise this objection, however it has come to my attention that the Supreme Court has ruled this act as “unconstitutional”. To find out about this Trojan Horse go to this web-site, http://www.lex-rex.com/newpg.html  and http://erlc.com/RLiberty/RFRA/1997/625SupCt.htm. Despite this act being shot down you still have religious liberties granted by the constitution of the USA and can still appeal based on your constitutional rights. Also it is illegal for them to label any religious belief a “delusion” and it is illegal for them to “treat” you based on your religious beliefs labeled as “delusions”. If the judge doesn’t allow you to exercise your religious liberties by allowing you to remain drug free then file and appeal. If it is difficult for you to remember this information then just print it out so you can read it to the court and tell them these are your beliefs as a Christian. Remember the web-sites above and look up Leviticus 17:7 which says “And they shall no more offer their sacrifices unto devils, after whom they have gone a whoring. This shall be a statute for ever unto them throughout their generations.” King James Version. This is how this same scripture reads in the New World Translation: “So they should no longer sacrifice their sacrifices to the goat shaped demons with which they are having immoral intercourse. This will serve as a statute to time indefinite for you, throughout your generations.” The big difference in these two translations is the use of “devils” verses the phrase “goat shaped demons”. To find out why the New World Translation rendered this scripture this way it will be necessary to reference the Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the King James Bible Again. Look up devils in the index and find this scripture and see the number 8163? Take this number and look in the back of this book in the Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary and find the number 8163. This will be the original Hebrew word translated into devils in the King James Version of the Holy Bible. Notice that the Hebrew word is saweer’ which means shaggy; as noun, a he-goat; by anal. A faun: – devil, goat, hairy, kid, rough, satyr. This is the same satyr in the Disney cartoon Hercules. Isaiah 13:21 speaks of “dancing satyrs” in the King James Version and the New World Translation speaks of “goat shaped demons skipping about”. The mythological figure named Pan was a satyr, a half man half goat creature depicted with a musical pipe and dancing about. According to Dr. Anton LaVey author of the Satanic Bible, Freemason and founder of the Church of Satan, Pan and Lucifer are two of the many “infernal” names of Satan the Devil. There are other names listed in the Satanic Bible but these are listed only as support for this footnote. Here is the web-site of the Church of Satan http://www.churchofsatan.com  or http://www.churchofsatan.org and the Satanic Network http://www.satannet.com . Satanists promote what they call a “Heroic Society”. They support the evil of eugenics. For the truth about Yehovah Elohim’s (Jehovah God’s) Holy Word the Holy Scriptures (Bible) please visit http://www.watchtower.org  and fill out the online form to request information. A wonderful paradise on Earth awaits all who put their trust in Jehovah and serve Him. He is going to set up a Kingdom on Earth through His son Yehoshuvah (“JESUS Christ”) as King for a thousand years. Armageddon is close so please look to Jehovah before it is too late. True Christians do not support any political party and do not vote. True Christians do not give their allegiance to any nation on the Earth but to Yehovah’s coming Kingdom on Earth. True Christians do not take up arms and go to war. If you are forced to take drugs by injection or have then put down your throat with a plastic tube then pray to Yehovah for protection because he will protect you from poison if it is forced on you if you pray to Him using His Name and end your prayer through His Son Yehoshuvah (“Jesus”), Yeshuah for short. In the Holy Scriptures it promises that Christians will be able to drink poison that is forced on them and it will not harm them. There is also the example of the apostle Paul who was bitten by the poisonous snake and it did not harm him. In Africa and elsewhere Voodoo Witchdoctors are not able to turn Jehovah’s Witnesses into Zombies with their Zombie potions. I still have my mind and health intact today and more children because the Almighty Father Yehovah has protected me. But do your best not to take the drugs “willingly” because you may grieve the Holy Spirit and therefore receive no protection. Sub-footnote A: It is interesting to note that the wizard (In the movie “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz”) who claims to be a good man seems to be a Freemason because he speaks of going back to the land of “E Pluribus Unum” so he can be with his “brother wizards”, not fellow but “brother” which is what freemasons call each other and freemasons practice the occult what they call the “craft” (Witchcraft). “E Pluribus Unum” means one out of many which is originally all the states of the USA but around the pyramid on the back of the one dollar bill are the words “Annuit Coeptis Novus Ordo Seclorum” which means Announcing the Creation New Secular (or World) Order. The Freemasons are the ones responsible for everything on the back of the one dollar bill. It is interesting to note that the pyramid has thirteen rows of bricks, the shield on the eagle has thirteen stripes, and the eagle holds thirteen arrows and an olive branch that has thirteen leaves and also thirteen olives. There are thirteen stars above the eagle. There are thirteen letters in “Annuit Coeptis” above the pyramid and thirteen letters in “E Pluribus Unum” above the eagle. In Washington DC the thirty three degree Freemason lodge is thirteen blocks North of the Whitehouse. On the back of the one dollar bill the eagle has thirty two feathers on one side representing the thirty two degrees of Freemasonry Scottish Rite and on the other side thirty three feathers for the honorary degree for which one is initiated into the Illuminati. The tail has nine feathers representing the nine additional honorary degrees of the York Rite of Freemasonry. To understand what the pyramid and the eye represents it will be necessary to visit www.maitreya.org and see the document called “Master Plan for Planet Earth” and also see the gratuitous use of the term “World Order”. Freemasons are behind the “Mission of Maitreya” and also the United Nations backed “Share International” run by the British theosophist Benjamin Crème. The Mission of Maitreya is claiming no previous affiliation with the UN backed Share International and Benjamin Crème but is inviting them to join them. Crème had always maintained that he was in direct contact with Maitreya telepathically and that Maitreya would make his presence known at anytime. This is a ruse to make it look like things are happening as Benjamin Crème foretold. Bemjamin Creme once called “Lucifer” our God and called him “the director of our planetary evolution”. Benjamin Creme is a supporter of Nazi eugenics. For more information see the links below. http://www.cuttingedge.org/fmcorner.html http://www.williamcooper.com/majestyt.htm http://www.freemasonrywatch.org http://www.cuttingedge.org/n1040.html http://www.cuttingedge.org/n1081.html http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1164.cfm http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1165.cfm http://www.webzonecom.com/ccn/cults/newageov.txt http://www.ametro.net/crownrights/fbs/naziism.htm http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1072.html http://www.webcom.com/enddays/masonry3.html#Masonry3-Contents http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/7771/MysteryBabylon.htm http://www.cuttingedge.org/ce1073.html http://www.cuttingedge.org/ce1009.html http://home.inreach.com/dov/cdlcons.htm http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Troy/3164/Introduction.htm http://religion-cults.com/Secret/Freemasonry/Freemasonry.htm http://www.bloomington.in.us/~lgthscac/freemasonry.htm Footnote D: This brings to mind a story that a man at the FDA told me of how a women he knew of that was institutionalized because her husband who was a doctor pulled some strings with connections he had, because he was having an affair with another woman. This man at the FDA told me that when this woman had gotten out of the institution in her late 30′s after years of being forced to take neuroleptics she had already gone through menopause and her back was humped over with the characteristics of an old woman. This same man at the FDA told me that the FDA does not conduct animal studies to determine how these drugs affect the duration of life span nor do they require the pharmaceutical companies to do so. Does this shock you? After all the FDA is supposed to be charged with protecting the safety of the American public. It would be a simple thing to conduct such studies on animals. Personally I knew of two young women being held in the state hospital in Dayton Ohio against their will and being forced to take neuroleptics that have already had to have hysterectomies because of these drugs. One of these women is now out of this state institution and I do not know the status of the other woman at this time. For the illustration scans spoken of above get them from the web-sites above. The following is an article by Anton Chaitkin that I took from the Internet. The article contains informative information that helps to understand the impetuous behind the conspiracy involving these neuroleptic drugs. END &&&

Fluoride – The Lunatic Drug

Never forget that;
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil
is that good men do nothing.
—  Edmund Burke
http://www.policyexperts.org/experts/

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 06:27:31 -0500
From: “Beaver Cole” <bcole@longview.net>

DO YOURSELF a favor and read this message to the very end.  Then we will talk some
more as this is how we get things done in this country by talking about it.

Please send this to your entire mailing list.

Beaver Cole
The Oil Patch Newspaper -
http://www.the-oil-patch.com
Longview, Texas

====================================
—– Original Message —–
From: Cliff Hume – humec@island.net
To: <Recipient list suppressed>
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 12:57 AM
Subject: [NH] Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride

Thanks Kraig and Shirley Carroll:

I have read much about this over the years, but this has to be the shortest
and the best.

Yours truly,

Cliff Hume.

=====================================

From: Shirley Carroll – thehavens@highland.net
Subject: [NH] Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride
From: Brian Jerome – brian@eternalmatrix.com
Subject: Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride

SICKNESS CONTROL 101: FLUORIDE, THE LUNATIC DRUG

“TELL A LIE LOUD ENOUGH AND LONG ENOUGH AND PEOPLE WILL BELIEVE IT.”
(Adolph Hitler)

“EARTH IS AN INSANE ASYLUM, TO WHICH THE OTHER PLANETS DEPORT THEIR
LUNATICS.” –Voltaire (Memnon the Philosopher).

Controversial fluoride is one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC
(FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl
FLUoride).

Sodium fluoride, a hazardous-waste by-product from the manufacture of
aluminum, is a common ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anesthetics,
hypnotics, psychiatric drugs, and military nerve gas. It`s historically
been quite expensive to properly dispose of, until some aluminum industries
with an overabundance of the stuff sold the public on the terrifically
insane but highly profitable idea of buying it at a 20,000% markup,
injecting it into our water supplies, and then DRINKING it.

Yes, a 20,000% markup: Fluoride– intended only for human consumption by
people under 14 years of age–is injected into our drinking water supply at
approx. 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink 1/2 of one
percent of the total water supply, the rest literally goes down the drain
as a free hazardous-waste disposal for the chemical industry, where we PAY
them so that we can flush their expensive hazardous waste down our toilets.
How many salesmen dream of such a deal? (Follow the money.)

Independent scientific evidence repeatedly showing up over the past 50
years reveals that fluoride allegedly shortens our life span, promotes
cancer and various mental disturbances, accelerates osteoporosis and broken
hips in old folks, and makes us stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one
package. There are reports of aluminum in the brain possibly being a
causative factor in Alzheimer`s Disease, and evidence points towards
fluoride`s strong affinity for aluminum and also its ability to “trick” the
blood-brain barrier by looking like the hydrogen ion, and thus allowing
chemical access to brain tissue.

Scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on this mega-bucks PR
ploy have consistently been given a very unscientific Black-PR treatment,
and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never
arrive in the press. Follow the money to find the control. In 1952 the
slick PR campaign which ramrodded the concept of fluoridation through via
our Public Health departments and various dental organizations was likened
to a highly-emotional “beer-salesman`s convention” instead of the objective
scientific experiment which it should properly have been. It`s continued in
that vein right up to present time. To illustrate the emotional vs. the
scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given by people
(perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of fluoridation comes up. Ask
yourself, “Is this response EMOTIONAL BLUSTER, or is it UNBIASED AND
OPENLY- INTERESTED OBJECTIVITY?” There is a tremendous amount of emotional,
highly unscientific know-it-all !
attached to fluoridation. Many truly independent (unattached to any
vested-interest) scientists who`ve spent a large portion of their lives
studying and working with this subject have been subjected to a surprising
amount of uncalled-for and unfair character assassination from strong
vested- interest groups who profit from the public`s ignorance as well as
from their illnesses. (Follow the money.)

Do you have diabetes or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11
million Americans with diabetes. Since many diabetics drink more liquids
than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 11
million Americans probably shouldn`t drink fluoridated water, because in
doing so, they`ll receive an excessive dose of fluoride.

Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which
is your main route of fluoride elimination. –So those people with kidney
disease also shouldn`t drink fluoridated water. Cases are on record
(Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where kidney patients on dialysis machines
died, due to a fluoride overdose in the city water supply. Let`s begin at
the beginning:

The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in
Germany`s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about
fluoride`s supposed effect on children`s teeth; their alleged reason for
mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and
force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission. (Ref.
book: “The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben” by Joseph Borkin.)

The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional
Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins,
a chemist:

“I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation
regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth About Water Fluoridation,
to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England
from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. “In the 1930`s, Hitler and
the German Nazi`s envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a
Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very
ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and
adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the
population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water
supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas,
reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in
women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied
a prominent place. …

“Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce
an individual`s power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and
narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the
will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient light lobotomy]

“The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children`s
teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could
be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real
purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses
to domination and control and loss of liberty.

“When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German
General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and
military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control
through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because
it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world. …

“I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official
of the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the
Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and
sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years` research into the
chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine–any person
who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more
will never again be the same person mentally or physically.” CHARLES E.
PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954.
__________________________

Quoting Einstein`s nephew, Dr. E.H. Bronner (a chemist who had also been a
prisoner of war during WWII) in a letter printed in The Catholic Mirror,
Springfield, MA, January 1952:

“It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts are among the `next` on the
agenda of the water poisoners.

“There is a sinister network of subversive agents, Godless `intellectual`
parasites, working in our country today whose ramifications grow more
extensive, more successful and more alarming each new year and whose true
objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic–from
within if they can, according to their plan–for their own possession. “The
tragic success they have already attained in their long siege to destroy
the moral fiber of American life is now one of their most potent footholds
towards their own ultimate victory over us.

“Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most
subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration. …

“As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22
years, 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on
my years of practical experience in the health-food and chemical field, let
me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national
suicide. Don`t do it.

“Even in small quantities, sodium fluoride is a deadly poison to which no
effective antidote has been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the
most efficient rat-killer. … Sodium fluoride is entirely different from
organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and provided by
nature, in God`s great providence and love, to build and strengthen our
bones and our teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from
proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assimilable
by the human body, whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in
fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully water soluble.
The body refuses to assimilate it. “Careful, bonafide laboratory
experimentation by conscientious, patriotic research chemists, and actual
medical experience, have both revealed that instead of preserving or
promoting `dental health,` fluoridated drinking water destroys teeth,
before adulthood and after, by the destructive mottling and other
pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also
creates many other very grave pathological conditions in the internal
organisms of bodies consuming it. How can it be called a “health” plan?
What`s behind it?

“That any so-called “doctors” would persuade a civilized nation to add
voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable.
It is the height of criminal

insanity. “No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed and agreed from 1939
to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin`s Last Will and Hitler`s Mein Kampf:

“America we shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within.” …

“Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of
water poisoning by fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other
countries. Sodium fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most
effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless, tasteless; no
antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete extermination of rats.
……………..

“Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide, or quick
national liquidation. It is criminal insanity–treason!” Dr. E.H. Bronner,
Mfg. Research Chemist, Los Angeles.

……………….

Re: Re: Here is a very interesting article about Fluoride. Willeam A Choby DMD MAGD MPA FICCMO ACD
Sunday, 13-Aug-2000 22:27:35

The addition of any chemical agent to public water for any purpose other than to improve its purity is a violation of our constitutional right to privacy. This civil right is drawn from the Bill of rights which prohibits the government from forcing homeowners to quarter soldiers at their expense for the purpose of protecting us from our enemies. The introduction of therapeutic fluoride into the water with the intention of protecting us from dental disease is a similar invasion of our private homes.

It is truly tragic that organized dentistry has taken this issue to promote itself as a caretaker of the public’s oral health. Nothing could be further from the truth. Organized dentistry’s primary purpose is to further the interests of its dues paying members. They should leave the affairs of the public’s health to the experts of constitutional law and not public opinion.

Willeam A Choby DMD MAGD MPA FICCMO ACD

———————————-
Earliest available Russian fluoride evidence:
(APFN NOTE: THIS INFO WAS FAXED VIA APFN IN 1993)
http://enteract.com/~mgfree/Medical/Fluorine/FluorineApathy.html

“I, Oliver Kenneth Goff, was a member of the Communist Party and the Young
Communist League, from May 2, 1936, to October 9, 1939. During this period
of time, I operated under the alias of John Keats with number 18-B-2. My
testimony before the Government is in Volume 9 of the Un-American
Activities Report for 1939.

“While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist training
schools in New York and Wisconsin … and we were trained in the
revolutionary overthrow of the U.S. Government. “… We discussed quite
thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in
Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school
felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would
bring about a spirit of lethargy in the nation, where it could keep the
general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism. We also
discussed the fact that keeping a store of deadly fluoride near the water
reservoir would be advantageous during the time of the revolution, as it
would give us opportunity to dump this poison into the water supply and
either kill off the populace or threaten them with liquidation, so that
they would surrender to obtain fresh water.

============================================
Nerve Agents
Lethal organo-phosphorus compounds inhibiting cholinesterase
http://www.opcw.nl/chemhaz/nerve.htm

“The plain fact that fluorine is an insidious poison, harmful, toxic and cumulative
in its effects, even when ingested in minimal amounts, will remain unchanged no
matter how many times it will be repeated in print that fluoridation of the water
supply is ‘safe’.” Ludwig Gross, M.D., former Chief of Veterans Administration
Cancer Research, Bronx, NY.
http://www.connect4free.net/home/geofjoan/chem_sen/halogen.html

Los Angeles fluoridation lawsuit
http://www.sonic.net/~kryptox/law/law.htm

Fluoride or Sodium Hydroxide?
An Environmental Detective Story, by Dan Montgomery
http://www.sonic.net/kryptox/water/hydrox.htm

AMERICA: OVERDOSED ON FLUORIDE
http://www.zerowasteamerica.org/Fluoride.htm

An International Coalition to End Water Fluoridation and Alert
People to Fluoride’s Health and Environmental Risks
http://www.fluoridealert.org/index.htm

“Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of
all time.” -
Robert Carton, PhD, scientist, formerly of the US Environmental Protection Agency.
http://www.npwa.org.uk/

PRESS RELEASE – July 2000
ARSENIC LEVELS COULD SOUND DEATH-KNELL FOR WATER FLUORIDATION PLANS
http://tinyurl.com/93tsm5

Fluoridation / Fluoride Toxic Chemicals In Your Water
http://www.holisticmed.com/fluoride/

Are the claimed benefits of ingesting fluoride over-rated
and the risks to our health and eco-system under-reported?
http://www.fluoridation.com/

Impact of Artificial Fluoridation on Salmon Species in
the Northwest USA and British Columbia, Canada
http://www.fluoridation.com/fish.htm

Skeletal fluorosis is a crippling bone disease caused by fluoride
http://www.fluoridation.com/skeletal.htm

STOP  Fluoridation  USA
http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/

DID GOVERNMENT APPROVE CITIZENS AS TOXIC WASTE SITES?
http://www.thewinds.org/archive/medical/fluoride01-98.html

Leading Edge Scientific Abstracts on Fluoride Bio-Toxicity
http://www.trufax.org/abstract/abstract.html

Related Research:
The Crime and Punishment of I. G. Farben
by Joseph Borkin (out of print book search)

Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride
by Bernard Meyer Wagner

Fluoridation : the Great Dilemma
by George L. Waldbott

Fluoride the Aging Factor :
How to Recognize and Avoid the Devastating Effects of Fluoride
by John, Dr. Yiamouyiannis

Scientific Knowledge in Controversy :
The Social Dynamics of the Fluoridation Debate
by Brian Martin

Medical Mafia by Guylaine Lanctot

Racketeering in Medicine by James P. Carter

The Cure for All Diseases by Dr. Hulda Regehr Clark

Censured for Curing Cancer :
The American Experience of Dr. Max Gerson
by S.J. Haught

******
Kraig and Shirley Carroll …… in the hills of SE Kentucky
http://www.thehavens.com/
thehavens@highland.net
606-376-3363

=============================================

The Real Story on Arsenic in Your Water

Neal Boortz
Mon Apr 9 15:41:13 2001

The Real Story on Arsenic in Your Water

Neal Boortz
April 3, 2001

At first it sounded pretty damming: George W. Bush had 86′ed an
EPA regulation further limiting the amount of arsenic that could
legally be found in America’s drinking water.

For people who don’t bother to look beyond the sensational
headlines, this sounds mighty bad indeed! Everybody knows that
arsenic is poisonous! Everybody knows that you can die from
arsenic poisoning! Why, it’s absolutely outrageous that President
Bush would do such a thing! He’s a madman!

I purposely avoided conversation on this particular subject this week
until I could get a little more information.

OK, here goes. So everybody knows that arsenic is poison, right?
Fine. Do you also know that arsenic is found naturally in broccoli and
other vegetables? Do you know that most groundwater already
contains arsenic? Did you know that at low levels arsenic is virtually
harmless to the human body?

Here’s what happened. The National Academy of Sciences issues a
report saying that there is too much arsenic in America’s water
supply. The EPA follows suit with a new regulation lowering the
permissible arsenic in our water supply form 50ppb (parts per
billion) to 10ppb.

Fine. Now, what would this cost, and how many lives would it save?

Cost? The water industry says it would cost about $6 billion in
immediate capital outlays and about $600 million a year from then
on.

That cost should be no factor, though, if huge numbers of lives could
be saved. So, what’s the toll in saved souls? The EPA says that by
reducing the arsenic level in water we’re going to statistically save
about 28 lives per year.

Whenever you talk about saving lives through regulation, you ought
to pay a little attention to just how much each one of those saved
lives would cost. We could, for instance, save the lives of a lot of
airline passengers if each passenger could be encased in an
escape pod with automatic fire suppression systems and a decent
parachute in case of a disaster. The cost, though, would be
absolutely prohibitive. The EPA realizes this and has suggested a
figure of “cost per statistical life saved” for its regulations. That
figure is around $4 million.

So, what would the cost-per-life-saved be of these new EPA arsenic
regulations? OK, get your official Clark Howard calculator out. The
new arsenic regs would save about 28 lives per year – at a cost of
$65 million per life. That’s over 16 times the EPA’s own suggest
threshold limit!

So, now that you’ve learned a bit more, does Bush’s rejection of the
new EPA standards sound so horrible?

So why does this work so well? How can Democrats, union goons
and mental midgets like Barbra Streisand succeed so wildly in
demonizing George W. for a decision that actually makes sense?
Easy, because the decision doesn’t make sense UNTIL the facts
are known. Facts – poison to the left and the liberal mental process.

Rioting College Students

So Arizona lost. Big deal. But once again we were treated to video
of rioting students overturning cars and setting fires.

Just once I would like to read about strong disciplinary action being
taken by a college or university after an event like this. Get the video,
then identify every single person you can in that video. If you had
your hands on that car when it was turned over – you’re out. Pack
your stuff. Your education at this university is over. Period. No
questions. If your face is shown around that fire – so long! Time to
apply to another institute of higher education.

Yeah – like we’re going to get that type of a response from today’s
college and university administrators.

Wouldn’t It Be Nice if This Spread!

Tax Revolt: Dozens of small-business owners have stopped
withholding taxes from their employees and have challenged the IRS
to prove them wrong. “60 Minutes II” reports on a tax revolt that’s a
direct challenge to the way our tax system runs.

Well, Texas congressman Ron Paul has introduced a bill that, sadly,
doesn’t have a snowball’s chance. He wants to end tax withholding.

Class Warfare Rages On

Let’s take a quick look at the way the AFL-CIO participates in and
encourages the politics of envy and class warfare in America.

Here’s a link to a page on the AFL-CIO Web site:

http://cw2k.capweb.net/aflcio/letterstate.cfm?letter_id=1512

It’s a letter you can automatically send to your favorite politician or
journalist. Throughout this letter you can see one of the elements of
this class warfare agenda. The left and the AFL-CIO are working to
differentiate between “the rich” and “working people.” The goal here
is to promote the idea that wealthy people don’t actually work for
their money. And since they don’t work for their money, it’s no real
big deal if their money is taken away from them and given to people
who actually DO work!

If you want a good rundown on the entire leftist-socialist movement
in the United States, there is no better place to start than
http://www.aflcio.org/home.htm .

Before we move on, here’s a quote from AFL-CIO president John J.
Sweeney about Bush’s tax cut idea:

“My fear is that he is so determined to reward his corporate and
ideological backers that he will ignore the needs of the vast majority
of American people who make daily decisions between pork chops
and peanut butter – as he pays attention only to those who must
decide between a $190 and a $125 bottle of Bordeaux.”

Nice, huh? We have two classes of people in this country. Those
who work and have to decide between pork chops and peanut
butter; and those who are rich and who’s only problem is which wine
to drink with their gourmet dinner.

Hey, Sweeney. The next time one of your precious union members
needs a job, tell him to go apply for work to someone trying to
decide between pork chops and peanut butter.

They’re Not Interested in Educating Your Kid

If you needed further proof that government schools don’t give a rat’s
derriere when it comes to educating your child, here it is.

Thomas Edison Elementary School in San Francisco used to be the
kind of school that “parents fought to get out of,” according to the
San Francisco Chronicle. I say “used to be” because in 1998, a
company called Edison Schools came in, privatized it and renamed
it the Edison Charter Academy. The New York Times says that
since Edison took over the school, the proportion of students
scoring in the upper half on national math and reading tests has
doubled. And the number of students scoring in the lowest ranks has
been cut by one-third.

That’s great, right? Kids at Edison Charter Academy are learning,
and their test scores show it. The kids get their future handed back
to them and San Francisco looks good for allowing Edison Schools
to take charge. It’s a win-win situation, right?

Not if you’re a member of the San Francisco Board of Education. A
recent investigation alleges Edison discriminates against black
students, sends special education students to other campuses, and
hasn’t provided the school district with records that track the public
money the school uses. At a school board meeting last Tuesday, the
board voted 6-1 to give Edison Schools 90 days to fix these
“problems.” If the board still finds problems, the school will lose its
charter and revert to government control.

Parents of children at the Edison Charter Academy attended last
week’s meeting and begged the board not to revoke Edison’s
contract. More than 80 percent of the academy’s parents have
signed a petition asking the city to keep Edison Schools.

And opponents of Edison Schools have failed to provide any
concrete evidence that Edison has forced students out to increase
test scores.

Oh, and let’s not forget that this is the same school district whose
loose finances led them to spend $30 million in voter-approved
construction funding for other things, like salaries. Audits show that
over the past eight years, the district has routinely spent money it
didn’t have. And this week, the district passed up a $50 million
federal technology grant because it couldn’t even pony up the 17
cents per federal dollar.

The bottom line is that a private company beat government
educators at their own game, and the school board doesn’t like it
one bit. So they’re going to do their best to sack Edison Schools
and protect their monopoly on San Francisco’s children.

Speaking of Privatizing Schools …

It wasn’t a very good week for Edison Schools.

The company also wanted to privatize the five worst-performing
schools in Brooklyn, the Bronx and Manhattan – but was stopped
cold. But it’s not the school administrators who sent Edison down to
defeat, it’s the apathetic, government-addicted parents that nixed
this proposal.

Only 2,267 of nearly 5,000 eligible parents cast votes last week.
And Edison Schools required “yes” votes from a majority of all
eligible parents at each school. Mayor Rudy Giuliani wants the
school board to allow Edison to take over the 20 worst schools –
with or without parental approval.

Kenneth Wilson is the father of a kindergartner and a first-grader at
one of these dreadful government schools: Community School 66 in
the Bronx. On Thursday he said, “We hate Edison because they’re
going to come in here as a business. Each child is a dollar sign.”
Wow! A true candidate for Parent of the Year.

Sorry … how is that different from a government-run school? And is it
somehow diabolical for a for-profit company to want to operate as a
business? Is there something about a company that makes it less
qualified than the do-nothing government educators who currently
run the show?

If Kenneth Wilson and the other parents put that much stock in the
ability of the government regime to teach their kids how to read and
write, they’re deluding themselves.

Every parent who sends their kid to a government school should sit
down and try to think of a single thing the government does well –
besides tyrannize freedom-loving individuals.

Our benevolent imperial federal government can’t do anything right.
So why should you think they’re qualified to educate your child?

Be Careful How You Ridicule Dubya

ABC News needs better copy editors.

On last Thursday’s “World News Tonight,” White House reporter
(and Clinton flack) Terry Moran ridiculed George W. Bush for using
the term “energy crisis.” That’s because, as Moran said, “there are
no gas lines and the price of crude oil is actually declining.”

The very next night, anchor Charles Gibson plugged an upcoming
story by saying, “When we come back, America’s energy crisis. Gas
prices are soaring and they’ll get even worse this summer.”

So one night there’s no energy crisis and Dubya’s a dunce … and
the next night there is an energy crisis!

Which is it, ABC? You can’t have it both ways. And you’ve just shown
the world that you’re more interested in slamming the Bush
administration than reporting the facts.

Neal Boortz is the hugely popular nationally syndicated radio host.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/4/3/143117.shtml

=========================================================
Why American’s are SHEEPLES: FLUORIDE
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/sheeples.htm

Shocking News About Fluoride
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flouride.htm

TOP FLUORIDE EXPERT APOLOGIZES FOR PUSHING POISON
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fluoride-expert.htm

FLUORIDE Links:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fluoride.htm

Fluoride is a Corrosive Poison
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/poison.htm

POPULATION CONTROL
Warning: The life you save may be your own!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/control3.htm

Finding the Truth about the Social Security Debate – JULY 2000
http://www.policyexperts.org/insider/2000/jul00/welcome.html

It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything
else, that prevents us from living freely and nobly.
-Bertrand Russell
http://www.apfn.org

Water vs. Coke

Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 10:02 AM

Subject: Water vs. Coke

Water vs. Coke

  We all know that water is important but I’ve never seen it written
down like this before.

75% of Americans are chronically dehydrated. (Likely applies to half
world pop.)

In 37% of Americans, the thirst mechanism is so weak that it is often
mistaken for hunger.

Even MILD dehydration will slow down one’s metabolism as much as 3%.

One glass of water shut down midnight hunger pangs for almost 100% of
the dieters studied in a U-Washington study.

Lack of water, the #1 trigger of daytime fatigue.

Preliminary research indicates that 8-10 glasses of water a day could
significantly ease back and joint pain for up to 80% of sufferers.

A mere 2% drop in body water can trigger fuzzy short-term memory,
trouble with basic math, and difficulty focusing on the computer
screen or on a printed page.

Drinking 5 glasses of water daily decreases the risk of colon cancer
by 45%, plus it can slash the risk of breast cancer by 79%, and one is
50% less likely to develop bladder cancer.

Are you drinking the amount of water you should every day?

=========================================================

   COKE

   No wonder coke tastes soooo good:

1. In many states (in the USA) the highway patrol carries two gallons
of Coke in the truck to remove blood from the highway after a car
accident.

2. You can put a T-bone steak in a bowl of coke and it will be gone in
two days.

3. To clean a toilet: Pour a can of Coca-Cola into the toilet bowl and
…….Let the “real thing” sit for one hour, then flush clean. The
citric acid in Coke removes stains from vitreous china.

4. To remove rust spots from chrome car bumpers: Rub the bumper with a
crumpled-up piece of Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil dipped in Coca-Cola.

5. To clean corrosion from car battery terminals: Pour a can of
Coca-Cola over the terminals to bubble away the corrosion.

6. To loosen a rusted bolt: Applying a cloth soaked in Coca-Cola to
the rusted bolt for several minutes.

7. To bake a moist ham: Empty a can of Coca-Cola into the baking pan,
wrap the ham in aluminum foil, and bake. Thirty minutes before the ham
is finished, Remove the foil, allowing the drippings to mix with the
Coke for a sumptuous brown gravy.

8. To remove grease from clothes: Empty a can of coke into a load of
greasy clothes, add detergent, And run through a regular cycle. The
Coca-Cola will help loosen grease stains. It will also clean road haze
from your windshield.

FYI: 1. The active ingredient in Coke is phosphoric acid. Its Ph is
2.8. It will dissolve a nail in about 4 days.

2. To carry Coca-Cola syrup (the concentrate) the commercial truck
must use the Hazardous material place cards reserved for Highly
corrosive materials.

3. The distributors of coke have been using it to clean the engines of
their trucks for about 20 years!

Still Want To Drink Up?

(Got MILK?) Or better yet, pure, clean WATER

=======================================

Subject: Proof is in the water…city stops adding fluride…
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:06:42 EDT
From: PLANETNEWS@aol.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
PLANETNEWS broadcast…
Proof is in the water
Bishopville to stop adding fluoride to water
By MATT SCHAFER
Item Staff Writer
June 25, 2001

BISHOPVILLE – Water – it runs from every spigot, every faucet, every shower
head. And in Bishopville, it soon will become more natural.
At the end of June, Bishopville will discontinue adding fluoride to its
water, a practice that started more than 30 years ago.

The American Dental Association began promoting adding fluoride to town
water supplies to fight tooth loss. But because there has been data showing
fluoride both harms and helps teeth, controversy has swirled about the
mineral.

Mike Deas, the Bishopville utility director, got curious one day and started
studying its effects.

“I started to do some research, and I started to read all these things where
fluoride could be dangerous,” Deas said.”I started thinking, what if 20
years from now, it turns out that fluoride is harmful, and we didn’t stop
using it? What would they think of us?”

Needed by the body in trace amounts, fluoride helps the body retain calcium
required for bone and tooth development. But research, Deas found, pointed
to long-term problems and diseases resulting from drinking water containing
fluoride.

Some studies show a link between fluoridation and hip fractures. One study
shows a 5 percent increase in cancers in communities that add fluoride to
the water.

Deas said he was braced for backlash when the decision was announced, but he
hasn’t received one phone call or visit. The state Department of Health and
Environmental Control has no official opinion and allows towns and water
companies to make their own decision on fluoride.

“There is no requirement that anyone use it,” said Ronny Rentz, the director
for DHEC’s Wateree District. “I don’t know what the general feeling is, to
be honest.”

The South Carolina Board of Dentistry has never issued an opinion on
fluoride use, either.

The Item contacted both dentists in Bishopville, and both declined to
comment.

Also, several European countries including France, Germany, Austria and
Luxembourg either never used fluoride or have stopped using it.

Locally, Sumter uses fluoride while Manning never has added it.

“The only thing we add to our water is chlorine for disinfectant,’ said
Rubin Hardy, public works director for Manning.

Al Harris, director of public services for Sumter, doesn’t plan on getting
rid of fluoride any time soon.

“There’s some controversy on it as it is with any chemical; but right now,
we plan to probably leave it in for a while,” Harris said.

The American Dental Association has maintained that fluoride is a key
component of dental care.

The ADA cites study after study that shows that adding fluoride to the water
supply is an effective means of helping tooth growth in poorer communities.

Still, Deas said he believes the people of Bishopville could be better
served by fluoride through other sources.

While the most common source of fluoride is water, it is also in meats such
as liver and kidneys; fish and seafood, including canned sardines; and
apples, grape juice, eggs and tea.

Additionally, much of the fluoride Bishopville adds to the water gets
returned to the environment. Once in the environment, it is considered a
contaminant and has to be regulated.

Deas estimates that less than one-tenth of a percent of Bishopville’s water
is actually consumed. Lee County has several industries and farms that use
water for irrigation and industrial purposes.

After reviewing the situation, Deas has come to one conclusion.

“If they could prove we knew it was harmful and didn’t do anything about it,
the lawsuits could wipe out a town like this,” he said.

END

&&&

Sterilization of Native American Women
Reviewed by Omaha Master’s Student

Bruce E. Johansen

For: José Barreiro (editor-in-chief of NATIVE AMERICAS)
September, 1998

On the phone, during long marches, occupying federal surplus property, in court fighting for treaty rights — wherever Indian activists gathered during the “Red Power” years of the 1970s, conversation inevitably turned to the number of women who had had their tubes tied or their ovaries removed by the Indian Health Service. This was, I heard one woman joke bitterly at the time, a “fringe benefit of living in a domestic, dependent nation.”
          Communication spurred by activism provoked a growing number of Native American women to piece together what amounted to a national eugenic policy, translated into social reality by copious federal funding. (See sidebar) They organized WARN (Women of All Red Nations) at Rapid City, South Dakota, as Native women from more than thirty nations met and decided, among other things, that “truth and communication are among our most valuable tools in the liberation of our lands, people, and four-legged and winged creations.”
          WARN and other women’s organizations publicized the sterilizations, which were performed after pro-forma “consent” of the women being sterilized. The “consent” sometimes was not offered in the women’s language, following threats that they would die or lose their welfare benefits if they had more children. At least two fifteen-year-old girls were told they were having their tonsils out before their ovaries were removed.
          The enormity of government-funded sterilization has been compiled by a masters’ student in history, Sally Torpy, at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. Her thesis, “Endangered Species: Native American Women’s Struggle for Their Reproductive Rights and Racial Identity, 1970s-1990s,” which was defended during the summer of 1998, places the sterilization campaign in the context of the “eugenics” movement.
          No one even today knows exactly how many Native American women were sterilized during the 1970s. One base for calculation is provided by the General Accounting Office, whose study covered only four of twelve IHS regions over four years (1973 through 1976). Within those limits, 3,406 Indian women were sterilized, according to the GAO.
          Another estimate was provided by Lehman Brightman, who is Lakota, and who devoted much of his life to the issue, suffering a libel suit by doctors in the process. His educated guess (without exact calculations to back it up) is that 40 per cent of Native women and 10 per cent of Native men were sterilized during the decade. Brightman estimates that the total number of Indian women sterilized during the decade was between 60,000 and 70,000.
          By 1970, anecdotal evidence of the surge in sterilization began to accumulate, according to Torpy’s detailed account. For example, welfare case workers in Apollo, Pennsylvania had removed Norma Jean Serena’s daughter Lisa, three years of age, and son, Gary, age four, from her home before she underwent a tubal ligation after the birth of her son Shawn, in 1970. One day after Shawn was removed to a foster home, Serena signed consent forms for the surgery, emotionally battered by accusations of case workers that she was an unfit mother.
          Three years later, with legal assistance from the Council of Three Rivers Indian Center in Pittsburgh, Serena sued Armstrong County for return of her children from foster care. She also sued a number of area hospitals for damages related to her sterilization. A jury found that the children had been taken under false pretenses from Serena, who is of mixed Creek and Shawnee ancestry.
          During trial, attorneys for Serena questioned the “evidence” on which welfare case workers had decided to take her children and recommend her sterilization. The main “problem” seemed to have been the fact that black friends of Serena visited her home, as reported by anonymous tipsters in the neighborhood who asserted fear for their own children. While one caseworker described Serena’s apartment as “dirty and unkempt,” and her children as “undernourished and dazed,” unable to walk, speak, or hold eating utensils, a doctor who examined the children shortly afterwards found them “alert and in good health.” According to Torpy’s account, Serena was awarded $17,000 by a jury, and her children were ordered released to her. The Armstrong County child welfare bureaucracy stalled several months before returning the children, according to Torpy’s account, and did so only after officials were confronted with a contempt-of-court citation.
          Parts of Serena’s case were not settled until 1979, when several doctors and a male social worker were acquitted of having violated her civil rights by taking part in her sterilization. The key issue was whether she had given consent for the operation. Serena said she could not recall having signed a consent form; the attending physician said he had explained the operation to Serena and that he was convinced she understood him. A jury agreed.
          At about the same time that Serena had her run-in with case workers, a twenty-six year old Native American woman entered the office of a Los Angeles physician in 1970 seeking a “womb transplant” because she had been having trouble getting pregnant. The doctor, who never asked her name, told the woman she had been the subject of an hysterectomy, removal of her ovaries, which cannot be reversed. The operation had been performed under false pretenses. The woman, who was engaged to be married and who had hoped to raise a family was “devastated,” according to Torpy.
          The last vestiges of legally sanctioned eugenics played out during the 1960s, when concern about overpopulation expressed by industrial leaders in the United States (most notably by members of the Rockefeller family) became official federal policy — with massive spending to back it up — under the Nixon administration. Sterilization for the poor and minorities was officially sanctioned in 1970, just about the time students were killed at Kent and Jackson State universities as they protested expansion of the Vietnam War. Reservation populations became targets of a policy that also was being advocated nationally, especially for poor and minority women. In 1969, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also had relaxed its own restrictions on sterilizations.
          In 1970, when the IHS initiated its sterilization campaign (paid 100 per cent by federal funds), the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare vastly accelerated programs that paid 90 per cent of the costs to sterilize non-Indian poor women, following enactment of the Family Planning Act of 1970. The rate of sterilization for women as a whole in the United States then jumped by 350 per cent in five years, according to Torpy’s research.
          Before 1969 (following Nixon’s election as president) funding of sterilizations (as well as abortion) had been banned by the federal government. Between 1969 and 1974, HEW increased its family planning budget from $51 million to more than $250 million, Torpy found. HEW records reveal that between 192,000 and 548,000 women were sterilized each year between 1970 and 1977, compared to an average of 63,000 a year between 1907 and 1964, a period which included the zenith of the eugenics movement.
          Torpy reports that during 1977 Dr. R.T. Ravenholt, director of the United States Agency for International Development (office for population control), said that the United States hoped to sterilize 25 per cent of the world’s roughly 570 million fertile women. Ravenholt linked such control measures to the “…normal operation of U.S. commercial interests around the world.” These statements were published in a news story in the St. Louis Dispatch.
          During this wave of sterilizations, no other medical structure had the captive clientele of the IHS, however. “Native American women represented a unique class of victims among the larger population that faced sterilization and abuses of reproductive rights,” Tropy wrote in her thesis. “They had, and continue to have, a dependent relationship with the federal government which has put them at greater risk…”
          Within half a decade, Indian Health Service doctors were sterilizing so many reservation women that, according to Torpy, one Native American woman was being sterilized for every seven babies born.

IHS Sterilizations Were
the Last Gasp of Official Eugenics

          By the time sterilization reached its zenith of popularity in the Indian Health Service, it was the last official gasp of a century-old “scientific” effort to breed “desirable” human traits. The pseudo-science of eugenics was born at a time when forced assimilation was the order of the day for most Native Americans, a time when reputable scientists invoked a Social Darwinism that separated all human societies into three classes: civilized (reserved for white European or European-derived cultures), “barbarian,” and “savage.”
          According to Sally Torpy’s master’s thesis, the word “eugenics” was first used in 1883 by an Englishman, Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. Galton defined the word as “the use of genetics to improve the human race.” He was a recognized genius by the age of eight, having translated Latin into English. All through his life, Galton sought to genetically perpetuate intelligence and reduce procreation by the “mentally deficient.” His writings helped to create a “science of race improvement.” Galton’s first priority was to stop reproduction by “imbeciles, feeble-minded persons, moral imbeciles, and such inebriates, epileptics, deaf, and dumb, and blind persons.”
          At the same time another pseudo-science, called Craniology, asserted that the intelligence of a race could be measured by the average size of a sample of skulls. Predictably, Nordic Europeans were found to have the largest skulls. In this context, Torpy quotes Edward Spriggs, Jr., writing in The Review of Law and Social Change. Spriggs, writing in the early 1970s, called involuntary sterilization “an unconstitutional menace to the poor.” He also wrote that early eugenicists “espoused the theory that a wide variety of individual maladies and even social ills, such as poverty, were eugenic (incurable) in nature and that the best solution was prevention by sterilization.”
          Eugenics was alternately prescribed for just about anyone deemed to be retarded, antisocial or otherwise unfit to pass on genes to future generations. These theories often were propounded with a definite racial cant in the “era of the vanishing race,” a time when Oswald Spengler also wrote that he foresaw the “decline of the West” in a maw of multiethnic madness. Schoolchildren memorized Rudyard Kipling’s Gunga Din, with its poetic imagery of the “white man’s burden.” The theories of Thomas Malthus, a century old by the time eugenics was born, were called into the service of population-control advocates who recalled Malthus’ dictum that population grows geometrically while food supply increases only arithmetically.
          By 1907, when Indiana enacted the first compulsory eugenic sterilization law, eugenicists generally fell into two ideological camps: “positive eugenicists,” who believed that those people with genes deemed behaviorally or racially superior should be encouraged to reproduce. “Negative eugenicists,” the category into which the IHS campaign would fall, favored aggressive sterilization of people whose traits should not, in their view, be allowed to remain in the human gene pool.
          Eugenics was championed by the American Breeders’ Association in the early years of the century. In 1913, the ABA changed its name to the American Genetic Association. This “scientific” association published an academic journal, Journal of Heredity, whose editor, Paul Popenoe, popularized the idea of sterilizing children who (in Torpy’s words) “did not show adequate improvement in their schooling by the time of puberty.” Eugenic views also were advanced by the Human Betterment Association.
          Eugenic views received support during the 1920s from Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, who is quoted by Torpy in a case involving sterilization:

It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime [which he seemed to assume to be predictable and incurable] or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.

          If society could require mandatory inoculation for disease, said Justice Holmes, it could require that certain person’s fallopian tubes be severed or their ovaries removed. Eugenics was most often practiced on criminals, the mentally disturbed, and the poor, many of whom were non-white. When the practice was aimed at certain ethnic groups, including Native Americans, Spriggs called it “incipient genocide.”
          The International Indian Treaty Council, which helped to mobilize opposition to the sterilization campaign as it unfolded, agreed with Spriggs:

The United Nations Convention on Genocide states that imposing measures intended to prevent births within a group of people…are acts of genocide…[such as] sterilization of women are direct attacks on nationhood. Sterilization must continue as a birth-control choice for women, but for Native people it should be seen in the context of national identity. If an Indian woman is a member of a 3,000-member nation, sterilization has serious consequences for the survival of [her] people as a whole.

          Holmes’ opinions popularized the practice throughout the rest of the 1920s and 1930s in the United States. The American Eugenics Society initially condoned sterilization of Jews and other “social undesirables” by Hitler’s regime in Germany, then reluctantly distanced itself from Nazi practices after their manifest cruelty became known.
          The effort to enact eugenics legally reached a zenith by 1930, by which time 30 states and Puerto Rico had passed laws requiring mandatory sterilization for a great number and variety of committed or anticipated crimes or moral offenses. Nearly all of the states with such laws allowed legal sterilization of the mentally ill or “defective.” In nineteen states, sterilization was legal for parents whose children were thought likely to experience “physical, mental, or nervous disorders.” Six states allowed operations to prevent childbirth to parents whose children might be “socially inadequate.”
          In Michigan, sterilization was legal for anyone deemed “criminally insane.” Eleven states allowed sterilization of epileptics. Seven states allowed sterilization of habitual criminals, and two (Washington and Wisconsin) could sterilize “nonhabitual criminals.” In Iowa, a person who was deemed to be a “menace to society” might be placed under orders to lose his or her reproductive rights. Also in Iowa, as well as South Carolina, a case of syphilis could earn a court order for sterilization, and in California, Iowa, and Michigan “moral degeneracy” was enough. Five states prescribed sterilization for “sexual deviants or perverts.” A sixth state, South Dakota, allowed sterilization for “perverted or abnormal mentality.” Other laws prescribed compulsory sterilization for drug addicts and prostitutes.
          The state sterilization laws were held to be unconstitutional for the general population under the Bill of Rights (prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment) before the same practices came into vogue within the federal Indian-management bureaucracy.
          Outside of very occasional, anecdotal reports in a few major newspapers, the mainstream media generally ignored the wave of sterilizations as it was happening. The first large-audience, detailed description of the sterilizations was published not in the United States, but in Germany. Torpy tapped sources of information in small, specialized (often leftist or health-related) journals of opinion that, taken together, sketch a history of the sterilization campaign. She credits Brightman and the International Indian Treaty Council and others, including Constance Redbird Pinkerton-Uri, for keeping the issue alive enough to spark the interest of Senator James Abourezk of South Dakota, which led to a General Accounting Office report and congressional oversight hearings that eventually curbed the practice.
          By 1974, some IHS doctors who were critical of the sterilizations began investigating on their own. Pinkerton-Uri, a physician and law student who is Choctaw and Cherokee, started her own inquiry after complaints were lodged by Native patients against the Claremore, Oklahoma, IHS hospital. Taking publicity about the Serena cases and what she had found at Claremore, along with other pieces of evidence, Pinkerton-Uri began calling Senator Abourezk’s office. The office also had received inquiries from Charlie McCarthy, an IHS employee in Albuquerque, regarding sterilizations of Native American women.
          Torpy followed the trail of Abourezk’s investigation, beginning with an intern in his office, Joan Adams, who took the initiative to investigate whether Native women were being sterilized “without their consent and under duress.” This preliminary investigation convinced Adams (and, later, Senator Abourezk) that further study was needed. Abourezk, using Adams’ research, then called for a GAO investigation.
          Torpy describes the findings of the GAO report, which surveyed IHS records in four of twelve Bureau of Indian Affairs regions: Albuquerque, Phoenix, Oklahoma City, and Aberdeen, South Dakota. The study covered only 46 months, between 1973 and 1976. (As of 1977, the IHS operated 51 hospitals and 86 health centers or clinics.) Within this sample, the GAO found evidence that the IHS or its contractors had sterilized 3,406 women, 3,001 of them of child-bearing age (15 to 44 years).
          Since the GAO study did not even begin to arrive at a total number of sterilizations, opponents of the practice looked at the data in another way, as a percentage of the women of child-bearing age in each examined area who were sterilized. In Oklahoma, using the GAO study’s numbers, 1,761 of roughly 17,000 women of child-bearing age were sterilized. In Phoenix, the number was lower, 78 of 8,000; in Aberdeen, the figure was 740 of 9,000. They began to make a case that, with only 100,000 fertile Native women of child-bearing age in the United States, the sterilizations were putting a significant dent in the gene pools of many individual Native American nations.
          Regarding the threat to the Native American gene pool, Torpy quotes Ms. Pinkerton-Uri:

A 200 million population could support voluntary sterilization and survive, but for Native Americans it cannot be a preferred method of birth control. While other minorities might have a gene pool in Africa or Asia, Native Americans do not; when we are gone, that’s it.

          At times, the battle over sterilization became localized and quite heated. In response to Pinkerton-Uri’s charges at the Claremore Hospital, physicians threatened to close the facility. “In response,” writes Torpy, “an unidentified group of Native Americans pitched a tipi on the hospital lawn alongside the American Indian Movement flag.”
          By the mid-to-late 1970s, the sterilization program was well known on the Native movement circuit. By 1974, Akwesasne Notes was carrying reports describing sterilizations, and Native American women’s attempts to mobilize against them. As a Ph.D. student in Seattle who had become involved in Native American issues (beginning with fishing rights), I requested an airing of the sterilization program in The Nation, the magazine that, in 1977, had allowed me a forum to present the first nationally published account of Leonard Peltier’s case. An editor at The Nation told me the magazine would publish the story only if I could supply a written statement from the IHS that genocide was its policy. No statement, the editor said, no story. I was unable to find such a tidy admission, although I could see a wave of sterilizations as I combined the GAO report’s findings with case-study materials from my files.
          By 1977, a class action suit had been initiated by three Montana Native American women. The names of the three Northern Cheyenne women who filed the class action suit were not released publicly out of fear that they would be condemned by other Cheyennes. The class-action suit never went to court, and never directly affected anyone other than the three claimants. Attorneys for the defendants approached the women’s attorneys and offered a cash settlement on condition that the case remain sealed. The women accepted the settlement.
          At about the same time, Marie Sanchez, the Northern Cheyennes’ chief tribal judge, conducted her own informal poll, and found that at least 30 women she contacted had been sterilized between 1973 and 1976. It was Sanchez who found two fifteen year old girls who said that they had been told they were having their tonsils out, only to emerge from a local IHS hospital without their ovaries.
          Torpy’s account brings what became a general pattern down to a personal level:

Another woman who had complained to a physician about migraine headaches was told that her condition was a female problem, and was advised that a hysterectomy would alleviate the problem. Her headaches continued, however, until she was diagnosed with a brain tumor.

          Also during 1977, the American Indian Policy review Commission found the IHS lacking adequate policies, appropriations, delivery services, and oversight for provision of health services to Native Americans. Even in 1977, the rate of infant mortality on Indian reservations was three times that of the general population in the United States; the tuberculosis rate was still eight times as high. the average life span of a Native American living on a reservation was 47 years, compared with almost 71 years in the general population. The IHS seemed to be short of personnel and equipment to treat many things, but the agency always seemed to have enough doctors, nurses, equipment, and money to tie fallopian tubes and remove ovaries.
          By the late 1970s, sterilizations continued at some IHS hospitals despite protests and suits. Brightman visited Claremore’s IHS facility for six months during late 1978 and early 1979, collecting records for six months, and found evidence of 81 sterilizations. Brightman later related his findings as part of a speech on the U.S. Capitol steps which was recorded and played for some of Claremore’s nurses, who, according to Torpy, “validated that sterilizations were occurring and with greater frequency.”
          Many Native women looked at the battle against sterilization as part of a broader, older, struggle to retain their families in a culturally appropriate context. The battle against sterilizations brought back memories of having children taken from their homes, beginning with the establishment of Carlisle School in 1879, to face a gauntlet of forced assimilation in a factory model of education. In 1977, roughly a third of reservation children were still attending the same system of boarding schools that had become a principal part of the assimilative model a century earlier. In 1973, 33,672 Native American children lived in federal boarding schools rather than at home, according to statistics compiled by Torpy.
          Many women also were reminded of the many Native children taken for foster care by non-Indians. In the middle 1970s, the proportion of Indian children placed in foster care in Western states (compared to the general population) ranged from 640 per cent, in Idaho, to 2,000 per cent, in North Dakota. This disparity was diminished (but not eliminated) by legislative measures beginning about 1980 which demanded that social workers appreciate Native ways of raising children instead of assuming that they were evidence of lack of parenting skills by Anglo-American, middle-class standards.
          On many reservations today, Indian midwives or nurses advise women on whether sterilization is appropriate. The number of births to Indian women had risen to 45,871 in 1988, compared with 27,542 in 1975, according to census records cited in Torpy’s thesis.
          Even though the cruder abuses of the sterilization wave in the 1970s seem to have abated, “Even today,” writes Torpy, “there remains a need for constant and close surveillance over physicians and health facilities and health facilities so that all poor women and women of color are allowed to make their own reproductive choices.”

International sterilization anecdotes

          While developing information about the impact of sterilization on Native American women in the United States, anecdotes popped up from time to time which indicate that sterilization is far from dead as a eugenic prescription for the elimination of Native populations in Latin America.
          Christina Lamb reported in the London Sunday Telegraph September 13 that a politician in northeastern Brazil is using sterilization of a diminishing Native tribe to garner votes among non-Indian Brazilians who have taken much of (and want more of) their land.
          At least eighty indigenous women of the Pataxuh-he band in the Brazilian state of Bahia have been sterilized by Ronald Lavigne, who is a medical doctor as well as a politician. Lavigne offers sterilization to women (who cannot get other types of birth control) every time he runs for office. Some women have complained after the fact that the finality of tube-tying was not explained to them.
          Lamb reports that many of the operations were undertaken on women desperate to reduce the size of their families because many children in the area die of malnutrition.
          ”This is genocide,” Lamb reported Roberto Liebgott, an activist with native peoples in Bahia, to have said. In some villages, every woman of child-bearing age has been sterilized, leading to the probable demise of entire peoples in a generation or two.
          For Lavigne, sterilizations are paid back at the ballot box, where a study by the Brazilian Congress estimates that the candidate snags between seven and 25 extra votes for each operation from land owners, many of them recent immigrants, who fully understand their stake in reducing Native populations in the area. Within a few years, Pataxuh-he land holdings have been reduced from 50,000 to 20,000 hectares, according to Lamb. Lavigne is a leading figure in Brazil’s right-wing Liberal Front, the party favored by new rich landowners in the Amazon Basin.
          Blood also has been spilled over the immigrants insistence that the land’s original inhabitants will not challenge their title. Last year, a local leader took his peoples’ complaints to Brasilia, the federal capital. Galdino Jesus dos Santos was jumped by a gang of youths at a bus stop in the capital. They beat him, then dumped gasoline over his bruised, battered body and lit a match.
          Far from Brasilia, in Omaha, Nebraska, medical personnel at local clinics caring for an influx of Mexican and other Latin American immigrants say that many women come to them complaining of having trouble getting pregnant. The Omaha care-givers are left to tell the women, many of whom are of Mexican Indian ancestry, that they have been sterilized or implanted with IUDs by Mexican doctors. Most of the women express surprise at this, to put it mildly, indicating that any form of consent they may have been given was not comprehended.
          The flood of immigration to Omaha has been caused by a vibrant labor market (state unemployment is under 2 per cent) and economic hardship from the Rio Grande southward. The influx is so large that local Immigration and Naturalization Service officials estimate that a quarter of the workers in Nebraska’s meat-packing plants are undocumented. The INS has set up a special program, “Operation Prime Beef,” to catch them.

Compulsory-sterilization

Compulsory sterilization (surgical procedure) programs sprouted up in many countries at the beginning of the 20th century, usually as part of a program of negative eugenics to prevent undesirable members of the population from reproducing. They generally specified that an institution or legal body could order that an individual be operated upon, for the purpose of preventing further procreation, against their will (and sometimes without their knowledge). Usually such programs advocated sterilization by means of vasectomy in males and salpingectomy or tubal ligation in females, as they were not operations which significantly affected sexual drive or the personality of the individuals operated upon (unlike, for example, castration). This increased the seemingly innocuous nature of the operations, adding a veneer of scientific objectivity. Plans for forced sterilization for the purposes of avoiding overpopulation are sometimes, but not usually, directly related to any eugenic intent. Please see population control for more information on this type of sterilization.

United States of America

The first significant country to undertake compulsory sterilization programs for the purpose of eugenics was the United States of America. The principal targets of the American program were the mental retardation and the mental illness, but also targetted under many state laws were the deaf, the blind, the epilepsy, the physically deformed, and even orphans and the homeless. Some sterilizations also took place in prisons and other penal institutions, targeting criminality, but they were in the relative minority. The first state to introduce compulsory sterilization legislation was Pennsylvania, in 1905, but it was vetoed by the governor. Indiana became the first state to enact sterilization legislation in 1907 followed closely by Washington and California in 1909. Sterilization rates across the country were relatively low until the 1927 Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell which legitimized the forced sterilization of patients at a Virginia home for the mental retardation. The number of sterilizations performed per year increased until another Supreme Court case, Skinner v. Oklahoma, complicated the legal situation by ruling against punitive sterilization in 1942. After World War II, public opinion towards eugenics and sterilization programs became more negative in the light of the connection with the genocide policies of Nazi Germany, though sterilizations continued in a few states until the early 1960s. Some states continued to have sterilization laws on the books for much longer after that, though they were rarely if ever used. In the end, over 64,000 individuals were sterilized under state compulsory sterilization programs in the United States, with California leading the pack, itself responsible for over a third of all sterilization operations. Information about the California sterilization program was produced into book form and widely disseminated by eugenicists E.S. Gosney and Paul B. Popenoe, which was said by the government of Adolf Hitler to be of key importance in proving that large-scale compulsory sterilization programs were feasible. In recent years, the governors of many states have made public apologies for their past programs. None have offered to compensate those sterilized, however, citing that few are likely still living (and by definition would have no affected offspring) and that inadequate records remain by which to verify them.

Germany

The most infamous sterilization program of the 20th century took place under the most infamous regime of the 20th century: the Third Reich. One of the first acts by Adolf Hitler after achieving total control over the Germany state was to pass the Gesetz zur Verh?erbkranken Nachwuchses (The Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring) in July 1933. The law was signed in by Hitler himself, and over 200 eugenic courts were created specifically as a result of the law. Under the German law, any doctor in the Reich was required to report patients of theirs who were mentally retarded, mentally ill (including schizophrenia and manic depression), epilepsy, blindness, deafness, or physically deformed, and a steep monetary penalty was imposed for any patients who were not properly reported. Individuals suffering from alcoholism or Huntingtons disease could also be sterilized. The individuals case was then presented in front of a court of Nazi officials and public health officers who would review their medical records, take testimony from friends and colleagues, and eventually decide whether or not to order a sterilization operation performed on the individual, using force if necessary. By the end of World War II, over 400,000 individuals were sterilized under the German law and its revisions, most within its first four years of being enacted. When the issue of compulsory sterilization was brought up at the Nuremberg trials after the war, many Nazis defended their actions on the matter by indicating that it was the United States itself from whom they had taken inspiration.

Other countries

Dozens of countries around the world, especially in Europe, also had similar sterilization programs, though very few had rates as high as the United States, much less Germany. In recent years it has come out that Sweden in particular had a strong sterilization program, sterilizing around 62,000 individuals over a period of 40 years. Other countries with notably active sterilization programs include Canada, Australia, Norway, Finland, Estonia, Switzerland, Iceland, and some countries in Latin America (including Panama and Puerto Rico).

T-4-Euthanasia-Program

In Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitlers T-4 Euthanasia Program was established in order to maintain the supposed purity (eugenics) of the so-called Aryan race by systematically killing children and adults born with physical deformities or suffering from mental illness. The name T-4 comes from the address of the office, Tiergartenstrasse 4 in Berlin. The operation was put by Hitler under the control of the Chief of the State Chancellery Philip Bouhler and Doctor of Medicine Karl Brandt. Defective children were removed from their families and taken to hospitals, where the exterminations were carried out at the Hartheim and Hadamar killing centres. The program was expanded to include adults to prevent any deficient member of the German Master race from breeding so they could not pass on their inferiority. One of the most important and well-known books about the Nazi Euthanasia action was written by Ernst Klee: Euthanasie im NS-Staat ? Die Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens. Klee describes the extermination hospitals like Grafeneck or Hartheim, where the first gas chambers were built, before the Holocaust, and where mostly adult victims were suffocated with carbon monoxide. Klee describes further the killing of crippled children by doctors with lethal injections and the starvation of patients marked for extermination. Klee describes as well the resistance from the churches and the relatives of the victims, which led to a slowdown and greater secrecy of the operation, but did not stop it. The operation was conducted still more covertly after August 1941, when 70,000 people had already died in the gas chambers of Grafeneck, Hartheim, Hadamar, Bernburg, Brandenburg and Sonnenstein. By that time every third inmate of a psychiatric institution in Germany had already died, either by being actively killed or by starvation, leading to about 93,000 free beds at the end of 1941, to use the Nazi terminology. On August 18, 1941, Hitler ordered a temporary halt to T-4. Graduates of the Aktion T4 program were then transferred to the concentration camps, where they continued in their trade. Euthanasia did not end in 1941, however, it still took place in hospitals around Germany and Austria, and crept East into a few of the occupied territories. An estimated 200,000 people died under the auspices of the T-4 program. As Klee notes, most of the persons responsible for carrying out the T-4 Euthanasia Program became active in the Holocaust as well, developing gas chamber technology and even helping to build death camps at Belzec, Treblinka or Sobib⠩n Operation Reinhard. Aside from the well-known Auschwitz concentration camp these were the main centers of extermination by gas for millions of people. Along with the euthanasia program, the Nazi regime also targeted the disabled through its compulsory sterilization program.

Bibliography

Henry Friedlander, The Origins of Nazi Genocide. From Euthanasia to the Final Solution, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill & London, 1995, ISBN 0807822086.
Ernst Klee. Euthanasie im NS-Staat. Die Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens, Frankfurt am Main 1983, ISBN 3596243262, in German.
Ernst Klee. Dokumente zur Euthanasie. ISBN 3596243270, in German.
Ernst Klee. Was sie taten. Was sie wurden. ISBN 3596243645, in German.
Michael Burleigh, Nazi Euthanasia Programs in Dieter Kuntz, ed. Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum/University of North Carolina Press, 2004. ISBN 0-8078-2916-1

Forced sterilization of mental patients

Edmonton, Alberta
March 21, 1928

“…the patient may safely be discharged if the danger of procreation with its attendant risk of multiplication of the evil by transmission of the disability to the progeny were eliminated, the board may direct …sexual sterilization of the inmate…”

Alberta passes the Sexual Sterilization Act. It provides for the forced sterilization of inmates in mental hospitals.

Similar laws are enacted in other provinces, such as British Columbia.

Want To Know More?

See:
Sexual Sterilization Act, S.A. 1928, c.37.

Did you know?

Sterilization of the “feeble-minded” is supported by leading women’s rights figures such as Emily Murphy and Nellie McClung.

The Sanger Paradox- the Myth of Choice

The founder of Planned Parenthood in her own words

“The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective  offspring… represents the most humane act of mankind.”   

Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Chapter 10

“We prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of  making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded.” 

 The Pivot of Civilization  Margaret Sanger, Brentano’s Press, NY, 1922, p. 263

“Authorities tell us that 75% of the school-children are defective.  This means that no less than fifteen million schoolchildren, out of 22,000,000 in the United States, are physically or mentally below par.

Planned Parenthood was known as the American Birth Control League until 1942.  (Backlash against the eugenics movement which the ABCL espoused, and its ties to Nazis here and abroad compelled the name change.)  That said, now for some little known facts regarding  Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, and her stated aims from its conception…

The eugenics movement was a pseudo-science which advocated the forced sterilization of “feeble-minded” U.S. citizens in hopes of insuring racial purity; it was a doomed and tragic attempt to create what Sanger believed would be “a race of thoroughbreds.”  Eugenics as a “science” fell apart with the discovery of DNA and new insights on chromosomes and genetic mutation. But thought the sterilization program which Sanger and supporters advocated most adversely affected poor whites and minorities, it was also aimed at all Americans of every color and creed who didn’t fit into an insanely narrow and scientifically invalid notion of who was fit to conceive. This was only 1 in 4 Americans, in Sanger’s most generous estimates.

Confronted with these shocking truths about the menace of feeble-mindedness to the race, a menace acute because of the unceasing and unrestrained fertility of such defectives, we are apt to become the victims of a ‘wild panic for instant action.’ There is no occasion for hysterical, ill-considered action, specialists tell us.  They direct our attention to another phase of the problem, that of the so-called ‘good feeble-minded.’ We are informed that imbecility, in itself, is not synonymous with badness.  If it is fostered in a ‘suitable environment,’ it may express itself in terms of good citizenship and useful occupation.  It may thus be transmuted into a docile, tractable, and peaceable element of the community. The moron and the feeble-minded, thus protected, so we are assured, may even marry some brighter member of the community, and thus lessen the chances of procreating another generation of imbeciles.  We read further that some of our doctors believe that in our social scale, there is a place for the good feeble-minded.

“In such a reckless and thoughtless differentiation between the ‘bad’ and the ‘good’ feeble-minded, we find new evidence of the conventional middle-class bias that also finds ___expression among some of the eugenists.  We do not object to feeble-mindedness simply because it leads to immorality and criminality; nor can we approve of it when it expresses itself in docility, submissiveness and obedience.  We object because both are burdens and dangers to the intelligence of the community”

To see more then go to this link: http://impiousdigest.com/sanger_paradox.htm

The Philippians version of Planned Parenthood is the Family Family Act.

In the Buck vs. Bell decision of May 2, 1927, the United States Supreme Court upheld a Virginia statute that provided for the eugenic sterilization for people considered genetically unfit. The Court’s decision, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., included the infamous phrase “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Upholding Virginia’s sterilization statute provided the green light for similar laws in 30 states, under which an estimated 65,000 Americans were sterilized without their own consent or that of a family member.

Although Indiana passed the first eugenic sterilization statute in 1907, this and other early laws were legally flawed and did not meet the challenge of state court tests. To remedy this situation, Harry Laughlin of the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor designed a model eugenic law that was reviewed by legal experts. The Virginia statute of 1924 was closely based on this model.

The plaintiff of the case, Carrie Buck, and her mother Emma, had been committed to the Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded in Lynchburg, Virginia. Carrie and Emma were both judged to be “feebleminded” and promiscuous, primarily because they had both had borne children out of wedlock. Carrie’s child, Vivian, was judged to be “feebleminded” at seven months of age. Hence, three generations of “imbeciles” became the “perfect” family for Virginia officials to use as a test case in favor of the eugenic sterilization law enacted in 1924.

On the eve of the Virginia legal contest, the ERO dispatched its field worker, Dr. Arthur Estabrook, to provide expert testimony. After some cursory examination, Estabrook testified that the seven month old Vivian “showed backwardness.” The Superintendent of the Virginia Colony, Dr. Albert Priddy, testified that members of the Buck family “belong to the shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of anti-social whites of the South.” Upon reviewing the case, the Supreme Court concurred “that Carrie Buck is the probable potential parent of socially inadequate offspring, likewise afflicted, that she may be sexually sterilized without detriment to her general health and that her welfare and that of society will be promoted by her sterilization”

Buck vs. Bell was flawed in many ways. “Feeblemindeness” is no longer used in medical terminology; it was clearly a catch-all term that had virtually no clinical meaning. It is impossible to judge whether or not Carrie was “feebleminded” by the standards of her time, but she was not patently promiscuous. According to Carrie, Vivian’s conception was the result of Carrie’s rape by the nephew of her foster parents. She, probably like many unwed mothers of that time, was institutionalized to prevent further shame to the family. Just as clearly, Vivian was no imbecile. Vivian’s first grade report card from the Venable School in Charlottesville showed that this daughter of a supposed social degenerate got straight “As” in deportment (conduct) and even made the honor role in April, 1931. She died a year later of complications following a bout of the measles.

Although in 1942 the Supreme Court struck down a law allowing the involuntary sterilization of criminals, it never reversed the general concept of eugenic sterilization. In 2001, the Virginia General Assembly acknowledged that the sterilization law was based on faulty science and expressed its “profound regret over the Commonwealth’s role in the eugenics movement in this country and over the damage done in the name of eugenics.” On May 2, 2002 a marker was erected to honor Carrie Buck in her hometown of Charlottesville.

END

&&&

TOXIC SECRETS

Fluoride & the A-Bomb Program

By Joel Griffiths and Chris Bryson

During the ultra-secret Manhattan Project, a report was commissioned to assess the effect of fluoride on humans.
That report was classified “secret” for reasons of “national security”.

---

Some 50 years after United States authorities began adding fluoride to public water supplies to reduce cavities in children’s teeth, recently discovered declassified government documents are shedding new light on the roots of that still-controversial public health measure, revealing a surprising connection between the use of fluoride and the dawning of the nuclear age.

Today, two-thirds of US public drinking water is fluoridated. Many municipalities still resist the practice, disbelieving the government’s assurances of safety.

Since the days of World War II when the US prevailed by building the world’s first atomic bomb, the nation’s public health leaders have maintained that low doses of fluoride are safe for people and good for children’s teeth.

That safety verdict should now be re-examined in the light of hundreds of once-secret WWII-era documents obtained by these reporters [authors Griffiths and Bryson], including declassified papers of the Manhattan Project-the ultra-secret US military program that produced the atomic bomb.

Fluoride was the key chemical in atomic bomb production, according to the documents. Massive quantities-millions of tons-were essential for the manufacture of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons throughout the Cold War. One of the most toxic chemicals known, fluoride emerged as the leading chemical health hazard of the US atomic bomb program, both for workers and for nearby communities, the documents reveal.

Other revelations include:
€ Much of the original proof that fluoride is safe for humans in low doses was generated by A-bomb program scientists who had been secretly ordered to provide “evidence useful in litigation” against defence contractors for fluoride injury to citizens. The first lawsuits against the American A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage, the documents show.
€ Human studies were required. Bomb program researchers played a leading role in the design and implementation of the most extensive US study of the health effects of fluoridating public drinking water, conducted in Newburgh, New York, from 1945 to 1955. Then, in a classified operation code-named “Program F”, they secretly gathered and analysed blood and tissue samples from Newburgh citizens with the cooperation of New York State Health Department personnel.
€ The original, secret version (obtained by these reporters) of a study published by Program F scientists in the August 1948 Journal of the American Dental Association1 shows that evidence of adverse health effects from fluoride was censored by the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)-considered the most powerful of Cold War agencies-for reasons of “national security”.
€ The bomb program’s fluoride safety studies were conducted at the University of Rochester-site of one of the most notorious human radiation experiments of the Cold War, in which unsuspecting hospital patients were injected with toxic doses of radioactive plutonium. The fluoride studies were conducted with the same ethical mindset, in which “national security” was paramount.

EVIDENCE OF FLUORIDE’S ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS

The US Government’s conflict of interest and its motive to prove fluoride safe in the furious debate over water fluoridation since the 1950s has only now been made clear to the general public, let alone to civilian researchers, health professionals and journalists. The declassified documents resonate with a growing body of scientific evidence and a chorus of questions about the health effects of fluoride in the environment.

Human exposure to fluoride has mushroomed since World War II, due not only to fluoridated water and toothpaste but to environmental pollution by major industries, from aluminium to pesticides, where fluoride is a critical industrial chemical as well as a waste by-product.

The impact can be seen literally in the smiles of our children. Large numbers (up to 80 per cent in some cities) of young Americans now have dental fluorosis, the first visible sign of excessive fluoride exposure according to the US National Research Council. (The signs are whitish flecks or spots, particularly on the front teeth, or dark spots or stripes in more severe cases.)

Less known to the public is that fluoride also accumulates in bones. “The teeth are windows to what’s happening in the bones,” explained Paul Connett, Professor of Chemistry at St Lawrence University, New York, to these reporters. In recent years, paediatric bone specialists have expressed alarm about an increase in stress fractures among young people in the US. Connett and other scientists are concerned that fluoride-linked to bone damage in studies since the 1930s-may be a contributing factor.

The declassified documents add urgency: much of the original ‘proof ‘ that low-dose fluoride is safe for children’s bones came from US bomb program scientists, according to this investigation.

Now, researchers who have reviewed these declassified documents fear that Cold War national security considerations may have prevented objective scientific evaluation of vital public health questions concerning fluoride.

“Information was buried,” concludes Dr Phyllis Mullenix, former head of toxicology at Forsyth Dental Center in Boston and now a critic of fluoridation. Animal studies which Mullenix and co-workers conducted at Forsyth in the early 1990s indicated that fluoride was a powerful central nervous system (CNS) toxin and might adversely affect human brain functioning even at low doses. (New epidemiological evidence from China adds support, showing a correlation between low-dose fluoride exposure and diminished IQ in children.) Mullenix’s results were published in 1995 in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific journal.2

During her investigation, Mullenix was astonished to discover there had been virtually no previous US studies of fluoride’s effects on the human brain. Then, her application for a grant to continue her CNS research was turned down by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), when an NIH panel flatly told her that “fluoride does not have central nervous system effects”.

Declassified documents of the US atomic bomb program indicate otherwise. A Manhattan Project memorandum of 29 April 1944 states: “Clinical evidence suggests that uranium hexafluoride may have a rather marked central nervous system effect… It seems most likely that the F component rather than the T is the causative factor.” The memo, from a captain in the medical corps, is stamped SECRET and is addressed to Colonel Stafford Warren, head of the Manhattan Project’s Medical Section. Colonel Warren is asked to approve a program of animal research on CNS effects. “Since work with these compounds is essential, it will be necessary to know in advance what mental effects may occur after exposure… This is important not only to protect a given individual, but also to prevent a confused workman from injuring others by improperly performing his duties.”

On the same day, Colonel Warren approved the CNS research program. This was in 1944, at the height of World War II and the US nation’s race to build the world’s first atomic bomb.

For research on fluoride’s CNS effects to be approved at such a momentous time, the supporting evidence set forth in the proposal forwarded along with the memo must have been persuasive. The proposal, however, is missing from the files at the US National Archives. “If you find the memos but the document they refer to is missing, it’s probably still classified,” said Charles Reeves, chief librarian at the Atlanta branch of the US National Archives and Records Administration where the memos were found. Similarly, no results of the Manhattan Project’s fluoride CNS research could be found in the files.

After reviewing the memos, Mullenix declared herself “flabbergasted”. “How could I be told by NIH that fluoride has no central nervous system effects, when these documents were sitting there all the time?” She reasons that the Manhattan Project did do fluoride CNS studies: “That kind of warning, that fluoride workers might be a danger to the bomb program by improperly performing their duties-I can’t imagine that would be ignored.” But she suggests that the results were buried because of the difficult legal and public relations problems they might create for the government.

The author of the 1944 CNS research proposal attached to the 29 April memo was Dr Harold C. Hodge-at the time, chief of fluoride toxicology studies for the University of Rochester division of the Manhattan Project.

Nearly 50 years later at the Forsyth Dental Center in Boston, Dr Mullenix was introduced to a gently ambling elderly man, brought in to serve as a consultant on her CNS research. This man was Harold C. Hodge. By then, Hodge had achieved status emeritus as a world authority on fluoride safety. “But even though he was supposed to be helping me,” said Mullenix, “he never once mentioned the CNS work he had done for the Manhattan Project.”

The “black hole” in fluoride CNS research since the days of the Manhattan Project is unacceptable to Mullenix who refuses to abandon the issue. “There is so much fluoride exposure now, and we simply do not know what it is doing. You can’t just walk away from this.”

Dr Antonio Noronha, an NIH scientific review advisor familiar with Dr Mullenix’s grant request, told us that her proposal was rejected by a scientific peer-review group. He termed her claim of institutional bias against fluoride CNS research “far-fetched”. He then added: “We strive very hard at NIH to make sure politics does not enter the picture.” \

THE NEW JERSEY FLUORIDE POLLUTION INCIDENT

The documentary trail begins at the height of World War II, in 1944, when a severe pollution incident occurred downwind of the E.I. DuPont de Nemours Company chemical factory in Deepwater, New Jersey. The factory was then producing millions of pounds of fluoride for the Manhattan Project whose scientists were racing to produce the world’s first atomic bomb.

The farms downwind in Gloucester and Salem counties were famous for their high-quality produce. Their peaches went directly to the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York City; their tomatoes were bought up by Campbell’s Soup.

But in the summer of 1944 the farmers began reporting that their crops were blighted: “Something is burning up the peach crops around here.” They said that poultry died after an all-night thunderstorm, and that farm workers who ate produce they’d picked would sometimes vomit all night and into the next day.

“I remember our horses looked sick and were too stiff to work,” Mildred Giordano, a teenager at the time, told these reporters. Some cows were so crippled that they could not stand up; they could only graze by crawling on their bellies.

The account was confirmed in taped interviews with Philip Sadtler (shortly before he died), of Sadtler Laboratories of Philadelphia, one of the nation’s oldest chemical consulting firms. Sadtler had personally conducted the initial investigation of the damage.

Although the farmers did not know it, the attention of the Manhattan Project and the federal government was rivetted on the New Jersey incident, according to once-secret documents obtained by these reporters.

A memo, dated 27 August 1945, from Manhattan Project chief Major-General Leslie R. Groves to the Commanding General of Army Service Forces at the Pentagon, concerns the investigation of crop damage at Lower Penns Neck, New Jersey. It states: “At the request of the Secretary of War, the Department of Agriculture has agreed to cooperate in investigating complaints of crop damage attributed…to fumes from a plant operated in connection with the Manhattan Project.”

After the war’s end, Dr Harold C. Hodge, the Manhattan Project’s chief of fluoride toxicology studies, worriedly wrote in a secret memo (1 March 1946) to his boss, Colonel Stafford L. Warren, chief of the Medical Section, about “problems associated with the question of fluoride contamination of the atmosphere in a certain section of New Jersey”.

“There seem to be four distinct (though related) problems:
“1. A question of injury of the peach crop in 1944.
“2. A report of extraordinary fluoride content of vegetables grown in this area.
“3. A report of abnormally high fluoride content in the blood of human individuals residing in this area.
“4. A report raising the question of serious poisoning of horses and cattle in this area.”

FLUORIDE DAMAGE: THE FIRST LAWSUITS

The New Jersey farmers waited until the war was over before suing DuPont and the Manhattan Project for fluoride damage-reportedly the first lawsuits against the US atomic bomb program. Although seemingly trivial, the lawsuits shook the government, the secret documents reveal.

Under the personal direction of Major-General Groves, secret meetings were convened in Washington, with compulsory attendance by scores of scientists and officials from the US War Department, the Manhattan Project, the Food and Drug Administration, the Agriculture and Justice departments, the US Army’s Chemical Warfare Service and Edgewood Arsenal, the Bureau of Standards, as well as lawyers from DuPont. Declassified memos of the meetings reveal a secret mobilization of the full forces of the government to defeat the New Jersey farmers.

In a memo (2 May 1946) copied to General Groves, Manhattan Project Lt Colonel Cooper B. Rhodes notes that these agencies “are making scientific investigations to obtain evidence which may be used to protect the interest of the Government at the trial of the suits brought by owners of peach orchards in…New Jersey”.

Regarding these lawsuits, General Groves wrote to the Chairman of the Senate Special Committee on Atomic Energy in a memo of 28 February 1946, advising that “the Department of Justice is cooperating in the defense of these suits”.

Why the national security emergency over a few lawsuits by New Jersey farmers? In 1946 the United States began full-scale production of atomic bombs. No other nation had yet tested a nuclear weapon, and the A-bomb was seen as crucial for US leadership of the postwar world. The New Jersey fluoride lawsuits were a serious roadblock to that strategy. “The specter of endless lawsuits haunted the military,” wrote Lansing Lamont in Day of Trinity, his acclaimed book about the first atomic bomb test.3

“If the farmers won, it would open the door to further suits which might impede the bomb program’s ability to use fluoride,” commented Jacqueline Kittrell, a Tennessee public interest lawyer who examined the declassified fluoride documents. (Kittrell specializes in nuclear-related litigation and has represented plaintiffs in several human radiation experiment cases.) “The reports of human injury were especially threatening because of the potential for enormous settlements-not to mention the PR problem,” she added.

Indeed, DuPont was particularly concerned about the “possible psychologic reaction” to the New Jersey pollution incident, according to a secret Manhattan Project memo of 1 March 1946. Facing a threat from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to embargo the region’s produce because of “high fluoride content”, DuPont dispatched its lawyers to the FDA offices in Washington, DC, where an agitated meeting ensued. According to a memo sent next day to General Groves, DuPont’s lawyer argued that “in view of the pending suits…any action by the Food and Drug Administration…would have a serious effect on the DuPont Company and would create a bad public relations situation”. After the meeting adjourned, Manhattan Project Captain John Davies approached the FDA’s Food Division chief and “impressed upon Dr White the substantial interest which the Government had in claims which might arise as a result of action which might be taken by the Food and Drug Administration”.

There was no embargo. Instead, according to General Groves’ memo of 27 August 1946, new tests for fluoride in the New Jersey area were to be conducted not by the Department of Agriculture but by the US Army’s Chemical Warfare Service (CWS)-because “work done by the Chemical Warfare Service would carry the greatest weight as evidence if…lawsuits are started by the complainants”.

Meanwhile, the public relations problem remained unresolved: local citizens were in a panic about fluoride. The farmers’ spokesman, Willard B. Kille, was personally invited to dine with General Groves (then known as “the man who built the atomic bomb”) at his office at the War Department on 26 March 1946. Although diagnosed by his doctor as having fluoride poisoning, Kille departed the luncheon convinced of the government’s good faith. Next day he wrote to the general, expressing his wish that the other farmers could have been present so that “they too could come away with the feeling that their interests in this particular matter were being safeguarded by men of the very highest type whose integrity they could not question”.

A broader solution to the public relations problem was suggested by Manhattan Project chief fluoride toxicologist Harold C. Hodge in a second secret memo (1 May 1946) to Medical Section chief Colonel Warren: “Would there be any use in making attempts to counteract the local fear of fluoride on the part of residents of Salem and Gloucester counties through lectures on F toxicology and perhaps the usefulness of F in tooth health?” Such lectures were indeed given, not only to New Jersey citizens but to the rest of the nation throughout the Cold War.

The New Jersey farmers’ lawsuits were ultimately stymied by the government’s refusal to reveal the key piece of information that would have settled the case: how much fluoride DuPont had vented into the atmosphere during the war. “Disclosure would be injurious to the military security of the United States,” Manhattan Project Major C. A. Taney, Jr, had written in a memo soon after the war’s end (24 September 1945).

The farmers were pacified with token financial settlements, according to interviews with descendants still living in the area.

“All we knew is that DuPont released some chemical that burned up all the peach trees around here,” recalled Angelo Giordano whose father James was one of the original plaintiffs. “The trees were no good after that, so we had to give up on the peaches.” Their horses and cows acted and walked stiffly, recalled his sister Mildred. “Could any of that have been the fluoride?” she asked. (The symptoms she detailed are cardinal signs of fluoride toxicity, according to veterinary toxicologists.) The Giordano family has also been plagued by bone and joint problems, Mildred added. Recalling the settlement received by the family, Angelo Giordano told these reporters that his father said he “got about $200″.

The farmers were stonewalled in their search for information about fluoride’s effects on their health, and their complaints have long since been forgotten. But they unknowingly left their imprint on history: their complaints of injury to their health reverberated through the corridors of power in Washington and triggered intensive, secret, bomb program research on the health effects of fluoride.

“PROGRAM F”: SECRET FLUORIDE RESEARCH

A secret memo (2 May 1946) to General Groves from Manhattan Project Lt Colonel Rhodes states: “Because of complaints that animals and humans have been injured by hydrogen fluoride fumes in [the New Jersey] area, although there are no pending suits involving such claims, the University of Rochester is conducting experiments to determine the toxic effect of fluoride.”

Much of the proof of fluoride’s alleged safety in low doses rests on the postwar work done at the University of Rochester in anticipation of lawsuits against the bomb program for human injury.

For the top-secret Manhattan Project to delegate fluoride safety studies to the University of Rochester was not surprising. During WWII the US Federal Government became involved for the first time in large-scale funding of scientific research at government-owned labs and private colleges. Those early spending priorities were shaped by the nation’s often-secret military needs.

The prestigious upstate New York college in particular had housed a key wartime division of the Manhattan Project to study the health effects of the new “special materials” such as uranium, plutonium, beryllium and fluoride which were being used in making the atomic bomb. That work continued after the war, with millions of dollars flowing from the Manhattan Project and its successor organisation, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). (Indeed, the bomb left an indelible imprint on all of US science in the late 1940s and 1950s. Up to 90 per cent of all federal funds for university research came from either the Department of Defense or the AEC in this period, according to Noam Chomsky in his 1997 book, The Cold War and the University.4)

The University of Rochester Medical School became a revolving door for senior bomb-program scientists. The postwar faculty included Stafford Warren, the top medical officer of the Manhattan Project, and Harold C. Hodge, chief of fluoride research for the bomb program.

But this marriage of military secrecy and medical science bore deformed offspring. The University of Rochester’s classified fluoride studies, code-named “Program F”, were started during the war and continued up until the early 1950s. They were conducted at its Atomic Energy Project (AEP), a top-secret facility funded by the AEC and housed at Strong Memorial Hospital. It was there that one of the most notorious human radiation experiments of the Cold War took place, in which unsuspecting hospital patients were injected with toxic doses of radioactive plutonium. Revelation of this experiment-in a Pulitzer Prize&endash;winning account by Eileen Welsome-led to a 1995 US presidential investigation and a multimillion-dollar cash settlement for victims.

Program F was not about children’s teeth. It grew directly out of litigation against the bomb program, and its main purpose was to furnish scientific ammunition which the government and its nuclear contractors could use to defeat lawsuits for human injury. Program F’s director was none other than Dr Harold C. Hodge- who led the Manhattan Project investigation of alleged human injury in the New Jersey fluoride pollution incident.

Program F’s purpose is spelled out in a classified 1948 report. It reads: “To supply evidence useful in the litigation arising from an alleged loss of a fruit crop several years ago, a number of problems have been opened. Since excessive blood-fluoride levels were reported in human residents of the same area, our principal effort has been devoted to describing the relationship of blood fluorides to toxic effects.”

The litigation referred to and the claims of human injury were of course against the bomb program and its contractors. Thus the purpose of Program F was to obtain evidence useful in litigation against the bomb program. The research was being conducted by the defendants.

The potential conflict of interest is clear. If lower dose ranges were found hazardous by Program F, this might have opened the bomb program and its contractors to public outcry and lawsuits for injury to human health.

Lawyer Jacqueline Kittrell commented further: “This and other documents indicate that the University of Rochester’s fluoride research grew out of the New Jersey lawsuits and was performed in anticipation of lawsuits against the bomb program for human injury. Studies undertaken for litigation purposes by the defendants would not be considered scientifically acceptable today because of their inherent bias to prove the chemical safe.”

Unfortunately, much of the proof of fluoride’s safety rests on the work performed by Program F scientists at the University of Rochester. During the postwar period, that university emerged as the leading academic centre for establishing the safety of fluoride as well as its effectiveness in reducing tooth decay, according to Rochester Dental School spokesperson William H. Bowen, MD. The key figure in this research, Bowen said, was Dr Harold C. Hodge-who also became a leading national proponent of fluoridating public drinking water.

THE A-BOMB AND WATER FLUORIDATION

Program F’s interest in water fluoridation was not just “to counteract the local fear of fluoride on the part of residents”, as Hodge had earlier written to Colonel Warren. The bomb program required human studies of fluoride’s effects, just as it needed human studies of plutonium’s effects. Adding fluoride to public water supplies provided one opportunity.

Bomb-program scientists played a prominent, if unpublicised, role in the nation’s first-planned water fluoridation experiment in Newburgh, New York. The Newburgh Demonstration Project is considered the most extensive study of the health effects of fluoridation, supplying much of the evidence that low doses are allegedly safe for children’s bones and good for their teeth.

Planning began in 1943 with the appointment of a special New York State Health Department committee to study the advisability of adding fluoride to Newburgh’s drinking water. The chairman of the committee was, again, Dr Harold C. Hodge, then chief of fluoride toxicity studies for the Manhattan Project. Subsequent members of the committee included Henry L. Barnett, a captain in the Project’s Medical Section, and John W. Fertig, in 1944 with the Office of Scientific Research and Development-the super-secret Pentagon group which sired the Manhattan Project. Their military affiliations were kept secret. Hodge was described as a pharmacologist, Barnett as a paediatrician. Placed in charge of the Newburgh project was David B. Ast, chief dental officer of the New York State Health Department. Ast had participated in a key secret wartime conference on fluoride, held by the Manhattan Project in January 1944, and later worked with Dr Hodge on the Project’s investigation of human injury in the New Jersey incident, according to once-secret memos.

The committee recommended that Newburgh be fluoridated. It selected the types of medical studies to be done, and it also “provided expert guidance” for the duration of the experiment.

The key question to be answered was: “Are there any cumulative effects, beneficial or otherwise, on tissues and organs other than the teeth, of long-continued ingestion of such small concentrations?” According to the declassified documents, this was also key information sought by the bomb program. In fact, the program would require “long-continued” exposure of workers and communities to fluoride throughout the Cold War.

In May 1945, Newburgh’s water was fluoridated, and over the next 10 years its residents were studied by the New York State Health Department.

In tandem, Program F conducted its own secret studies, focusing on the amounts of fluoride Newburgh citizens retained in their blood and tissues-information called for by the bomb program in connection with litigation. “Possible toxic effects of fluoride were in the forefront of consideration,” the advisory committee stated. Health department personnel cooperated, shipping blood and placenta samples to the Program F team at the University of Rochester. The samples were collected by Dr David B. Overton, the department’s chief of paediatric studies at Newburgh.

The final report of the Newburgh Demonstration Project, published in 1956 in the Journal of the American Dental Association,5 concluded that “small concentrations” of fluoride were safe for US citizens. The biological proof, “based on work performed…at the University of Rochester Atomic Energy Project”, was delivered by Dr Hodge.

Today, news that scientists from the A-bomb program secretly shaped and guided the Newburgh fluoridation experiment and studied the citizens’ blood and tissue samples is greeted with incredulity.

“I’m shocked…beyond words,” said present-day Newburgh Mayor Audrey Carey, commenting on these reporters’ findings. “It reminds me of the Tuskegee experiment that was done on syphilis patients down in Alabama.”

As a child in the early 1950s, Mayor Carey was taken to the old Newburgh firehouse on Broadway which housed the public health clinic. There, doctors from the Newburgh fluoridation project studied her teeth, and a peculiar fusion of two fingerbones on her left hand which she’s had since birth. (Carey said that her granddaughter has white dental-fluorosis marks on her front teeth.)

Mayor Carey wants answers from the government about the secret history of fluoride and the Newburgh fluoridation experiment. “I absolutely want to pursue it,” she said. “It is appalling to do any kind of experimentation and study without people’s knowledge and permission.”

When contacted by these reporters, the now 95-year-old David B. Ast, former director of the Newburgh experiment, said he was unaware that Manhattan Project scientists were involved. “If I had known, I would have been certainly investigating why, and what the connection was,” he said. Did he know that blood and placenta samples from Newburgh were being sent to bomb-program researchers at the University of Rochester? “I was not aware of it,” Ast replied. Did he recall participating in the Manhattan Project’s secret wartime conference on fluoride in January 1944, or going to New Jersey with Dr Hodge to investigate human injury in the DuPont case, as secret memos state? He told these reporters he had no recollection of any such events.

Bob Loeb, a spokesperson for the University of Rochester Medical Center, confirmed that blood and tissue samples from Newburgh had been tested by the University’s Dr Hodge. On the ethics of secretly studying US citizens to obtain information useful in litigation against the A-bomb program, he said: “That’s a question we cannot answer.” He referred inquiries to the US Department of Energy (DOE), successor to the Atomic Energy Commission.

Jayne Brady, a spokesperson for the Department of Energy in Washington confirmed that a review of DOE files indicated that a “significant reason” for fluoride experiments conducted at the University of Rochester after the war was “impending litigation between the DuPont company and residents of New Jersey areas”. However, she added: “DOE has found no documents to indicate that fluoride research was done to protect the Manhattan Project or its contractors from lawsuits.”

On Manhattan Project involvement in Newburgh, Brady stated: “Nothing that we have suggests that the DOE or predecessor agencies-especially the Manhattan Project-authorised fluoride experiments to be performed on children in the 1940s.”

When told that these reporters have several documents that directly tie the AEP-the Manhattan Project’s successor agency at the University of Rochester-to the Newburgh experiment, DOE spokesperson Brady later conceded her study was confined to “the available universe” of documents.

Two days later, Brady faxed a statement for clarification. “My search only involved the documents that we collected as part of our human radiation experiments project; fluoride was not part of our research effort.”

“Most significantly,” the statement continued, “relevant documents may be in a classified collection at the DOE Oak Ridge National Laboratory, known as the Records Holding Task Group. This collection consists entirely of classified documents removed from other files for the purpose of classified document accountability many years ago [and was] a rich source of documents for the human radiation experiments projects.”

SUPPRESSION OF ADVERSE HEALTH FINDINGS
The crucial question arising from the investigation is whether adverse health findings from Newburgh and other bomb-program fluoride studies were suppressed. All AEC-funded studies had to be declassified before publication in civilian medical and dental journals. Where are the original classified versions?

The transcript of one of the major secret scientific conferences of World War II-on “fluoride metabolism”-is missing from the files of the US National Archives and is “probably still classified”, according to the librarian. Participants in the January 1944 conference included key figures who promoted the safety of fluoride and water fluoridation to the public after the war: Harold Hodge of the Manhattan Project, David B. Ast of the Newburgh Demonstration Project, and US Public Health Service dentist H. Trendley Dean, popularly known as “the father of fluoridation”.

A WWII Manhattan Project c lassified report (25 July 1944) on water fluoridation is missing from the files of the University of Rochester Atomic Energy Project, the US National Archives, and the Nuclear Repository at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. The next four numerically consecutive documents are also missing, while the remainder of the “M-1500 series” is present.

“Either those documents are still classified, or they’ve been ‘disappeared’ by the government,” said Clifford Honicker, Executive Director of the American Environmental Health Studies Project in Knoxville, Tennessee, which provided key evidence in the public exposure and prosecution of US human radiation experiments.

Seven pages have been cut out of a 1947 Rochester bomb project notebook entitled “DuPont Litigation”. “Most unusual,” commented the medical school’s chief archivist, Chris Hoolihan.

Similarly, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests lodged by these reporters over a year ago with the DOE for hundreds of classified fluoride reports have failed to dislodge any. “We’re behind,” explained Amy Rothrock, chief FOIA officer at Oak Ridge National Laboratories.

So, has information been suppressed? These reporters made what appears to be the first discovery of the original classified version of a fluoride safety study by bomb program scientists. A censored version of this study was later published in the August 1948 Journal of the American Dental Association.6 Comparison of the secret version with the published version indicates that the US AEC did censor damaging information on fluoride-to the point of tragicomedy. This was a study of the dental and physical health of workers in a factory producing fluoride for the A-bomb program; it was conducted by a team of dentists from the Manhattan Project.

€ The secret version reports that most of the men had no teeth left. The published version reports only that the men had fewer cavities.
€ The secret version says the men had to wear rubber boots because the fluoride fumes disintegrated the nails in their shoes. The published version does not mention this.
€ The secret version says the fluoride may have acted similarly on the men’s teeth, contributing to their toothlessness. The published version omits this statement and concludes that “the men were unusually healthy, judged from both a medical and dental point of view”.

After comparing the secret and published versions of the censored study, toxicologist Phyllis Mullenix commented: “This makes me ashamed to be a scientist.” Of other Cold War&endash;era fluoride safety studies, she asked: “Were they all done like this?”

Asked for comment on the early links of the Manhattan Project to water fluoridation, Dr Harold Slavkin, Director of the National Institute for Dental Research-the US agency which today funds fluoride research-said: “I wasn’t aware of any input from the Atomic Energy Commission.” Nevertheless, he insisted that fluoride’s efficacy and safety in the prevention of dental cavities over the last 50 years is well proved. “The motivation of a scientist is often different from the outcome,” he reflected. “I do not hold a prejudice about where the knowledge comes from.”

 

Endnotes:
1. Dale, Peter P., and McCauley, H. B, “Dental Conditions in Workers Chronically Exposed to Dilute and Anhydrous Hydrofluoric Acid”, Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 37, no. 2, August 1948, pp. 131-140. Note that Dale and McCauley were both Manhattan Project and, later, Program F personnel; they also authored the secret Manhattan Project paper.
2. Mullenix, Phyllis et al., “Neurotoxicity of Sodium Fluoride in Rats”, Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 17, no. 2, 1995, pp. 169-177.
3. Lamont, Lansing, Day of Trinity, Atheneum, New York City, 1965.
4. Chomsky, Noam, The Cold War and the University, New Press, New York City, 1997 (distributed by W.W. Norton & Co. Inc., NYC).
5. Hodge, H. C., “Fluoride metabolism: its significance in water fluoridation”, in “Newburgh-Kingston caries-fluorine study: final report”, Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 52, March 1956.
6. Dale and McCauley, ibid.

About the Authors:
Joel Griffiths is a medical writer based in New York City. He is the author of a book on radiation hazards that included one of the first revelations of human radiation experiments, and has contributed numerous articles to medical journals and popular publications.
Chris Bryson, who holds a Master’s degree in journalism, is an independent reporter for BBC Radio, ABC-TV and public television in New York City, and writes for a variety of publications.
The authors wish to thank Clifford Honicker, Executive Director of the American Environmental Health Studies Project, Knoxville, TN, for his indispensable archival research.

Resources:
Copies of 155 pages of supporting documents, including all the declassified papers referred to in this article, can be obtained from the following contacts for a small fee to cover copying and postage:
€ Australia: Australian Fluoridation News, GPO Box 935G, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, phone (03) 9592 5088, fax (03) 9592 4544.
€ New Zealand: New Zealand Pure Water Association, 278 Dickson Road, Papamoa, Bay of Plenty, phone (07) 542 0499.
€ UK: National Pure Water Association of the UK, 12 Dennington Lane, Crigglestone, Wakefield, WF4 3ET, phone 01924 254433, fax 01924 242380.
€ USA: Waste Not newsletter, 82 Judson Street, Canton, NY 13617, phone (315) 379 9200, fax (315) 379 0448, e-mail http://us.f535.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=wastenot@northnet.org.

FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK (NZ) Inc.		Fluoridation everywhere is a political matter and the dental profession has to be prepared to treat it as such. - British Dental Journal 1972
“We cannot escape the fact that fluoridation has been wrested from the hands of the scientist and deposited squarely in the middle of the political arena. Fluoridation is now a political problem. - Journal of the American Dental Association 1961

A History of Fluoridation

A more detailed history follows the following summary, which encapsulates the essence of the issue.

Right click here to download a pdf version of this file.

A Fatal Error The “mistaken assumption” that led to the misguided practice of water fluoridation The early observations which eventually led to fluoridation were made from 1901 in communities where inhabitants showed an unsightly brown staining on the teeth, known as “Colorado Brown Stain”, now know as dental fluorosis. It was also observed that those parts of the teeth not affected by this condition seemed particularly resistant to decay. In fact later review of such communities showed that the improved dental health was related to calcium and phosphorus levels, not the fluoride level. (Tooth enamel is made of calcium and phosphorus, not fluoride) It wasn’t until 1931 that analytical techniques determined that all these communities had fluoride levels in drinking water of 2.5 ppm or more, some as high as 8ppm. The understandable assumption was made that these phenomena were due to the ingestion of the water. After all, all nutrients were assimilated into the body by ingestion, digestion, uptake into the blood, and incorporation into the bodily tissue: there was no reason to believe that fluoride was any different. From 1931 H Trendley Dean surveyed many US towns to determine the maximum level at which the dental fluorosis did not occur. Although he in fact observed the condition in areas as low as 0.3ppm, in general the critical point appeared to be 1ppm. The assumption was subsequently made that if the level in water was limited to 1ppm there would be minimal fluorosis (since proven incorrect) but with a significant level of benefit continuing, by way of hardening the tooth enamel to resist decay. This, as said, was on the mistaken but understandable assumption that both phenomena were caused by ingesting the fluoride: both effects would simply be scaled back. This was half right: dental fluorosis is caused by ingestion of fluoride, and subsequent interference with the enamel formation process. Mineralisation of the tooth enamel so as to resist decay, however, is not, as is now known. It wasn’t until 1999 and 2000 that it was accepted by dental authorities that the beneficial effect of fluoride is topical (by surface contact) not systemic (by ingestion). In 1989 it had been proved that a minimum fluoride level of 2ppm was required to produce this topical effect. As recorded above, those early towns had 2.5ppm fluoride or more. Hence there was sufficient fluoride to give a beneficial topical effect, following the 1989 findings, which researchers at the time could not have known. This is what was causing the resistance to decay; the topical effect, not the swallowing. The mistaken assumption that water at 1ppm would still give beneficial resistance to decay led to the proposal for water fluoridation. The error would, nevertheless, have been proven had the fluoridation experiments Grand Rapids and Newburgh been conducted scientifically. But of course they were not. More importantly, the dentists Frisch and Bull pushed the US PHS into premature endorsement of fluoridation before these experiments were even 5 years into their 10-15 planned duration (in 1949-1950). Once this premature commitment was made, the experiments had to show the desired results, no matter what. As proof of the lack of benefit, as would be expected from the 2 ppm minimum, all European countries who did complete 10-20 year studies without political interference, found no benefit and rejected fluoridation. In fact the Health Ministry of Sweden published an official statement in 1972 stating that although the early results seemed promising, the results from the full 10 years showed no benefit. There can be no excuse, however, for the Dental Associations of the English-speaking Western world subsequently deliberately suppressing any research which (correctly) contradicted the fluoridation theory, and launching character assassinations against those scientists who sought to reveal the truth about this misguided practice. The problem today is that promoters have been claiming that fluoridation at 1ppm is “safe and effective” for so long, in the face of unequivocal scientific evidence to the contrary, that they do not know how to get off the roller coaster without facing law suits and loss of all credibility. But just as the “authorities” who insisted in ancient times that the earth was flat and the centre of the universe, had, eventually, to bow to scientific proof to the contrary, so, eventually, will today’s flat-earthers who likewise cite “authorities” in the face of the clear scientific evidence: the promoters of the misguided practice of water fluoridation.

1855. Smelters in Freiburg, Germany first paid damages to neighbours injured by fluoride emissions.

1901. A young dental school graduate named Frederick McKay left the East Coast to open a dental practice in Colorado Springs, Colorado. McKay was astounded to find scores of Colorado Springs natives with grotesque brown stains on their teeth. This became known as “Colorado brown stain”, now known as dental fluorosis.

1909. Independently, Dr. F. L. Robertson, a dentist in Bauxite, Arkansas, noted the presence of mottled enamel among children after a deep well was dug in to provide a local water supply.

The same year, renowned dental researcher Dr. G.V. Black came to Colorado Springs and collaborated with McKay on the mysterious ailment.
Black commented “This is much more than a deformity of childhood. If it were only that, it would be of less consequence, but it is a deformity for life.”
Black investigated fluorosis for six years, until his death in 1915. During that period, he and McKay made two crucial discoveries:

1. Mottled enamel resulted from developmental imperfections in children’s teeth.
2. Teeth afflicted by Colorado Brown Stain were surprisingly and inexplicably resistant to decay.

1923. McKay travelled to Oakley, Idaho to meet with parents who had noticed peculiar brown stains on their children’s teeth. This began appearing shortly after Oakley constructed a communal water pipeline to a warm spring five miles away. McKay analyzed the water, but found nothing suspicious in it. Nonetheless, he advised town leaders to abandon the pipeline altogether and use another nearby spring as a water source. McKay’s advice did the trick. Within a few years, the younger children of Oakley were sprouting healthy secondary teeth without any mottling. But it remained a mystery as to what was in the water.

The answer came when McKay and Dr. Grover Kempf of the United States Public Health Service (PHS) travelled to Bauxite, Arkansas-a company town owned by the Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA)-to investigate reports of the familiar brown stains. The two discovered that the mottled enamel disorder was prevalent among the children of Bauxite, but nonexistent in another town only five miles away.

McKay and Kempf published a report on their findings that reached the desk of ALCOA’s chief chemist, H. V. Churchill, who had spent the past few years refuting claims that aluminum cookware was poisonous. He became worried that this report might provide fresh fodder for ALCOA’s detractors.
Using photospectrographic analysis in 1931, Churchill found that the water was high in fluoride.

1931. Drs. Smith determined that even 0.9ppm can cause fluorosis. “The Cause of Mottled Enamel, a Defect of Human Teeth” Univ Ariz Agric Exp Sta Tech Bull No 32, (1931).

In 1940 they determined that this did not in fact reduce dental problems, contrary to claims by the PHS researchers: “Although mottled teeth are somewhat more resistant to the onset of decay, they are structurally weak; when decay does set in, the result is often disastrous.”

Credit was however given to ALCOA’s researchers: Churchill “The Occurrence of Fluorides in Some Waters of the United States” Journal of American Water Works Assn 23: 1399 (1931)

Churchill wrote to McKay on this new revelation. Samples from Colorado were collected and also proved high in fluoride.

This revelation led to the establishment in 1931 of the Dental Hygiene Unit at the National Institute of Health headed by Dr. H. Trendley Dean who began investigating the epidemiology of fluorosis so that new restrictive standards could be set for natural fluoride levels. First developing an analytical method accurate to 0.1ppm, from 1932-1937 Dean conducted surveys to determine the prevalence of dental fluorosis in various States of the USA. He observed fluorosis in communities with as little as 0.3 ppm. Dean was a public dentist, not a medical doctor, yet without any research into toxicology he stated in 1937: “Amounts of fluoride not exceeding 1ppm are of no public health significance” without quoting a total daily intake.

Meanwhile, throughout the 1930’s Aluminium and Superphosphate companies, like ALCOA and Reynolds Metals, were successfully sued for millions of dollars for damage to crops, pastures, and livestock from fluoride fumes.

Back at the Mellon Institute, ALCOA’s Pittsburgh industrial research lab, this news was galvanic. There, biochemist Gerald J. Cox immediately fluoridated some lab rats in a study and concluded that fluoride reduced cavities and that: “The case should be regarded as proved.” In a historic moment in 1939, the first public proposal that the U.S. should fluoridate its water supplies was made not by a doctor, or dentist, but by Cox, an industry scientist working for a company threatened by fluoride damage claims and burdened by the odious expense of disposing of tons of toxic industrial waste. Cox began touring the country, stumping for fluoridation. Dean would go on to carve out a nice career for himself as the “father” of public water fluoridation.

1933. McClure, who later became a leading proponent of fluoridation, shows enzyme interference from fluoride. (“A review of Fluorine and its Physiological Effects” Physiol Rev 13:289 (1933))

1936. HT Dean promotes the theory that fluoride makes teeth more resistant to decay.

In 1955 Dean admitted that the graphs and charts on which he based his theory that fluoride makes teeth decay-resistant were invalid. (see below)

1937. Acknowledgement of the importance of other minerals, apart from fluoride, in dental health :Mills CA “Factors affecting the incidence of Dental Caries on Population Groups” J Dent Res 16:417 (1937)

1938. HT Dean acknowledged that other mineral content of water, especially calcium and phosphorus, may be as relevant as fluoride: “Endemic Fluorosis and its relation to Dental Caries” Public Health Reports 53: 1452 (19 Aug 1938)

Two scientists at New Mexico University (Clark and Mann) conduct the first State-wide survey of drinking water in New Mexico, identifying fluoride contents up to 12ppm. Of 157 communities 35 showed fluoride content “above the danger point of 0.9 ppm.” The authors set the dividing line of toxicity between 0.8 and 1ppm. A university release classified this as “hopelessly out of date”, with no further research evidence to support this claim, once the Newburgh experiment at 0.9-1.2ppm was initiated.

Dr Wallace D Armstrong and PJ Brekhus claimed their analysis of tooth enamel showed less fluoride in decayed teeth than healthy teeth.

This was contradicted in South Africa and the US in 1943, by FJ McClure in 1948 (US), Australia in 1952. McClure repeated his studies in 1951 and claimed now to support Armstrong’s findings. In 1963, Armstrong re-examined his original research and admitted he had misinterpreted his data: age was the factor, not fluoride. This was the sole study on which Cox later recommended adding fluoride to water for strengthening teeth: the basis for Cox’s theory was simply false!

The Mellon Institute was founded by Andrew and Richard Mellon in 1911 while owners of ALCOA. It was described by Life in 9 May 1938 as an institution designed to assist businesses with research to solve their business problems. They can hire a research scientist for a year for $6000. The scientist’s job is to improve the product or find a new use for it. ALCOA and other companies, notably Reynolds metals (search Westlaw legal database for the cases) had a problem: fluoride. They could not dump it due to toxicity, and litigation abounded, with settlements ranging up to $3M. When the research is complete, the results are the property of the company, thus incriminating findings need not be disclosed.

For studies into dental decay GJ Cox received grants from the Buhl Foundation at the Mellon Institute, and from the Sugar Institute. Up until this point in 1939, fluoride had been targeted for removal from food and water supplies because of its recognised toxicity. (GJ Cox “New Knowledge of Fluorine in Relation to Dental Caries” J Am Waterworks Assn 3: 1926 (1939). Cox was the first to promulgate the idea that fluoride may be necessary for tooth formation.

From being a troublesome industrial pollutant, fluoride suddenly became a desirable medication, and the fluoride-producing industries had a market for their toxic wastes.

In the early 1940’s Cox promoted fluoridation like crazy, becoming a member of the National Research Council, compiling several summaries of fluoride research, becoming one of “the experts”.

Cox had already completed research showing no benefit to the teeth of rat offspring at up to 20.6 ppm in the water of pregnant and lactating mother rats, and that humans are more sensitive to fluoride toxicity than rats:

1. GJ Cox, MC Matuschak, SF Dixon. ML Dodds, WE Walker “Experimental Dental caries IV Fluorine and its Relation to Dental Caries” J Dent Res 18: 481-90 (1939)
2. GJ Cox, MC Matuschak, SF Dixon, WE Walker “Mottled Enamel in rat Molars”: Science 90: 83 (1939)

Cox advocated fluoridation of Johnstown Pa. more than 5 years before the Newburgh and Grand Rapids experiments. He prepared several summaries for the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council, and from 1944-48 was funded as a research chemist, at the Mellon Institute, by Corn Products Refining Ltd, a sugar company. In 1962 he was appointed to the Pennsylvania Drug, Device, and Cosmetics Board, which had jurisdiction over licensing fluoride distribution, and which advised the State Health Department.

1939. New York water authorities propose a maximum level of 0.1 ppm based Dean’s 1937 statement (thast 1ppm was safe) and a safety factor of 10. However the fluoridation movement adopted 1ppm as a safe level, without any toxicological studies.

1940. Drs Mr &Mrs Smith: “Although mottled teeth are somewhat more resistant to the onset of decay, they are structurally weak; when decay does set in, the result is often disastrous.” Smith M, Smith H “Observations on the Durability of Mottled Teeth” American Journal of Public Health 30:1050 (1940)

The study was conducted in St David Arizona. Water fluoride levels were 1.6 – 4 ppm. Very few persons over 21 were free of dental caries. There was a high incidence of extracted teeth in all age groups with over 50% false teeth at ages 24-26.
Fillings would not anchor in the structurally weakened teeth, which had then to be removed.

1943. Tooth decay studied in Hereford and Colorado Springs. Both had 2.5 ppm fluoride, but there was high tooth decay in Colorado Springs yet low rates in Hereford. There were, however, high phosphorus levels in Hereford foods. Phosphorus is an important mineral for bones and teeth. This recognition that Hereford’s other minerals were involved was again confirmed in 1965.

Dr Ast, main investigator of the Newburg experiment: “[dental fluorosis is] the first objective indication of chronic fluoride poisoning.”

FA Arnold, NIDR advocated fluoridation in the Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 30:499-508 (1943) “Role of Fluorides in Preventive Dentistry” on the basis of Cox’s experiments and the invalid Armstrong-Brekhus analysis. He acknowledged the possibility of cumulative toxic effects but casually dismissed it as “rather remote”.

In 1955 Dr Arnold acknowledged on the witness stand that he had no proof of fluoridation’s safety and “could not possibly have”.

Meanwhile, the “Manhattan Project” had produced the atomic bomb. The radioactive Uranium was separated by first turning all the Uranium ore into Uranium Hexafluoride. The fluoride fumes caused serious health problems in workers, notably Central Nervous System damage, later to be confirmed by Dr Phyllis Mullinex in laboratory trials in 1995, at Forsyth Dental School. The US Government was facing law suits over fluoride exposure and was looking for a way of denying harm in such actions. Its subsequent involvement in the Newburgh-Kingston experiment was revealed in documents released under the US Official Secrets Act in 1997.

Journal of the American Medical Association describes fluoride as:

“Fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, with the capacity to modify cell metabolism, changing the permeability of the cell membrane by inhibiting certain enzymes. Sources of fluoride intoxication include drinking water containing 1ppm or more of fluorine.

1945. Cox’s hypothesis was also a godsend for those interested in dental health which, in contrast to the great medical advances made in the 20^th century, had made no such advances. This led to four initial experiments: Grand Rapids, Newburgh, Evanston, and Brantford.

Grand Rapids

The fluoridation experiment in Grand Rapids, Michigan, was originally sponsored by the U.S. Surgeon General, but taken over by the NIDR (a unit within the PHS) shortly after the Institute’s inception in 1948. This was planned as a 15 year project, but the control city, Muskegon, was fluoridated in 1951 (the same year as the infamous Conference, and the year following the PHS’ premature “go-ahead” for fluoridation) . It had shown the same rate of dental improvement as Grand rapids, which was not politically acceptable, so the experiment was reported as a success by quoting only the “before and after” results of Grand Rapids, and excluding the Muskegon figures.

Later the methodology was found so poor that no conclusions could validly be drawn, yet this was one of the experiments quoted worldwide, even today, as “conclusive proof” of the alleged benefits of fluoridation: Lack of standardisation of data gathering methods, personal examiner bias, inadequate control of studies, relatively short exposure when a lifetime exposure is contemplated. In related studies, there was an 89% deviation in  the average number of caries recorded in 33 teeth by 8 dentists. JC Boyd, NE Wessels: “Epidemiological Studies in Dental Caries III: The interpretation of Clinical Data Relating to Caries Advance” Am J Public Health 41: 967-986 (1951).
Examination of the data also showed that the claimed 53% improvement over the first 4 years was an alleged 80% improvement in the first year, and and worsening over the next 3. The 80% improvement in 1 year is of course impossible. It was then discovered that only a selection of the original children were studied after the initial survay. Further, at one point the figures for 11 year olds were better than the figures for the previous yearfor 10 year olds, when (supposedly) the same children were a year younger. Again this is impossible, proving the statistcial base was so corrupt as to be useless.

1956. The Grand Rapids data is published after 7 years. It is analysed by KK Paluev, a professional statistician. he concludes that no permanent improvement was achieved but only a 1-3 year delay. The results are also analysed by a New York professional statistics company: Standard Audit and Measurement Service Inc. 89 Broad St NY: Data was described as “raw” “not capable of being checked”, sampling design of the experiment was “embarrassingly conspicuous by its absence”, “variations were not accounted for”, and that the authors “gave no attention” to possible other (confounding) factors involved.

After 17 years 19.3% of white and 40.2% negro children had dental fluorosis. After only 4 years deaths from heart disease cancer brain disease diabetes hardening of arteries had increased 25-50% over Michigan as a whole. (1950 census) The population increase was 7.8% 1940-1950. (published in The Press Grand Rapids 28 July 1955.) The PHS published bogus figures, disproved by official records, to cover this up. (A Struggle With Titans p173.) Note that this experiment was supervised by Arnold, who advised T Ludwig on how to run the Hastings experiment in New Zealand. In 1986 Dr John Colquhoun of Auckland uncovered National Archive documents which revealed precisely the same flaws in methodology, leading to equally false conclusions, and the claim of 60% improvement, still promoted today by the NZ Ministry of Health.

Newburgh

The same year a second experiment began in Newburgh, NY, with Kingston as the control city, planned as a 10 year study into both the possible benefits and possible adverse effects of fluoride. At the 1951 State Dental Directors Conference, Dr Bain, who was on the technical committee, acknowledged that it had hoped to keep its findings secret until the 10 years was up, only then advising if any adverse health effects had been found. This aspect of the study was controlled by a group from the Manhattan project, who wanted to keep quiet any adverse effects which could be used against them in the pending court actions mentioned earlier.

The people of Newburgh were also given dental hygiene information, and topical treatments, in addition to fluoridating the water, invalidating the comparison with Kingston. The published results after 7 years of the trial were analysed by independent statisticians who, aside form identifying “embarrassingly” inadequate methodology or sampling techniques, concluded that no permanent improvement was evidenced in Newburgh, and predicted that shortly the decay rates would exceed those of Kingston. This in fact happened and today Kingston continues to have less tooth decay than the fluoridated Newburgh, a result consistent with the New Zealand Hastings-Napier experiment.

Fluoride levels varied by up to 900% between individuals, hence averages as the basis of safety conclusions were not only worthless, but dangerous. FA Smith, DE Gardner, HC Hodge “Investigation on the Metabolism of Fluoride, Fluoride Content of Blood and Urine as a Function of the Fluoride in Drinking water” J Dent Res 29: 596-600 (1951)

The Newburgh experiment director, Dr Ast, originated the idea of fluoridating without citizen’s knowledge. (see 1969, Michigan.)

1946. JJ Frisch launched a campaign to fluoridate his home town of Madison, Wisconsin, 1 year after the Newburgh and Grand Rapids studies began; 9 years before adverse health data was expected to be available.
Frisch enlisted Frank Bull, who immediately launched a political campaign to adopt fluoridation in Madison.

The council composed a committee which, after studying the evidence, advised against fluoridation, largely because of the time the experiments were to run.( EB Hart., Professor Emeritus, Wisconsin University, before a Congressional Committee, 6 years later)

Bull and Frisch persisted. The council approached the US PHS who advised “many years of research are needed before fluoridation can be implemented on a general basis. [The studies may take 12-15 years to determine a final answer].Mass fluoridation cannot yet be recommended.”

Leonard Scheele, however, decided it was time for the PHS to back fluoridation, in spite of the lack of any evidence of benefit or safety.   At the State Dental Directors 1950 Conference, Bull and two other State Dental Officers challenged HT Dean, now Director of Dental Research at the (PHS) NIH, and B Forsyth, Assistant Surgeon General, to endorse fluoridation without further delay. Dean refused to do so until the experiments were complete. Forsyth and Scheele overruled Dean, presumably approached Oscar Ewing (see below) and on 1 June 1950, the PHS announced “Communities desiring to fluoridate their communal water supplies should be strongly encouraged to do so.”

1947. Oscar Ewing took a leave of absence form his law firm of Hughes, Hubbard, and Ewing, solicitors for ALCOA, where he was earning approximately $750,000 annually. He became Director of the US Federal Security Agency directing, amongst others, the US PHS, on a salary of $120,000. Although the PHS had initially taken a cautious approach to fluoridation, it was lobbied by a Wisconsin group, including J Frisch and Dr Frank Bull, who argued that there was no need to wait 10-15 years for the results of the Grand Rapids experiment because there were generations of experience with naturally high fluoride areas.
Ewing promoted fluoridation before the permanent teeth of the children in the test cities had erupted. Ewing was later confirmed as the committer of PHS to fluoridation: Hearings on Res  74 and 447 House Select Committee to investigate the Use of Chemicals in Foods and Cosmetics  82^nd US Congress 1952.

1948.

Dr Weaver was a pro-fluoridation medical officer who had been studying dental decay in Shields England, half of which had high fluoride levels. He went to great lengths to ensure there were no demographic differences when claiming that there was less decay in the high fluoride area.
His results, however, supported the delay theory: there was no difference in decay of 15 year olds in South Shields UK at 1.4 ppm fluoride and 12 year olds in N Shields at 0.25ppm: R Weaver “The Inhibition of Dental caries by Fluorine” Proc Royal Soc Med 41: 284 (1948)

He subsequently published in the British Dental Journal his comparison of general medical health. The records showed a significantly higher mortality in the 1.4 ppm area, especially infant mortality (as also shown 1977 by Dr Albert Schatz in Chile). Weaver refused to accept that fluoride was the cause, claiming there must have been some other factor, even though he had ensured there was no other possible factor.

 

20 people died in Donora Pa. An independent investigation showed this was due to fluoride 12 -25 times higher blood plasma levels than normal. (public health Bulletin 306, 1959) The US PHS covered this up, supporting industry in denial, but never offered an alternative explanation.

1948. Dr Leo Spira Acta Medica Scandinavia showed the presence of fluorine in cigarette smoke.

	1965 Okamura and Matsuhisa, Japan Cigarettes:
	Type ppm fluoride mcg/cig Japanese 163 157 American 236 244
	1977 Rose and Marier, NRC Canada: cigarettes may be another significant source of fluoride.
	NZ Med J 10 July 1985, reports a study showing uptake of approximately 0.48 mg fluoride per 10 cigarettes. At 30 a day (2 subjects) this is 1.44 mg per fluoride per day: already over the “optimal” amount.

1949. US promoter Dr Rowlett began lobbying the World Health Organisation to adopt fluoridation as policy, without success.

Dr AP Black Florida, is personally responsible for introduction of fluoridation, 3 years before it becomes official PHS policy. (Testimony before Florida State Board of Health Aug 20 1955.) He was a collaborator with HT Dean. As president of the American Water Works Association Black obtained the Association’s permissive resolution at its 1949 Convention.

1950. January 1950. ALCOA advertised fluoridation for improving children’s teeth. Journal of the American Water Works Association Vol 42. Advertising was discontinued once the PHS started doing so.

US PHS survey in American Samoa, conducted by USN Capt FL Losee. It reveals almost perfect teeth amongst inhabitants of low to near-zero fluoride areas.

1 June 1950, the PHS announced “Communities desiring to fluoridate their communal water supplies should be strongly encouraged to do so.” This endorsement was followed 5 months later by the American Dental Association, and others.

The Sugar Research Foundation with 130 sugar company members 7^th annual report: at p23 – its aim is “To discover effective means of controlling tooth decay by methods other than restricting carbohydrate (sugar) intake.”

Two of the most vociferous institutions in fluoride promotion were the Rochester and Harvard Dental Schools, both of whom received Foundation grants. In 1957 the Foundation withdrew support of Harvard after providing $57K to biochemist JH Shaw who concluded “all sugars cause decay”; “we should cut down on sugar consumption, particularly candy”

January 1950. ALCOA advertised fluoridation for improving children’s teeth. Journal of the American Water Works Association Vol 42. Advertising was discontinued once the PHS started doing so.

The NSW branch of the Australian Dental Association, the Faculty of Dentistry Sydney University, and the Sydney Institute of Dental research, submitted a report to the Australian Government urging that fluoridation begin.

1951. Ewing persuaded Congress to release $2M for the promotion of artificial fluoridation.

The infamous Conference of State Dental Directors was held, where the main strategist, Dr Frank Bull, told attendees how to get fluoridation into communities by subversive means, against public opposition, and particularly how to deal with concerns over adverse health effects, which had at that time not been sufficiently researched. In particular it was stated that fluoride must be promoted as “absolutely safe” yet was admitted that this was unknown.
Right click here and select “Save Target As” to download pdf file.

Bull’s promotional tactics were taken up by the American Dental Association, whose representative, Philip Phair, had attended the conference.

The US Surgeon General, Dr Leonard Scheele, became president of WHO, paving the way for its later fluoridation policy.

The American Medical Association is pressured to “fully endorse” fluoridation as safe and effective. The chairman of the AMA’s Public Health Committee, Dr Farrell, proposed that the AMA support fluoridation “in principle” as there was insufficient research on adverse health effects was available. In fact the main protagonist, F J McClure, who insisted fluoride was absolutely safe, had published articles in 1933 and 1946 stating that the possibility of adverse anti-enzymatic activity could not be disregarded. Once fluoridation was approved “in principle,” promoters within the AMA pushed it as hard as they could, with no regard for possible adverse effects.
Note that, similarly, in its correspondence with the NZ Human Rights Commission, the NZMA also stated it supported fluoridation “in principle”, rather than the outright commitment to compulsion proposed by the NZDA.

A 63% reduction in decay is shown by brushing with a non-fluoride dentifrice: LS Fosdick “Reduction of Incidence of Dental Caries” JADA 40:133 (1951).

Dr A Taylor PhD, biochemist, Biochemical Institute, Texas University: Original tentative studies showed a shortening of the life of cancer-prone mice fed 0.44ppm fluoride. Two PHS officials visited him (HT Dean, H Andervont). Although Dr Taylor had stated these were preliminary findings, the PHS declared the experiments invalid because there was measurable fluoride in the feed pellets.

Taylor eliminated this source of fluoride and confirmed a 9% reduction in lifespan in 1954: ( A Taylor “Sodium Fluoride in the Drinking Water of mice” Dental Digest 60: 170 (1954). Proponents continued to quote the “invalidity” of the 1951 study, ignoring the valid 1954 study. Further, research by WD Armstrong and JJ Bittner, using too few mice to be conclusive, was quoted in rebuttal of Taylor (ie: we found no evidence of life –shortening) Taylor had used 645 mice, 1ppm fluoride, in 12 experiments. At the 1951 State Dental Director’s Conference Dr Johns, referring to this study, states: “The university is now sorry it happened and doesn’t know how to stop the ‘rumour’… We are preparing a refutation statement of three or four pages. Is that a good technique?” (Dr Frank Bull replies: “Yes. Anything you can do is a good technique… when they say ‘yes’, you say ‘no’.”) Oct 1 1951, the university Vice President dissociated the university from this perfectly valid and valuable research.

McClure repeats his 1933 findings of enzyme interference from fluoride, stating “Anti-enzymatic effects of trace quantities of fluoride cannot be disregarded.” (“Non-dental Physiological Effects of Trace Quantities of Fluorine. Dental Caries and Fluorine” a Symposium ed: FR Moulton Am Soc for Advancement of Science p89 Wash DC (1951)). McClure then assures AMA Councils on Pharmacy and Chemistry and on Foods and Nutrition that fluoridation is completely safe.

The National Research Council reports. Its 9 member committee to consider fluoridation was guided by 3 men: promoter Dr Basil Bibby, had carried out research for the Sugar Research Foundation, Dr FF Heyroth assistant director of the Kettering laboratory, financed by ALCOA and other industries with serious fluoride problems, and HT Dean of the PHS. Their final report in 29 November 1951 referenced papers by about 30 authors, all but 2 of whom were closely linked with either the PHS or industry.

By the end of 1951, the US PHS and American Association for the Advancement of Science were apparently endorsing fluoridation. The ADA used these endorsements to gain others, without any subsequent organisations investigating safety or asking for evidence. The more organisations that endorsed it, the more the campaign snowballed. The ADA, as is still the primary tactic, avoided answering the science and simply quoted the endorsements.

Foreign countries established study groups. Their representatives visiting the US were hosted around the Newburgh and Grand Rapids experiments by Scheele, Dean, and Knutson (now Assistant Surgeon General)

Around this time the US Government enlists Edward L. Bernays, since dubbed “the original spin-doctor”, to launch amassive public reelations campaign. Bernays promoted the tactic of vigorous character assassination of opponents, in the absence of scientific argument.

1952. ALCOA had offered research grants for disposal of its aluminium waste. The USPHS was collaborating closely with industry to in the disbursement of these research funds. (Conflict of interest).(Seattle Times 16 December 1952.)

May 30 1960, Seattle Times: branch director of PHS, Dr. Henry Welch, was obliged to resign due to acceptance of $260,766 derived from the industries he was sworn to regulate.

A. Kantorowicz a German scientist observes no correlation between fluoride and caries in 18 German cities: “Caries Incidence in Communities of North Rhein-Westfallen and the Fluorine Content of their Drinking Water” Deutsch. Zahn. Zeitschrift 7:1017-20 (1952).

Dr L Matthews promoting dentist in Chester, Virginia said “tooth decay among Chester children is about as bad as anywhere else.” (New York Herald, 15 May 1952). Chester’s water had 2ppm, unbeknown to Matthews. (See 2001: the same statement is made about Kentucky: promoters don’t appear to check their facts any more today than they did 50 years ago.)

The same occurred in Fort Worth Texas in 1953 (see below).

US Select Committee to Investigate the Use of Chemicals in Food and Cosmetics: Examined a wide range of chemicals, many of which were proven carcinogenic but which no one had bothered to check. The Committee had 7 days of hearings on fluoridation, with many scientists expressing concern that the safety of fluoridation was not sufficiently demonstrated.

The National Research Council’s report on fluoridation states regarding the Grand Rapids – Muskegon experiment:

“Concurrently there has been a slight decline in the caries rate reported by Muskegon with its fluoride-free water supply, 22 % in 6 year olds and 28% in 7 yr olds. This is unexplained”! Yet it still recommended fluoridation.  US Select Committee hearing held on the Newburgh, Grand Rapids, and Evanston experiments. “In none of these experiments is the effect on the adult or old age population being studied [regarding] physiological effects.” “The Committee is of the view that a sufficient number of unanswered questions concerning the safety of this program exist as to warrant a conservative attitude.” The data on 6 and 7 year old children showed no difference in dental caries at that time. Bone-density studies were planned, but the director advised that none had been conducted due to non-availability of the necessary equipment. (Newburgh) Recognised that one proponent acknowledged that it was “a calculated risk” “Medicine deals with the prevention, cure, and alleviation of disease. It is safe to say that fluoridation is mass medication without parallel in the history of medicine.” Comparing fluoridation with compulsory vaccination and the risk of contagion in epidemics: “Community health [in those cases] requires the wishes of the individual to be submerged [in the safety of the community]. Even so a physician administers the medication and watches the patient. Fluoridated water however, must be drunk by everyone and without personal medical supervision and guidance. Furthermore, dental decay is not contagious, nor can it be said to constitute a serious danger to health.” Appendage by AL Miller of Nebraska: “[T]he United States Public Health Service has been premature in urging universal use of fluorides in water … without knowing the results of the experiments now in progress.” It also acknowledged that the AMA approval was qualified, not unqualified. The AMA said that question about fluoridation of the water supplies “should be answered by the dental profession”. (P1709.) “In reading through the testimony we find that the very people of the US Public Health Service who now so earnestly urge the use of fluorides in drinking water were, as late as 1950, saying, and I quote: ‘The evaluation of the effects of fluorides in water has not been established and must wait until the experiments now in progress are completed.’”

Research by M Massler and I Schour shows that the nutritional status of the population, especially calcium intake, affects the prevalence and degree of mottling caused by [water fluoridation]. The poorer the nutritional status and the lower he calcium intake, the more prevalent and more severe the mottling.

1953. The basis of 1ppm fluoride in the water in temperate climates is established on the basis that 4 glasses of water per day gives 1 mg. This is recommended by NIDR (PHS) based on: FJ McClure “Ingestion of Fluorine and Dental Caries. Quantitative Relations Based on Food and Water Requirements of Children, 1-12 Years Old.” Amer J Diseases of Children 66: 362 (1953)

Hastings, New Zealand, becomes the first city to fluoridate outside the USA.

The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC ) assisted in a study of children at the Hopewood Home, Bowral, NSW. The children were fed a healthy diet, and used water with no measurable amount of fluoride. 78% had perfect teeth. The average DMFT was 0.58.

In spite of the Hopewood study the NHMRC first endorses fluoridation. Its task is to advise the Australian government on all matters concerning health of people. Its recommendation was based on the advice of the Dental Research Advisory Committee. It was, nevertheless, conditional:

• That a large proportion of the public desire and that no large proportion oppose, water fluoridation.
• That the need be established for that community, including that the total daily intake be determined.

Promoters claimed this to be an unequivocal endorsement. Deliberations were held in secret, the same as the 1979 Hamer Committee. Even the conditional endorsement was based on the uncompleted US studies. As at 1982 the NHMRC had conducted no research in Australia, but simply kept repeating its original endorsement.

Chile also begins fluoridation, banning it in 1977 due to proven adverse health effects and increased death rates amongst its poor.

Most countries in Europe set up fluoridation trials. All eventually abandon them.

For example Sweden, in 1972 stated publicly that although the results from the first 5 years looked hopeful, the results from the full 10 year study showed no benefit. The early termination of the US trials is interesting to note in this context.

Fort Worth Texas, Council voted for fluoridation in August 1953, yet water already contained up to 1.8 ppm (different supplies). It was listed as “naturally fluoridated” by the PHS in a nationwide release in 1963. Yet dentists started promoting fluoridation again in September 1964. (Fort Worth Star Telegram 20 Sept 1964.)

1954. Canadian Medical Association studies fluoridation and states:

“We don’t know enough about:

• physical and oral damage which may be unrecognisable in the absence of dental fluorosis
• the toxic effect of fluoride over long periods of time
• fluoride levels in relation to fluoride bearing food combined with artificially fluoridated water
• the relation of nutritional factors to the action of fluoride
• the toxicity of fluoride as allied to climate and geography which may increase absorption or diminish excretion.”

Evanston Illinois. PHS studies by JR Blayney, well known promoter of fluoridation, reported before the International Association for Dental Research, 1954: persons with kidney disease eliminate only 60% as much fluoride as healthy person with water at 1ppm, but the same amount with water at 0.1ppm. Abstract: J Dent Res 33: 691 (1954)”Evanston Dental Caries Study XIII. Preliminary Report on Comparative Fluorine Retention in human Tissue.” The research was never allowed to be published in full.

Dr GF Lull, Secretary AMA “I am aware of the fact that the American Dental Association may only publish what it desires on the subject” Letter to Dr George Waldbott, April 23 1954.

Dr George Waldbott seeks to submit article against fluoridation to AMA for publication. Response: “[The AMA has] endorsed fluoridation. Any contribution on this subject must therefore first clear the policy making body of our organisation.” The same response from the New England Journal of Medicine: “the profession hereabouts is pretty much sold on fluoridation.”

The ADA publish a booklet ( “How to Obtain Fluoridation in your community” May 1954) based on Bull’s tactics as preached at the 1951 Conference (see above). They add a section “Downgrading the Public Image of opponents of Fluoridation”

It also advocated that dentist promoters not answer technical questions, but insist that it is unnecessary to do so because US health authorities had endorsed fluoridation therefore any objections had already been addressed. Also that fluoridation be represented as correcting a fluoride deficiency in the water, not as adding medication. This tactic is still followed in New Zealand in 2003). The booklet contained not one single piece of scientific data.

These tactics, including the incessant attacks on the competence and intellectual honesty of opponents, were officially promoted by the ADA and its sister organisations around the world, as noted by Dr. George Waldbott, and as seen here in NZ in the Ministry of Health’s statements regarding Drs Burk and Yiammouyannis many years ago, and Dr. Paul Connett on his visit to New Zealand in 2002.

A New York scientist (who asked to remain anonymous) opposed fluoridation over the radio. The following day the Dean of the New York University Dental School advised him that his services were no longer require. When the scientist threatened to publicise the matter it was dropped.

The Fleming Whitfield experiment is the standard reference to the teratogenicity of sodium fluoride.

1955. At the State Public Utilities Commission hearing 20-22 October 1955, FA Arnold, supervisor of the Grand Rapids experiment and leading promoter of fluoridation, admitted on the witness stand that he had no proof of the safety of fluoridation and that he “couldn’t possibly have”.

HT Dean admitted that the graphs and charts on which he based his theory that fluoride makes teeth decay-resistant were invalid. (Original research: HT Dean, E Elvove “Some Epidemiological Aspects of Chronic Endemic Fluorosis” Am J of Public Health 26: 569 (1936).)

Dr Elmer Hess, President AMA : “I think most of us in the AMA have to depend on the ADA and the PHS primarily for scientific facts concerning a situation of this kind and I am unable to express an opinion as to whether it is safe or not safe”. Letter to Dr George Waldbott August 9 1955.

Journalist George Sokolsky: letter in Journal of the American Dental Association 50:567 1955:

“I find that as many of those whom I interviewed who are members of your association are opposed to the process as favour it. I also find that they live in terror of being quoted. They tell me that they may be brought up (before the ethics committee) on charges should I quote their names. I regard such intimidation of any citizen for whatever reason to be un-American. I should like to see a Congressional Committee investigate this whole subject.” (Note that it is currently a breach of the ADA’s code of ethics for dentists to oppose fluoridation, in contravention of the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution.)

4 March 1955, the ADA publish a smear letter regarding Dr George Waldbott, who by now is a well known figure in revealing the truth about fluoridation, alleging intellectual dishonesty an incompetence, and that he was associated with a mental institute escapee and an imposter. This was also distributed by the PHS wherever Dr Waldbott spoke or submitted information adverse to fluoridation, for example the NZ Commission of Inquiry. It was also distributed to journal editors or program organisers where Dr Waldbott was likely to speak. (G Waldbott A Struggle With Titans 1965, p66.)

Fluoride toothpaste first marketed. PHS required the following warnings, due to the danger of double dosing with fluoride from the toothpaste and water:

• Not to be used in fluoridated areas
• Not to be used by children under six. (cannot control swallowing response.)(In some countries in 2003 the age is 4)

(Ref: Chemical Week 6 July 1957)
Both regulations were abandoned in 1958 even though no adequate safety studies had been done.>

1955. Journal of the North Carolina Dental Society Vol 38 p 144 Aug 1955. Dentists RP and DHE Greensboro were suspended from membership for openly opposing fluoridation. The Boston Daily Record 28 Sept 1961: Dr M Ginns was “dropped” from the Massachusetts Dental Society for the same reason.

1956. The New Zealand Commission of Inquiry sits, and the antifluoridation movement becomes national. Not one of the 3 Commissioners was in a position to evaluate scientific medical data in his own. They had to rely on “advisors”. A National Archive document shows that this “Inquiry” was “established and guided” by the Health Department, in conjunction with the NZ Dental Association.

Dr JR Herman New York City Urologist, found 1795ppm fluoride in a kidney stone. He was immediately provided with a PHS grant and PHS scientists as “collaborators”, to conduct a second study. This purported to show that fluoride has no bearing on kidney stones.(Se p290) JR Herman “Fluorine in Urinary Tract Calculi” Soc Exp Biol Med 91: 189 (1956).

Dr Ionel Rappaport, analysed PHS statistics from Wisconsin, Illinois, North and South Dakota. Significantly higher levels of Mongolism occurred in levels of high natural fluoride than areas of low natural fluoride: I Rappaport “Mongolism and Fluoridated Drinking Water” The Bulletin of the National Academy of Medicine of France 140: 529 (1956).

Following attempts at refutation by fluoridation promoters, Rapport repeated his studies on a much larger scale, in Illinois. PHS officials “assisted” but the results ere even more certain. (1/1000 possibility of statistical chance: 5.5 million people. 335,000 births 148 cases of mongolism.) This is confirmed in 1963 by Dr Chas Curry, senior dental surgeon Middlefield Hospital, Knowle England, who found an unusually high incidence of mottled teeth among mongoloid babies (25-50%) of tooth surface. (Testimony in High Court Dublin 1 May 1963: reported Irish Times 2 May 1963.)

Dr Hornung, one of Europe’s most fanatical proponents of fluoridation, was sponsored to come to the US by the American Council on Education to “study” fluoridation in 1955 and 1956, visiting the main battle sites. He stayed with DR Waldbott, a leading opponent of fluoridation, pretending professional interest and friendship. Waldbott writes “I showed him my case studies, and explained that I first used a questionnaire in order to eliminate and which to carefully investigate. The questionnaire served solely for screening purposes.” (p229 A Struggle With Titans) Hornung subsequently promulgated the lie that Waldbott accepted any positive answer as proof of fluoride poisoning, along with an unconscionable character assassination. These lies were printed in the Journal of the American Dental Association September 1956.

1957. WF Ramsayer, CAH Smith, CM McCay, “Effect of Sodium Fluoride Administration on Body Changes in Old rats” J Gerontology 12:14 (1957) at Cornell University demonstrated that rats fed throughout their lives with 1ppm water eventually developed periodontoclasia (gum disease) and kidney disturbances. JW Knutson, Asst Surgeon General PHS Dental Division claimed this must have been due to 20-30 times the fluoride level used in fluoridation (9 August 1956) on what basis, since the water was 1ppm, is not known. A new team under the PHS reproduced the same abnormal changes, did not test for fluoride levels, and reported that these effects were due to “old age”.(1962)

11 December 1957: 4 of the 6 Michigan delegates of AMA’s “House of Delegates” – the AMA’s political arm – advise Dr George Waldbott verbally or in writing that they were opposed to fluoridation but stated that to openly oppose fluoridation “was political suicide.”

WHO adopt the report of their Expert Committee, favouring fluoridation. 5 of the 7 man Committee were known fluoridation promoters (Expert Committee on Fluoridation, Technical Report 146, WHO, Geneva, 1958). WHO resolved to commission a monograph “Metabolism of Fluorides and their Utilisation in Medicine, Dentistry, and Public Health.” Professor Ynge Ericsson of Sweden, a well known ardent proponent of fluoridation (who later acted as advisor to the profluoridation side in the Irish case of Ryan, 1965), acted as special consultant. He commissioned 28 pro-fluoridation scientists of international standing to contribute. Not one scientist involved in research adverse to fluoride was asked to contribute, in fact many requested that they be allowed to submit papers and were refused. This resulted in the 1970 report Fluorides and Human Health.

The typical scenario throughout this era, and still today, is for a committee to be “guided” by 1-3 experts, who are always pro-fluoridation and ensure most of the information put before the committee is pro-fluoride, and that any adverse research is accompanied by a proponent “critique”.

1958. New Zealand holds a “fluoridation symposium” along the same lines as the 1951 US conference. It determines to implement fluoridation by “back door” methods and avoid public consultation, like the US. The New Zealand Health Department claims the statements, published in a local newspaper in 1959, were not the views of the department but of an individual participant. That participant was a member, and later chairman, of the department’s fluoridation promotion committee. (Col. J Ferris-Fuller)

US OHS study: EF Geever NC Leone, P Geiser, JE Lieberman “Pathological Studies in Man after prolonged Ingestion of Fluoride in Drinking Water” Public Health Reports 73: 721 (Aug 1958). Reported on microscopic examination of bones of subjects in areas of 1-4 ppm fluoride, compared with communities at 0.5ppm. The study found “no significant differences” concluding no harm to bones from fluoride. However on p722 it states “those persons with chronic illness and diseases known to affect the bone structure were excluded”. Among the diseases specified, two are associated with chronic fluoride poisoning: namely parathyroid and kidney diseases. Thus the proof of harm was specifically excluded from the study, which then found “no evidence of harm”.

US PHS grants to countries where fluoridation is being promoted:

	1958	1960	1963
Canada	$8,640	$810,621	$1,237,365
Denmark	$27,297	$101,067	$439,704
Eire	$19,078	$62,250	$78,730
Netherlands	$56,945	$175,436	$289,320
Norway	$14,875	$129,286	$258,528
Sweden	$87,600	$507,570	$1,509,011
Switzerland	$5,259	$44,288	$892,606
UK	$232,035	$900,048	$2,751,326

 

1958: PHS pub 621(1958)
1960: PHS pub 777 part I (1960)
1963: PHS pub 1079 part I(1963)

1958. Drs D Jackson and SM Weidmann recorded that water with as little as 0.8ppm could result in a bone concentration of 5000ppm. (J Path Bact 76: 451, 1958))

Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary defines fluorosis as: Fluorosis – chronic poisoning with fluorine… enamel, mottled – a chronic endemic dental fluorosis found in communities using a drinking water that contains one part or more of fluorine per million.

Dr R Soggnaes found on Tristan da Cunha 30% of 6-9 year olds had dental fluorosis of their upper incisors. The water contained 0.2 ppm fluoride.

Dr VO Hurme observed mottling among Negro children in New Haven, Connecticut (0.25ppm)

1959. Research shows only 1/3 fluoride ingested is eliminated, far from the 75-90% claimed by the PHS based on the work of Largent and McClure: Muhler JC, Wagner MJ “Fluoride Ingestion and Urinary Calcium” Journal of Dental Research Vol 38 p 1078 (1959).

Errors and Omissions in Experimental Trials is published by PRN Sutton. It highlights the total inadequacy of the methodology of the early fluoridation studies. In the same year it is reviewed by the UK National Health and Medical Research Council, Dental Research and Advisory Committee. After 3 years they were forced to produce their report, but its contents were never disclosed. The WHO, in 1960, do not mention Sutton’s critique, but refer to the 3 studies of Newburgh, Grand Rapids, and Evanston as “well planned”.

 

1960. HT Dean, “the father of fluoridation”, is honoured  by Irish Dental Society. Dean personally persuaded the Minister of Health to introduce compulsory fluoridation.

Drs R Feltman and G Kosel conclude a 14 year single blind study commissioned by Abbott Laboratories. They gave fluoride tablets to a large population of children and pregnant women. Use of placebos proved that 1% had adverse reactions. (Published J Dent Med 1961). Abbott subsequently put a warning on their fluoride tablets.

TheLancet 1960. “Fluorides occur naturally in water with a high calcium content, and the effects of fluoride may well be modified in soft water.”

 

Gabovich and Ovrutsky, USSR 1977, found calcium to have a measurable protective effect against fluoride where the fluoride level was 1-1.5 ppm. 1ppm was considered “high”. 1942 Dr DC Deatherage: “It is soft waters which cause the most severe mottled enamel.” NRC Canada No. 16081(Rose and Marier). There is no doubt that inadequate nutrition increases the severity of fluoride toxicosis.

1961. Dr FJ Stare, very powerful due to his position at the Harvard School of Public Health, denigrated every opponent of fluoridation as “misinformed, stupid, or dishonest”. (JAMA 2 Dec 1961). He pushed and repeated propaganda in “rebuttal” of every article published against fluoridation. Yet he admitted before the committee of the Ottawa legislature in 27 Feb 1964 “I don’t pretend to be an expert on fluoride metabolism.”
In fact he had not published any original research at all for 25 years at this point.

Dr George Waldbott organises a conference in Rome to discuss fluoride research (adverse).(19-22 March 1961.) The Italian government had agreed to underwrite the conference costs. Meanwhile an uninvited scientist , a top official in the Canadian government, appeared and was anxious to serve on the organising committee. 3 weeks before the conference the Italian government withdrew support. The Eastman Dental Institute in Rome was funded from the US. Italian scientists received over $1M in research grants from the US PHS in 1960-62.

Letter by the chairman of the Fluoridation Committee of a dental society in Pennsylvania, 6 October 1961 to Mrs WS, Ketchikan, Alaska: “We now have spies in most of the established national organisations opposed to fluoridation and can anticipate the moves they are making, and we can really hit hard now. Of course this is not for publication.”

1962. Australia: a 9 year old boy experienced gastric haemorrhages, requiring removal of a large portion of the stomach. After his return home he suffered another, requiring removal of part of the upper bowel. Several hours before the second incident he had taken a 1 milligram fluoride tablet.

1963. The Kettering Institute, funded by vested commercial interests and supported by US PHS grants, published a “selected bibliography” on fluoridation. (a copy of which is in the Otago Dental School Library). All references to adverse research were either omitted or presented in such a way as to infer they were groundless.

The New Zealand case of Lewis v Lower Hutt City begins, eventually going to the Privy Council, who make the opposite decision to that of the Canadian Supreme Court and rule that Local Councils can put anything they like in the water, including medication, so long as the water remains “wholesome”.
The Australian case of Kelberg in 1964 and the Scottish case of McColl in 1983 ruled that fluoridation was unlawful on exactly the same wording, as the Candian Supreme Court had already done. The latter cases “distinguished” Lewis which, in the circumstances, was a polite way of saying the judgment was plainly wrong.

The US PHS issued a public health warning in Drug News Weekly Nov 14 1963. “In areas supplied with fluoridated water use of added supplements is not only unnecessary but definitely contraindicated.”

1964. The case of Kelberg v City of Sale in Victoria Australia, adopts the Canadian interpretation, rejecting the New Zealand approach. Australian States simply pass legislation instead.

January 1964. A US Sociology student surveyed 400 local members of the medical society. She found 49% for fluoridation, 34% against, and 17% undecided. The assistant dean, prompted by the local fluoridation promotion committee chairman, wrote a letter berating the student as besmirching the good name of the university. A threatened libel suit by the student resulted in a retraction.

1965. The Irish case of Ryan v Attorney General is heard, challenging the constitutionality of fluoridation. Ministry of Health stenographers made transcripts so that the case could be prepared for the following day, including phone correspondence with the US PHS. Witnesses we supplied by the US PHS: most admitted to active involvement in promotion. The defence attacked the status of plaintiff witnesses after they had returned overseas. The Court needed explanation of even the simplest scientific and medical matters yet held fluoridation acceptable and Ireland became compulsorily fluoridated.

Dr. George Waldbott, an allergy specialist and independent fluoride researcher, publishes A Struggle with Titans, detailing:

• the control of research by withdrawing of grants by commercial interests and the US PHS;
• the placement of PHS personnel on technical advisory boards of major medical journals to “advise” editors which fluoride research to print (pro – usually funded by research grants as above) and which to reject (adverse, independent research);
• the character assassination of all those who reveal research results adverse to fluoridation;
• the silencing of doctors and dentists by threats of deregistration.

Dr Waldbott writes “For eleven years I have been engaged in medical research on the effect of fluoride on the human organism. While exploring the subject I have observed many practices usually not encountered in medical research.”

January 1965 several Detroit dentists told a newspaper editor, who had published facts unfavourable to fluoridation, that $27,000 was available for advertising to win the vote for fluoridation in Detroit, and that some of it would be spent on his paper if he cooperated.

March 24, 1965, two prominent fluoridation promoters representing themselves as a newspaper editor and a member of “The Antigo Freedom from Fluoridation Committee” gained the confidence of Mrs JWP of W, Wisconsin, whose physician had recognised that she was poisoned by fluoridated water and had advised her to eliminate it for cooking and drinking. Having convinced her that they were genuinely interested in assisting her in proving her case valid, she divulged her physician’s name and granted them permission to contact him for details. Subsequently the physician Dr S was visited by five fluoridation promoters. After their visit he had no choice but to remain silent. The following day, the profluoridation committee “Antigo Citizens for Better Health” declared in the local Antigo Daily Journal while this so-called “legal and medical investigation” was “in process” (sic) that the case of Mrs P was “a flagrant abuse of truth, in fact a hoax.”

This is typical of the way the PHS suppressed the truth, by threatening doctors who diagnosed fluoride poisoning.

May 13 1965, every member of the Detroit District Dental Society was notified of a $20 levy to support this campaign. Any dentists not complying within 4 months were threatened with loss of membership.

Patient deaths ensued from using fluoridated water in dialysis treatment. The AMA quietly arranged to advise hospitals to use unfluoridated water for this process, without revealing the death cases specifically.

1966. The US Food and Drug Administration bans the sale of fluoride tablets to pregnant women, due to evidence that it caused birth deformities.

1967-68. WHO Report #482 expresses concern over safe use of drugs.
It finds the following categories of existing drugs should be high priorities for updated testing (fluoride meets all categories):

• Known or suspected mutagens
• Drugs used over a period of years, especially in children and young adults
• Prescribed for a large proportion of the population
• Used for general prophylaxis

WHO definition of a drug: “any substance used to alter or influence a physiological system for the benefit of the recipient.”

WHO resolution 13 July 1969:

Recommends fluoridation where total intake from all sources is below “optimal”, and that further research be conducted into dental caries. But it never specified the “optimal” dose. Similarly the US PHS have never specified an “optimal” dose as a daily intake.

1968. Smith and Hodge, 2 proponent experts state: “No large scale epidemiological studies are available comparing the health of fluoridated communities with that of communities where the water [contains] only traces of fluoride.” Dental associations worldwide, and the US PHS, continue to promote fluoridation as “safe and effective.”

Tasmanian Inquiry into fluoridation supports fluoridation
Tasmania bans local councils form holding referenda on fluoridation, making it compulsory. (In 1995 the lower House passes a Bill making it illegal to hold public meetings to discuss fluoridation, which was overturned by the upper House.)

Dr George Waldbott founds the International Society for Fluoride Research, dedicated to independent scientific research on fluoride, free of political influence or position.

1969. Jan 21 1969, Dr F Wertheimer, Michigan State Dental Director of health boasted that 7 communities had been secretly fluoridated during that year. He recommended public discussion be avoided until fluoridation had been “sold to citizens”.

The World Health Organisation endorses fluoridation of water supplies on July 23, 1969, despite cautions from G.Penso of the Italian delegation, who warned about “possible genetic damage to future generations”.
During the final hours of the session, when only 45 of the 1,000 delegates from 131 countries were still present, all bills that had not been accepted, including the one on fluorides, were collected and voted upon (no quorum), including the statement on fluoridation.
The Health Minister of Luxembourg later describes the earlier debate as heated, at times violent (as between proponents and opponents).

1970. WHO publishes Fluoride and Human Health recommending fluoridation but only if the total intake from all sources is taken into account. It also acknowledges: “fluorides accumulate in the aorta and possibly the kidney.”

WHO also acknowledge that skeletal fluorosis can occur with as little as 2 mg fluoride per day – we get at least this much today if our water is fluoridated:

“At higher levels of ingestion – from 2 to 8 mg daily, skeletal fluorosis may arise … Whereas dental fluorosis is easily recognised, the skeletal involvement is not clinically obvious until the advanced stage of crippling fluorosis … early cases may be misdiagnosed as rheumatoid or osteoarthritis.?
- Fluorides and Human Health, 1970 pages 239-240

 

1970 Dr Arvid Carlsson, Head of Pharmacology, Gothenburg University, advisor to the Swedish government, in the Swedish Medical Association Journal: “There is no proof that fluoride is an essential nutrient. All the talk of water fluoridation as being merely a “restoration of the natural balance” is groundless.”

1971. Punjab province, India: Professor SS Jolly demonstrates by X-ray 1320 cases of skeletal fluorosis. The water contains 1-5ppm fluoride. The majority of subjects also demonstrate rheumatic arthritic, or neurological symptoms.

FJ McClure and others found 8400ppm fluoride in the aortas of two men.

Sweden abandoned fluoridation in 1969. WHO pressures it to resume and Sweden asks for research proof of safety. WHO fails to provide any and backs down. Throughout the 1970’s European countries abandon fluoridation due to ineffectiveness, and health and civil liberties concerns.

• Finland, 1978, after 20 years of experimentation on one town;*
• West Germany, 1971;
• The Netherlands, 1976, after 23 years of experimentation;
• Norway, 1975;
• Luxembourg, 1979.The Minister of Health: “Fluoridation is a naive utopia, without practical effect, and an attack on personal liberty.”
• Other European countries such as France, Italy (defluoridates some water supplies), Greece, Denmark, choose to remain unfluoridated

* This was following the discovery by researchers that people who lived for 10 years or more in the fluoridated city (Kuopio) had accumulated dangerously high levels of fluoride in their bones.(Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia 51:413-420, (1980))

1972. Sydney, Australia. Dental promoters claim a significant improvement in tooth decay due to fluoridation. The actual figures, when broken down, show that there was 60% improvement in tooth decay from 1961 to 1967. Sydney was fluoridated in 1968. By 1972 the improvement was only another 2%, with a backslide of 1% until 1970. That is, the rate of improvement declined after fluoridation commenced. Dental promoters then selected children from the affluent northern Sydney, with less than average tooth decay, to claim a better improvement than reality. (A similar technique appears to have been used in Grand Rapids).

The Netherlands: A double blind study by 10 physicians, biologists, a pharmacologist, an allergy specialist, a dermatologist, and a notary (to ensure objectivity) demonstrated the same adverse (allergic) symptoms as already described in the literature. Water was supplied from drinking bottles with secret codes, changed every 2 weeks, known only to the notary. After 16 weeks the reports were delivered, sealed, to the notary. They were opened with two witnesses. The study found 1-5% of subjects showed adverse symptoms. The validity of the study was subsequently upheld in court. (31 August 1976, by Royal decree, fluoridation was banned in the Netherlands.)

1973. Australia NSW Health Department Policy, stated in the Medical Journal of Australia “It has been conventional practice to give a fluoride supplement during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy at a rate of 1.5mg of fluoride per day.” In fact the US FDA had banned fluoride tablets for pregnant women in 1966.

During the 1973 Victorian election (Australia) Premier Hamer undertakes to honour the wishes of Ballarat people over fluoridation. 1978: the Council conducted an opinion poll on fluoridation: 2922 against, 186 for. The Victorian Government ordered the Ballarat Water Commission to proceed with fluoridation regardless. A petition to the Queen ensued, signed by 12,500 people, about 1/3 of the adult population. Unions put a black ban on the fluoridation plant installation. Due to an unexpected by-election, Hamer agreed to suspend work and establish an independent inquiry. (See 1979) However of the 3 commissioners appointed without consultation, one was past president of the Victorian branch of the Australian Medical Association, who supported fluoridation. (VD Pleuckaham. The other two were DM Myers, and ALG Rees.) It undertook to hold public meetings: they never did. All proceedings were in secret. The Ballarat people made many in depth submissions on the science involved. One went to Europe at his own expense to gather information. Not one reference could be found in the report. The petition was sent from the Queen back to the Australian Governor-General, who then referred it to the Victorian Governor. It then went back to the Victorian Premier’s department. The people of Ballarat were then informed that it did not meet standing Orders and hence could not be tabled before parliament. On 11 November 1980 it was presented unaltered to the House by the member for Ballarat North. It was not debated. On 11 Feb 1981 it was sent to the relevant Minister. The union bans continued in the face of this deliberate political manoeuvring by Hamer.

1975. 16 December 1975: Dean Burk and John Yiammouyannis published analysis of the US Cancer statistics for fluoridated and unfluoridated cities, showing a 5% increase in cancer deaths. The study covered 18 years and 18 million people. This led to court action in 1978 (see below).

The National Cancer Institute hastily prepared a rebuttal, and sent this to Drs M Sheppard, R Doll, and/or LJ Kinlen, who submitted it to the New Scientist, published 5 February 1976, as their own work, claiming that they showed no increase in cancer in fluoridated communities. The NCI also claimed their own analysis showed no difference, and quoted the supposedly independent Kinlen and Doll study in support. They had used the same erroneous figure as the NCI. (14,487 instead of 14,272), revealing the conspiracy to deceive. This was admitted on oath before the court. In the US, PD Oldham and DJ Newell published the erroneous NCI data also, again claiming it as their own independent work, which was also claimed in support by the NCI. Oldham and Newell disclaimed responsibility for theNCI data in Applied Statistics 28(2) 184, 1979. They acknowledged that the data contained errors and claimed they were only to provide independent appraisal of the data provided, not search for new data. Yet they presented this to the courts (Aitkenhead v West View and McColl v Strathclyde) as an independent study showing the Burk-Yiammouyannis analysis to be incorrect.

Kinlen also published a paper on Birmingham cancer rates from 1961 to1968 (Fluoridated in 1964. Published in the British Dental Journal 1975. There was no adjustment for age; it was a static study only with no time trend data from before fluoridation to after. Kinlen admitted the results were estimates only. In the report he claimed there was no evidence of increased cancer in Birmingham. This was also presented in the Aitkenhead case in rebuttal of the Burk-Yiammouyannis claim of increased cancer rates. Under cross-examination (11 May 1978) Kinlen admitted that the fluoridated cancer rate was in fact 5% higher (1.03 v 0.98). The statement in the Journal was simply a lie.

In 1976 the (UK) Royal College of Physicians repeated the claim, (see below) based on Kinlen’s work, with no reference to the Burk-Yiammouyannis study.

The validity of the Burk-Yiammouyannis conclusion was admitted on 1 Dec 1976 by D S Fredrickson MD, Director, NIH, after consultation with the NCI over the Burk-Yiammouyannis analysis.

The NZ Medical Journal 27 Aug 1980 No 666 pp164-167 claims that all the international studies show that fluoridation does not increase cancer death rates, citing the statement of the Royal College of Physicians which in turn relied on Kinlen’s report in the British Dental Journal.

RN Hoover et al “Fluoridated Drinking water and the Occurrence of Cancer” presented to Congress 14 Nov 1975, republished in J of the National Cancer institute 57 (4) 1976. pp757-768. 16 Texas towns were compared. The authors claimed no difference in the cancer rates. The study was found inadequate for the following reasons:

• The fluoride categories (low, intermediate, high etc.) were not defined and the “control” subjects’ intake was more than that of some of the “experimental” subjects.
• The sample size of the control and 3 fluoride categories were too small.
• Data was “rounded” to the extent that a 5% difference would be obscured thereby.
• An adjustment as made for “years in education” which has never been shown to relate to cancer rates.
• The natural fluoride study had no time trend analysis, only a static analysis.
• The artificial fluoride study used 5 year time periods without determining when fluoridation actually began, nor that different parts of the subject counties were fluoridated at different times.
• Results were weighted by square root of population, not the actual population.

T Hirayama Cancer Res 35 3460, 1975. Elevated levels of dietary fluoride were found to be related to increased cancer death rates.

Sir Arthur Amies, Dean of the faculty of Dental Science, Melbourne University, after 20 years study of fluoride and being one of the world’s experts: “In my opinion the claim for complete medical safety of fluoride is entirely false.”

1976. The Royal College of Physicians England, publishes Fluoride Teeth and Health endorsing the safety of fluoridation. Lord Douglas of Barloch describes this as “not an original contribution to research, but merely an evaluation of pre-existing information. Careful perusal reveals that it does not conform to the scientific standard [of skill and impartiality] required. Much of it reads like a piece of propaganda in favour of fluoridation. The Report does not attempt to specify what daily intake from all sources is important. Its [data on intake from food] is 30 years out of date.”

There is a stormy WHO General Assembly vote over fluoridation: “the vote on this resolution had been preceded by dramatic discussions, at times extremely violent, between followers and the adversaries of fluoridation of drinking water, which proves to society that the last word has certainly not been said in this complex and complicated domain”. (Health Minister of Luxembourg)

W Klein et al, Report of the Austrian Society of Atomic Energy Sabetsdorf research Centre 1 May 1976: Fluoride ions can inactivate DNA repair mechanisms.

27 April 1976. Feingold Association USA (care of hyperactive children) “Fluoride is one additive that cannot be tolerated by children in this group. It has a severe adverse reaction upon the nervous system.” (Compare the work of Mullinex in 1995, showing central nervous system damage, as also shown by Manhattan Project files released in 1997.)

1977. USA Congressional Inquiry into the USA National Cancer Institute (part of the USPHS) and fluoridation. Washington DC 1977. The purpose was to determine whether the NCI had “done its job” before endorsing fluoridation. NCI admit that although it had endorsed fluoridation as “completely safe” for 27 years, it had never done a single study, and only was only planning animal studies at the time because of pressure, otherwise it “probably still would not do it.” Testimony of Dr Newell pp243-245 of the report. The NCI started experiments on mice in 1979. It is a standard requirement that the test last for the natural life of an animal. (3 yrs) So until at least 1982 no one could have known whether fluoride caused cancer or not.

Chile discontinues fluoridation following research by Dr Albert Schatz, Nobel laureate and discoverer of the antibiotic streptomycin, that the poor were suffering adverse health effects and higher infant mortality due to fluoridation.

Melbourne, Australia, fluoridated February 1977. Over 100 statutory declarations were filed by persons suffering adverse health effects whenever they drank the water. The Victorian “Hamer” Commission of Inquiry (1979-1980) claimed no adverse health effects had been observed.

The ADA state: “No evidence is available to support the claim that the use of dietary fluoride supplements by adults will provide dental benefits in adults.”

The Council on Dental Therapeutics of the ADA recommended that the maximum daily dose of fluoride for children 2-5 years old be reduced to 0.5 mg, and that this be decreased if the water contained more than 0.3 mg. Also that the daily dose for less than 2 years be 0.25 mg, reduced if the water contained more than 0.3 mg.

1978. Bacchus Marsh Australia. Promoters stated that the percentage of children with no decay had increased (1963-1978) by 15.8% due to fluoridation. In fact the total number had increased from 2 to 3 individuals (Bacchus Marsh population was approx 5000).

The landmark case of Aitkenhead v Borough of West View (16 November 1978) Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Civil Division, Pennsylvania, is heard. This was an application for injunction to prevent the city from fluoridating the water. It revolved around the Burk-Yiammouyannis study of National Cancer Institute data showing a 5% increase in cancer death rates following fluoridation. Dean Burk was a former head of the NCI and one of the world’s leading experts in cancer. The NCI called in every expert they could find to challenge the Burk-Yiammouyannis findings. The trial lasted 5 1/2 months; the transcript covered 2500 pages. The judge held that every objection by the NCI was met and even turned against them by Burk and Yiammouyannis. Sadly, the injunction against the City of West View was stayed on appeal on purely jurisdictional grounds.

1979. Quebec Ministerial Inquiry into Fluoridation rejects fluoridation as being unsafe. Bill 88 had been put before parliament to implement fluoridation. The Inquiry concluded fluoride was mutagenic and cancer-causing. “We should be more concerned about possible intoxication than with deficiencies of fluorides.”

John Yiammouyannis visits Australia. Proponents are invited to publicly debate with him. NHMRC put up their expert at a meeting at Canberra University, 27 June. The debate was publicly described as a complete walkover for Yiammouyannis.

 

The Official Physician’s Desk Reference (Australia): Fluoride supplements should not be administered to persons who are hypersensitive to fluoride. Side effects [include] Eczema, atopic dermatitis, urticaria, skin rashes, gastro-intestinal upsets, headache, nausea, and vomiting.

HC Hodge: “The most important and widely disregarded fact about dental fluorosis is this: no safe established daily intake exists.” Hodge was an ardent proponent of fluoridation, operating out of Rochester University.

Weatherell et al 1979 quoted in British Dental Journal 19 May 1981. “In recent years, views about the mechanism of fluoride action have changed. The action of fluoride post-eruptively … is now considered to be of equal if not more importance than its pre-eruptive effect.” i.e. this contradicts the long-standing claim that fluorides benefit is systemic – the justification for fluoridation. This topical effect is confirmed definitively in 1999 and 2000 by the Centre for Disease Control and the American Dental Association.

1979-1980. The “Hamer” Commission of Inquiry sits in Victoria Australia. To support its predetermined outcome it repeats lies and deceptions throughout its report, and omits much adverse evidence put before it. A detailed analysis of this, referencing original documents “quoted” by the Commission, is available in Fluoridation: Poison on Tap by G Walker, Magenta Press, Melbourne, 1982.

100 statutory declarations, some with doctor’s certificates were provided regarding hypersensitivity. All stated the symptoms cleared up upon using distilled water for drinking and cooking. The Commission never called in for medical testing. One woman was just out of Melbourne public hospital and had been given a wristband warning nurses not to give fluoridated water to the patient. Evidence was given that doctors had no hesitation in ordering unfluoridated water to be supplied from the dispensary for that purpose.

Re fluoride ions, the Commission finds, contrary to proponent’s usual claims, that although in water the formation of HF and HF₂^- is quite insignificant, at pH 4,( and below) some F^- would be converted to HF₂^-. Note the stomach acidity is often pH2-3, (pH1 without food) hence some HF₂^- would be expected. Formation of both had been shown by one of the leading experts Kaj Roholm, with the stomach’s hydrochloric acid. (HF (hydrofluoric acid) is the most corrosive acid known, and causes burns which get worse, rather than heal.)

Brisbane. A boy ingested between 4 and 6 fluoride tablets. The cause of death was listed as fluoride poisoning. Queensland Health Administration claimed that he had swallowed half a bottle – 92 tablets. No evidence was forthcoming to substantiate this. The mother said 6; his stomach had 4. (pumped at hospital) Reported 3 Nov 1979. The hospital doctors refused to believe the cause was fluoride poisoning because they were unaware that fluoride had a lethal dose (in spite of being used as rat poison for years) No inquest was ever held.

Dental fluorosis in Queensland (Australia) school children. March 1979, Dr G Smith took up a position of dentist at Prosperine Hospital, Queensland. He encountered a large number of children with dental fluorosis. He reported this to Brisbane authorities who told him to forget about it. He did not, but had the information published in Victoria. He was immediately asked to resign. Two investigators were sent. They were both employed by the school dental service, one taught the female dental therapists to apply fluoride .They advised they would do no more than classify the degrees of fluorosis. Smith advised that this was a superficial and cynical approach to the issue which he would not be associated with. He was classified as “unco-operative” in justifying the request for his resignation. The level of fluorosis was only marginally below the level considered a “public health problem”. The equipment was obsolete, no one monitored the fluoride levels. Subsequent tests averaged 0.93 ppm: the recommended level was 0.6. (hot climate, high water consumption) School dental therapists were giving fluoride treatments and recommending fluoride tablets. They had never been taught about fluorosis. Two of the children were suffering from chizzola maculae: a possible symptom of fluoride poisoning resembling small bruises. The dentist were totally unqualified to address this, which is in the area a of clinical pharmacology and toxicology. Smith officially requested they be properly examined. No response to this request was received.

December 1979. Michigan Governor’s scientific task force: “Most studies which comprehensively review the topic [of fluoridation] are able to identify areas in need of further research.”

1980. Australian Prescribing Manual 1980: recommended fluoride doses: expectant mothers in fluoridated areas: 0.75 mg per day fluoride; non-fluoridated areas: 1.5 mg/day. The 1966 US FDA ban is still in force.

Dr John Colquhoun of New Zealand visits the US NIDR, who tell him about their research into the US statistics on tooth decay. They advise that they are confident that this will prove once and for all the benefits of fluoride. The report, when published, failed to mention these results. Dr Colquhoun enquired why. He was told that a different statistical analysis was going to be used. When published this new analysis claimed a 33% improvement, but neither the calculations nor the original data was ever published. Obviously the anticipated improvement was not shown by the statistics.

1981. American Chemical Society Journal Vol 3 Issue 1 pp84-88. Research results unexpectedly showed that the fluoride ion can form an amide-fluoride hydrogen bond as the strongest heteronuclear hydrogen bond known. Many components within the living cell contain amide groups- hydrogen bonds between amides are the most important weak hydrogen bonds in biological systems. These can be disrupted by the formation of the much stronger N-H-F bond, explaining how the fluoride ion could interfere with healthy cellular systems.

 

1982. By this time fluoridation is compulsory in all Australian military camps.

1983. In the case of McColl v Strathclyde Regional Council Lord Jauncey held that the Council had no authority to fluoridate the water supply. The Water (Scotland) Act required the local authority “to provide a supply of wholesome water to every part of their limits of supply.” Lord Jauncey also held that there was no proof of harmful effects, a finding which is untenable in light of the admissions before the Aitkenhead Court in Pennsylvania in 1978.

1986. Dr John Colquhoun proves that the Hastings experiment was a fraud. This study had been cited around the world, along with the US experiments. The Ministry of Health simply stops citing it as authority. Dr Colquhoun becomes persona non gratis and the Ministry of Health attempts to silence him and to disparage his work.

1989. Arends et al show that 2ppm fluoride is required to remineralise tooth enamel: the 1ppm level in water is useless as a topical application. See admission by the CDC and ADA in 1999/2000 that it is a topical effect that allegedly prevents tooth decay.

Dr John Colquhoun in New Zealand seeks to publish NZ school dental statistics which show that tooth decay was the same if not better in unfluoridated areas. Dr Colquhoun was the chief dental offcier in Auckland, and for 2 years had been the chairman of the NZ Government’s Fluoridation Promotion Committee. The Director-General of Health refused permission. (Fluoridation was, and still is, a strongly promoted Government policy in NZ). Dr Colquhoun retired shortly after and published it anyway. He notes that although these were official figures he could not get his analysis published in either the medical or dental journal in NZ: he had to get it published by a body which was not politically aligned with fluoridation. He supported Dr George Waldbott’s observation that such journals regularly refuse to publish adverse research on fluoride.

Dr Colquhoun stated in a sworn affadavit:

“I was shocked to discover, when the statistics were sent to me, they revealed no such benefit. In fact, in most Health Districts the percentage of children who were “caries-free” was higher in the non-fluoridated areas than in the fluoridated areas. I disagreed sharply with my superiors’ action in circulating a document, “overview of fluoridation statistics,” which omitted the above information, disgracefully “doctored” the remaining statistics, and claimed that a marginal benefit existed. When, in addition, I discovered that dental fluorosis prevalences (a sign of fluoride toxicity) were much higher than expected in fluoridated areas, I publicly changed my stance on fluoridation in 1983.”

1990. Brunelle and Carlos publish the US National Institute of Dental Research study, the largest in US history, showing minimal difference between fluoridated and unfluoridated communities. (0.6 dmfs out of 128 in the mouth. Refer also Spencer et al, 1996, below)

1992. The US EPA is ordered to reinstate Dr William Marcus, with $50,000 damages, for firing hime over whistleblowing regarding NTP’s coverup of cancer dangers from fluoridation.

1993. According to the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR, 1993), large cohorts of the public will be at considerable risk of adverse health effects from fluoridation. To quote from the Toxicological Profile for Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluorine (p 112): “Populations that are unusually susceptible: the elderly, people with calcium deficiency, magnesium and vitamin C deficiencies, and people with cardiovascular and kidney problems.”

1994. WHO publishes Fluorides and Oral Health again reiterating that the total fluoride intake from all sources must be taken into account.

1995. Tasmania attempts to ban public meetings held to discuss fluoridation. The Bill passes the Lower House but is rejected by the Upper House.

Dr Phyllis Mullinex demonstrates Central Nervous System damage in rats at the same blood-fluoride levels as humans drinking fluoridated water. Her funding grant is withdrawn, she is sent to a children’s hospital with no research funding, and her laboratory and all equipment and records are destroyed 3 days later.
Click here for Mullinex’s story: it is typical of the history of fluoridation, and now GE research as we saw with Aberdeen University.

1996. Philip RN Sutton publishes The Greatest Fraud Fluoridation.

Spencer et al publish their Australian study showing insignificant difference in lifetime dental figures as between fluoridated and unfluoridated communities. (0.12-0.3 dmfs. Refer Brunelle and Carlos, 1990, above)

1997. Jennifer Luke, UK, demonstrates accumulation of up to 22,000ppm fluoride in the pineal gland.

“Manhattan Project” documents released under the US Official Secrets Act reveal that Central Nervous System damage was evident in refinery workers, working with fluoride, and was covered up by the US Government. The documents also revealed that the scientists overseeing the adverse health effect research aspect of the Newburgh – Kingston fluoridation experiment from 1945 were appointed by the Atomic Energy Commission to supress any adverse data, and collect information useful in defending litigation by workers for health damage.

1998. Betty De Liefde publishes a paper in the NZ Dental Journal revealing that it had been demonstrated that:

• There has been little valid statistical difference over the past 10 years between fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas with both showing identical falling incidences.
• A controlled field trial of topical fluoride showed no benefit.
• Most of the benefits of fluoride tablets could be explained by other dentally beneficial practices.
• The conclusions of many fluoride mouth-rinsing studies are now questioned because historical base-line data… can give the illusion of benefit.
• Attempts to attribute all the changes in caries prevalence to fluoride divert attention from other investigations.
• NZ epidemiological evidence of change in prevalence does not correlate well with the timetable of the introduction

1999. Drs Masters and Coplan demonstrate an increased uptake in Lead with silicofluorides now used in water fluoridation, as opposed to the original sodium fluoride. At first dismissed by the US EPA, this is later accepted and in part leads to the EPA’s change in position in 2002.

In November 1999, Professor Limeback, Head of Preventive Dentistry, University of Toronto, President of Canadian Association of Dental Research, and the country’s leading fluoride authority, publicly apologised to his faculty members and the media for mistakenly promoting water fluoridation for over 15 years.
His apology included the following:” Skeletal fluorosis is a debilitating condition that occurs when fluoride accumulates in bone making them extremely weak and brittle. The earliest symptoms are mottled and brittle teeth. In Canada, we are now spending more on dental fluorosis than we do treating cavities.” He added: “Dentists have absolutely no training in toxicity. Your well- intentioned dentist is simply following 50 years of misinformation from public health and the dental association. Me, too. Unfortunately, we were wrong. Poisoning children was the furthest thing from my mind.”
He was dismissed by the university, but was subsequently reinstated with $150,000 damages on a wrongful dismissal action.

The US Center for Disease Control admits that any benefit from fluoride is topical, not systemic: the whole basis of fluoridation is proven wrong.

2000. Journal of the American Dental Association: “Fluoride works primarily via topical mechanisms. Fluoride incorporated during tooth development is insufficient to play a significant role in caries protection.”

The York Review, in spite of being established by the British Ministry of Health to prove the case for fluoridation, finds that all epidemiological studies are unreliable, and that there is no evidence of significant benefit, social equity, or safety. Proponent organisations, including the NZ Ministry of Health, lie about the outcome, claiming the report supported fluoridation. This led the review board chairman, Dr Trevor Sheldon, to make a public statement, presented to the House of Lords, regarding these lies and the true findings of the review. (See on this site)

2001. US promoters pressure the South African government to adopt fluoridation, in spite of endemic fluorosis throughout Africa. The usual farce Inquiry follows. The government decides to fluoridate. The fluoride is to be supplied by the Nuclear Energy Corporation of South Africa (NECSA), located in the Pelindaba nuclear complex west of Pretoria, though not as a waste product. This promises an annual income to the company of R13 Million.

In a 90 page report entitled “Endemic Goitre in the Union of South Africa and some Neighbouring Territories”, prepared for the Department of Nutrition for the South African government, Dr. Douw Steyn and colleagues concluded that there were two separate causes for endemic goiter. In their summary, they state: “In the Union of South Africa endemic goitre is caused by: (1) a primary iodine deficiency in the drinking water and soil, and most probably in the food; and (2) excessive quantities of fluorine in subterranean drinking-water in spite of super sufficiency of iodine in the waters.” Research by University of Stellenbosch researchers (Loue AJ and Grobler SR (2002, J Dent Res) reported that in some regions already containing fluoride naturally, dental decay rates increased with increasing dental fluorosis. The government’s controversial plan is delayed, pending further research on several issues from cost to the effects on human health and the environment: “Several questions have been raised to which there are no answers.”

“The 2001 Kentucky Childrens Oral Health Survey: findings for children ages 24 to 59 months and their caregivers.”
Hardison JD, Cecil JC, White JA, Manz M, Mullins MR, Ferretti GA. Pediatr Dent. 2003 Jul-Aug;25(4):365-72.
In this article it is revealed that for children in Kentucky, “43% had untreated caries, 47% had caries experience (early childhood caries), and 31% had severe early childhood caries.”

CONCLUSIONS of the report:

“Dental caries is a major health and early childhood development problem in high-risk preschool children in Kentucky”

Kentucky is 100% fluoridated!

 

2002. There is a major push from the US to compulsorily fluoridate its own communities. A similar push to recover lost ground begins in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK.

The US Environmental Protection Agency, a traditional promoter of fluoridation (though opposed by its Union of Scientists, who actually do the research) acknowledges that no human health safety tests have ever been done on silicofluorides used in water fluoridation, and calls for such research. It holds a scientific forum, and includes a 1 1/2 hour time slot for a fluoridation debate. Dr Paul Connett and Dr Hardy Limeback put the case against fluoridation. Not one federal agency, claiming fluoridation to be one of the 10 great medical achievements of the 20th century, is prepared to debate with these experts. The media, and Congressional aides present, begin asking why proponents cannot apparently support their claims.

Belgium bans all fluoride supplements citing that excessive use of fluoride increases the risk of osteoporosis, could damage the nervous system and, even Belgian dentists agree, is ineffective when ingested.
Belgian health minister at the time, Magda Aelvoet, said she was now pressing for a Europe-wide ban, hinting that the removal of supplements was just the first step towards removing the chemical from the food chain

The Irish Fluoridation Forum reports its “findings”. It is unable to answer even one of the questions put to it by Dr Paul Connett, in spite of a special committee having been established for that express purpose and sitting for 2 years. It fails to mention any of the adverse research presented to it, rather like the Hamer Inquiry in Victoria in 1979, and simply repeats the endorsements of promoters instead of addressing the science.

The US pressure Israel, “the US of the Middle East”, to adopt fluoridation. The Israeli parliament passes compulsory legislation: in 2003 the Israeli Supreme Court stands down the law, ruling it unconstitutional.

In January, 2002, the South Korean Medical Association official statement announced that “we are not in definitely positive position about water fluoridation since there are not enough scientific and medical evidences on its effects on human health” and expressed their wish to withdraw their name from the list of professional groups endorsing water fluoridation. This movement was followed by another announcement from the Korean Pharmaceutical Association in May, 2002, in which the latter said that the Pharmaceutical Association will not support the practice of water fluoridation until clear scientific evidence on its effects is available.

2003. Four South Korean city councils -Chongju, Pohang, Gwacheon, Uiwang- decide to stop the fluoridation of public water supplies.

The town of Basel, the only fluoridated town in Switzerland, ends fluoridation citing “lack of any perceptible benefit”. In 1975 the Health Department had recommended discontinuing fluoridation because of “lack of any perceptible benefit”.

 

Tony Blair in the UK introduces a Bill to make fluoridation compulsory. The House of Commons passes the Bill, in spite of the Government’s own York Review finding no justification for fluoridation.

Dr Sam Epstein, Chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition, author of “The Politics of Cancer”, and “The Politics of Cancer Revisited”, publicly opposes fluoridation.

Local councils of Pierce-Tacoma County, USA, file for injunction against the health boards who are trying to force councils to fluoridate water supplies against their wishes. The case goes to the Washington State Supreme Court, on the constitutional issues only. The health boards claim that dental caries is a dangerous disease allowing them to invoke their “police powers”. One of the judges asks “If dental caries is dangerous, tell me: how do I catch it?” The decision of the court is awaited.

An international petition is launched calling for aan independent evaluation of fluoridation

The Mayor of London calls for an “independent” review of fluoridation

The Welsh nationalist party opposes fluoridation.

…

That is a brief summary of the history -
whether we will tolerate this indefensible practice, promoted by commercial and political interests, in the future, is in our hands.

#724 – Fluoridation: Time For A Second Look?, May 10, 2001

  

by Paul, Ellen and Michael Connett* In 1997 the union representing scientists, engineers and lawyers at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Washington, D.C., voted to support a California citizen initiative to stop fluoridation of public drinking water. In 1999 the union’s vice-president released a paper explaining the union’s opposition to fluoridation.[1] Fluoridation is the practice of adding fluoride to the public water supply to reduce dental decay. U.S. fluoridation trials began in 1945 and by 1992 approximately 56% of the U.S. public received its water from fluoridated systems.[2] Typically, fluoride-containing (or -generating) compounds are added to water to bring the level up to 1 milligram of fluoride ion per liter (1 part per million). In 1986 EPA set a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for fluoride in drinking water at 4 ppm.[3] The MCL was based on only one adverse health effect: skeletal fluorosis, a crippling bone disease. Fluoridation of public water supplies has stirred passionate debate for over 50 years. Now new data is refining the debate. It appears that some of the early claims for fluoridation’s benefits were inflated. In recent years tooth decay has declined in both fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities. In fact, the largest U.S. survey indicates that the benefit to fluoridated communities amounts to 0.6 fewer decayed tooth surfaces per child, which is less than one percent of the tooth surfaces in a child’s mouth.[4] The public health community justified medicating whole communities via public drinking water using certain arguments that recent research has now shown to be false. For example, in 1945 scientists believed that fluoride had to be swallowed to be effective. However, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has recently acknowledged that fluoride’s mechanism of action is primarily topical, not systemic.[5] This means that you don’t need to swallow fluoride to reap its tiny benefits. A second early belief, now known to be false, is that fluoride is an essential nutrient. There is no evidence of any disease related to fluoride deficiency. Natural levels of fluoride in human milk (0.01 ppm) are approximately a hundred times less than baby formula reconstituted with fluoridated water.[6] A third early belief was that dental fluorosis (a defect of the tooth enamel caused by fluoride’s interference with the growing tooth) would occur in only about 10% of the children drinking water fluoridated at 1 ppm and would occur only in its mildest form. Today fluorosis occurs on two or more teeth in 30% of children in areas where the water is fluoridated, and not all in its mildest form.[7] A fourth early belief was that 1 ppm fluoride in drinking water provided an ample margin of safety against toxic effects. Not only is there no safety margin for dental fluorosis but there is growing evidence that there may be no safety margin for changes to bone structure and impacts on the brain, thyroid, and other soft tissues, especially when it is coupled with nutrient deficiencies, particularly iodide. THE EVIDENCE 1) In 1998 the results of a long-term, low-dose rat study were published.[8] Two groups of rats were exposed to two different kinds of fluoride at 1 ppm in distilled water. A third group received only distilled water. Amyloid deposits (associated with Alzheimer’s Disease and other forms of dementia) were elevated in the brains of both fluoridated groups compared to the control group. The authors speculate that fluoride enables aluminum to cross the blood-brain barrier. 2) Millions of people in India and China suffer a crippling bone disease called skeletal fluorosis, caused by moderate to high natural levels of fluoride (1.5 to 9 ppm) in their water.[9] Skeletal fluorosis has several stages of severity, with the less severe being chronic joint pain. “Because some of the clinical symptoms mimic arthritis, the first two clinical phases of skeletal fluorosis could be easily misdiagnosed.”[3] Arthritis is now at epidemic levels in the U.S. Fluoride’s plausible contribution has been ignored, but needs to be taken seriously. 3) Since fluoridation began in 1945 our exposure to other sources of fluoride has increased substantially. These include processing food and beverages with fluoridated water; air pollution from fluoride emitting industries; pesticide residues; vitamins; and dental products. If 1 ppm in drinking water were the only source of fluoride, the average person would ingest 2 milligrams (mg) of fluoride each day, though some may get less because they use bottled water, or they drink less water than the average adult. In 1991, the federal Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) estimated that the range of exposure in communities with approximately 1 ppm fluoride in the water was 1.58 to 6.6 mg per day.[10] 4) The dose of 1.58 to 6.6 mg per day overlaps the dose found to depress the functioning of the human thyroid gland. At 2.27 to 4.54 mg/day, fluoride has been found to “completely relieve” the symptoms of hyperthyroidism (overactive thyroid).[11] With fluoride’s known capacity to depress thyroid activity, it seems that there may be a link between current fluoride consumption and the prevalence of hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid). More than twenty million people in the U.S. receive treatment for thyroid problems and many others are thought to go undiagnosed.[12] 5) Fluoride is a hormone disrupter. It mimics the action of many water-soluble hormones by interacting with G proteins, which transmit hormonal messages across cell membranes.[13] Additionally, fluoride accumulates in the pineal gland and may reduce melatonin production.[14] 6) Fluoride (50-75 mg per day) given to osteoporosis patients to strengthen bones has actually increased their rate of hip fractures.[15,16] Of 18 studies conducted since 1990, 10 have found an association between water fluoridation and hip fractures in the elderly.[17] According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): “If this effect is confirmed, it would mean that hip fracture in the elderly replaces dental fluorosis in children as the most sensitive endpoint of fluoride exposure.”[18] Hip fracture is not a minor problem: in the U.S. up to 50,000 people die each year of osteoporosis-related hip fractures.[19] 7) Some evidence suggests that fluoride causes bone cancer in male rats and perhaps in young men.[20, 21] 8) A recent report by the Greater Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility reviews studies showing that fluoride interferes with brain function in young animals and in children, reducing IQ.[22] Most European countries have rejected fluoridation. Recognizing that there are simple and effective alternatives, they have applied the precautionary principle. Their children’s teeth have not suffered as a consequence. Parents willing to expose their children to fluoride can simply purchase fluoridated toothpaste (which contains 1000 to 1500 ppm fluoride — read the warning label on the package).[23] The American policy of giving fluoride to children by medicating whole communities with a potent drug that may harm some people seems a dubious practice at best. At worst it violates the primary principle of medical ethics: First do no harm. Furthermore, it violates the ethical principle of informed consent. In May 2000 the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) was formed by a coalition of activists and scientists from 12 countries (see: http://www.fluoridealert.org/). FAN’s goal is to end fluoridation and minimize exposure to fluoride. FAN’s founding members include the late David Brower; Teddy Goldsmith; Michael Colby; Gar Smith; Terri Swearingen; the union representing professional employees at EPA headquarters; and Dr. Hardy Limeback, Canada’s leading dental authority on fluoridation who in 1999 apologized for having promoted fluoridation for 15 years. We urge our colleagues working on public health and environmental issues to become involved and take a second look at fluoridation. ===== * Paul Connett is professor of chemistry at St. Lawrence University in Canton N.Y.; Ellen Connett is editor of WASTE NOT , 82 Judson, Canton N.Y. 13617; Michael Connett is FAN’s webmaster <http://www.fluoridealert.org>/ [1] J. William Hirzy, “Why the union representing U.S. EPA’s professionals in Washington D.C. opposes fluoridation,” WASTE NOT #448 ( May 1, 1999), pgs. 1-4. And see http://www.fluoridation.com/epa2.htm. [2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Prevention Services, Division of Oral Health, “Water Supply Statistics” (Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1993). Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nohss/FSSupplyStats.htm. [3] Bette Hileman, “Fluoridation of water. Questions about health risks and benefits remain after more than 40 years,” CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS Vol. 66 (August 1, 1988), pgs. 26-42. Available at http://www.fluoridealert.org/hileman.htm. [4] J.A. Brunelle and J.P. Carlos, “Recent Trends in Dental Caries in U.S. Children and the Effect of Water Fluoridation,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH Vol. 69, Special Issue (February 1990), pgs. 723-727 and discussion pgs. 820-823. [5] Centers for Disease Control, “Achievements in Public Health, 1900-1999: Fluoridation of Drinking Water to Prevent Dental Caries,” MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT Vol. 48, No. 41 (October 22, 1999), pgs. 933-940. [6] C.J. Spak and others, “Fluoride in Human Milk,” ACTA PAEDIATRICA SCANDINAVICA Vol. 72, No. 5 (September 1983), pgs. 699-701. [7] Keith E. Heller and others, “Dental Caries and Dental Fluorosis at Varying Water Fluoride Concentrations,” JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY Vol. 57, No. 3 (Summer 1997), pgs. 136-143. [8] Julie A. Varner and others, “Chronic administration of aluminum-fluoride and sodium-fluoride to rats in drinking water: alterations in neuronal and cerebrovascular integrity,” BRAIN RESEARCH Vol. 784, No. 1-2 (February 1998), pgs. 284-298. [9] S.S. Jolly and others, “Human Fluoride Intoxication in Punjab,” Fluoride Vol, 4, No. 2 (1971), pgs. 64-79. [10] Ad Hoc Subcommitttee on Fluoride of the Committee to Coordinate Environmental Health and Related Programs, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services. REVIEW OF FLUORIDE: BENEFITS AND RISKS, REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON FLUORIDE OF THE COMMITTEE TO COORDINATE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND RELATED PROGRAMS (February 1991), pg. 17. [11] Pierre-M. Galletti and Gustave Joyet, “Effect of fluorine on thyroidal iodine metabolism in hyperthyroidism,” JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY Vol. 18 (October 1958), pgs. 1102-1110. [12] Beth Ann Ditkoff and Paul Lo Gerfo, THE THYROID GUIDE [ISBN 0060952601] (New York: Harper, 2000), cover notes. [13] Anna Strunecka and J. Patocka, “Pharmacological and toxicological effects of aluminofluoride complexes.” FLUORIDE Vol. 32, No. 4 (November 1999), pgs. 230-242. [14] Jennifer Anne Luke, THE EFFECT OF FLUORIDE ON THE PHYSIOLOGY OF THE PINEAL GLAND , Ph.D Thesis, University of Surrey, United Kingdom (1997). See also Jennifer Luke, “Fluoride Deposition in the Aged Human Pineal Gland,” CARIES RESEARCH Vol. 35 (2001), pgs. 125-128. [15] L.R. Hedlund and J.C. Gallagher, “Increased incidence of hip fracture in osteoporotic women treated with sodium fluoride,” JOURNAL OF BONE MINERAL RESEARCH Vol. 4, No. 2 (April 1989), pgs. 223-225. [16] B.L. Riggs and others, “Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rates in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis,” NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE Vol. 322, No. 12 (March 22 1990), pgs. 802-809. [17] Paul Connett and Michael Connett, “The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Critique of the CDC’s Promotion of Fluoridation,” WASTE NOT #468 (October 2000), pgs. 27-28. Available at http://www.fluoridealert.org/cdc.htm. [18] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR FLUORIDES, HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, AND FLUORINE (F) [ATSDR/TP-91/17]. (Atlanta, Ga.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, April 1993), pg. 57. [19] K. Phipps, “Fluoride and bone health,” JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY Vol. 55, No. 1 (Winter 1995), pgs. 53-56. [20] National Toxicology Program, TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS (December 1990). This NTP study is summarized in reference 10, pgs. 71-73. [21] Perry D. Cohn, A BRIEF REPORT ON THE ASSOCIATION OF DRINKING WATER FLUORIDATION AND THE INCIDENCE OF OSTEOSARCOMA AMONG YOUNG MALES. (Trenton, N.J.: New Jersey Department of Health, November 8, 1992). [22] Ted Schettler and others, IN HARM’S WAY: TOXIC THREATS TO CHILD DEVELOPMENT (Cambridge, Mass.: Greater Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility [GBPSR] , May 2000). Available at http://www.igc.org/psr/ or from GBPSR in Cambridge, Mass.; telephone (617) 497-7440. [23] Paul Connett and Ellen Connett, “The Fluoridation of Drinking Water: a house of cards waiting to fall. Part 1: The Science,” WASTE NOT #373 (November 1996). See Table 2 pgs. 6-7.

 

 

END

&&&

VITAL INFORMATION

***NOTE..I JUST CHECKED THE ARTICLE LINKS BELOW…AS I WROTE BEFORE BECAUSE OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE INFORMATION THE NWO MEMBERS HAVE DIRECTED THE LINKS TO SHOW THE ARTICLE DOESN’T EXIST…

SEARCH FOR IT ON THE SEARCH ENGINES…NOTE THE MAIN SEARCH ENGINES ARE CONTROLLED BY THE NWO…( AS CRAZY AS THIS READS THIS IS DOCUMENTED FACT BY HIGHLY RESPECTED EX INSIDERS, TOP HIGHLY RESPECTED INVESTIGATORS ***

***NOTE I AM MIRRORING THIS ARTICLE IN IT’S ENTIRETY TO BE ANOTHER SOURCE THAT IS AVAILABLE FOR ALL OF US. MANY ARTICLES, VIDEOS, PDFs, ETC. HAVE AND ARE BEING REMOVED FROM THE INTERNET..INFORMATION THAT WE NEED.

***NOTE…NWO MEMBERS HAVE TAMPERED WITH THE BELOW LINKS…USE SEARCH ENGINES TO FIND THE ARTICLES…THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO GET THE TRUTH …THESE ARE COLD BLOODED TORTURERS, KILLERS..OF INNOCENT BABIES, CHILDREN, WOMEN & MEN OF ALL AGES..!!!

*** PLEASE DO THE SAME. COPY ALL TRUTH ARTICLES, VIDEOS / RE UPLOAD THEM UNDER YOUR YOUBUTE, ETC. CHANNEL. OPEN A BLOG , (EASY, SIMPLE, FAST), COPY & PASTE THE TRUTH ON YOUR BLOGS, WEB SITES – NOW !!!

***YOU CAN MAKE AN INFINITE IMPACT FOR THE TRUTH, FOR THE GOOD TO WIN ! VISUALIZE – THE WATER AT A LAKE ON A CALM DAY – IT IS JUST LIKE GLASS – NO RIPPLES. NOW THROW A SMALL PEBBLE INTO THE WATER, A RIPPLING EFFECT GOES THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE LAKE. MAKE THAT DIFFERENCE….NOW!!!

** CRITICAL **

!!!ALERT TO ALL COMPUTER HACKERS / GENIUSES / THOSE IN POSITIONS TO MAKE A POSITIVE SOLUTION….. NOTE WHO NEW WORLD ORDER MEMBERS ARE & SHUT THEM DOWN NOW.. YOU KNOW HOW…

***WITH OUT MONEY, CREDIT, TRANSPORTATION, WEAPONS, AMMO, CONTACTS ( PEOPLE LIKE THEM ), SUPPORT SYSTEMS (FAMILY MEMBERS, FRIENDS), WITH OUT TRANSPORTATION, WITHOUT HOMES ( MANY OF THEM HAVE FORCED OUT, INJECTED, INFECTED, DISABLED THROUGH SICKNESS BY CHEMICAL, INJECTIONS, KILLED ), WITHOUT THEIR HEALTH ( WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO Us…THE NON N.W.O. MEMBERS..MADE US SO SICK WE WISH WERE WE DEAD..THEIR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE ) ETC. THEY CAN DO NOTHING!

***** HOW ******

1, FIRE THEM FROM THEIR JOBS, 2. CANCEL OUT THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS, 3. CANCEL OUT THEIR CREDIT SOURCES, 4. REPOSSES THEIR TRANSPORTATION, 5. TAKE THEIR WEAPONS, AMMO,, 6. SEPARATE THEM FROM THEIR SUPPORT SYSTEMS – FAMILIES, 7. REMOVE THEM FROM THEIR HOMES, 8. INFECT, INJECT THEM..SO THEY ARE SOOO SICK THEY WISH THEY ARE DEAD… ( LIKE THEY HAVE DONE TO OUR GRANDPARENTS, OUR ANCESTORS, OUR LOVED ONES,… (BABIES, CHILDREN, WOMEN & MEN OF ALL AGES, TO OUR FRIENDS, TO …Us ) 8. SHUT DOWN THEIR CONTACTS..DO THE SAME TO THEM ( STEPS 1 – 7 ) SO SICK THAT THEY CAN NOT HELP IN BRINGING IN THIS HELLISH NEW WORLD ORDER –

( NOTE MORE AND MORE OF NEW WORLD ORDER MEMBERS ARE AWAKENING TO WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING, WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO THEM…EX. FUKUSHIMA’S MELT DOWN, RELEASING THE WORST RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT…MOX FUEL, WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO THE EARTH…THE GULF OIL DISASTER, AND OTHER CRITICAL EVENTS BUT THERE ARE STILL MANY WHO ARE STILL CONTINUING THEIR HARMING, INJECTING, INJECTING, THEIR “ACCIDENTS”, ETC. OF GOOD, DECENT PEOPLE…THESE MUST BE STOPPED AND THAT IS RIGHT NOW !!!

—–

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT NOTE:  

   I AM LOOKING ONLY FOR THE TRUTH WITH ALL THE LIES, DISINFORMATION, WITH HELD FACTS, ETC. ( HOW NWO ELITE & MEMBERS GO ABOUT THEIR PLAN FOR THIS HELLISH NWO – PLEASE SCROLL DOWN BELOW READ “SECRET COVENANT (PLAN) OF THE ILLUMINATI NOW, THIS CRITICAL INFORMATION FOR ALL OF US ).

    CRITICAL NOTE 2: THE JESUIT / ILLUMINATI ( PLUS ALL SECRET & NON SECRET ORGANIZATIONS…PLUS EVERY ORGANIZATION THAT TOUCHES OUR LIVES HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED & CONTROLLED: ALL WORLD LEADERS, ALL WORLD POLITICIANS, ALL WORLD MILITARIES, ALL WORLD LEGAL SYSTEMS, ALL WORLD LAW ENFORCEMENT – LOCAL, STATE, GOVERNMENT, ALL MAIN STREAM NEWS & TELEVISIONS MEDIAS, ALL WORLD TYPES OF BUSINESS, ALL WORLD EDUCATION SYSTEMS, ALL WORLD MOVIE MAKING BUSINESSES, ALL WORLD RELIGIONS, EVERYTHING , EVERY WHERE, THIS HAS ORIGINATED FROM THE FIRST POWERFUL EMPIRE & KEPT SECRET! 

    !!  THANK THE CREATOR FOR THE EX JESUITS, EX ILLUMINATI, EX FREEMASONS, EX INSIDERS, TOP INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS, ETC. WHO DO NOT WANT ANY PART OF THIS HELLISH NEW WORLD ORDER ( NWO ) AND THANK THE CREATOR FOR THE INTERNET, EMAIL, VIDEO SHARING WEB SITES, TRUTH WEB SITES, TRUTH BLOGS SO WE GET THE TRUTH !!!

  NEW WORLD ORDER ELITE & MEMBERS  LIVE IN EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD AROUND THE WORLD, BLENDING IN WITH US “SHEEPLE”, THE “USELESS EATERS” ( WHAT NWO REFER TO OUR BABIES, CHILDREN, WOMEN AND MEN OF ALL AGES ) .. – RICH TO POOR NEIGHBORHOODS – WHO ARE IN EVERY WHITE COLLAR, BLUE COLLAR CAREER / JOB – EX. TOP PAYING CAREERS – RICH NEIGHBORHOODS, MIDDLE CLASS NEIGHBORHOODS, POOR NEIGHBORHOODS – LOW PAYING JOBS, STREET GANGS, CRIMINALS, ETC. LIVING AMONG THE “GOOD” PEOPLE & TARGETING US WITHOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE, KEEPING TRACK OF WHAT WE DO, INVENTORING WHAT WE HAVE WHILE WE ARE NOT HOME OR UNAWARE, INFECTING, INJECTING MANY OF US , MEDICATING WHILE WE ARE ASLEEP ( OUR HOMES “SETUP” WITH MICRO / PIN CAMERAS, GPS OUR VEHICLES ( LOOK AT “BAIT CAR” TRU TV TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA WHAT THEY CAN DO) – TRACKING US IN REAL TIME, ETC. ) OR UNAWARE.

     USING THEIR MEMBERS TO DO US, OUR LOVED ONES, OUR FRIENDS HARM OR WORST – WHO ARE IN THE MILITARY, LEGAL SYSTEMS, LAW ENFORCEMENT, …MEDICAL, DENTAL, PHARMACEUTICAL, PSYCHIATRY, ETC.  ( WHO CAN INJECT , INFECT, MEDICATE, OPERATE ON OUR BODIES, OUR MINDS ..THAT CAN DO US DIRECT HARM  ) – ALL LEVELS, BANKING, EDUCATION SYSTEMS, ALL RELIGIONS…EVERY ORGANIZATION, EVERY WHERE..( NOTE NO “GOOD” PERSON IS GOING TO GO AGAINST THEM..UNLESS THEY ARE PROTECTED…ALL LEVELS FROM THE TOP DOWN CONTAIN THEIR MEMBERS..THE “GOOD” EITHER KEEP QUIET & GO ALONG OR THEY ARE PUNISHED OR SILENCED ( FROM CORRUPT, NWO MEMBERS WITHIN THEIR ORGANIZATIONS, CORRUPT ENFORCERS, LEGAL SYSTEM JUDGES, LAWYERS, LAW ENFORCEMENT – LOCAL, STATE, GOVT., MEDICAL, DENTAL, BANKERS, TRADES, ETC.  ( THINK OF WHAT KIND OF HARM THESE CORRUPT PEOPLE CAN DO)..THIS HAS BEEN KEPT SECRET & IS STILL KEPT FROM THE PUBLIC ) !

    THOSE THAT ARE  NWO MEMBERS & BORN INTO NWO MEMBER’S FAMILIES DON’T HAVE THE SAME INOCULATIONS, VACCINES, FLU SHOTS, EAT OR DRINK THE SAME FOODS, ETC. ( THEY DO WHEN THEY ARE WITH US..THE “SHEEPLE” “USELESS EATERS”..BLENDING IN, ETC. FROM KINDERGARTEN TO ALL LEVELS OF SCHOOL, ALL TYPES OF JOBS, IN EVERY AREA, SHOP ALONG SIDE US, GO TO CHURCH WITH US, GO TO SPORTS WITH US, GO TO ALL TYPES OF RELIGIONS..CHURCHES, TEMPLES, ETC. WITH US ). THEY ARE TAKEN CARE OF WITH GOOD TO GREAT JOBS, CAREERS, HOMES, VEHICLES, ETC.  ( EVER WONDER WHY JOHN OR JANE DOESN’T GET THAT SICK, LEARNED EASIER, EXCELS IN SCHOOL, GETS THAT GREAT JOB, HAS THAT NEW VEHICLE, ETC. SEEMS TO BE BORN BLESSED.

    THIS CAN HAPPEN BY CHANCE BUT THE REAL TRUTH …IT IS KEPT SECRET FROM US THE “USELESS EATERS”, “SHEEPLE” THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE OUR FRIENDS, THEY MARRY INTO OUR FAMILIES, ETC. AND THEY ARE THE EYES, EARS, AND ENFORCERS ( AS CRAZY AS THIS READS TO THE AVERAGE PERSON) BUT THIS HAS AND IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW !!!

——-

***PLEASE READERS COMPLETELY COPY PDF…GET THIS TO TRUTH WEB SITES & BLOGS…HAVE THEM PUT THIS PDF ON THEIR SITES IN IT ENTIRETY…PLEASE START A BLOG….WORDPRESS.COM, BLOGSPOT.COM..AND PUT THE PDF ON YOUR SITES…

MANY TOP ARTICLES ARE BEING REMOVED THAT HAS THE TRUTH  DAILY…DEPENDING ON THE TOPIC & SUBJECT …MANY ARE REMOVED WITH IN THE HOUR OR SOONER…NO EXAGGERATION..

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT….THIS MUST BE PUT ON THE INTERNET..TO THOSE THAT CAN PLEASE COPY BELOW AND MAKE IT AVAILABLE TO ALL THE “GOOD” PEOPLE….THIS EXPOSES THE TAKE OVER BY THE JESUIT / ILLUMINATI ( BOTH ABOVE 33RD DEGREE FREEMASONS )..PLEASE COPY THE WHOLE PDF AND PUT IT INTO REGULAR PAGES SO THAT IT CAN BE COPIED COMPLETELY AND MORE SOURCES CAN BE COPIED AND RE POSTED ..

* CRITICAL RELATED ARTICLES…COPY THEM COMPLETELY ..GET THEM TO TRUTH WEB SITES & TRUTH BLOGS NOW….ARTICLES, VIDEOS, PDFs, ETC. THAT EXPOSE THE LIES, REVEAL THE TRUTHS ARE BEING REMOVED WITH IN THE 1/2 HOUR NOW….IF THIS IS DONE THE INFORMATION IS GONE..SO OTHERS LIKE US WON’T KNOW THE TRUTH !!!

     REGISTER FOR A BLOG…FREE, SIMPLE, EASY TO START ..JUST COPY & PASTE, ADD A TITLE, TAGS ( KEYWORDS..THAT GETS TO YOUR ARTICLES, ETC. )  AND PUBLICIZE..THAT IS ALL THERE IS TO IT

TOP INFO FROM TOP SOURCES, EX INSIDERS, EXPERTS, ETC.

*** NOTE..CLICK ON TITLE TO OPEN LINK

1. EMPEROR CONSTANTINE WAS THE FIRST POPE !!!HOW CONSTANTINE ORDERED THE FIRST ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH & CATHOLIC BIBLE ..WHICH HE HAD HIS SCHOLARS BLEND PAGANISM & CATHOLICISM TOGETHER BUT NEIGHTER WOULD BE RECOGNIZED BY PAGANS NOR CATHOLICS.

2 . The Vatican against the Orthodox Church

3.Constantine’s 6 Major Changes to Christianity

4. FREEMASONS WORSHIP LUCIFER – EX 33RD DEGREE FREEMASON’S TESTIMONY

5. Third 3rd Secret Of Fatima – St. Lucia, David Booth (St. Lucia’s Cousin)

6. Former Bishop of Gautemala Claims Jesuits Control the Vatican & Are the Real Spiritual Controllers of the New World Order

4. WHAT HAPPENS TO EX JESUIT WHISTLEBLOWERS WHO WANT THE TRUTH TO GET OUT TO THE TRUE RELIGIOUS CATHOLICS & PUBLIC ?

7. Vatican Insider Who Denounces Evil In Jesuit Order Contracts Bone Cancer – Jesuits/ Illuminati Are Above 33rd Degree Freemasons Who Worship Lucifer ( Satan )

8. (NWO ) JESUISTS ( WHO ARE TOP LEVEL FREEMASONS = ILLUMINATI ) CONTROL THE VATICAN, CONTROL THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH..A MUST READ

9 JESUITS – ( MOST EVIL ORGANIZATIONS ) A MUST READ

10. THE JESUIT GENERAL – (THE BLACK POPE) PART 1 OF 2

11. The Jesuits are a Military Religious Order of the Roman Catholic Church ( The Jesuit, Illuminati, Knights of Columbus and …)

12.  NWO – ERIC JON PHELPS QUOTES A MUST READ..TOPS

13. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH – ( MOST EVIL ORGANIZATIONS ) A MUST READ

14. THE ROMAN (CATHOLIC) CULT – ( MOST EVIL ORGANIZATIONS ) A MUST READ

15. ILLUMINATI – ( MOST EVIL ORGANIZATIONS ) A MUST READ

16. NEW WORLD ORDER ( MOST EVIL ORGANIZATIONS ) A MUST READ

17. THE RELIGION CONSPIRACY ( NWO PLAN FOR WORLD DOMINATION) A MUST READ

Explosive Satanist “Deathbed Confession” Confirms My Reporting

18. NASI SS – ( MOST EVIL ORGANIZATIONS ) A MUST READ

19. THE “HOLY” SEE (SS) – ( MOST EVIL ORGANIZATIONS ) A MUST READ

20. The Crown Temple Of Babylon – The Crown Temple – Secret Society of the Third Way Order by Rule of Mystery Babylon, The “Templars” of the Crown

23. The “Secret Covenant” of the Jewish Secret Society Known As the Order of the Illuminati..SHOCKING WHAT, HOW, ETC. THEY ARE DOING TO US, OUR CHILDREN, TO OUR GRANDPARENTS, OUR ANCESTORS..TO BRING IN THIS ONE WORLD CONTROL….A MUST READ

PLEASE GET THE BELOW PDF. TO TRUTH WEB SITES & TRUTH BLOGS…THERE WILL BE MANY AGAINST THE TRUTH FROM BEING AVAILABLE ON THE WEB ( NWO MEMBERS..AS OBAMA, & OTHERS TALK ABOUT IN THEIR SPEECHES )

ROBERT SUNGENIS PhD EXPOSES THE LIES

A Review of “EWTN: A Network Gone Wrong” ~ Robert Sungenis, Ph.D …

forums.catholic.com › Forums › Catholic Living › Popular Media15 posts - 3 authors - Last post: Apr 3, 2007

***** Page 4- A Review of “EWTN: A Network Gone Wrong” ~ Robert Sungenis, Ph.D. Popular Media. … That must take faith… I really think this is something to assess on a case by case … I’ll have to save the PDF file and read it later. … I never watched Mother Angelica much, but what I saw, I liked. …

ECT GOES THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE LAKE. MAKE THAT DIFFERENCE….NOW!!!

IS REALLY HAPPENING, WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO THEM…EX. FUKUSHIMA’S MELT DOWN, RELEASING THE WORST RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT…MOX FUEL, WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO THE EARTH…THE GULF OIL DISASTER, AND OTHER CRITICAL EVENTS BUT THERE ARE STILL MANY WHO ARE STILL CONTINUING THEIR HARMING, INJECTING, INFECTING, THEIR “ACCIDENTS”, ETC. OF GOOD, DECENT PEOPLE…THESE MUST BE STOPPED AND THAT IS RIGHT NOW !!!

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages/video may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, economic, DEMOCRACY, scientific, MORAL, ETHICAL, and SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode

NWO: Diagrams, Flow Charts, and How U.S. Policy-Making is Controlled and Channeled

 Dr. John Coleman’s- The Committee of 300: (see- The Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Committee of 300, 4th edition)

Diagram By An Under-Cover Intelligence Agent:

Here’s how the power structure functions, according to Dr. John Coleman, The Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Committee of 300.

How United States Policy-Making is Controlled and Channeled: 
Issues are Created and Decided By:

The Committee of 300, Royal Families,  Top Illuminati Members, the Nine Unknown Men (Masonry), Tavistock Institute of Human Relations
Decisions Given for Execution To:

The Royal Institute for International Affaris: consisting of key members connected by  bloodlines and oligarchic family ties.  Every major city in the West is controlled by this simple but effective method.

Research is Carried Out By:

Universities, Foundations, Think Tanks, Institutes: e.g., Hudson, MIT, Stanford, IPS, Business Round Table, Milner Group, The American Enterprise Institute, Heritage Foundation, Brookings, Population Council, RAND Institute.

Orders Executed By:

Level 1 Planning Groups: Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Cini Foundation, National Security Council, Club of Rome, Morgan Bank (U.S.) Operations Coordination Board backed up by Interfaced Corporations, Banks, Insurance Companies.

Decisions and assassination orders carried out by: 

Intelligence Agencies, NSA, M16, CIA, FBI counter-intelligence (Division 5), Note: CIA and M16 elicit covert support from France (DGSE), Israel (Mossad), Australia (ASIO), Canada (SIS), Egypt (Mukhabaral el-Am), Japan (Naicho-Cabinet Research Office).

CRITICAL INFORMATION…A MUST READ…KEPT FROM Us !!!!

LIST OF SATANIC HOLIDAYS

Satanic holiday dates change annually according to the regular calendar and differ from cult to cult Date Celebration Type Usage Age Jan 1 New Year’s Day Druid Feast Day 15-33 Jan 7 St. Winebald Day blood animal and/or human sacrifice and dismemberment (male, if human) Jan 17 Satanic Revels sexual oral, anal, vaginal 7-17 female Jan 20-27 Abduction, ceremonial preparation and holding of sacrificial victim for Candlemas sexual and blood oral, anal, vaginal human sacrifice female or child  (any age) Jan 29 St. Agnes Eve casting of spells Feb. 2 Candlemas (Sabbat Festival) blood animal and/or human sacrifice Feb. 2 Satanic Revels sexual oral, anal, vaginal 7-17 female Feb. 25 St. Walpurgis Day blood communion of blood and dismemberment any age Mar. 1 St. Eichatadt blood drinking of human blood for strength and homage to the demons any age (male or female) Mar. 15,17 Eides Mar. 20 date varies Spring Equinox (Sabbat Festival) (Major fertility Sabbat) orgies oral, anal, vaginal any age (male or female, human or animal) Shrovetide – three days before Ash Wednesday (which is a Witch Sabbat) date varies Good Friday Day of Passion (death of Christ) blood human sacrifice male only (adult) date varies Easter Eve Day blood human sacrifice male or female (adult) Apr 21-26 Abduction, ceremonial preparation and holding of sacrificial victim Apr 24 St. Mark’s Eve divining and herb gathering Apr 26 – May 1 Grand Climax De Meur oral, anal, vaginal Corpus De Baahl 1-25 (female) Apr 30 Walpurgisnacht Roodmas Day blood animal and/or human sacrifice any age Beltane Eve (often celebrated with a festival that includes bonfires and fertility rites) – greatest Witches Sabbat May 1 Beltane Walpurgis Day May Day Druid Fire Festival Coven Initiations Jun 21 date varies Feast Day (Summer Solstice) orgies oral, anal, vaginal animal and/or human sacrifice any age (male or female or animal) Jul 1 Demons Revel blood Druid sexual association with demons any age (female) Jul 20-26 Abduction, ceremonial preparation and holding of sacrificial victim for Grand Climax Jul 25 St. James Day gathering of herbs Jul 27 Grand Climax (5 weeks, 1 day after summer solstice) Da Meur oral, anal, vaginal human sacrifice female (child or adult) Aug 1 Lammas Day (Sabbat Festival) blood animal and/or human sacrifice any age (male or female) (Feast of Sun God, Harvest seasons begin) Aug 3 Satanic Revels sexual oral, anal, vaginal 7-17 (female) Aug 24 St. Bartholomew’s Day (Great Sabbat and Fire festival) large herb gathering Sep 7 Marriage to the Beast sexual sacrifice, dismemberment infant – 21 (female) Sep 21 Midnight Host blood dismemberment and hands removed for Hand of Glory (female) Sep 22 date varies Feast Day (fall equinox) orgies oral, anal, vaginal any age Oct 13 – 30 Preparation for all Hallows Eve, Samhain (Halloween) Abduction, holding and ceremonial preparation of individual for human sacrifice (13 -Backward Halloween Date) Oct 28-30 Satanist High (Holy Day related to Halloween) blood human sacrifice each day any age (male or female) Oct 30-31 All Hallows Eve and Halloween Night blood and sexual sexual climax, association with the demons, animal and/or human sacrifice any age (male or female and/or animal) Nov 1 Satanist High (Holy Day related to Halloween) blood human sacrifice any age (male or female) Nov 4 Satanic Revels sexual oral, anal, vaginal 7-17 (female) Dec 22 Winter Solstice (Sabbat Festival) (Feast Day) orgies oral, anal, vaginal any age (male or female, human or animal) Dec 24 Demon Revels Da Meur High Grand Climax any age (male or female, human and/or animal) Christmas Eve blood Receive body parts as Christmas gifts infant male The highest ritual holiday is the member’s birthday.  It usually involves the member or a victim of the member’s choice and someone in authority, usually the coven’s leader. The first and third of every month.  Put 1 and 3 together and it makes 13, though ritual/worship can occur at anytime, frequently coinciding with times of stress. All Friday the 13th’s are high satanic days. All full-moon nights provide reason for major occult activity (easiest to move around without difficulty and without being detected). Holy week (Palm Sunday to Easter Sunday).  Some groups are thought to sacrifice, cook and eat a human baby on Easter Sunday.. Satanic Calendar COMBINED Information and History Written by Anthony La Vey (Son of Anton La Vey- The Church of Satan) And Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower News Release Dec 19, 2002 stewwebb@sierranv.net www.stewwebb.com   Fact Sheet: The Church of Satan Founder: Aleister Crowley (1875-1947) Tenure ( 1920-1930) Mailing address: (none available) Current Leader: Anton S. La Vey: Founder of U.S. Church of Satan Members: 50,000 (1994) The Church membership are teachers, movie stars, government officials, lawyers, judges, police, high ranking military, and doctors. Not everyone who applies for membership is accepted. A through background check is performed prior to acceptance. All members must sign a contract and pay yearly fees. New members are watched closely for the first year. The Church of Stan has different levels that a member can work into. Number Churches: 600 in U.S. and another 100 abroad. Church Government: The Mother Church (International Headquarters) is in East Berlin, Germany, and in Amsterdam. International churches are also located in Belgium, London, Holland, Germany, Austria, Norway, Russia and Romania. Each church has groups which are called covens. Each coven consists of 13 people. There are as many as 26 to 66 coven in a church. The Church is governed by the Council of 13 which is made up of 100 Knights Templar Bankers who control between 1-3 Trillion Dollars each in behalf of the Gray Men’s Empire. These 100 Templar Bankers have raped and robbed the Countries of the world. Through what is known as Frauds are Us. These 100 Knights Templar Bankers revolve yearly on the Council of 13. They are selected by the Councils leader who resides in Israel. The 100 Knights Templar Bankers, all desire to be the “ONE” “THE ANTICHRIST IN HUMAN FORM”, they all want to be posed by the Devil-Baphomet-to become the Antichrist here on Earth. I might add there is one other who plays an important part in the coming of the Antichrist which is the BLACK POPE, the Pope behind the current Popemon. He is the Head of the secretive Jesuit priests. I think the black popemon is the false prophet in the Bible. The Council of 13 the 100 Templar Bankers, 12 of them are in the USA and control the White House. Their identification is kept concealed. Each one is a member of the Golden Dawn, Order of Templi, and the Order of the Trapezoid. Each year they meet in East Berlin in the Mother Church. These 13 men control what happens in the churches, our governments, marketing, media (and the disposal of individuals who stand in their way.) Note: Anthony and his father meet with them all as they though that Anthony was to be the next leader of the Church of Satan. They are the most dangerous men in the world. They are the hidden party who make decisions for the New World Order plan which we will be faced with soon. They are also involved with organized crime underground. History: Anton S. La Vey started the first Church of Satan in San Francisco, California on April 30, 1966. This was the first one ever started in the U.S.. La Vey is a generational Satanist. He is of German and Romanian descent. He was raised for the purpose of leadership. He is also teaching Wicca and mind control. LaVey has authored four books: THE SATANIC BIBLE, THE SATANIC RITUALS, THE COMPLETE WITCHCRAFT and the DEVIL’S NOTE BOOK ( which was released in May 1993). Three Types of Satanism: There are the self styled, organized and dabblers. Anton LaVey is the religious organized type and the most dangerous, although many in the world would like for us to believe differently. (Note: Satan wants the world to believe that Anton LaVey and Satanists are harmless). Methods: They work underground and are difficult to catch. They use children to do the recruiting in schools and colleges. In 1993 it was announced in the media that the Church of Stan would begin accepting enrollment from elementary and high schools. There are women in the Church who are called breeders who are used for the purpose of producing children for leadership. Rituals: Rituals are on Halloween and walpurgissnacht. They distribute children for these rituals by the thousands each year. These two rituals are the most deadly. Rituals are held at night in dark black rooms with pentagrams about the altar and on the floor. Their rituals consist of chanting, drinking blood from victims to enhance more power for themselves. They practice baptism by immersing in blood or vinegar. Teachings: They believe in self indulgence, spiritualism, magic, astrology, satanic doctrine, mind control, vampirism, warlocks, werewolfism, and the extermination of the lower class people. God: There is only one God: The Prince of Darkness. Jesus Christ: They deny the reality of Jesus Christ. Humanity: They believe in self power through the Prince of Darkness. They believe they can enter into the realm of creation to work their will upon the universe through the prince of darkness. STRONGHOLDS IN THIS CULT 1. People are attracted to this kind of occult because they have a hunger for satisfaction, power, and wealth. Let’s pray that their hunger will be for Jesus Christ. 2. The oddness of the rituals and activities are an attraction. They have a need for God under all of these activities. Let’s believe that God will draw many into His Kingdom. 3. They often believe that it is too hard to follow Christ because they feel that they have to be perfect. Many cultists share this false assumption. Pray that God will bring an evangelist armed with the “good news” of the loving kindness and tenderness mercies of Jesus. 4. Power in Satan seems to be a big stronghold that keeps them in Satan’s grip. They have been told that the Seal of Satan which is on them can not be removed. They fear that if they try and leave that they will die an awful death. These are controlling methods used to manipulate church members. Many cultists share this fear. Let’s pray a protective covering over these people as they return to the God of their fathers and lay aside this false god which in the Devil. Satanic Calendar This Satanic ritual calendar is to be used to help you know when these rituals take place so you can pray against the Satanist on those days. It is to be noted that in southern California the sensational kidnapping of 5 children were grouped in the several days immediately preceding the dates when children of such age groups were required for the specific rituals each Satanic Holiday. Date Celebrated _ Type _Usage __Age Jan 1-7 Winebald Day Blood Animal or MaleHuman sacrifice Jan 17 Satanic Revels Sexual Oral/Anal Female7-17yrs Feb 2 Candlemas Sexual Oral/Anal 7-17yrs Mar2-3 St. Eichatadt Blood Drinking of Female Blood for 7-18yrs Strength,Homage to Satan. March20 Feast Day Orgies Homage to Satan April 30 Walpurgis Blood Blacksabbath Female Human Sac. Infant May 1 Beltanc Blood Human Sac. Infant June 21 Feast Day Orgies & Female Blood Human Sac Infant Jul 1 Demon Revel Blood Droids sexual Femalesensual association with the Demons any age Aug 1 Lammas Sexual Satanic Male orSummer Female Aug 3 Satanic Revels Blood Human or Male or Animal Sac. Female Sept 7 Marriage to Blood Mid Blacksabbath F-18yrs the Beast, Satan Sexual Sac. & Dismemberment Sept 20 Midnight Host Blood Dismemberment F 7-17 Hands Planted yrs Sept 22 Feast Day Orgies Fall/Autumn Equinox Oct 31 All Hollow’s Blood Feast of thedead M or F Sacrifice Human Child to Adult 7-18yrs Dec 22 Winter Solstice Blood Human Sac. M-F Infant Dec 24 Demon Revel Da Mar High Grand M or F Climax THE FAMILY TREE OF THE OCCULT CHURCH OF SATAN ——Council of 13—— Order of the Golden Dawn                   Hell Fire Club Order of The Templars                        Order of Elect Cohens (Ordo Templi Astarte) Order of Baeds,Dyates,Dauids             Order of the Cubic(Wicca)                                                 Stone Order of The Siivar Star                       Order of Rose of Ruby (Masons & Odd Fellows & Cross of Gold Roseacusions) The Family Tree of The Occult Each one has 6 or 13 levels with in their society. The highest level is The Dangerous. Many who belong to these societies do not know about what goes on at the top level. The Council of 13 are 12 men made up of men in the US Government and One Foreign Government. Source: Sword of the Spirit Ministries, Evangelist Anthony J. LaVey (Ex-Satanist) former address Las Vegas, Nevada with contributions by Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower A soldier in the Army of Jesus Christ stewwebb@sierranv.net www.stewwebb.com P.O.Box 31052, Las Vegas, Nevada 89173

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages/video may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, economic, DEMOCRACY, scientific, MORAL, ETHICAL, and SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode